CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
PITTSBURG COUNTY • CJ-2026-00030

STATE OF OKLAHOMA, EX REL. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION v. ETERNAL HOSPITALITY LLC FORMERLY D/B/A MOTEL 6

Filed: Feb 17, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s be real: when you’re staying at a Motel 6, you’re not expecting a spa weekend with turn-down service and a minibar stocked with artisanal gummy bears. You’re looking for a clean bed, a working shower, and maybe—maybe—a continental breakfast that doesn’t taste like regret. But what you’re definitely not expecting is that the motel itself is so financially unhinged it owes the state of Oklahoma over $23,000 in unpaid taxes, prompting the Oklahoma Tax Commission to storm into court like the IRS on a caffeine bender.

Yes, folks. The State of Oklahoma, via its tax enforcers, has dragged not one, not two, but four defendants into Pittsburg County District Court—all connected to the Motel 6 in McAlester—over a tangled web of unpaid sales tax, lodging tax, and withholding tax. And the numbers? They’re not just bad. They’re epic. We’re talking $23,351.59 in sales tax alone for one individual, plus another $16,513.59 in lodging tax for the business, and interest piling up like dirty towels in Room 12. This isn’t just a case of “forgot to file the forms.” This is a full-blown tax dumpster fire with receipts missing, warrants flying, and a motel that somehow still has a Yelp page.

So who are these players in this fiscal farce? On one side, we’ve got the Oklahoma Tax Commission—the state’s financial hall monitor—represented by attorney Taylor Thomas, who’s probably been sipping strong coffee and muttering “again?” since 2022. On the other side? A corporate game of musical chairs involving two LLCs and two men with a growing list of tax problems. First up: Eternal Hospitality LLC, formerly doing business as Motel 6, run by Patel Navnitkumar, who’s named both as an individual and as the managing member of the LLC. Then there’s Nandi’s LLC, which took over operations of the same Motel 6 location in December 2024 under a lease agreement, run by Nandi Sarthak, also named individually and as an officer. Oh, and fun fact: both LLCs are “not in good standing” with the Oklahoma Secretary of State. That’s the legal equivalent of having your driver’s license suspended but still insisting you’re a safe driver.

The story starts—like so many tax nightmares do—with money that was collected but never paid. According to the filing, these defendants had a legal duty to collect sales tax, lodging tax, and withholding tax (that’s the tax businesses are supposed to withhold from employee paychecks and send to the state). And they did collect it. Guests paid. Employees got paid. But somewhere between the cash register and the state treasury, the money… vanished. Poof. Like a motel towel left on the floor after checkout.

The Tax Commission says Eternal Hospitality LLC failed to file sales tax returns for periods stretching from September 2022 to September 2024, racking up $24,544.74 in unpaid taxes, penalties, and interest in Pittsburg County alone. Patel Navnitkumar, personally? He’s on the hook for $23,351.59 in sales tax debt—yes, the exact amount from the hook—plus penalties, because apparently, owing the state isn’t a one-time mistake but a recurring hobby. Then there’s the lodging tax—a tax specifically on short-term stays, which, surprise, this motel specializes in—where Eternal Hospitality LLC owes $16,513.59 for just one month of unreported revenue: November 2024. Let that sink in. One month. One tax bill. Over 16 grand. That’s not a clerical error. That’s either a math problem or a moral one.

And just when you think it can’t get weirder, enter Nandi’s LLC—the new operator, which took over the lease in December 2024 but is already in the crosshairs for $2,285.25 in unpaid sales tax for September 2025. Wait—September 2025? The lawsuit was filed in February 2026. That means the tax period they’re being sued for hadn’t even ended yet when the warrant was issued. Either the Tax Commission has a time machine, or someone really messed up the dates. (We’re going with “messing up dates” being a theme here.)

So why are we in court? Because the Tax Commission isn’t just asking for a “please send money” email. They’re asking the judge for injunctive relief—which, in plain English, means: shut this place down until they pay up and file their damn taxes. They want the court to order the defendants to stop operating the motel, to file all missing returns, and to stop destroying or hiding any financial records. They also want to freeze the defendants’ assets so they can’t just sell the property and vanish into the night like tax fugitives. And yes, they want the full amount owed—plus interest, penalties, and their attorney fees. Because nothing says “I’m serious” like billing the people who already can’t pay.

