JORDAN PICKARD and SAMANTHA BACHMAN-PICKARD v. OKLAHOMA GAS GATHERING, LLC, Mija, LLC, and VAQUERO RESOURCES, LLC
What's This Case About?
Let’s cut straight to the part that will make you spit out your morning coffee: a married couple in Midwest City, Oklahoma, claims an oil company didn’t just accidentally leak petroleum on their property — they allegedly bulldozed over fifty trees, tore up septic lines, rerouted water flow, and left behind a toxic mess — all while trespassing and ignoring direct instructions — and then tried to play corporate musical chairs with their LLCs like it was no big deal. This isn’t just a lawsuit. This is eco-vandalism with paperwork.
Jordan Pickard and Samantha Bachman-Pickard weren’t living on some remote oil field outpost. They were homeowners, minding their business at 409 Westminster Road, where they presumably enjoyed things like fresh air, functional septic systems, and trees that weren’t being summarily executed by gas company contractors. Their slice of suburban peace, however, shared a fence line with infrastructure belonging to Oklahoma Gas Gathering, LLC — a company whose name sounds like a side hustle for a particularly ambitious Boy Scout troop, but is in fact a petroleum pipeline operator. Also tangled in this mess: Mija, LLC, the outfit that allegedly owned the oil well feeding into that pipeline, which — plot twist — changed its name to Vaquero Resources, LLC after the disaster. Yes, really. It’s like watching a cartoon villain swap hats and pretend, “Nope, not me, never seen that guy before.”
Here’s how the nightmare unfolded. On April 13, 2024, Jordan and Samantha came home to what can only be described as a scene from a low-budget horror film — their property reeked of petroleum. We’re not talking “oh, someone spilled gas while mowing the lawn” levels of stink. This was so bad they called Oklahoma Natural Gas, convinced they were about to die in a fiery explosion. Turns out, no explosion — just a slow-motion environmental crime. The next day, they caught employees from Oklahoma Gas Gathering stomping around the back of their land like they owned it. Surprise! There’d been a leak in a petroleum line on the adjacent property, and the gunk had oozed right onto the Pickards’ yard. At least the company had the decency to ask permission to come in and clean it up. Sort of. They asked after the fact, like showing up to a dinner party two hours late and saying, “Mind if I use your kitchen to reheat my casserole?”
The Pickards, bless their cooperative hearts, said fine — but with rules. Specific instructions were given about where crews could go and what they could touch. And then? The crews allegedly ignored all of it. What followed wasn’t a cleanup. It was a demolition derby. Over fifty trees — yes, fifty — were removed. Deer feeders? Destroyed. Roadways? Torn up. Grass? Obliterated. Septic lines? Damaged. Water flow? Altered like they were rerouting a river for a theme park. All in the name of “fixing” a leak they should’ve prevented in the first place. And let’s not forget the lingering petroleum still in the soil — because apparently, “clean up” means “leave toxic sludge and call it a day.”
Now, here’s where the corporate shell game kicks in. Weeks after the spill, Mija, LLC — the company tied to the source well — rebranded itself as Vaquero Resources, LLC. Poof! Same people, same liabilities, new name tag. And Vaquero didn’t stop the destruction — they continued it, sending their own crews to further ravage the property under the guise of remediation. At this point, it’s less “fixing a mistake” and more “committing a sequel.”
So why are we in court? Because Jordan and Samantha aren’t just mad — they’re legally livid. Their lawsuit throws the entire civil code playbook at these companies: negligence, because the pipeline wasn’t monitored or maintained like it should’ve been; trespass, because employees kept coming onto their land without permission and wrecked stuff they had no business touching; private nuisance, because imagine trying to enjoy your backyard when it smells like a gas station bathroom and looks like a war zone; and environmental damage, because, hello, petroleum in your soil is not a feature, it’s a felony-level foul-up. They’re also citing Oklahoma’s Surface Damages Act — a law designed to protect landowners from exactly this kind of corporate overreach — arguing the companies violated it so badly they’re negligent per se, which is legalese for “so obviously wrong, we don’t even need to debate it.”
And what do they want? A judgment for over $75,000 — though they originally floated up to $100,000 — plus attorney fees and, crucially, punitive damages. Now, is $75,000 a lot? For a couple who lost fifty trees, a functional yard, their septic system, and peace of mind? Honestly? It’s a bargain. Replacing that kind of greenery alone could cost tens of thousands. Environmental remediation? Easily six figures. And that’s before you factor in the emotional toll of watching your home turn into an industrial crime scene. The punitive damages are the spicy part — they’re not meant to compensate, they’re meant to punish. To say, “You didn’t just mess up — you acted with willful and wanton disregard,” which is the legal equivalent of calling someone a menace.
So what’s our take? Look, we’re not anti-oil. We’re not even anti-pipeline. But we are very anti-“We’ll just rename the company and pretend this didn’t happen.” The most absurd part isn’t even the scale of the destruction — it’s the sheer audacity of the response. Not only did these companies allegedly fail at basic infrastructure maintenance, but they then treated a private residential property like a construction site with no rules. They trespassed. They ignored boundaries. They changed their names like they were hiding from a bad Yelp review. And they left a family with a yard that sounds more like a Superfund site than a place to host a barbecue.
We’re rooting for the trees. We’re rooting for the septic lines. We’re rooting for the idea that you shouldn’t come home to find your property has been turned into an oil company’s personal junk drawer. This isn’t just about money — it’s about the principle that corporations don’t get to waltz onto your land, destroy it, and then vanish into a cloud of LLC paperwork like a cartoon fox in a trench coat. If justice has a sense of humor, the court’s ruling will come with a side of poetic karma — and maybe a mandatory tree-planting clause. Fifty new trees. Same spot. And this time, ask permission first.
Case Overview
-
JORDAN PICKARD and SAMANTHA BACHMAN-PICKARD
individual
Rep: HOLLOWAY, DOBSON & BACHMAN, P.L.L.C.
| # | Cause of Action | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Negligence, Trespass, Private Nuisance, and Environmental Damage | Petroleum product leak and subsequent damage to property |