CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
LINCOLN COUNTY • CS-2026-00096

Midland Credit Management, Inc. v. Angela D. Carroll

Filed: Feb 24, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s be real: no one wakes up dreaming of becoming a debt collector. But here we are, in the hallowed halls of the Lincoln County District Court, where a woman in Oklahoma is being sued for $1,602.26—less than you’d pay for a decent used washer and dryer set—by a company that exists solely to buy up other people’s bad debts and then legally harass them for it. This isn’t The Social Network. There’s no betrayal, no tech bros in hoodies, no $650 million lawsuit over a stolen idea. Just cold, hard credit card math, a notarized affidavit, and the quiet, soul-crushing hum of capitalism doing its thing at the lowest possible stakes.

Meet Angela D. Carroll, resident of somewhere in Lincoln County, Oklahoma—population: probably too small to have a Starbucks. We don’t know much about her, and that’s the point. She’s not a villain. She’s not a hero. She’s just… a person who, at some point in 2024, got a credit card from First Electronic Bank—possibly the most generically named financial institution in America, like it was pulled from a Mad Libs game—tied to something called a “Destiny” account. (Destiny! Was this card meant to help her fulfill her dreams? Buy concert tickets? Fund a spontaneous trip to see the northern lights? Or was it just another plastic rectangle for gas and groceries?) She opened the account on June 5, 2024. By August 31, she made her last payment. Then… silence. Radio silence. The account went dark. And on January 23, 2025, First Electronic Bank officially gave up and “charged it off,” which is corporate-speak for “we don’t think we’re getting this money back, so we’re writing it off and selling it to someone who might.”

Enter Midland Credit Management, Inc.—the vulture of the financial world. These guys don’t issue credit. They don’t offer loans. They don’t care about your credit score or your life story. What they do care about is buying defaulted debts for pennies on the dollar and then suing people to collect the full amount. It’s like buying a beat-up car at auction for $500 and then suing the original owner for the full Blue Book value because they “still owe” it. Only with paperwork. And lawyers. And a whole lot more passive aggression.

Midland swooped in—on or about February 25, 2025—and purchased the rights to Angela’s debt. Now, legally, they’re the ones holding the bag. Or rather, the ones holding the claim. And on December 23, 2025—yes, Christmas Eve Eve—they filed a lawsuit in Lincoln County, Oklahoma, demanding exactly $1,602.26. Not a penny more. Not a penny less. They even brought receipts—or at least, the legal equivalent: a notarized affidavit from one Lucas Hoffman, a “Legal Specialist” from St. Cloud, Minnesota, who swears under penalty of perjury that he has “personal knowledge” of Midland’s electronic records. He didn’t meet Angela. He’s never seen her credit card. But he has seen the digital trail, and according to Midland’s internal system, as of December 5, 2025, she still owes every last cent.

So why are we here? Why is this a lawsuit and not just a collection letter? Because in civil court, when someone claims you owe them money and you don’t pay, they can sue. That’s it. No drama. No witnesses. No jury. Just a petition, an affidavit, and a prayer for judgment. Midland isn’t accusing Angela of fraud. They’re not saying she maxed out the card and fled the country. They’re just saying: She didn’t pay. We bought the debt. Now we want the money. It’s called a “Petition for Indebtedness,” which sounds like a Shakespearean tragedy but is really just the legal version of “you still haven’t Venmo’d me for dinner.”

And what do they want? $1,602.26. Plus interest. Plus court costs. That’s it. No punitive damages. No demand for Angela to write a public apology. No request that she return the “Destiny” card in a ceremonial box. Just cold, hard cash. Now, is $1,600 a lot? Well, it depends. If you’re Midland Credit Management, Inc., which likely paid less than $200 for this debt, it’s a potential 700% return—if they win. If you’re Angela D. Carroll, and you’re living paycheck to paycheck in rural Oklahoma, $1,600 could be two months of groceries. Or a car repair. Or the difference between keeping the lights on and getting a disconnect notice. But here’s the kicker: this entire legal machine—a lawsuit, a notarized affidavit, a team of attorneys at LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C.—has been activated over an amount that, in the grand scheme of American debt, is basically pocket lint.