Now, is $23,351 a lot? In the grand scheme of corporate tax evasion, maybe not. But for a single Motel 6 in McAlester, Oklahoma—a town with a population under 20,000—it’s massive. That’s enough to buy 425 nights of rooms at their advertised $48 rate (though, as one guest noted, they actually charge $75, so make it 311 nights). It’s enough to pay a full-time employee for over a year. It’s enough to upgrade every pillow in the place and still have change for a new lobby air freshener that doesn’t smell like stale cigarettes.

But here’s the real kicker: the motel is still open. Still taking reservations. Still collecting taxes from guests—presumably—while owing tens of thousands to the state. And the online reviews? Oh, they’re a treasure. One guest said the front desk clerk was asleep and incoherent. Another said they were booked into an occupied room. One review literally says, “Someone had previously went #2 in the toilet and didn’t flush!” And yet, the “response from the owner” is always the same cheerful corporate nonsense: “We appreciate your feedback! We’ll work to improve!” Meanwhile, the state is trying to shut them down for financial noncompliance, and the toilet’s still full of yesterday’s regrets.

Our take? This case is less “tax evasion thriller” and more “business management horror story.” The most absurd part isn’t even the unpaid taxes—it’s that this operation is still running at all. How do you owe the government $23k, have your LLCs in bad standing, get multiple tax warrants, and still think it’s a good idea to respond to a one-star review about a poop-filled toilet with a cheerful “We’re glad you enjoyed your stay!”? It’s like the Titanic sending out a Yelp reply: “Thanks for sailing with us! Hope the iceberg didn’t ruin your evening!”

We’re not rooting for the Tax Commission because we love bureaucracy. We’re rooting for them because someone has to be the adult in the room. And right now, the room is a Motel 6 in McAlester, the lights are out, the toilet’s broken, and the owners are missing in action—financially, legally, and possibly morally. If this place doesn’t get shut down, we may need to start a GoFundMe: Help Us Flush This Motel.

Case Overview

Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Pittsburg County, Oklahoma
Filing Attorney
Relief Sought
$0 Monetary
$0 Punitive
Injunctive Relief
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Petition for Injunctive Relief and Recovery of Indebtedness Plaintiff seeks to recover unpaid taxes and penalties from Defendants

