CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
TULSA COUNTY • CJ-2026-824

LVNV Funding LLC v. Crissa DeVivo Martin

Filed: Feb 24, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s be real: no one wakes up dreaming of being sued for $30,507.60 over a credit card bill they probably forgot existed. But that’s exactly what happened to Crissa DeVivo Martin of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, who—on what was likely a perfectly normal Tuesday—became the defendant in a cold, hard, decimal-point-precise lawsuit filed by a company she’s never heard of, over a debt she may not even remember. And here’s the kicker: the plaintiff isn’t some big bank with a familiar logo. It’s LVNV Funding LLC—a name that sounds less like a financial institution and more like a startup that sells NFTs of vintage lawnmowers. Welcome to the wild world of debt buying, where your late payments get auctioned off like concert tickets, and suddenly, you’re being chased by a faceless corporation with a law firm that employs six attorneys to collect one person’s credit card balance. Grab your popcorn, because this is petty civil court at its most surreal.

So who are these players in this financial drama? On one side, we’ve got Crissa DeVivo Martin—presumably a regular human being trying to adult in 2025, paying bills, maybe binge-watching something on Netflix, possibly forgetting to check her credit statements after a life change, a job loss, or just the slow creep of overspending. On the other side? LVNV Funding LLC, a debt buyer based in Nevada that exists for one reason and one reason only: to buy up defaulted debts for pennies on the dollar and then sue people to collect the full amount. Think of them as the vultures of the financial ecosystem—except instead of circling carcasses, they’re circling credit reports. The original lender here was SoFi Bank, N.A., the trendy fintech darling that used to be the cool kid on the block offering personal loans and student refinancing. Somewhere along the way, Crissa opened a credit line with them on November 7, 2022—probably with dreams of home improvements, a vacation, or just surviving a rough month. But by early 2024, the account had gone sideways, and SoFi decided they didn’t want the headache of collecting anymore. So they bundled Crissa’s debt into something called “Portfolio 43161” (sounds like a spy mission) and sold it off. Enter LVNV, who now legally owns the right to collect every last cent—plus interest, fees, and the full wrath of the Oklahoma court system.

Now, let’s walk through the actual story, because it’s not like Crissa ran a tab at Neiman Marcus and then fled the country. According to the court filing, she defaulted on her SoFi credit account—meaning she stopped making payments. That’s it. No fraud, no embezzlement, no burning down a building to collect insurance. Just… not paying a bill. The kind of thing that happens to millions of Americans every year. But here’s where it gets juicy: LVNV didn’t just send a sternly worded letter or call her five times a day (though they probably did that too). No, they went straight for the jugular—filing a lawsuit in the District Court of Tulsa County on November 19, 2025, demanding exactly $30,507.60. Not $30,500. Not “about thirty grand.” No, we’re talking to the penny. That specificity is either impressive accounting or a flex. And to prove they’re not just making this up, they attached an affidavit from one Dimeshia Hook (yes, that’s her real name, and yes, we’re low-key rooting for her), who swears under penalty of perjury that LVNV legally owns the debt, that the amount is accurate, and that they’ve already sent a demand for payment—more than thirty days ago, because apparently even debt collectors have to follow basic etiquette.

So why are they in court? Because this isn’t just a “please pay us” note. It’s a formal petition for indebtedness, which in plain English means: “We tried being nice. Now we’re suing.” LVNV isn’t asking for forgiveness or a payment plan. They’re asking a judge to issue a judgment—a legal declaration that Crissa owes them this money, which then allows them to potentially garnish wages, freeze bank accounts, or put a lien on property. And they’re not stopping at the principal. Oh no. They also want “interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment,” court costs, and “a reasonable attorney’s fee.” Which, by the way, is why they brought six lawyers on this case. Six. That’s more attorneys than most people have pairs of shoes. Are they preparing for a Supreme Court showdown? Is Crissa represented by a team of legal eagles ready to argue constitutional rights to debt forgiveness? Nope. She doesn’t even have a lawyer listed in the filing. It’s six against one, and one of them might not even know she’s being sued yet.

Now, let’s talk about the money. Is $30,507.60 a lot? Well, yes and no. For context, that’s enough to buy a decent used car, make a down payment on a house in some parts of Oklahoma, or fund a very luxurious wedding. But in the world of credit card debt? It’s not unheard of. The average American carries about $6,000 in credit card balances—but that’s an average. For someone who maxed out a card, missed payments, accrued interest, and got hit with late fees, $30K isn’t impossible. The real question isn’t the amount—it’s whether Crissa actually owes it, whether LVNV can prove they own the debt, and whether they followed all the rules in collecting it. Because here’s the dirty little secret of the debt-buying industry: sometimes, the paperwork is a mess. Sometimes, the original creditor didn’t keep perfect records. Sometimes, the debt was already paid, or discharged in bankruptcy, or belongs to someone with a similar name. And if LVNV can’t produce the actual contract, the payment history, or clear proof of the chain of ownership? Their whole case could collapse like a house of cards. But they’re betting Crissa won’t show up to court. And honestly? They’re probably right. Most people don’t. They ignore the summons, assume it’ll go away, or don’t realize they can fight back. And that’s how you end up with a judgment on your credit report for thirty grand—over a debt you might not even owe.

