Cody Day v. Felecia Clark
What's This Case About?
Let’s get straight to the wild part: two parents are suing over $45,000 in medical bills after their minors got into a car crash — not because they’re blaming some drunk driver or a semi-truck jackknifing through a stoplight, but because the person behind the wheel was apparently the defendant, and now everyone’s scrambling to figure out who pays for the ER visits, the X-rays, the therapy sessions, and the sheer emotional toll of teenage drivers doing what teenage drivers do best: making questionable life choices behind the wheel. And get this — the plaintiffs are representing themselves, which means we’re not just dealing with trauma and insurance claims, we’re diving headfirst into DIY justice, Oklahoma-style.
Meet Cody Day and Waurika Ragan — not a crime-fighting duo, but real-life parents caught in the messy aftermath of a car accident involving their kids, H.D. and K.D., both minors at the time. Cody lives in Weatherford, Oklahoma, which, let’s be honest, is about as quiet a town as you can find unless your idea of excitement is a tractor pull on a Saturday night. Waurika’s from Hartshone, a stone’s throw from the Arkansas border, where the deer outnumber the stoplights. These two aren’t married (at least not according to the filing), but they’re united by blood — or at least by shared parental panic — when their children end up in a wreck in Latimer County, deep in coal-mining country, where the roads are twisty, the cell service is spotty, and the nearest hospital might as well be in another time zone.
The crash happened on November 6, 2023 — a crisp fall evening, possibly with leaves changing and tempers flaring, though the petition doesn’t say who was texting, who ran a stop sign, or whether someone tried to drift around a corner like they’re in Fast & Furious: Pittsburg County Drift. What we do know is that Felecia Clark — our defendant — was allegedly behind the wheel. She lives in Greenwood, Arkansas, which means this wasn’t even a local mix-up. This was an interstate incident. Someone crossed state lines, got behind the wheel, and ended up wrapped around a guardrail or trading paint with a mailbox — the details are sparse, but the consequences were not.
H.D. and K.D. walked away — or more accurately, were carried away — with injuries serious enough to rack up nearly $45,000 in medical bills. That’s not a sprained ankle and a Band-Aid situation. We’re talking possible fractures, concussions, therapy, follow-ups, the whole nine yards of post-crash adulting that kids shouldn’t have to do, but parents have to pay for. And Cody and Waurika? They’re on the hook. They’re the ones getting the hospital statements, the collection calls, the “your balance is now $12,478.32” emails at 2 a.m. And since their kids were passengers (we assume — the filing doesn’t say they were driving), they’re pointing fingers at Felecia Clark, the driver, and saying, “Hey, you caused this. You pay.”
Enter the legal claim: negligence. That’s the big one. In plain English, Cody and Waurika are arguing that Felecia Clark didn’t drive like a reasonable person should — maybe she was speeding, maybe she was distracted, maybe she took a blind corner like she was in Mad Max. Whatever happened, they believe her actions (or lack thereof) directly led to the crash and the resulting injuries. And because of that, she’s legally responsible for the damages. That’s how negligence works — it’s not about intent, it’s about carelessness. You don’t have to mean to cause harm. You just have to drive like a maniac and hit someone.
Now, here’s where it gets a little twisty. The plaintiffs say Felecia Clark was insured — thank God for small favors — by Progressive Northern Insurance Company. That’s the grown-up version of “the grown-ups will handle it.” Except… not quite. Because before this lawsuit even hit the court, Cody and Waurika say they already settled with Progressive — $10,000 for H.D., $35,000 for K.D. — in exchange for releasing Felecia from all liability. Wait — what? Then why are they suing her?
Ah. Here’s the kicker: they’re not suing to get more money. They’re suing to make the settlement official, to get the court to bless what’s already been agreed upon. This is a “confirm the settlement” lawsuit — a legal formality, kind of like when you sign a lease and the landlord still has to file it with the city clerk even though you’ve already moved in and painted the walls neon green. It’s not about drama. It’s about documentation. Without a court order, that $45,000 might not be enforceable. The insurance company might back out. The check might bounce. The sky might fall. So they’re going full pro se — that’s legalese for “we’re doing this ourselves, no lawyers, just Google and grit” — to make sure the deal sticks.
And $45,000 — is that a lot? For a car crash involving minors? Honestly, it’s not outrageous. One night in a hospital can cost $10,000. A broken femur? Surgery, rehab, crutches, missed school — easily $30K. Emotional distress? That’s harder to price, but when a kid has nightmares about headlights and won’t get back in a car, it’s real. So no, $45,000 isn’t some greedy grab. It’s the bare minimum of what this probably cost. If anything, it’s low. Most personal injury lawyers would sniff at that number. But here’s the thing — Cody and Waurika aren�t lawyers. They’re parents. They’re not trying to get rich. They’re trying to not go broke because their kids got in a car with someone who shouldn’t have been driving — or at least, someone whose insurance needs to pay up.
So what’s our take? That this case is wildly relatable. Not the suing part — most of us don’t file lawsuits against people who crash our kids — but the desperation of it. The “I didn’t ask for this, but now I have to adult like a champion” energy. Two parents, doing their best with a legal system that assumes you have a JD from somewhere, navigating court forms like they’re assembling IKEA furniture without the instructions. And all over a settlement they already agreed to. It’s like paying your electric bill and then getting sued by the power company to confirm you paid it. It’s bureaucratic absurdity at its finest.
But here’s what’s really wild: Felecia Clark hasn’t responded. At least, not in this filing. No defense attorney. No counterclaim. Nothing. Is she ignoring it? Is she broke? Did she move to Belize? We don’t know. But the fact that Cody and Waurika are going pro se while chasing down an unresponsive defendant in another state? That’s not just a lawsuit. That’s a modern American tragedy wrapped in a petty civil dispute. It’s The Florida Project meets Law & Order: Traffic Court.
And honestly? We’re rooting for them. Not because Felecia Clark deserves to be dragged (though, let’s be real, someone messed up), but because two parents are out here trying to protect their kids after the fact, with nothing but a printer, a notary, and sheer willpower. They’re not asking for a mansion or a yacht. They’re asking for what they’re owed — medical bills paid, peace of mind earned, and a little bit of justice in a world where insurance loopholes and state lines make everything harder.
So here’s to Cody and Waurika — the unsung heroes of Latimer County, fighting the good fight one notarized page at a time. May their motion be granted, their checks clear, and their kids never get in a car again without a pre-nup and a dashcam.
Case Overview
-
Cody Day
individual
Rep: pro se
-
Waurika Ragan
individual
Rep: pro se
-
Felecia Clark
individual
Rep: null
| # | Cause of Action | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | negligence | injuries and damages from automobile accident |