CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
OKLAHOMA COUNTY • CJ-2026-1450

Jason Richardson, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jennifer Mays, deceased v. Mercy Hospital Ardmore, Inc.; Mercy Clinic Oklahoma Communities, Inc.; Mercy Health; Mercy Health Network, L.L.C.; Jeffrey Thomasson, M.D.; Bethany Clutts, D.O.; Kale Hunter, M.D.; Premise Health of Oklahoma Medical, P.C.; Christy Morris, APRN-CNP

Filed: Feb 25, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s be honest—nobody expects to die because a doctor looked at a CT scan and said, “Yep, everything looks fine,” when it absolutely did not. But that’s exactly what Jennifer Mays faced: months of worsening symptoms, multiple medical visits, two CT scans showing a growing tumor on her adrenal gland, and not a single healthcare provider saying, “Hey, this could kill you.” Instead, she was handed an EpiPen and told to take Benadryl like she had seasonal allergies, not a ticking time bomb inside her body. By the time anyone acknowledged the problem, it was too late. Jennifer Mays, a 41-year-old woman with a daughter, a husband, and decades of life ahead of her, died in February 2024 from what the lawsuit claims was a completely preventable medical failure—a failure so systemic, so staggeringly avoidable, that nine defendants are now on the hook in Oklahoma County District Court.

Jennifer wasn’t some anonymous patient lost in the shuffle. She was a real person with a name, a family, and a medical history that should’ve screamed red flag. Starting in mid-2023, she began suffering from abdominal pain, bloating, nausea, rapid heart rate, cold chills, sweating, and even swelling in her hands. These aren’t vague “I just feel off” symptoms—they’re the kind of things that should send a doctor’s Spidey-sense tingling. On June 28, 2023, she went to a clinic run by Premise Health of Oklahoma Medical, P.C., where she was seen by Christy Morris, an advanced practice nurse. Morris ordered a CT scan of her abdomen and pelvis, which was performed on July 14 at Mercy Hospital Ardmore. That scan? It showed a nodule on Jennifer’s adrenal gland. A nodule. Not a speck, not a shadow—something big enough to be seen, significant enough to warrant action. But here’s where it gets wild: Dr. Jeffrey Thomasson, the radiologist who interpreted the scan, claimed the adrenal glands were “normal.” He missed it. Or ignored it. Or looked right at it and called it nothing. And no one—not Morris, not Thomasson, not the hospital—told Jennifer a single word about it.

Fast forward. Jennifer’s symptoms don’t go away. They get worse. She’s sweating profusely, her heart’s racing, her stomach’s in knots. She goes back to Morris in January 2024, complaining of the same issues. Morris prescribes Bentyl, tells her to keep Benadryl and an EpiPen on hand—again, treating her like she’s having allergic episodes—and doesn’t mention the nodule. Doesn’t mention the scan. Doesn’t mention anything. Then, on February 1, 2024, she sees Morris again. This time, Morris says the July 2023 scan was “essentially clear”—which it absolutely was not—and orders a second CT scan. On February 9, that second scan confirms it: there’s a 1.8 cm nodule on her right adrenal gland. This time, a different radiologist, Dr. Adam Sharp, sees it and recommends further evaluation—an MRI or a specialized adrenal CT. But again… radio silence. Jennifer isn’t told. Her husband isn’t told. No one sounds the alarm.

Then comes the final visit. On February 20, 2024, Jennifer sees Dr. Bethany Clutts at Mercy Clinic Surgery in Ardmore. Clutts’ own notes say she knew about the nodule, knew about Dr. Sharp’s recommendation for more testing, and even wrote that “further imaging” and “initial biochemical investigation” were warranted. But what did she do? She ordered a 24-hour urine test—fine, but not enough—and didn’t refer Jennifer to an endocrinologist, didn’t schedule the MRI, didn’t admit her for observation, didn’t even tell her she had a potentially deadly tumor. Six days later, Jennifer Mays was dead. The cause? According to the lawsuit, the untreated adrenal nodule hemorrhaged, triggering a catecholamine crisis—a massive, uncontrolled flood of stress hormones—that caused her cardiovascular system to collapse. In other words, her body literally tore itself apart from the inside, and every single step of the way, the medical system failed to stop it.