Petition Text

4,810 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF PITTSBURG COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA STATE OF OKLAHOMA, EX REL. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION, PLAINTIFF, VS. ETERNAL HOSPITALITY LLC FORMERLY D/B/A MOTEL 6, PATEL NAVNITKUMAR, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE MANAGING MEMBER OF ETERNAL HOSPITALITY LLC FORMERLY D/B/A MOTEL 6; AND NANDI’S LLC D/B/A MOTEL 6; NANDI SARTHAK, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AN OFFICER OF NANDI’S LLC D/B/A MOTEL 6; DEFENDANTS. CASE NO [C-216-30] JUDGE: Hogan PETITION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND RECOVERY OF INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW, Plaintiff, the STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ex rel. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION, by and through its Counsel, Taylor Thomas, and for its cause of action against Defendants, ETERNAL HOSPITALITY LLC FORMALLY D/B/A MOTEL 6 and PATEL NAVNITKUMAR, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS OFFICER OF ETERNAL HOSPITALITY LLC FORMERLY D/B/A MOTEL 6, as well as NANDI’S LLC D/B/A MOTEL 6 and NANDI SARTHAK, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS OFFICER OF NANDI’S LLC D/B/A MOTEL 6, (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Defendants”) alleges and states as follows. INTRODUCTION AND JURISDICTION 1. That the Oklahoma Tax Commission is an Agency of the State of Oklahoma. The Oklahoma Tax Commission is authorized and required to enforce the Oklahoma Tax Code. See 68 O.S. §§ 101, 102. 2. That this Petition is filed pursuant to the Oklahoma Tax Commission’s statutory authority to collect unpaid taxes, namely: a. When a taxpayer fails to make state-required returns and/or reports, the Oklahoma Tax Commission may petition the District Court of the taxpayer’s county of residence for an order compelling the taxpayer to do so. See 68 O.S. § 222. b. That when state-imposed taxes go unpaid and/or corresponding returns are not filed, the Oklahoma Tax Commission may initiate injunction proceedings against the delinquent party until said obligations have been satisfied. See 68 O.S. § 232. c. That when unpaid taxes become delinquent, the Oklahoma Tax Commission may issue a warrant, which carries the same force as a court judgment, against the noncompliant party. See 68 O.S. § 231. 3. That Defendant Patel Navnitkumar operates Eternal Hospital LLC, a domestic LLC, not in good standing with the Oklahoma Secretary of State. 4. That tax warrants have been filed against Defendant Eternal Hospitality LLC in Pittsburg County, Oklahoma. 5. That tax warrants have been filed against Defendant Patel Navnitkumar in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma. 6. That Defendant Eternal Hospitality LLC’s principal place of business was in Pittsburg County, Oklahoma doing business as Motel 6 until leasing the property at 1400 S. George Nigh Expressway, McAlester, Oklahoma 74501-7406 (hereinafter referred to as “the Motel”) to Defendant Nandi’s LLC. 7. That Defendant Patel Navnitkumar has had, and continues to have, direct control, supervision, and responsibility for withholding, collecting, remitting taxes, and filing returns on behalf of the business to the State of Oklahoma for Eternal Hospitality LLC. 8. That Defendant Nandi Sarthak Individual is operating Nandi’s LLC, a domestic LLC, not in good standing with the Oklahoma Secretary of State and currently doing business as Motel 6. 9. That Defendant Nandi Sarthak has had, and continues to have, direct control, supervision, and responsibility for withholding, collecting, remitting taxes, and filing returns on behalf of the business to the State of Oklahoma. 10. That a tax warrant has been filed against Defendant Nandi’s LLC in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma. 11. That Defendant Nandi’s LLC currently operates the principal place of business in Pittsburg County, Oklahoma. 12. That Defendants, Nandi’s LLC and Nandi Sarthak, leased the building located at 1400 S. George Nigh Expressway, McAlester, Oklahoma 74501-7406 beginning on November 30, 2024, from Defendants, Eternal Hospitality LLC and Patel Navnitkumar, for the price of $8,250.00 rent per month. See Exhibit A. 13. That Defendant Nandi’s LLC lease with Defendant Eternal Hospitality LLC does not end until October 31, 2027. See Exhibit A. 14. That pursuant to the foregoing, jurisdiction and venue is proper with this Court. See 12 O.S. §§ 134, 731-942, 2020; 68 O.S. §§ 215(a), 222, 231(K). FACTS SALES TAX 15. That Defendants have a duty to collect and remit sales tax to the State of Oklahoma. See 68 O.S. §§ 1361, 1365. 16. That Defendants have collected sales tax on behalf of the State of Oklahoma and failed to remit those taxes to the State of Oklahoma. 17. That Defendants have failed to file its sales tax returns as required by law. WITHHOLDING TAX 18. That Defendants principally operate the business in Pittsburg County, Oklahoma. 19. That as a business with employees, Oklahoma law requires Defendants to file quarterly withholding returns and remit payment to the Oklahoma Tax Commission. See 68 O.S. §§ 2385.1-2386. Defendants have failed to file and withhold taxes as required by Oklahoma law. LODGING TAX 20. That Defendants have a duty to collect and remit lodging tax to the State of Oklahoma. See 68 O.S. § 1370.9. 