CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
KAY COUNTY • CS-2026-00191

LVNV Funding LLC v. Dave D Cassady

Filed: Mar 12, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut straight to the drama: a man in Oklahoma is being sued for $4,100.73 — not by a bank, not by a friend, not even by a shady ex-roommate — but by a company called LVNV Funding LLC, which sounds less like a financial entity and more like a suspiciously named cryptocurrency scam that pops up in your Instagram DMs at 2 a.m. And get this — they didn’t even lend him the money. They just… bought the debt. Like it was a slightly used PlayStation on Facebook Marketplace. Welcome to America, folks, where your credit card bill can be resold like concert tickets during scalper season.

So who are we talking about here? On one side, we’ve got Dave D. Cassady — a regular guy from Kay County, Oklahoma, whose name sounds like he should be a retired high school football coach or a minor character in a John Grisham novel. We don’t know much about Dave, except that at some point in 2020, he opened a credit account with Citibank, presumably to buy something — maybe a new HVAC unit, maybe a flat-screen TV, maybe a very expensive collection of cowboy boots. What we do know is that things went sideways. He stopped paying. The account went into default. And then, like a financial game of hot potato, Citibank decided they didn’t want to deal with Dave’s unpaid balance anymore and sold it — along with a whole portfolio of other delinquent accounts — to a third-party debt buyer. Enter: LVNV Funding LLC.

Now, LVNV Funding LLC is not a bank. It’s not even pretending to be one. It’s a debt collection company — or more accurately, a debt purchaser. These companies specialize in buying up bundles of defaulted consumer debt for pennies on the dollar, then trying to collect the full amount (plus interest and fees) from the original borrowers. Think of it like someone buying a box of expired coupons at a garage sale and then trying to use them at Target like they’re still valid. Only in this case, it’s legal. And court-enforceable. And backed by a law firm with six attorneys listed on the petition, like this is some kind of corporate Avengers team assembling to take down one man’s credit card bill.

According to the court filing, LVNV claims that Dave owes them exactly $4,100.73 — down to the penny, like they’ve been auditing his soul. They say Citibank originally extended credit to him back in March 2020 (right around the time the world shut down and everyone started stress-buying sourdough starters and Pelotons). At some point, Dave stopped making payments. Then, in August 2025 — yes, 2025, which means this lawsuit was filed after that date, so buckle up, we’re living in the future — LVNV or one of its financial ancestors bought the debt as part of a larger portfolio. Now, nearly six years after the account was opened and after who-knows-how-many dunning letters and automated calls, they’ve decided it’s time to take Dave to court.

The legal claim here is as straightforward as a highway billboard: indebtedness. That’s legalese for “you owe us money and won’t pay, so we’re suing.” LVNV isn’t accusing Dave of fraud, theft, or identity theft. They’re not saying he burned down their office or mailed them a live raccoon. They’re simply asserting that the debt exists, that they legally own it, and that Dave hasn’t paid. They’ve even attached an affidavit — signed by someone named Janet Cortez, who claims to be an authorized representative — swearing that all this is true based on their business records. It’s a standard playbook move in debt collection lawsuits: file the petition, attach the affidavit, demand judgment. No drama, no witnesses, no need for a trial — at least, not if Dave doesn’t show up to defend himself.

And what do they want? $4,100.73. Plus interest. Plus court costs. Plus a “reasonable attorney’s fee,” which, given that six lawyers are listed on the filing, could theoretically be enough to buy a small island in the Caribbean. But let’s keep it real: is $4,100 a lot? In the grand scheme of civil lawsuits, it’s chump change. Billionaires settle bigger disputes over parking spots. But for an individual? That’s a car down payment. That’s a year of rent in a studio apartment in Ponca City. That’s a lot of gas, groceries, and GoFundMe campaigns. And yet, it’s also not so much that it’s unimaginable — which makes this case such a perfect example of the quiet, grinding machinery of consumer debt in America. This isn’t a high-stakes corporate battle. It’s not even a messy breakup over a shared Netflix account. It’s the financial equivalent of a papercut — small, annoying, and somehow so much worse because of how it keeps stinging.

Now, here’s where things get deliciously absurd. LVNV Funding LLC didn’t lend Dave a single dime. They weren’t there when he swiped the card in 2020. They didn’t offer him 0% APR for 18 months or send him birthday cards with fake money inside. They just bought the debt from Citibank — likely for a fraction of the $4,100.73 they’re now suing for. Maybe they paid $1,000 for it. Maybe $500. Maybe a slightly used toaster and a case of energy drinks. We don’t know. But here’s the kicker: if they win, they get to collect the full amount. Not what they paid. Not a fair market value. The whole enchilada. And if the court awards them attorney’s fees? That’s extra profit. This isn’t just debt collection — it’s debt speculation. It’s financial vulture capitalism at its most efficient.