So why are we in court? Because Jennifer’s husband, Josh Mays, and her brother, Jason Richardson (now the personal representative of her estate), are saying this wasn’t just bad luck—it was negligence on a massive scale. The lawsuit lays out multiple claims, but the big one is medical negligence: the idea that these doctors and hospitals didn’t meet the basic standard of care that any reasonable medical provider should have. They missed a tumor. They didn’t communicate. They didn’t follow up. They didn’t inform the patient. And when they finally did see it, they did nothing. The suit also claims vicarious liability—meaning the hospitals are on the hook for their employees’ mistakes—and negligent credentialing, which is legalese for “you shouldn’t have trusted these people to make life-or-death calls if they’re this bad at their jobs.” There’s even a claim of res ipsa loquitur—a fancy Latin phrase that means “the thing speaks for itself,” used when the injury is so obviously preventable that you don’t even need an expert to prove someone screwed up.

Now, let’s talk money. The estate is asking for $150,000—split between $75,000 in compensatory damages (for medical bills, funeral costs, lost income, and the emotional toll on her family) and another $75,000 in punitive damages. Wait—punitive? That’s not about paying for losses. That’s about punishment. The family isn’t just saying, “We want to be made whole.” They’re saying, “This was so reckless, so careless, so inexcusable that you should be fined for it.” And honestly? When you read this timeline, it’s hard not to agree. $150,000 might sound like a lot for a civil case, but in the world of medical malpractice, it’s barely a rounding error. Hospitals pay millions for this kind of failure. So is this a lowball? Maybe. Or maybe it’s a strategic move—keeping the demand just under certain thresholds to control where the case is heard. Either way, the message is clear: this wasn’t just a mistake. It was a breakdown of the entire system.

Our take? Look, we’re not doctors. We’re entertainers, not lawyers. But even we know that when a scan shows a growing mass on a vital organ, and two different providers fail to act, and the patient dies days later, something is deeply, fundamentally broken. The most absurd part isn’t just that they missed the nodule—it’s that they knew about it and still did nothing. Dr. Clutts wrote down that further testing was needed. She just… didn’t do it. And Morris kept calling the scan “clear” like she was gaslighting reality itself. Was Jennifer Mays failed by one overworked doc? Maybe. But by nine defendants? That’s not an accident. That’s a pattern. And if there’s one thing we’re rooting for, it’s transparency. We want to know: Who read that first scan? Who decided not to tell her? Who signed off on doing nothing while a tumor grew inside a living, breathing woman? This case isn’t just about money. It’s about accountability. And in a world where we trust doctors with our lives, the least they can do is look at the damn scan.

Case Overview

$150,000 Demand Jury Trial Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$75,000 Monetary
$75,000 Punitive
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Negligence Failure to timely diagnose and treat adrenal nodule resulting in death

Petition Text

4,030 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR OKLAHOMA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA JASON RICHARDSON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of JENNIFER MAYS, deceased, Plaintiff, v. 1. MERCY HOSPITAL ARDMORE, INC.; 2. MERCY CLINIC OKLAHOMA COMMUNITIES, INC.; 3. MERCY HEALTH; 4. MERCY HEALTH NETWORK, L.L.C.; 5. JEFFREY THOMASSON, M.D.; 6. BETHANY CLUTTS, D.O.; 7. KALE HUNTER, M.D.; 8. PREMISE HEALTH OF OKLAHOMA MEDICAL, P.C.; and, 9. CHRISTY MORRIS, APRN-CNP, Defendants. PETITION Plaintiff, for his claim, states: DEFENDANTS, JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. Defendant, Mercy Hospital Ardmore, Inc., selected a service agent located in Oklahoma County. The service agent is located at 10300 Greenbriar Place, Oklahoma City, OK 73159. Defendant, Mercy Hospital Ardmore, Inc., was / will be served through its service agent. 