CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
JEFFERSON COUNTY • CJ-2025-00022

Capital One, N.A. v. Mike D King

Filed: Nov 7, 2025
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut straight to the chase: a bank is suing a man in rural Oklahoma for $12,371 over a Discover credit card bill — except Discover doesn’t even exist as a standalone company anymore. It got swallowed by Capital One like some kind of financial black hole, and now, years later, the paperwork ghost of that merger is chasing down Mike D. King like a debt-obsessed Terminator. This isn’t Die Hard — it’s Debt Hard, and it’s playing out in the District Court of Jefferson County, population: not a lot.

Now, who are these players? On one side, we’ve got Capital One, N.A., the financial Goliath that wears its corporate mergers like badges of honor. Remember Discover? That credit card that used to brag about cashback and customer service? Yeah, Capital One ate it, digested it, and now legally is it — or at least claims to be, which is all that matters in court. They’re represented by not one, not two, but six attorneys. Six. That’s more lawyers than most people have shoes. Stephen L. Bruce leads the pack, backed up by a legal dream team operating out of Edmond, Oklahoma — a city best known for being nowhere near Tulsa or Oklahoma City, but somehow still important enough to have its own law firms specializing in collecting on old credit card debt.

And then there’s Mike D. King. That’s it. That’s the whole file on him. No address. No job title. No dramatic backstory. Just a name, a debt, and a docket number. He could be a farmer. He could be a mechanic. He could be a retired Elvis impersonator who once bought a rhinestone jumpsuit on credit and never looked back. We don’t know. But what we do know is that at some point, he signed a Discover Cardmember Agreement — probably online, probably during a moment of weakness while ordering something he didn’t need but really, really wanted. Maybe it was tires. Maybe it was a Peloton. Maybe it was emotional support garden gnomes. Doesn’t matter. The deal was this: Capital One (via Discover) gave him a line of credit, he agreed to pay it back, and somewhere along the way… he didn’t.

And that’s the whole story. That’s the inciting incident. That’s the Romeo and Juliet balcony scene. That’s the Avengers portal-opening moment. Mike D. King stopped paying his bill.

According to the petition — which, by the way, is about as dramatic as a dry cough — King entered into a contract, agreed to pay, and then defaulted. That’s paragraph 3, in case you were wondering. No mention of hardship. No explanation. No “my dog ate my credit card statement.” Just a clean, cold, corporate cut: he didn’t pay. And now, the balance sits at $12,371.15. That extra 15 cents? That’s the cherry on top of the financial sundae. That’s Capital One saying, “We’re not rounding down. We’re not rounding up. We’re charging you exactly what the algorithm says you owe, down to the penny.”

So why are we in court? Because when a bank wants its money and you don’t give it, they have two options: hire a collection agency that yells at you on the phone, or go full legal ninja and file a petition in district court. Capital One chose the latter. Their claim? Breach of contract — specifically, the Discover Cardmember Agreement. In plain English: “You signed a piece of paper saying you’d pay us back. You didn’t. Now we’re suing.” It’s not exactly Erin Brockovich, but it’s law. And in the eyes of the court, a contract is a contract, even if it was clicked through on a mobile app at 2 a.m. after three beers and a late-night Amazon splurge.

The relief sought? $12,371.15. Plus interest. Plus court costs. And — plot twist — they also want the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission to hand over King’s employment information. Why? So they can potentially garnish his wages if they win. That’s the nuclear option: “You won’t pay us? Fine. We’ll just ask the state where you work and start taking it out of your paycheck.” It’s not jail. It’s not a repo man at your door. But it’s close enough to make you check your rearview mirror a little more often.