21. That Defendants have collected lodging tax on behalf of the State of Oklahoma and failed to remit those taxes to the State of Oklahoma. 22. That Defendants have failed to file its sales tax returns as required by law. RECOVERY OF INDEBTEDNESS 23. That tax warrants filed by the Oklahoma Tax Commission have the same force and effect as court judgments. See 68 O.S. § 230. Therefore, as a creditor, the Oklahoma Tax Commission requests all remedies to which it is lawfully entitled. 24. That the following tax warrants have been filed against Defendants: <table> <tr> <th>EXPENSE WARRANT</th> <th>COUNTY</th> <th>PAYEE</th> <th>TAX TYPE</th> <th>PERIODS</th> <th>DUE BY</th> <th>BALANCE</th> </tr> <tr> <td>B</td> <td>1108756480</td> <td>Pittsburg</td> <td>Eternal Hospitality LLC</td> <td>Sales</td> <td>06/2024-09/2024</td> <td>11/19/2024</td> <td>$298.88</td> </tr> <tr> <td>C</td> <td>542197760</td> <td>Oklahoma</td> <td>Patel Navnitkumar</td> <td>Sales</td> <td>09/2022-11/2023; 06/2024-09/2024</td> <td>01/22/2025</td> <td>$23,351.59</td> </tr> <tr> <td>D</td> <td>1848494080</td> <td>Pittsburg</td> <td>Eternal Hospitality LLC</td> <td>Sales</td> <td>09/2022-11/2023</td> <td>04/18/2025</td> <td>$24,544.74</td> </tr> <tr> <td>E</td> <td>1078110208</td> <td>Pittsburg</td> <td>Eternal Hospitality LLC</td> <td>Lodging</td> <td>11/2024</td> <td>12/31/2025</td> <td>$16,513.59</td> </tr> <tr> <td>F</td> <td>1142761472</td> <td>Oklahoma</td> <td>Nandi’s LLC</td> <td>Sales</td> <td>09/2025</td> <td>12/02/2025</td> <td>$2,285.25</td> </tr> </table> 25. That interest on the tax warrant balances has been calculated to February 12, 2026, and continues to accrue on the unpaid tax at the rate of (15%) per annum. 26. That the above-referenced tax warrants have been filed in accordance with the laws of the State of Oklahoma. See 68 O.S. § 231(K) (stating that “the Tax Commission shall have all of the remedies and may take all the proceedings thereon for the collection thereof which may be had or taken upon a judgment of the district court.”) 27. That the total amount due and owing will not be known until Defendants file all returns as required by law, or alternatively, the State elects to assess Defendants for the unfiled returns. The Oklahoma Tax Commission reserves its right to issue further tax warrants against Defendants for current and future indebtedness. 28. That the Oklahoma Tax Commission requests that all necessary actions be maintained against Defendants to collect the full amount of indebtedness, together with interest and penalties, and for the costs of this action. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 29. That upon knowledge and belief, Defendants have continued business operations despite the tax violations described herein. See Exhibit G. 30. That the Oklahoma Tax Commission requests an order enjoining Defendants from operating for failure to file and pay reports and/or returns as required by Oklahoma law. See 68 O.S. § 232. 31. That the Oklahoma Tax Commission further requests an order requiring Defendants to file all reports and returns required by Oklahoma law. See 68 O.S. § 222. 32. That the Oklahoma Tax Commission further requests that Defendants and all representatives be restrained and enjoined, whether acting directly or indirectly, from destroying, erasing, falsifying, writing over, mutilating, concealing, altering, transferring, or otherwise disposing of, in any manner, documents, including electronically stored materials that relate to: the business, business practices, assets, or business or personal finances of any Defendant unless expressly approved by this Court. See 12 O.S. § 1381. 33. That the Oklahoma Tax Commission further requests that the Court issue an order enjoining and restraining Defendants’ transfer, disposition, or concealment of any money or property belonging to Defendant or the State of Oklahoma without prior approval of this Court. See 12 O.S. § 852. 34. That the Oklahoma Tax Commission further requests that notice be affixed to Defendant Business’s entrance(s) upon being enjoined from operation. See 12 O.S. § 1381. 35. That the Oklahoma Tax Commission, if successful upon its Petition for Injunction, requests that bond be required and posted with the Oklahoma Tax Commission before this Court’s injunction is lifted. See 68 O.S. § 210. REQUEST FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Oklahoma Tax Commission respectfully requests that (a) Defendants and all agents, employees, successors, assigns, servants, attorneys and all others under Defendants’ control be enjoined from any and all business operations; (b) the Court order Defendants to file all delinquent reports and returns pursuant to 68 O.S. § 222; (c) the Court issue an order under 12 O.S. § 852 enjoining and restraining Defendants’ transfer, disposition, or concealment of any money or property belonging to any Defendant or the State of Oklahoma without prior approval of this Court; (d) Defendants be ordered to pay the costs of this action, together with the Oklahoma Tax Commission’s attorney fees as governed by 12 O.S. §§ 936(B), 942; (e) all necessary actions be maintained