2. Defendant, Mercy Clinic Oklahoma Communities, Inc., selected a service agent located in Oklahoma County. The service agent is located at 10300 Greenbriar Place, Oklahoma City, OK 73159. Defendant, Mercy Clinic Oklahoma Communities, Inc., was / will be served through its service agent. 3. Defendant, Mercy Health, selected a service agent located in Oklahoma County. The service agent is located at 10300 Greenbriar Place, Oklahoma City, OK 73159. Defendant, Mercy Health, was / will be served through its service agent. 4. Defendant, Mercy Health Network, L.L.C., selected a service agent located in Oklahoma County. The service agent is located at 10300 Greenbriar Place, Oklahoma City, OK 73159. Defendant, Mercy Health Network, L.L.C., was / will be served through its service agent. 5. Defendant, Premise Health of Oklahoma, P.C., selected a service agent located in Oklahoma County. The service agent is located at 10300 Greenbriar Place, Oklahoma City, OK 73159. Defendant, Mercy Hospital Ardmore, Inc., was / will be served through its service agent. 6. Defendant, Jeffrey Thomasson, M.D., is a citizen of the State of Missouri and maintains an office located at 615 S New Ballas Road, Saint Louis, MO 63141. Defendant, Jeffrey Thomasson, M.D., will be served at his office. 7. Defendant, Bethany Clutts, D.O., is a citizen of the State of Oklahoma and maintains an office located at 731 12th Avenue Northwest, Ardmore, OK 73401. Defendant, Bethany Clutts, D.O., will be served at her office. 8. Defendant, Kale Hunter, M.D., is a citizen of the State of Oklahoma and maintains an office located at 1921 Stonecipher Boulevard, Ada, OK 74820. Defendant, Kale Hunter, M.D., will be served at his office. 9. Defendant, Christy Morris, APRN-CNP, is a citizen of the State of Oklahoma and maintains an office located at 404 S. Commerce Street, Ardmore, OK 73401. Defendant, Christy Morris, APRN-CNP will be served at her office. 10. This Court has jurisdiction over all claims and parties. 11. Venue is proper in Oklahoma County and is the most convenient venue for this action. 12. All Defendants were properly serviced with process in this case. 13. All parties are properly named in this case and have sued, or been sued, in their proper capacity. 14. Plaintiffs’ claims were brought within the statute of limitations and are, therefore, timely. 15. Plaintiffs’ damages, exclusive of costs and attorneys’ fees, exceed $75,000.00. PERTINENT FACTS GIVING RISE TO THIS LAWSUIT 16. Beginning in mid-2023 and continuing until her death on February 26, 2024, Jennifer Mays experienced recurrent symptoms including abdominal pain, bloating, nausea, tachycardia, hand itching / swelling, cold chills, sweating, and gastrointestinal distress. 17. On June 28, 2023, Jennifer Mays presented to a clinic owned and operated by Defendant, Premise Health of Oklahoma Medical, P.C., where she was seen by Defendant, Christy Morris, APRN-CNP, for these issues. 18. At the visit on June 28, 2023, Defendant, Christy Morris, APRN-CNP, ordered a CT Scan of Jennifer Mays’ abdomen and pelvis. 19. On July 6, 2023, Jennifer Mays presented to the Emergency Department at Mercy Hospital Ardmore complaining of a rash, lip tingling, throat tingling and abdominal pain. She was seen by Kale Hunter, M.D. 20. After reviewing her symptoms, Dr. Hunter prescribed Jennifer Mays an Epi-Pen and instructed her to take Benadryl. 21. On July 14, 2023, Jennifer Mays underwent a CT Scan of the abdomen and pelvis at Mercy Hospital Ardmore as ordered by Defendant, Christy Morris, APRN-CNP 22. Mercy Hospital Ardmore is owned and operated as a joint venture by Defendants, Mercy Hospital Ardmore, Inc., Mercy Clinic Oklahoma Communities, Inc., Mercy Health, and Mercy Health Network, L.L.C. 23. Defendant, Jeffrey Thomasson, M.D., interpreted the CT Scan and reported that Jennifer Mays’ adrenal glands were normal despite the scan revealing the presence of a nodule on her adrenal gland. 24. Christy Morris, APRN-CNP, received the results of the CT Scan performed on July 14, 2023. At no time was Jennifer Mays advised by Christy Morris, APRN-CNP or any other healthcare provider, of the presence of a nodule on her adrenal gland in July 14, 2023. 