Union Station South Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Allison K. Folta
What's This Case About?
Let’s be honest: most of us have at some point ignored a bill, crossed our fingers, and hoped it would just… go away. But Allison and Michael Folta? They’ve taken that strategy to a whole new level—because now, over $4,500 in unpaid homeowners association fees could cost them their house. That’s right: a fight over less than five grand might end with a foreclosure auction, complete with gavel, real estate agents in sensible shoes, and possibly a bidding war between the IRS and Wells Fargo. Welcome to the wild, petty, and slightly absurd world of civil court, where your HOA is scarier than a loan shark.
So who are these people? Allison and Michael Folta, a married couple living in a modest little corner of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, at 3810 W Galveston Place. It’s not a mansion—more of a suburban starter home in the Union Station South development, a neighborhood that probably has a Facebook group called “Union Station South Gossip & Grill” and a rule against parking RVs on the street during Easter. The Folta home, like all homes in the development, is governed by a set of HOA bylaws, which, in theory, keep the grass green, the trash cans hidden, and the neighbors from painting their front doors neon pink. In exchange for this utopia of curb appeal, residents pay monthly assessments—basically HOA rent for shared amenities like landscaping, streetlights, and the occasional holiday wreath on the mailbox. The Union Station South Homeowners Association, Inc., the plaintiff in this case, is the self-appointed gatekeeper of that dream. They’re not a corporation in the traditional sense—they’re a not-for-profit, which means they don’t exist to make money, just to make sure your fence is the right shade of white.
But somewhere along the line, the Folta account went dark. According to the filing, they stopped paying their assessments. Not all at once, probably not dramatically. More likely, it started with a missed payment here, a “we’ll catch up next month” there. But months turned into years, and by February 16, 2026, the tab had ballooned to $4,498.27. That’s not just the base dues—it’s the original $1,398.25 in unpaid assessments, plus $272.83 in interest, $800 in attorney fees (because yes, the HOA lawyer gets paid whether you show up or not), and $485 in “other charges” that remain deliciously unexplained. Was it a late fee surcharge? A fee for sending the second reminder? A penalty for failing to attend the annual HOA meeting where they voted on whether to allow inflatable dinosaurs in yards during Halloween? We may never know. But what we do know is that the HOA, through its attorney Timothy D. Geary of Jones Property Law, PLLC, decided it was done playing nice. They filed a lien on September 18, 2025—officially claiming the property as collateral for the debt—and now, they want to foreclose. That means they’re not just asking for the money. They’re asking to take the house.
And here’s where it gets deliciously complicated. Because the Folta home isn’t just encumbered by an HOA lien. Oh no. This property is basically a legal piñata, swinging in the Oklahoma wind, with creditors lining up to take a whack. The petition lists not just the Folta couple, but a who’s-who of financial chaos: Wells Fargo Bank (with a mortgage from 2006), St. Paul Federal Bank for Savings (a 1998 lien—older than some of the trees in the yard), Midland Credit Management (a debt collector with a 2022 claim), the Internal Revenue Service (because who doesn’t owe the IRS?), and the Oklahoma Tax Commission (twice, in 2020 and 2024, like a state-level tag team). There’s even a defendant called “OCCUPANTS OF THE PREMISES,” which sounds like a horror movie title but is, legally, a way to cover anyone who might be squatting or claiming tenancy rights. The HOA is basically saying: Look, we don’t know who owns what anymore, but we’re first in line to get paid—or at least, we want to be.
Now, let’s talk about what’s actually happening in court. The HOA is filing what’s called a “foreclosure of owners association lien,” which is a fancy way of saying: “We have a legal claim on this house because of unpaid fees, and we want the court to let us sell it to get our money back.” Under Oklahoma law, HOAs can do this—yes, really. You can lose your home over lawn care fees. The claim hinges on the idea that the Folta couple, as property owners, agreed to the HOA’s rules when they bought the house. Those rules are recorded in something called the “Deed of Dedication and Restrictive Covenants,” filed way back in 1992, which gives the HOA the right to place a lien and eventually foreclose. The Folta’s debt? $4,498.27. That’s the number the HOA is chasing. But if the house goes to auction, the proceeds don’t just go to them. First in line are usually mortgage lenders—so Wells Fargo and St. Paul Federal would get paid first. Then, possibly, the IRS and the state tax folks. The HOA? They’re somewhere in the back, hoping there’s enough left to cover their $4.5K tab. If not? Well, they might end up with a foreclosure judgment but no actual cash. Which makes you wonder: is this really about the money, or is it about sending a message?
And what do they want? On paper, it’s straightforward: a judgment for $4,498.27, plus ongoing fees, interest, attorney costs, and the right to foreclose on the property. But in context? That amount is tiny compared to the value of a home. Even in Broken Arrow, a house like this is worth well over $200,000. So we’re talking about risking a six-figure asset over a debt that’s less than the cost of a used car. It’s like burning down the barn to get rid of a mouse. The HOA isn’t trying to collect $50,000—it’s not even trying for $10,000. It’s chasing a sum that could’ve been settled with a payment plan, a sternly worded letter, or maybe a strongly implied threat at the neighborhood barbecue. Instead, they’ve launched a full-scale legal siege, dragging the IRS, multiple banks, and “the occupants” into a courtroom drama that reads like a legal version of Survivor: Suburbia Edition.
So what’s our take? Look, we’re not here to defend deadbeat homeowners. If you live in an HOA, you sign up for the rules. But there’s something deeply, darkly absurd about a system where a couple could lose their home—not to a mortgage default, not to back taxes, but to homeowners association fees. The Folta’s situation might be the result of financial hardship, miscommunication, or just plain stubbornness. Maybe they moved out and forgot to cancel the account. Maybe they’re fighting the HOA on principle. Maybe they’re just ghosts haunting their own mailbox. But the real villain here isn’t the Folta couple—it’s the escalation. The HOA could’ve negotiated. They could’ve paused. They could’ve done anything other than file a foreclosure petition over a debt that wouldn’t even cover the closing costs on the house. And yet, here we are. The IRS is involved. The banks are on notice. And some poor process server is probably trying to figure out how to serve papers to “the occupants” without getting chased by a dog named Mr. Fluffins.
At the end of the day, this case isn’t really about $4,498.27. It’s about power, pride, and the bizarre legal machinery that turns a missed payment into a property seizure. We’re rooting for a settlement. We’re rooting for common sense. And we’re definitely rooting for someone to finally answer the door at 3810 W Galveston Place—because honestly, we’ve got questions.
Case Overview
-
Union Station South Homeowners Association, Inc.
business
Rep: Timothy D. Geary, OBA No. 36121, Jones Property Law, PLLC
- Allison K. Folta individual
- Michael A. Folta individual
- OCCUPANTS OF THE PREMISES AT 3810 W GALVESTON PL S BROKEN ARROW, 74012 government
- Wells Fargo Bank business
- St. Paul Federal Bank for Savings business
- Midland Credit Management, Inc. business
- Internal Revenue Service government
- Oklahoma Tax Commission government
| # | Cause of Action | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | foreclosure of owners association lien | Plaintiff seeks to foreclose a lien on a property owned by Defendants for unpaid assessments and other charges. |