against Defendants to collect the full amount of indebtedness, together with interest and penalty as provided by 68 O.S. § 231(K) and other Oklahoma law; and (f) this Court grants Plaintiff all other relief permissible under Oklahoma law and deemed proper by this Court. Respectfully submitted, OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION Taylor Thomas, OBA #35753 201 W. 5th St. Ste. 400 Tulsa, OK 74103 Telephone: (918) 581-2979 Facsimile: (918) 303-0395 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff VERIFICATION STATE OF OKLAHOMA ) COUNTY OF TULSA ) Taylor Thomas, being duly sworn on oath, states that she is an attorney for the Oklahoma Tax Commission; that she has read the foregoing pleading and is familiar with the contents thereof; and that the matters and things stated therein are true and correct to the best of her knowledge. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 12th day of February 2026. Notary Public Taylor Thomas, OBA #35753 Assistant General Counsel Oklahoma Tax Commission 201 W. 5th St. Ste. 400 Tulsa, OK 74103 Telephone: (918) 581-2979 Facsimile: (918) 303-0395 Email: [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiff HOTEL LEASE AGREEMENT This Lease Agreement is made between ETERNAL HOSPITALITY LLC (Organized under the State of Oklahoma) with office at 4505 REDWOOD CT., IRVING, TX 75038, hereby referred to as Owner and NANDI’S LLC (Organized under the State of Oklahoma) hereby referred to as Renter, and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. (1) Duration : - In consideration of the covenants hereinafter contained on the part of the Resident to be kept and performed, the term of this lease shall commence on the December 1st 2024 and expire at 12.00 A.M. midnight on October 31st 2027. (2) Monthly Rent : - Renter shall pay rent of $8,250.00 (Eight Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars) per month in advance on the 5 days of each month. Payment shall be made via Check payable to ETERNALHOSPITALITYLLC. (3) Security Deposit : - Owner hereby acknowledges receipt from Renter of $10,000.00 (Ten Thousand Dollars) as security for renter full faithful performance of each and every term, covenant and condition of this Lease. In the event that Renter shall default in the payment of any installment of rent when due, or shall fail to perform and / or observe any term / covenant or condition of this Lease on Renter’s part ot be kept and / or observed, Owner may use, apply or retain the whole or any part of Renter’s security deposit for the payment of any rent and / or additional rent or at time thereafter due, or for the satisfaction of other sums which Owner may expend or be required to expend or incur by reason of Renter’s default hereunder, including any expenses in the relating of the hotel. In the event that Renter shall fully and faithfully comply with all of the terms, provisions, covenants and conditions of the Lease, the said security deposit (or any balance thereof) shall be returned to Renter within Fourteen (14) days after expiration of the terms of the lease and vacation of the premises by tenant or after 14 days that the said landlord learns that the premises has been abandoned, and shall provide a written statement describing the basis for retaining any deposit. The security deposit shall be refunded only if, PLAINTIFF’S EXHIBIT #A A. A Thirty (30) days written notice of intention of vacating is given by Renter to the Owner prior to the expiration of this lease. B. The keys are promptly returned to the Owner; and C. The hotel and its contents are found, upon inspection, to be in good, clean condition with no unusual ordinary wear and tear expected. (4) Payment:- Landlord shall be responsible for the following payment and services in connection with the premises: - Insurance - Property Tax Renter shall be responsible for the following utilities and services in connection with the premises: - Payroll - Telephone - Internet & TV Cable - Water and Sewer - Garbage - Landscaping - All other utilities and services not listed under the Landlords responsibility Renter acknowledges that Landlord has fully explained to the Renter the utility rates, charges and services for which Renter will be required to (If any), other than those to be paid directly to the utility company furnishing the service. (5) Right of Entry : - Owner may enter the Premises in the event of an emergency and during reasonable hours to make necessary repairs, alteration, or agreed to services to Premises or upon any other portion of the building, which may require access through the Premises. Unless impractical to do so, Owner shall endeavor to provide notice to Renter and attempt to obtain Renter’s prior consent for entry. Consent may be presumed from the Renter’s failure to object to access after reasonable notice is given. The Renter may not unreasonably deny access to the Premises. (6) Restriction on Use : - Renter shall not violate the quiet enjoyment of other renters. Renter shall not violate any criminal or civil law, ordinance or statute in the use and occupancy of the Premises. Renter shall keep the Premises as clean and sanitary as conditions of premises permit, and shall not commit waste or nuisance, annoy, molest, disrupt or interfere with any