25. At no time was Jennifer Mays advised by Christy Morris, APRN-CNP, or any other healthcare provider, that she needed further evaluation of the nodule and treatment for it. 26. Over the next several months, Jennifer Mays continued to experience abdominal pain, profuse sweating, tachycardia and bloating. 27. On January 12, 2024, Jennifer Mays was seen by Defendant, Christy Morris, APRN-CNP, at a clinic owned and operated by Defendant, Premise Health of Oklahoma Medical, P.C. 28. Jennifer Mays expressed complaints of abdominal pain and bloating at the visit. 29. Defendant, Christy Morris, APRN-CNP, prescribed Jennifer Mays Bentyl and advised her to keep Benadryl, Pepcid, and EpiPen with her at all times in the event of an allergic reaction. 30. During the appointment, Jennifer Mays was not advised of the presence of a nodule on her adrenal gland on the July 14, 2023 CT Scan, any other anomaly, and was not advised of the need for further evaluation or treatment. 31. On February 1, 2024, Jennifer Mays was seen by Defendant, Christy Morris, APRN-CNP, at a clinic owned and operated by Defendant, Premise Health of Oklahoma Medical, P.C. At the visit, Jennifer Mays expressed complaints of abdominal pain and bloating. 32. Defendant, Christy Morris, APRN-CNP, noted the July 14, 2023, CT Scan was "essentially clear." However, Defendant, Christy Morris, APRN-CNP, ordered a second CT Scan. 33. On February 9, 2024, Jennifer Mays underwent a CT Scan of her abdomen and pelvis with contrast at Mercy Hospital Ardmore. The CT Scan was interpreted by Adam Sharp, M.D. in Ada, Oklahoma. 34. Dr. Sharp noted an indeterminate nodule in the right adrenal gland measuring 1.8 x 1.2 cm in size. 35. Dr. Sharp recommended a follow-up MRI of the abdomen with contrast or adrenal protocol CT with and without contrast for further evaluation. 36. On February 20, 2024, Jennifer Mays was seen by Defendant, Bethany Clutts, D.O., at Mercy Clinic Surgery Ardmore which is owned and operated by Defendants, Mercy Hospital Ardmore, Inc., Mercy Clinic Oklahoma Communities, Inc., Mercy Health, and Mercy Health Network, L.L.C. 37. The notes for the visit made by Defendant, Bethany Clutts, D.O., state Dr. Clutts was aware that a CT Scan was performed on February 9, 2024, was aware of Dr. Sharp’s finding of a nodule on Jennifer Mays’ adrenal gland and was aware of Dr. Sharp’s recommendations for further evaluation. Dr. Clutts did not advise Jennifer Mays of any of Dr. Sharp’s findings or recommendations. 38. Dr. Clutts noted that she “recommended further imaging for better evaluation of the adrenal lesion” and that “initial biochemical investigation is warranted.” 39. On February 20, 2024, Dr. Clutts ordered a 24-hour urine metanephrines test but did not order follow-up imaging, make a referral to endocrinology, or take any other action regarding further evaluation or treatment for Jennifer Mays’ abnormal adrenal nodule. 40. At no time was Jennifer Mays advised that the CT Scan performed on February 9, 2024, revealed the presence of an adrenal nodule or that Dr. Sharp advised that further evaluation or treatment of the nodule was needed. 41. Jennifer Mays died six days after the visit with Dr. Clutts. 42. Defendants’ failure to timely diagnose and treat the lesion on Jennifer Mays’ adrenal gland allowed it to grow and hemorrhage resulting in a catecholamine crisis that caused cardiovascular collapse, ultimately resulting in Jennifer Mays’ death. 43. Despite a CT Scan in July 2023 revealing the presence of a nodule on Jennifer Mays’ adrenal gland, no medical provider advised Jennifer Mays or her spouse, Josh Mays, that a nodule was present. 44. Despite a CT Scan in July 2023 revealing the presence of a nodule on Jennifer Mays’ adrenal gland, no medical provider advised Jennifer Mays or her spouse, Josh Mays, that a nodule was present, nor was she advised of the need for further evaluation or treatment 45. Despite a CT Scan on February 9, 2024 confirming the presence of a nodule on Jennifer Mays’ adrenal gland, and Dr. Sharp’s recommendation to have it further evaluated, no medical provider advised Jennifer Mays or her spouse, Josh Mays, that a nodule was present and that it needed further evaluation. 46. Jennifer Mays died on February 26, 2024, as a result of Defendants’ failure to timely diagnose and treat the lesion on her adrenal gland. Her death resulted in damages as set forth below. 