So what do they want? Money. Obviously. But more than that, they want compliance. They want Crissa to either pay up, settle, or disappear quietly so they can win by default. And if they get that judgment? They’ll likely try to collect aggressively. But here’s the thing: this isn’t a murder mystery. There’s no twist ending. No secret witness. Just a woman, a bank, and a debt collector playing legal Jenga with her financial future. And yet, it’s fascinating—because this is how modern debt works in America. Your obligations aren’t sacred contracts between you and a bank. They’re commodities. They’re traded, sold, resold, and litigated by companies that never met you, don’t care about you, and will spend more on legal fees than they paid for your debt in the first place.

Our take? The most absurd part isn’t the amount. It’s the machine. It’s the fact that a single credit card default—something so mundane, so human—gets transformed into a six-lawyer lawsuit with affidavits, portfolios, and notarized statements from people named Dimeshia Hook. It’s the sheer overkill. It’s the idea that LVNV Funding LLC, a company whose entire business model is built on other people’s misfortune, can waltz into court and demand thirty grand like they’re entitled to it, while the person on the other side might not even have $300 in the bank. We’re not saying Crissa doesn’t owe the money. We’re not saying debt should be ignored. But this system? It’s less about justice and more about volume. LVNV files hundreds, maybe thousands, of these cases a year. Most of them end in default judgments. Most of the defendants don’t show up. And so the machine grinds on.

Do we root for Crissa? Sure. Not because she’s innocent, but because she’s human. Because we’ve all forgotten a bill. Because we’ve all had a rough month. And because somewhere, deep down, we all fear the day we open our mailbox and find a lawsuit for $30,507.60 over something we can’t even remember.

Case Overview

$30,508 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$30,508 Monetary
Plaintiffs
  • LVNV Funding LLC business
    Rep: William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804; Harley L. Homjak, #019736; Alexander M. Hall, #33900; Jenifer A Gani, #021876; Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309; Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 indecency Plaintiff seeks judgment against Defendant for $30,507.60, plus interest, court costs, and attorney's fees.

Petition Text

541 words
25-48864-0 ZH5 010 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA LVNV FUNDING LLC, Plaintiff, vs. CRISSA DEVIVO MARTIN, Defendant. PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for its cause of action against the defendants alleges and states as follows: 1. SoFi Bank, N.A., provided credit to the defendant on account number XXXXX7659. Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $30,507.60. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $30,507.60, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment, all court costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Alexander M. Hall, #33900 Jenifer A Gani, #021876 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405/720-0565 Fax: 405/720-9570 E-Mail: [email protected] IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT IN AND FOR TULSA COUNTY, OK LVNV Funding LLC Plaintiff vs. Crissa DeVivo Martin Defendant(s) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT I am an Authorized Representative for LVNV Funding LLC (hereafter the "Plaintiff"), and hereby certify as follows: 1. I have personal knowledge regarding Plaintiff's creation and maintenance of its normal business records, including computer records of its accounts receivable. This information is regularly and contemporaneously maintained during the course of Plaintiff's business. I am authorized to execute this affidavit on behalf of Plaintiff and the information below is true and correct based on the Plaintiff's business records. 2. In the regular course of business, Plaintiff regularly acquires revolving credit accounts, installment accounts, service accounts, and/or other credit lines or obligations. The records provided to Plaintiff at the time of acquisition are represented to include information provided by the original creditor and/or its successors-in-interest. Such information includes the debtor's name and social security number, the account balance, the identity of the original creditor and the account number. 3. Based on the business records maintained on account XXXXX7659 (hereafter, the "Account"), which are a compilation of the information provided to Plaintiff upon acquisition and information obtained since acquisition, the Account is the result of the extension of credit to Crissa DeVivo Martin by SoFi Bank, N.A. on or about 11/07/2022. Said business records further indicate that the Account was then owned by SoFi Bank, National Association. SoFi Bank, National Association later sold and/or assigned Portfolio 43161, which included the Defendant's Account, to Plaintiff or Plaintiff's predecessor(s)-in-interest on 02/21/2024. Thereafter, all ownership rights were assigned to, transferred to and became vested in Plaintiff, including the right to collect the balance owing of $30,507.60 plus any legally permissible interest. 4. Based on the business records maintained in regard to the Account, the above stated amount is justly and duly owed by the Defendant to the Plaintiff and all just and lawful offsets, payments and credits to the Account have been allowed. Demand for payment was made more than thirty days ago. [Signature] Dimeshia Hook November 19, 2025 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by the above-signed on Wednesday, November 19, 2025. [Notary Public] PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.