other renter or neighbor. (7) Repair : - Renter shall alert Owner to defective or dangerous conditions on the Premises. Renter shall make alteration, additions or improvements in or to the Premises without the prior written consent of the Owner. Owner will pay for repairs and maintenance to Premises beyond normal wear and tear, unless such damage is caused by the abuse or neglect of the Renter. The Renter shall be liable to the owner for any such damage caused by Renter’s lack of due care. (8) Condition of Rental Property : - The Renter hereby acknowledges that the said property is in good condition. If there is anything about the condition of the property that is not good, they agree to repost it to the Landlord within Three (3) days of taking possession of the property. They agree that failure to file any written notice of defects will be legally binding proof that the property is in good condition at the time of occupancy. (9) Return of Property : - Renter shall keep the Premises, Furniture, Furnishings, Appliances and Fixtures, which are rented for Renter’s exclusive use, in good order and conditions. Renter shall vacate the Premises, remove all trash and debris from the Premises and return the property to the Owner in the same condition as when Renter took possession, except for normal wear and tear. Renter shall pay Owner for the costs of repair, replacement or rebuilding of any portion of the premises damaged by Renter. Renther’s guests or invitees or by Renter’s personal property. If Renter fails to surrender the Premises to Owner on the expiration date as required by this Section 11, Renter agrees to hold Owner harmless from any and all damages including but not limited to succeeding Renter’s Claims. (10) Indemnification : - Renter shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Owner from and against any claims demand, cause of action, loss or liability (including attorney’s fees and expenses of litigation) for any property damage or personal injury on the Premises by any cause or arising out of conduct of renter(s), their guests and invitees, except to the extent caused by Owner’s gross negligence or willful misconduct. The provisions of this Article shall survive the termination of this Agreement with respect to any claims or liability accruing before such termination. (11) Waiver : - No failure of the Owner to exercise or enforce any of its rights under this Agreement shall act as a waiver of subsequent breaches; and the waiver of any breach shall not act as waiver of subsequent breaches. Owner’s acceptance of rent with knowledge of a default by Renter shall not constitute a waiver of any breach. (12) Severability : - In the event any provision of this Agreement is held by a court or other tribunal of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable, that provision will be enforced to the maximum extent permissible under applicable law, and the other provisions of this Agreement will remain in full force and effect. The parties further agree that in the event such provision is an essential part of the Agreement, they will begin negotiation for a suitable replacement provision. (13) Entire Agreement : - This Agreement represents the entire understanding relating to the subject matter hereof and prevails over any prior or contemporaneous, conflicting or amendment signed by the party against whom enforcement of such modification is sought. (14) Assignment : - Renter may not, without the prior written consent of Owner, transfer or assign this Agreement or any part thereof, given to Renter hereunder. Renter may not sublet the Premises or any part thereof, without the prior written consent of Owner, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any attempt to transfer, assign or sublet without consent shall be a material default of this Agreement and shall be void. (15) Headings : - Paragraph headings used in this Agreement are for reference only and shall not be used or relied upon in the interpretation of this Agreement. (16) Counterparts : - This Agreement and any amendment thereof, may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same document. Renter acknowledges receipt of a copy of this Agreement and acknowledges having read and understood the foregoing. ETERNALHOSPITALITYLLC Navnitbhai Patel Printed Name ____________________________ Signature _____________________________________________ Owner Title 12/01/2024 Date NANDI'S LLC Sarthak Nandi Printed Name ____________________________ Signature _____________________________________________ Owner Title 12/01/2024 Date OKLAHOMA Tax Commission PO Box 26930 Oklahoma City Oklahoma 73126 Pittsburg County FEIN/SSN: **-**7691 Taxpayer: ETERNAL HOSPITALITY LLC Tax Warrant: 1108756480 Date Assessed: November 19, 2024 THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA TO: The County Clerk of Pittsburg County, Oklahoma Whereas, the above named taxpayer(s) is indebted to the State of Oklahoma for Sales Tax with penalties and interest thereon computed to date, for the period(s) and in the amount(s) as follows: STS-16026968-06 06/01/2024 - 09/30/2024 <table> <tr> <th>Total Tax:</th> <td>$ 8,769.26</td> </tr> <tr> <th>Interest to Date of Issuance:</th> <td>$ 227.75</td> </tr> <tr> <th>Penalties to Date of Issuance:</th> <td>$ 