47. After her death, Jennifer Mays’ husband, Josh Mays, and her brother, Jason Richardson, first became aware of the presence of the adrenal nodule after reviewing Jennifer Mays’ medical records. NEGLIGENCE 48. Defendants, individually, and by acting by and through their agents and employees, including, but not limited to, Bethany Clutts, D.O., Jeffrey Thomasson, M.D., Kale Hunter, M.D. and Christy Morris, APRN-CNP, acted negligently and deviated from the standard of care by, inter alia, failing to advise Jennifer Mays of the presence of a nodule on her adrenal gland, failing to timely diagnose the adrenal nodule, failing to properly evaluate the nodule and failing to provide proper medical care for it. 49. Jennifer Mays died as a result of negligent medical care rendered by Defendants that violated the acceptable standards of medical care. Defendants’ conduct caused damages as set forth below. DEFENDANTS’ VICARIOUS LIABILITY FOR THE NEGLIGENCE OF ITS EMPLOYEES, AGENTS AND THOSE WHO HAD APPARENT AUTHORITY TO ACT ON THEIR BEHALF 50. At the time of the negligent conduct giving rise to this lawsuit, Defendant, Bethany Clutts, D.O., was the agent, servant, and employee of Defendants, Mercy Hospital Ardmore, Inc., Mercy Health, Mercy Health Network, L.L.C. and Mercy Clinic Oklahoma Communities, Inc., making each liable to Plaintiff for her conduct. 51. At the time of the negligent conduct giving rise to this lawsuit, Defendant, Jeffrey Thomasson, M.D., was the agent, servant, and employee of Defendants, Mercy Hospital Ardmore, Inc., Mercy Health, Mercy Health Network, L.L.C. and Mercy Clinic Oklahoma Communities, Inc., making each liable to Plaintiff for her conduct. 52. At the time of the negligent conduct giving rise to this lawsuit, Defendant, Kale Hunter, M.D., was the agent, servant, and employee of Defendants, Mercy Hospital Ardmore, Inc., Mercy Health, Mercy Health Network, L.L.C. and Mercy Clinic Oklahoma Communities, Inc., making each liable to Plaintiff for her conduct. 53. At the time of the negligent conduct giving rise to this lawsuit, Defendant, Christy Morris, APRN-CNP, was the agent, servant, and employee of Defendant, Premise Health of Oklahoma Medical, P.C., making it vicariously liable for her conduct. DEFENDANTS’ DIRECT NEGLIGENCE FOR THEIR SYSTEMATIC FAILURES 54. Defendants, Mercy Hospital Ardmore, Inc., Mercy Clinic Oklahoma Communities, Inc., Mercy Health, and Mercy Health Network, L.L.C., acting through their managers, directors, committees and leadership structure, have a duty to develop effective and safe processes for delivering patient care, educating staff and agents about these processes, and enforcing adherence to them. 55. Defendants, Mercy Hospital Ardmore, Inc., Mercy Clinic Oklahoma Communities, Inc., Mercy Health, and Mercy Health Network, L.L.C., acting through their managers, directors, committees and leadership structure, have a duty to regularly reevaluate their procedures to identify and implement any needed improvements resulting from near misses, adverse events, evidence-based practice and the state of the art. 56. Defendants, Mercy Hospital Ardmore, Inc., Mercy Clinic Oklahoma Communities, Inc., Mercy Health, and Mercy Health Network, L.L.C., have a non-delegable duty to develop, adopt, and enforce adequate and appropriate processes, procedures, rules, and policies to ensure the delivery of quality care to their patients. 57. Defendants, Mercy Hospital Ardmore, Inc., Mercy Clinic Oklahoma Communities, Inc., Mercy Health, and Mercy Health Network, L.L.C., breached these duties to Plaintiffs by not having, implementing, reevaluating, educating and enforcing policies that would have ensured, inter alia, the following: a. that the CT Scan in July 2023 was correctly read by the remote radiologist they provided; b. that Jennifer Mays was advised in February 2024, that the CT Scan of her abdomen revealed abnormal findings and further testing was recommended. c. that Jennifer Mays received immediate medical care in February 2024 given the life-threatening condition from which she suffered. 