Brenda Carol Harris v. Integris Baptist Medical Center, Inc.
What's This Case About?
Let’s be clear: this is not a story about a patient who walked into a hospital, had a routine procedure, and things just went sideways. No. This is the story of a woman who went in for a relatively common outpatient surgery—and left in a body bag, after a cascade of alleged medical failures so dramatic it sounds like a Grey’s Anatomy season finale written by someone who really hates hospitals. An entire team of doctors, nurses, anesthesiologists, and a hospital system are now being sued for negligence after Billie Faye Harris died during what was supposed to be a straightforward arm procedure—followed by a chaotic, last-ditch attempt to save her with a heart-lung machine that, according to the lawsuit, came too late and didn’t last long enough. And now, her family wants answers—and $200,000 in damages.
Billie Faye Harris wasn’t a mystery patient. She was a resident of Oklahoma County, a woman with a medical history that, while not detailed in the filing, clearly involved kidney issues—because the surgery she went in for on October 10, 2022, was a revision of a brachiocephalic AV fistula in her left arm. For the uninitiated: that’s a surgically created connection between an artery and a vein, usually in the arm, designed to make dialysis easier for patients with kidney failure. It’s not brain surgery—but it is surgery, and it requires anesthesia. Billie’s sister, Brenda Carol Harris, is now suing as the personal representative of Billie’s estate, claiming that what should have been a routine outpatient fix turned into a fatal disaster due to a chain of medical missteps.
Here’s how it allegedly went down. Billie showed up at Integris Baptist Medical Center in Oklahoma City for her fistula revision, expecting to be in and out the same day. Dr. James Daniel Shepherd was listed as the surgeon. Dr. James B. Pate was handling anesthesia, with physician assistant Caitlyn Kohake assisting. Everything seemed on track—until, as the petition puts it, “some difficulty with anesthesia” occurred. That’s medical-ese for things went wrong fast. According to the filing, an endotracheal tube had to be placed—meaning they had to intubate her, likely because she stopped breathing or her airway collapsed. Then, within minutes, her heart started failing. A “code blue” was called—the hospital’s emergency signal that a patient is in cardiac arrest. CPR began. And then, about 30 minutes into the crisis, the hospital deployed the big guns: ECMO.
ECMO—extracorporeal membrane oxygenation—is basically a heart-lung bypass machine used in extreme emergencies. It oxygenates the blood outside the body and pumps it back in, giving the heart and lungs a chance to rest or recover. It’s not something you whip out for a minor scare. It’s for when someone is this close to flatlining. And while it’s impressive tech, it’s not a magic wand. The petition claims that ECMO was only run for about two hours—and then, abruptly, it was discontinued. Billie Faye Harris was pronounced dead shortly after.
Now, the lawsuit doesn’t claim that the anesthesia issue itself was the sole cause of death—though it certainly didn’t help. Instead, the core of the case hinges on two alleged failures: first, that the medical team didn’t handle the initial procedure and anesthesia properly, leading to the cardiac arrest; and second, that once the crisis hit, the response was too little, too late. Specifically, the plaintiffs argue that ECMO should have been initiated sooner and continued longer—and that the delay or premature discontinuation may have cost Billie her life. The list of defendants reads like a hospital org chart: not just the surgeon and anesthesiologist, but the entire ECMO team—Dr. Ammar Sharif, Dr. Mircea Mihu, Dr. Laura Swant, Dr. Marc Maybauer, Dr. Aly El Banayosy—all named for their roles in the life-support effort. Even Meagan Williams, an advanced practice nurse, is included for her involvement in the ECMO treatment. And then there’s Integris Baptist Medical Center itself, which is being sued not just for the actions of its staff, but for its own alleged negligence—failing to enforce proper care protocols, failing to monitor patient safety, and possibly failing to ensure that life-saving interventions like ECMO were used appropriately.
So what exactly is Brenda Harris asking for? The petition demands at least $100,000 in actual damages—covering medical bills, funeral costs, and the emotional toll of losing her sister under such traumatic circumstances. But here’s the kicker: she’s also asking for another $100,000—or more—in punitive damages. That’s not about compensation. That’s about punishment. Punitive damages are the legal system’s way of saying, “You didn’t just mess up—you acted recklessly, or with gross negligence, and we need to slap you hard enough that you don’t do it again.” The filing accuses the defendants of “wanton and gross negligence,” suggesting this wasn’t just a tragic accident, but a preventable failure of care on multiple levels.
Now, is $200,000 a lot in a medical malpractice case? In most states, no—many such lawsuits seek millions. But Oklahoma has a cap on non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases (though it’s been legally shaky in recent years), and $100,000 is still a significant sum, especially when you consider this was an outpatient procedure. The fact that the family is pushing for punitive damages suggests they’re not just after money—they’re after accountability. They want someone to admit that this wasn’t just bad luck. That a chain of errors, delays, and poor decisions turned a survivable situation into a death.
And honestly? The most absurd part of this whole thing isn’t even the number of doctors named—it’s the sheer bureaucratic whiplash of the case’s history. This lawsuit was first filed in October 2024—and then dismissed because the plaintiffs didn’t serve the defendants in time. Now it’s being refiled under a legal loophole that lets you restart a case if it was dismissed due to a technicality. So we’re not just dealing with a medical tragedy—we’re dealing with a legal do-over. Imagine being one of those doctors, thinking the case was over, only to get served again a year later. That’s not just stressful—it’s the legal equivalent of a jump scare.
Look, we’re not doctors. We can’t say whether ECMO should’ve been started five minutes earlier or run for five hours longer. But what we can say is this: when you have ten medical professionals and a hospital system all named in a wrongful death suit over a routine procedure, something went very, very wrong. Whether it was incompetence, miscommunication, or just a perfect storm of bad decisions, the result was the same: a woman went in for an arm surgery and never came home. And now, her family is left asking why it took so long to intubate, why ECMO was delayed, and why it was turned off so quickly. They’re not just suing for money—they’re suing for answers. And in a system where accountability is often buried under jargon and legal defenses, that might be the hardest thing to get. We’re rooting for the truth to come out—because Billie Faye Harris deserved better than to become a cautionary tale in a hospital’s incident report.
Case Overview
-
Brenda Carol Harris
individual
Rep: Thomas J. Steece
- Integris Baptist Medical Center, Inc. business
- James Daniel Shepherd, MD individual
- Ammar Sharif, MD individual
- Mircea Mihu, MD individual
- Laura Swant, DO individual
- Marc Maybauer, MD individual
- Aly El Banayosy, MD individual
- James B. Pate, MD individual
- Caitlyn Kohake individual
- Meagan Williams individual
| # | Cause of Action | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Negligence | Medical malpractice resulting in death |