876.91</td> </tr> <tr> <th>Tax Warrant Penalty:</th> <td>$ 200.00</td> </tr> <tr> <th>Filing Fee:</th> <td>$ 36.00</td> </tr> <tr> <th>Total Amount Due:</th> <td>$ 10,109.92</td> </tr> </table> Interest continues to accrue on the total tax until paid and additional penalties may accrue as authorized by Oklahoma law. Now therefore, you are directed to record and index this warrant in the same manner as a judgment, using the name(s) of the delinquent taxpayer(s) shown above, name of the tax, the amount of the tax, interest and penalties for which the warrant is issued, and the date and time when filed. In witness whereof, the Oklahoma Tax Commission has caused this writ to be subscribed and duly attested, with the seal of said commission affixed this December 19, 2024. Oklahoma Tax Commission: [signature] Assistant Secretary PLAINTIFF’S EXHIBIT #B OKLAHOMA Tax Commission PO Box 26930 Oklahoma City Oklahoma 73126 Oklahoma County FEIN/SSN: ***-**-3190 Taxpayer: PATEL, NAVNITKUMAR C Tax Warrant: 542197760 Date Assessed: January 22, 2025 THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA TO: The County Clerk of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma Whereas, the above named taxpayer(s) is indebted to the State of Oklahoma for Sales Tax with penalties and interest thereon computed to date, for the period(s) and in the amount(s) as follows: STS-16026968-06 09/01/2022 - 11/30/2023, 06/01/2024 - 09/30/2024 Total Tax: $14,156.05 Interest to Date of Issuance: $4,450.16 Penalties to Date of Issuance: $2,199.89 Tax Warrant Penalty: $200.00 Filing Fee: $36.00 Total Amount Due: $21,042.10 Interest continues to accrue on the total tax until paid and additional penalties may accrue as authorized by Oklahoma law. Now therefore, you are directed to record and index this warrant in the same manner as a judgment, using the name(s) of the delinquent taxpayer(s) shown above, name of the tax, the amount of the tax, interest and penalties for which the warrant is issued, and the date and time when filed. In witness whereof, the Oklahoma Tax Commission has caused this writ to be subscribed and duly attested, with the seal of said commission affixed this January 28, 2025. Oklahoma Tax Commission: Jesi Kring Assistant Secretary PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT #C OKLAHOMA Tax Commission PO Box 26930 Oklahoma City Oklahoma 73126 Pittsburg County FEIN/SSN: **-**7691 Taxpayer: ETERNAL HOSPITALITY LLC Tax Warrant: 1848494080 Date Assessed: April 18, 2025 THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA TO: The County Clerk of Pittsburg County, Oklahoma Whereas, the above named taxpayer(s) is indebted to the State of Oklahoma for Sales Tax with penalties and interest thereon computed to date, for the period(s) and in the amount(s) as follows: STS-16026968-06 06/01/2022 - 11/30/2023 Total Tax: $ 14,156.05 Interest to Date of Issuance: $ 5,859.33 Penalties to Date of Issuance: $ 2,737.60 Tax Warrant Penalty: $ 200.00 Filing Fee: $ 36.00 Total Amount Due: $ 22,988.98 Interest continues to accrue on the total tax until paid and additional penalties may accrue as authorized by Oklahoma law. Now therefore, you are directed to record and index this warrant in the same manner as a judgment, using the name(s) of the delinquent taxpayer(s) shown above, name of the tax, the amount of the tax, interest and penalties for which the warrant is issued, and the date and time when filed. In witness whereof, the Oklahoma Tax Commission has caused this writ to be subscribed and duly attested, with the seal of said commission affixed this April 18, 2025. Oklahoma Tax Commission: [signature] Histor King Assistant Secretary PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT # D OKLAHOMA Tax Commission PO Box 26930 Oklahoma City Oklahoma 73126 Pittsburg County FEIN/SSN: **-**7691 Taxpayer: ETERNAL HOSPITALITY LLC Tax Warrant: 1078110208 Date Assessed: December 31, 2025 THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA TO: The County Clerk of Pittsburg County, Oklahoma Whereas, the above named taxpayer(s) is indebted to the State of Oklahoma for Lodging Tax with penalties and interest thereon computed to date, for the period(s) and in the amount(s) as follows: STH-16026968-07 11/01/2024 - 11/30/2024 <table> <tr> <th>Total Tax:</th> <td>$\quad$12,371.00</td> </tr> <tr> <th>Interest to Date of Issuance:</th> <td>$\quad$2,339.03</td> </tr> <tr> <th>Penalties to Date of Issuance:</th> <td>$\quad$1,237.10</td> </tr> <tr> <th>Tax Warrant Penalty:</th> <td>$\quad$200.00</td> </tr> <tr> <th>Filing Fee:</th> <td>$\quad$36.00</td> </tr> <tr> <th>Total Amount Due:</th> <td>$\quad$16,183.13</td> </tr> </table> Interest continues to accrue on the total tax until paid and additional penalties may accrue as authorized by Oklahoma law. Now therefore, you are directed to record and index this warrant in the same manner as a judgment, using the name(s) of the delinquent taxpayer(s) shown above, name of the tax, the amount of the tax, interest and penalties for which the warrant is issued, and the date and time when filed. In witness whereof, the Oklahoma Tax Commission has caused this writ to be subscribed and duly attested, with the seal of said commission affixed this December 31, 2025. Oklahoma Tax Commission: Jeri