58. Defendants’ conduct deviated from the standard of care, breached Defendants’ duties to Plaintiffs and resulted in Jennifer Mays’ death, as well as the injuries and damages set forth below. INFORMED CONSENT 59. Defendants failed to inform Jennifer Mays of the material risks involved in the course of treatment rendered to her, including the risk of no evaluation and treatment; failed to inform Jennifer Mays of the presence of a nodule on her adrenal gland as revealed by two CT Scans; failed to inform Jennifer Mays of the alternative treatments, including MRI of the abdomen with contrast or adrenal protocol CT; failed to advise her of the use of therapeutic drugs; failed to advise her that hospitalization for observation was an alternative option. 60. If Jennifer Mays had been informed by Defendants that the CT Scans revealed the presence of a nodule on her adrenal gland, or that there was a recommendation by the radiologist of an MRI of the abdomen with contrast or adrenal protocol CT, she would have immediately sought evaluation and treatment for it. 61. Defendants’ conduct deviated from the standard of care and caused Plaintiff’s injuries and damage as set forth below. NEGLIGENT PRIVILEGING, CREDENTIALING AND ENTRUSTMENT 62. At the time of the injuries giving rise to the lawsuit, Bethany Clutts, D.O., Jeffrey Thomasson, M.D., Kale Hunter, M.D. were privileged, credentialed and otherwise entrusted to care and treat the patients of Defendants, Mercy Hospital Ardmore, Inc., Mercy Clinic Oklahoma Communities, Inc., Mercy Health, and Mercy Health Network, L.L.C. 63. Defendants, Mercy Hospital Ardmore, Inc., Mercy Clinic Oklahoma Communities, Inc., Mercy Health, and Mercy Health Network, L.L.C., were negligent in retaining, supervising, credentialing, privileging and otherwise entrusting the care and treatment of its patients to Bethany Clutts, D.O., Jeffrey Thomasson, M.D., Kale Hunter, M.D. 64. Defendants were negligent in managing, operating or otherwise overseeing the care provided to Jennifer Mays while a patient at Mercy Hospital Ardmore. 65. The conduct of Defendants, Mercy Hospital Ardmore, Inc., Mercy Clinic Oklahoma Communities, Inc., Mercy Health, and Mercy Health Network, L.L.C., deviated from the standard of care and caused Plaintiff's injuries and damages as set forth below. 66. At the time of the injuries giving rise to the lawsuit, Christy Morris, APRN-CNP, was privileged, credentialed and otherwise entrusted to care and treat the patients of Defendant, Premise Health of Oklahoma Medical, P.C., 67. Defendant, Premise Health of Oklahoma Medical, P.C., was negligent in retaining, supervising, credentialing, privileging and otherwise entrusting the care and treatment of its patients to Christy Morris, APRN-CNP 68. Defendant, Premise Health of Oklahoma Medical, P.C., was negligent in managing, operating or otherwise overseeing the care provided to Jennifer Mays while a patient at Defendant, Premise Health of Oklahoma Medical, P.C. 69. The conduct of Defendant, Premise Health of Oklahoma Medical, P.C., deviated from the standard of care and caused Plaintiff's injuries and damages as set forth below. RES IPSA LOQUITUR 70. Plaintiffs' injuries and damages were caused by an act, omission or instrumentality which was under the exclusive control and management of Defendants and the events causing the injuries to her were of a kind which ordinarily do not occur in the absence of negligence on the part of Defendants. 71. Defendants' conduct caused Plaintiffs' injuries and damage as set forth below. AGENCY AND APPARENT AUTHORITY 72. At the time of the injuries giving rise to the lawsuit, various healthcare providers, including, but not limited to, Bethany Clutts, D.O., Jeffrey Thomasson, M.D., and Kale Hunter, M.D., were the agents, servants, and employees of Defendants, Mercy Hospital Ardmore, Inc., Mercy Clinic Oklahoma Communities, Inc., Mercy Health, and Mercy Health Network, L.L.C. making each vicariously liable to Plaintiff. 