CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
OKLAHOMA COUNTY • CJ-2026-1755

AUTO ADVANTAGE FINANCE, LLC v. DEREK JASON SERRATO

Filed: Mar 10, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut straight to the chase: a man in Oklahoma owes $11,000—plus nearly two grand in interest—because he stopped paying for a 2012 RAM 1500 that probably had more dents than a boxing gym when he bought it. And now, a finance company is dragging him through court like a tire with a blown tread, demanding every penny, plus legal fees, because apparently, even pickup trucks from the Obama administration era come with consequences.

Meet Derek Jason Serrato, the defendant in this financial drama, and Auto Advantage Finance, LLC, the plaintiff that sounds less like a car lender and more like a sketchy infomercial promising “instant auto approval—no credit? NO PROBLEM!” Except this isn’t a late-night TV ad. This is real life. And in real life, when you sign a contract to buy a used truck you can’t really afford, the music stops, the lights come up, and someone sends a lawyer named Hugh H. Fudge after you. Yes, that’s really his name. Hugh H. Fudge. It sounds like a character from a Scooby-Doo villain lineup, but no—this man is very real, very licensed, and very ready to collect on your debt.

So what happened? Let’s rewind to March 4, 2023—a day that probably felt full of promise for Derek. Maybe the sun was shining. Maybe he’d just gotten a raise. Or maybe he just really, really wanted a 2012 RAM 1500 SLT, a truck so mid-tier it makes you wonder if it was once a rental car, a work vehicle for a failed landscaping business, or both. Regardless, on that fateful day, Derek entered into a contract with Express Credit Auto (not to be confused with Express Yourself Credit, which would’ve been a more honest name) to purchase said truck. The details of the original loan aren’t in the filing—how much it was, how much he put down, whether he traded in a lawnmower and a PlayStation 3—but we do know one thing: Derek stopped paying.

That’s the kind of thing that happens when life gets in the way. Maybe his job dried up. Maybe the transmission blew three weeks after purchase. Maybe he realized that a 12-year-old truck with 17.98% interest (yes, seventeen point nine eight percent—that’s loan shark territory, folks) was not, in fact, a sound financial decision. Whatever the reason, the payments stopped. And when payments stop, the machine kicks in.

Auto Advantage Finance, LLC—apparently the assignee of the original contract, which is legalese for “we bought your debt from the original lender because someone thought this might still be worth collecting”—took back the truck. They repossessed it. They towed it. They probably slapped a “WE’VE GOT YOUR WHEELS” sticker on the windshield and drove it off with a smug sense of capitalist justice. Then, they sold it. Fire sale? Private auction? Craigslist with extra caution flags? We don’t know. But we do know this: after they sold the truck and applied the proceeds to what Derek owed, there was still a gap. A big one. $11,000.14, to be exact. And that, dear listener, is how you go from owning a used pickup to owing more than the truck was worth—because depreciation is a cruel, cruel mistress.

Now, why are we in court? Because Auto Advantage Finance isn’t just mad—they’re motivated. They’re filing a breach of contract claim, which, in plain English, means: “You signed a piece of paper saying you’d pay us back. You didn’t. Now we want the court to make you pay, plus extras.” It’s not about the truck anymore. The truck is gone. It’s about the money that’s still missing after the truck was sold. And under Oklahoma law, when a borrower defaults and the collateral (in this case, the RAM) doesn’t cover the full debt, the lender can come after them for the difference. It’s called a deficiency balance, and it’s the financial equivalent of getting kicked while you’re already down.

Auto Advantage isn’t just asking for the $11,000.14. Oh no. They want interest—17.98% per year, from February 2025 to February 2026, which they calculate at $2,015.75. That’s right: if this drags on, the debt keeps growing. They also want “all costs of this action,” which includes filing fees, service fees, and probably the cost of Hugh H. Fudge’s espresso machine. They want “a reasonable attorney fee,” which could mean thousands more, depending on how long this takes. And they want “such other relief to which plaintiff may be justly entitled,” which is lawyer-speak for “and whatever else we can squeeze out of this, please.”