King Assistant Secretary OKLAHOMA Tax Commission PO Box 26930 Oklahoma City Oklahoma 73126 Oklahoma County FEIN/SSN: **-***8739 Tax Warrant: 1142761472 Taxpayer: NANDI'S LLC Date Assessed: December 2, 2025 THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA TO: The County Clerk of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma Whereas, the above named taxpayer(s) is indebted to the State of Oklahoma for Sales Tax with penalties and interest thereon computed to date, for the period(s) and in the amount(s) as follows: STS-16016830-05 09/01/2025 - 09/30/2025 Total Tax: $ 1,833.51 Interest to Date of Issuance: $ 32.39 Penalties to Date of Issuance: $ 183.35 Tax Warrant Penalty: $ 200.00 Filing Fee: $ 36.00 Total Amount Due: $ 2,285.25 Interest continues to accrue on the total tax until paid and additional penalties may accrue as authorized by Oklahoma law. Now therefore, you are directed to record and index this warrant in the same manner as a judgment, using the name(s) of the delinquent taxpayer(s) shown above, name of the tax, the amount of the tax, interest and penalties for which the warrant is issued, and the date and time when filed. In witness whereof, the Oklahoma Tax Commission has caused this writ to be subscribed and duly attested, with the seal of said commission affixed this December 2, 2025. Oklahoma Tax Commission: Jeri King Assistant Secretary PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT # F Google review summary 3.9 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 418 reviews Reviews on other travel sites Priceline 7.2/10 · 101 reviews Tripadvisor 5/5 · 1 review Reviews Search reviews All Nightlife (6) Breakfast (34) Fitness (18) Property (161) Atmosphere (23) Dining (16) Restaurant (20) Cleanliness (118) Service (115) + 14 more Most recent All reviews Kaitlyn Tippin a week ago on Google Vacation | Family The lady at the front desk was asleep in the back we could see her from the desk we banged and yelled and could not get her to answer. We called the phones twice. She finally got up and she was so incoherent that you couldn’t understand ... Read more Mariah a month ago on Google Absolutely worst motel 6 I’ve ever been to. PLEASE DO NOT STAY HERE- From the moment we stepped inside I was very underwhelmed. The lobby stunk like cigarettes and the employees looked very disheveled and unprofessional. ... Read more Motel 6 McAlester, OK - South Additionally, we regret that our staff did not meet your expectations in terms of professionalism. We will reinforce our training to ensure that all team members present themselves in a manner that reflects our commitment to guest satisfaction. If you would like to discuss your experience further, please feel free to reach out to us at [email protected]. We value your feedback and hope to have the opportunity to restore your faith in our brand. Thank you for bringing these issues to our attention. Sincerely, Team G6 Rich connors 2 months ago on Google 3/5 Vacation | Family Everything was clean, the beds were comfortable. Pillows could use updating though. Other than that, it was perfect for us. Just needing to crash overnight only cost 55 bucks can't beat that. Rooms 3.0 Service 3.0 Location 4.0 Hotel highlights Great value Response from the owner 2 months ago Thank you for choosing us to stay. We highly appreciate your wonderful ratings. And we are happy to hear that you enjoyed your stay with us. We can't wait to welcome you back for another unforgettable experience! Jeremy Ward #TeamG6 Glenda Mobbs 2 months ago on Google 1/5 Business | Family Location was the only positive about this place. First, the lobby left much to be desired. Not very clean and old and run down looking. Then, the clerk booked us into a room that was already occupied. Trying to unlock the door, we hear a ... Read more Response from the owner 2 months ago Thank you for sharing your experience. We’re sorry to hear that your stay did not meet your expectations and appreciate your honest feedback. We take your comments seriously and will work on addressing these issues to improve our guests’ comfort and overall experience. Jeremy Ward Advertising $48 when you call they charge $75. Of course they want to blame the President. Don't advertise $48 very misleading. We'll is just a lie. Service 1.0 C Ray Wiseman 2 months ago on Google Solo Decent at best Response from the owner 2 months ago Gee, we really do love getting such positive feedback! We're glad your experience was a good one and hope to see you again real soon. Sarah Jacobs #Team6 Aaron kreger 2 months ago on Google Friends Oh where to begin! Checked in and went to our FIRST room. The only working light was in the headboard. Then there was the Toilet. Someone had previously went #2 in the toilet and didn't flush! I discovered it was because the toilet wouldn't ... Read more Darrell Snow Edited 3 months ago on Google Business | Solo Very nice and very helpful. Very accommodating. Highly recommend. The room was very clean. And very comfortable with no issues. Rooms 5.0 Service 5.0 Location 5.0 Hotel highlights Luxury · Quiet · Great value Jeffrey Taylor 3 months ago on Google Business | Couple Motel 6 McAlester, OK - South $43 · Feb 19–20 View prices
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.