73. At the time of the injuries giving rise to the lawsuit, various healthcare providers, including, but not limited to, Bethany Clutts, D.O., Jeffrey Thomasson, M.D., and Kale Hunter, M.D., were acting in the scope of their employment by Defendants, Mercy Hospital Ardmore, Inc., Mercy Clinic Oklahoma Communities, Inc., Mercy Health, and Mercy Health Network, L.L.C. 74. The acts or omissions of the healthcare providers involved in treating Jennifer Mays, including, but not limited to, Bethany Clutts, D.O., Jeffrey Thomasson, M.D., and Kale Hunter, M.D., are the acts or omissions of Defendants, Mercy Hospital Ardmore, Inc., Mercy Clinic Oklahoma Communities, Inc., Mercy Health, and Mercy Health Network, L.L.C. 75. Defendants, Mercy Hospital Ardmore, Inc., Mercy Clinic Oklahoma Communities, Inc., Mercy Health, and Mercy Health Network, L.L.C., are liable for the conduct of the various healthcare providers, including, but not limited to, Bethany Clutts, D.O., Jeffrey Thomasson, M.D., and Kale Hunter, M.D. 76. At the time of the injuries giving rise to the lawsuit, various healthcare providers, including, but not limited to, Bethany Clutts, D.O., Jeffrey Thomasson, M.D., and Kale Hunter, M.D., had the apparent authority to act on behalf of Defendants, Mercy Hospital Ardmore, Inc., Mercy Clinic Oklahoma Communities, Inc., Mercy Health, and Mercy Health Network, L.L.C., and Jennifer Mays changed her position to her detriment in reliance on their apparent authority. 77. At the time of the injuries giving rise to the lawsuit Christy Morris, APRN-CNP, was the agent, servant, and employee of Defendant, Premise Health of Oklahoma Medical, P.C., making it vicariously liable to Plaintiff for her conduct 78. Christy Morris, APRN-CNP, was acting in the course and scope of her employment by Defendant, Premise Health of Oklahoma Medical, P.C., at the time she treated, or failed to treat, Jennifer Mays. 79. The acts or omissions of Christy Morris, APRN-CNP are the acts or omissions of Defendant, Premise Health of Oklahoma Medical, P.C. 80. Defendant, Premise Health of Oklahoma Medical, P.C., is liable for the conduct of its employees, agents, and servants involved in treating Jennifer Mays, including, but not limited to, Christy Morris, APRN-CNP 81. At the time Jennifer Mays was a patient of Defendant, Premise Health of Oklahoma Medical, P.C., the words and actions of Defendant, Premise Health of Oklahoma Medical, P.C., caused her to reasonably believe that it had authorized Christy Morris, APRN-CNP to take action on its behalf. 82. Defendant, Christy Morris, APRN-CNP, had the apparent authority to act on behalf of Defendant, Premise Health of Oklahoma Medical, P.C., and Jennifer Mays changed her position to her detriment in reliance on that apparent authority. 83. As a result of Defendant’s conduct, it is liable to Plaintiff for Jennifer Mays’ death, as well as the injuries and damages set forth below. JOINT VENTURE 84. Defendants, Mercy Hospital Ardmore, Inc., Mercy Clinic Oklahoma Communities, Inc., Mercy Health, and Mercy Health Network, L.L.C., entered into a joint venture to operate Mercy Hospital Ardmore in that Defendants (1) had a joint interest in Mercy Hospital Ardmore, (2) had an express or implied agreement to share profits and losses of Mercy Hospital Ardmore; and (3) engaged in action or conduct showing cooperation in Mercy Hospital Ardmore. 85. Each member of Defendants’ joint venture acted for itself as principal and as agent for the other Defendants within the general scope of the enterprise. 86. Defendants are estopped in favor of Plaintiff from denying that they are joint venturers, even if they never intended to become such. 87. Defendants engaged in an enterprise in which they have a community of interest and a common purpose in its performance, thereby providing the existence of a joint venture. 88. An employee of one Defendant engaged in a joint venture with its co-Defendants renders the employee of one Defendant the employee of all Defendants. CAUSATION 89. Defendants’ conduct, in a natural and continuous sequence, produced Jennifer Mays’ death, injury and damages to Plaintiff and without Defendants’ conduct, Jennifer Mays’ death, Plaintiff’s injuries and damages would not have happened. 90. Had the CT of July 14, 2023, been read correctly, and Jennifer Mays advised of the presence of a nodule on her adrenal gland, she would have sought further evaluation and treatment. More likely than not, that treatment would have prevented the nodule from advancing in size and, more likely than not, the nodule would not have caused complications which were fatal. 91. Had Jeffery Thomasson, M.D. met the standard of care, Jennifer Mays would have been correctly diagnosed and treated and such treatment would have prevented Jennifer Mays’ death. 