Now, let’s talk about that $11,000. Is it a lot? Is it a little? Well, in the grand economy of civil lawsuits, it’s not a king’s ransom, but it’s no pocket change. It’s enough to buy a decent used car today. It’s enough to cover a year of rent in some parts of Oklahoma. It’s enough to fund a really ambitious taco truck dream. For someone who couldn’t afford a $17.98% loan on a 2012 RAM, it’s likely a mountain. And the fact that they’re being hit with more interest—on top of already having lost the vehicle—is the kind of detail that makes you want to scream into a pillow. But again, the law is the law. You sign the contract, you play the game.

What’s the most absurd part of this whole saga? Is it the interest rate that makes credit cards look generous? Is it the idea that a decade-old truck could leave behind an $11,000 hole in someone’s life? Is it the fact that a law firm with five attorneys (yes, five are listed on this petition for a single auto deficiency case) is treating this like a high-stakes corporate battle? Or is it the name “Hugh H. Fudge,” which feels like it was pulled from a courtroom satire sketch?

Honestly, it’s all of it. This case is a perfect storm of predatory lending, financial desperation, and legal overkill. It’s the kind of story that makes you wonder how many people out there are one missed paycheck away from being sued over a vehicle that no longer exists. And while we don’t know Derek’s full story—maybe he’s a deadbeat, maybe he’s just down on his luck—we do know this: he bought a truck, it didn’t work out, and now a finance company with a name that sounds like a pyramid scheme is coming after him with a legal army.

Are we rooting for Derek? Not exactly. He signed the contract. He knew—or should’ve known—what he was getting into. But are we rooting for the system to be less brutal? Absolutely. Because when a used car loan balloons into an $11,000+ legal demand with 18% interest, something’s broken. And it’s not just the transmission.

So here’s to Derek Jason Serrato, driving his metaphorical truck straight into the sunset of civil litigation. May his credit score recover, may his next vehicle be reliable, and may he never, ever sign a contract with a company called “Auto Advantage Finance” again. And to Hugh H. Fudge? Good luck collecting. We’re not saying justice has a sense of humor—but if it does, it’s laughing right now.

Case Overview

Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$11,000 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
- breach of contract default on auto loan

Petition Text

218 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA AUTO ADVANTAGE FINANCE, LLC Plaintiff, vs. DEREK JASON SERRATO Defendant. PETITION COMES NOW the plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys, and states as follows: 1. Express Credit Auto and the defendant executed a contract on March 04, 2023 whereby the defendant purchased a 2012 RAM 1500 SLT ("motor vehicle"). 2. The defendant has defaulted in the obligations required under the contract. 3. The motor vehicle was recovered and sold. After the proceeds of the sale were applied to the indebtedness owed by the defendant, there remains a deficiency balance owed under the contract. 4. The defendant is indebted to plaintiff, as assignee, in the principal amount of $11,000.14, with interest at the contractual rate of 17.98 % per annum from February 06, 2025 through February 13, 2026 in the amount of $2,015.75. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against the defendant as follows: 1. The principal amount of $11,000.14; 2. Prejudgment and post judgment interest at the contractual rate (12 O.S. § 727.1); 3. All costs of this action (12 O.S. § 928); 4. A reasonable attorney fee (12 O.S. § 936); and 5. Such other relief to which plaintiff may be justly entitled. Hugh H. Fudge (OBA# 20487) Dani L. Schinzing (OBA# 32113) Emily R. Remment (OBA# 22110) Sean A. Nelson (OBA# 30194) Keith A. Daniels (OBA# 19788) Robinson, Hoover & Fudge, PLLC P.O.Box 1748, Oklahoma City, OK 73101 (405) 232-6464 | (833) 342-0001 Toll Free [email protected] | (405) 232-6363 Fax Attorneys for Plaintiff
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.