And let’s talk about the timing. The assignment happened in August 2025. The lawsuit was filed in January 2026. That means LVNV waited all of five months before pulling the trigger. No long campaign of letters. No escalating calls. No “we’ve tried to work with you” sob story. Just: bought your debt, now pay up or see you in court. It’s less “let’s resolve this” and more “checkmate, debtor.”

So what’s our take? Honestly, we’re torn. On one hand, if Dave did rack up a credit card bill and just ghosted it, then sure, he should pay. Debts aren’t magic disappearing acts. But on the other hand — come on. This whole system is bananas. A guy gets sued by a company that didn’t lend him money, represented by a law firm with more attorneys than a mid-sized corporation, over a debt that was literally traded like a stock. And the whole thing hinges on an affidavit signed by someone named Janet Cortez, who we’ve never met, whose only job seems to be certifying that yes, according to the computer, Dave owes money. It’s like the Saw franchise, but with spreadsheets.

We’re not rooting for deadbeats. But we’re also not thrilled about a legal system that lets faceless debt buyers weaponize old credit lines like financial landmines. If Dave shows up in court with a receipt proving he paid it off, or a letter saying the debt was discharged, or even just a solid alibi from 2020 (look, we all lost track of time during the pandemic), then good for him. But if he doesn’t? If he misses the hearing or doesn’t know how to respond? Then LVNV wins by default, collects the money, and goes hunting for their next target.

And that’s the real story here. This isn’t about $4,100.73. It’s about how easy it is for ordinary people to get caught in a machine designed to extract every last penny — not because they’re evil, but because the system rewards whoever files the paperwork first. So congrats, LVNV. You’ve got your lawsuit. Now let’s see if Dave shows up to fight for his future — or if he’s already ghosted this one too.

Case Overview

$4,101 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Kay County, OKLAHOMA
Relief Sought
$4,101 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 debt collection plaintiff seeks to collect $4,100.73 from defendant

Petition Text

553 words
25-60529-0 ZH1 010 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF KAY COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA LVNV Funding LLC, Plaintiff, vs. Dave D Cassady, Defendant. PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for its cause of action against the defendants alleges and states as follows: 1. Citibank, N.A., provided credit to the defendant on account number XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX5019. The Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $4,100.73. An Affidavit of Account and/or contract is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $4,100.73, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment, all court costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Gracelyn Porras Dillingham, #35852- Jenifer A. Gani, #021876 Daniela Westfahl, #36242 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405-720-0565 E-Mail: [email protected] IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT IN AND FOR KAY COUNTY, OK LVNV Funding LLC Plaintiff vs. Dave D Cassady Defendant(s) PLAINTIFFS AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT I am an Authorized Representative for LVNV Funding LLC (hereafter the "Plaintiff"), and hereby certify as follows: 1. I have personal knowledge regarding Plaintiff's creation and maintenance of its normal business records, including computer records of its accounts receivable. This information is regularly and contemporaneously maintained during the course of Plaintiff's business. I am authorized to execute this affidavit on behalf of Plaintiff and the information below is true and correct based on the Plaintiff's business records. 2. In the regular course of business, Plaintiff regularly acquires revolving credit accounts, installment accounts, service accounts, and/or other credit lines or obligations. The records provided to Plaintiff at the time of acquisition are represented to include information provided by the original creditor and/or its successors-in-interest. Such information includes the debtor's name and social security number, the account balance, the identity of the original creditor and the account number. 3. Based on the business records maintained on account XXXXXXXXXXXXX5019 (hereafter, the "Account"), which are a compilation of the information provided to Plaintiff upon acquisition and information obtained since acquisition, the Account is the result of the extension of credit to Dave D Cassady by Citibank, N.A. on or about 03/09/2020. Said business records further indicate that the Account was then owned by Citibank, N.A.. Citibank, N.A. later sold and/or assigned Portfolio 46191, which included the Defendant's Account, to Plaintiff or Plaintiff's predecessor(s)-in-interest on 08/20/2025. Thereafter, all ownership rights were assigned to, transferred to and became vested in Plaintiff, including the right to collect the balance owing of $4,100.73 plus any legally permissible interest. 4. Based on the business records maintained in regard to the Account, the above stated amount is justly and duly owed by the Defendant to the Plaintiff and all just and lawful offsets, payments and credits to the Account have been allowed. Demand for payment was made more than thirty days ago. Janet Cortez January 21, 2026 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by the above-signed on Wednesday, January 21, 2026. (Notary Public) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.