92. Had Christy Morris, APRN-CNP met the standard of care, Jennifer Mays would have been correctly diagnosed and treated and such treatment would have prevented Jennifer Mays’ death. 93. Had Bethany Clutts, D.O. met the standard of care, Jennifer Mays would have been correctly diagnosed and treated and such treatment would have prevented Jennifer Mays’ death. 94. Had Defendants directly, and/or acting through their agents, servants and employees, met the standard of care, Jennifer Mays would have been correctly diagnosed and treated and such treatment would have prevented Jennifer Mays’ death. 95. The failures of Defendants are a direct cause of Jennifer Mays’ death. 96. The injuries and damages suffered by Plaintiffs as a result of Defendants’ conduct were the reasonably and foreseeable result of Defendants’ negligence. DAMAGES 97. As a result of Defendants’ conduct, Jennifer Mays sustained severe personal injuries, suffered severe physical and emotional pain and suffering, incurred medical expenses and died, resulting in damages in excess of $75,000.00, exclusive of interest, attorney’s fees, and costs. 98. As a further result of Defendants’ conduct, Josh Mays, spouse of Jennifer Mays, suffered damage due to loss of service, society, companionship, support and consortium of his wife; and incurred medical expenses resulting in damages in an amount in excess of $75,000.00, exclusive of interest, attorney’s fees, and costs. 99. As a further result of Defendants’ conduct, L.M., minor daughter of Jennifer Mays, suffered damage due to grief and loss of companionship of her mother and claims damages in an amount in excess of $75,000.00, exclusive of interest, attorney’s fees, and costs. 100. As a further result of Defendants’ conduct, Janice Kimmell, mother of Jennifer Mays, suffered damage due to grief and loss of companionship of her daughter and claims damages in an amount in excess of $75,000.00, exclusive of interest, attorney’s fees, and costs. 101. As a further result of the Defendants’ conduct, the Estate of Jennifer Mays incurred medical, funeral, and burial expenses and lost income for which the Estate seeks damages in excess of $75,000.00, exclusive of interest, attorney’s fees, and costs. 102. At the time of her death, Jennifer Mays was 41 years of age. According to the United States Social Security Administration Actuarial Life Table, she had a life expectancy of 40.93 years. 103. On January 9, 2026, Jason Richardson was appointed as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Jennifer Mays by the Honorable Judge Laura J. Corbin, Johnston County District Court, State of Oklahoma. 104. Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 1053(A), Jason Richardson is the proper party to bring this action on behalf of all claimants. PUNITIVE DAMAGES 105. Defendants’ conduct was done in reckless disregard of Jennifer Mays and Plaintiff’s rights, was intentional and done with malice toward others, including Jennifer Mays and Plaintiff. 106. Defendants were either aware, or did not care, that there was a substantial and unnecessary risk that their conduct would cause serious injury and the death of Jennifer Mays. 107. Defendants’ conduct was unreasonable under the circumstances and there was a high probability that the conduct would cause serious harm and the death of Jennifer Mays. 108. Defendants committed wrongful acts intentionally without just cause or excuse. 109. Plaintiffs seek punitive damages against Defendants in an amount in excess of $75,000.00. Respectfully submitted, Larry A. Tawwater, OBA No. 8852 Darren M. Tawwater, OBA No. 18854 B. Adam Myers, OBA No. 33985 B. Trevor Nation, OBA No. 36734 THE TAWWATER LAW FIRM, P.L.L.C. 14001 Quail Springs Parkway Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73134 Telephone: (405) 607-1400 Facsimile: (405) 607-1450 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] and Geren T. Steiner, OBA No. 18845 RUPERT & STEINER, PLLC 14001 Quail Springs Parkway Oklahoma City, OK 73134 Telephone: (405) 607-1494 Facsimile: (405) 607-1450 [email protected] ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS ATTORNEYS' LIEN CLAIMED JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.