Our take? The most absurd part isn’t that someone’s being sued for under two grand. It’s how normal this all is. This isn’t an outlier. This is the daily grind of America’s debt collection industrial complex. Companies buy your old credit card balances for pennies, then hire law firms with names that sound like 1980s detective duos (Love and Beal? Seriously?) to file dozens of these cases a day. The affidavits are templated. The lawyers never meet their clients. The defendants often don’t show up. And the courts? They’re just processing paperwork, one $1,600 claim at a time.

We’re not rooting for the debt collector. We’re not even really rooting for Angela—we don’t know her well enough. But we are rooting for the idea that human beings shouldn’t be reduced to account numbers and digital footprints, that a system this impersonal and mechanical should at least require more than a PDF and a notary stamp to take someone to court. And we’re rooting for the day when “Destiny” doesn’t mean a credit card, but something a little more… well, destined.

Until then, we’ll be here, watching the docket numbers roll in, one petty civil dispute at a time. And if you’re out there, Angela D. Carroll? We hope your destiny involves a little more peace, and a lot less paperwork.

Case Overview

$1,602 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$1,602 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Debt Collection Petition for Indebtedness

Petition Text

662 words
25-58049-0 YE1 008 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF LINCOLN COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA Midland Credit Management, Inc., Plaintiff, vs. Angela D Carroll, Defendant. PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for cause of action against the Defendant alleges and states: 1. Defendant Defaulted on FIRST ELECTRONIC BANK obligation with account number XXXXXXXXXXXXX2525. Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $1,602.26. An Affidavit of Account and/or contract is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $1,602.26, with interest at the statutory rate, all court costs, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Daniela Westfahl, #36242 Gracelyn Porras Dillingham, #35852 Jenifer A Gani, #021876 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405/720-0565 Fax: 405/720-9570 E-Mail: [email protected] STATE OF OKLAHOMA Midland Credit Management, Inc, Plaintiff -vs- Carroll, Angela D, Defendant(s). AFFIDAVIT OF LUCAS HOFFMAN Lucas Hoffman, whose business address is 600 W. Saint Germain St Suite 200, St. Cloud, MN 56301-3616, certifies and says: 1. I am employed as a Legal Specialist and have access to pertinent account records for Midland Credit Management, Inc. ("Plaintiff" or "MCM"). I am a competent person over eighteen years of age, and make the statements herein based upon personal knowledge of those account records maintained by Plaintiff. Plaintiff is the current owner of, and was assigned all the rights, title and interest to Defendant's FIRST ELECTRONIC BANK/DESTINY account XXXXXXXXXXXXXX2525 (MCM Number 331899657) (hereinafter "the Account"). 2. I have access to and have reviewed the electronic records pertaining to the Account maintained by MCM and am authorized to make this affidavit on MCM's behalf. The electronic records reviewed consist of (i) data and records acquired from the seller or assignor when MCM purchased or was assigned the Account, which were incorporated into MCM's business records upon purchase or assignment, and (ii) data and records generated by MCM in connection with servicing the Account since the date the Account was purchased by or was assigned to MCM. 3. I am familiar with and trained on the manner and method by which MCM creates and maintains its business records pertaining to the Account, which consist of (i) data and documents acquired from the seller or assignor, and (ii) subsequent collection and/or servicing activities by MCM. The records are acquired or created, and are kept in the regular course of MCM's business. It was in the regular course of MCM's business for a person with knowledge of the subsequent collection and/or servicing activities recorded, and a business duty to report, to make the record or data compilation, or to transmit information thereof to be included in such record, or for such information to be posted in MCM's records by a computer or similar digital means. In the regular course of MCM's business, the record or compilation of the subsequent collection activities is made at or near the time of the act or event by MCM as a regular practice. 4. MCM's records show that Defendant(s) owed a balance of $1,602.26 as of 2025-12-05. 5. On or about 2025-02-25, Midland Credit Management, Inc became the successor in interest to this Account. 6. MCM's records show that: 1) the Account was opened on 2024-06-05; 2) the last payment posted to the Account on 2024-08-31; and 3) the Account was charged off on 2025-01-23. 7. If called to testify as a witness thereon, I could and would competently testify as to all the facts stated herein. Left Blank Intentionally I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements are true and correct. Date STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF STEARNS Signed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on DEC 23 2025 by Lucas Hoffman. Karia Ann Sutter Notary Public - Minnesota My Commission Expires 01/31/2029 OK038
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.