Now, is $12,371 a lot? In the grand scheme of credit card debt, it’s not crazy high. It’s not “I bought a boat” money. It’s more like “I had a rough few years” money. Maybe a medical emergency. Maybe a job loss. Maybe just the slow creep of minimum payments and compound interest turning a $5,000 balance into a $12K nightmare. For a lot of people in Jefferson County — where the median household income is around $50,000 — that’s over a quarter of a year’s take-home pay. It’s not nothing. But for Capital One, a bank with billions in assets? It’s a rounding error. This isn’t about the money. It’s about the principle. Or, more accurately, it’s about the precedent. If they let one Mike D. King slide, what’s to stop every other debtor in Oklahoma from ghosting their bills and living rent-free in financial purgatory?

And that’s where the absurdity kicks in. Six lawyers. A full court petition. A demand for employment records. All over a debt that, for the plaintiff, is less than the cost of one partner’s lunch at a fancy steakhouse. Meanwhile, Mike D. King is out here somewhere, probably unaware that his name is now part of the official court record, possibly wondering why his credit score took a nosedive, or why his employer suddenly got a subpoena. There’s no drama. No betrayal. No secret affair paid for on the card. Just… debt. The most American of all tragedies.

Are we rooting for the little guy? Sure. Why not. There’s something deeply satisfying about hoping Mike D. King shows up with a notarized letter, a receipt from 2018, and a PowerPoint proving he paid it all off in Canadian Tire money. Or better yet, that he countersues for emotional distress caused by receiving mail from a law firm with six names on the letterhead. But let’s be real — this case is going exactly where 99% of debt collection cases go: default judgment for the bank. King probably won’t show up. He might not even know about it. And Capital One will get their $12,371.15, plus interest, plus costs, plus the sweet, sweet satisfaction of another W on their corporate scoreboard.

It’s not justice. It’s not revenge. It’s not even particularly interesting. But it is the law. And in the quiet, unglamorous world of civil court, where the stakes are money and the drama is measured in interest rates, this is peak entertainment. Welcome to CrazyCivilCourt, where the crimes are petty, the players are tired, and the real victim is always, always the inbox of some poor guy named Mike.

Case Overview

$12,371 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Jefferson County, Oklahoma
Filing Attorney
Relief Sought
$12,371 Monetary
Plaintiffs
  • Capital One, N.A. business
    Rep: Stephen L. Bruce, OBA #1241; Everette C. Altdoerffer, OBA #30006; Leah K. Clark, OBA #31819; Clay P. Booth, OBA #11767; Roger M. Coil, OBA #17002; Adam W. Sullivan, OBA #35748
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 breach of Discover Cardmember Agreement

Petition Text

269 words
THE DISTRICT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA CAPITAL ONE, N.A. Successor by merger to Discover Bank vs. MIKE D KING Defendant Case No CJ-2025-22 FILED NOV 07 2025 KIM BERRY, COURT CLERK JEFFERSON COUNTY PETITION COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Capital One, N.A., successor by merger to Discover Bank, and for its cause of action against the Defendant MIKE D KING (hereinafter referred to as "Defendant") alleges and states as follows: 1. That the Defendant entered into an agreement referred to as a "Discover Cardmember Agreement" with the Plaintiff whereby the Plaintiff agreed to extend a revolving line of credit to the Defendant for cash advances or the purchase of goods and services. 2. The Defendant agreed to pay the account balance plus finance charges and other charges and fees in monthly installments according to the terms of the above referenced agreement. 3. The Defendant defaulted under the terms of the agreement referred to in paragraph 1 above. 4. The Defendant is currently indebted to Plaintiff for charges made under the above referenced agreement in the sum of $12371.15. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff prays for judgment against the Defendant in the amount of $12371.15, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment until paid, and costs of this action. Plaintiff further requests an order directing the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission to produce employment information of the judgment debtor(s) pursuant to 40 O.S. § 4-508(D). Stephen L. Bruce, OBA #1241 Everette C. Altdoerffer, OBA #30006 Leah K. Clark, OBA #31819 Clay P. Booth, OBA #11767 Roger M. Coil, OBA #17002 Adam W. Sullivan, OBA #35748 Attorneys for Plaintiff P.O. Box 808 Edmond, Oklahoma 73083-0808 (405) 330-4110 | [email protected]
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.