CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
WAGONER COUNTY • CS-2026-00248

PCA Acquisitions V, LLC v. Kristopher Stouten

Filed: Feb 24, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s get one thing straight: a company named PCA Acquisitions V, LLC—which sounds less like a real business and more like a hedge fund villain from a John Grisham novel written by someone who really loves Roman numerals—is suing a guy named Kristopher Stouten for $3,672.94… over a debt they bought from someone else after it was already in default. That’s right—this isn’t even Synchrony Bank coming to collect. This is a debt buyer, stepping in like a vulture at a financial car crash, picking up the scraps for pennies on the dollar, and now demanding full price. And if that doesn’t scream “late-stage capitalism sitcom,” we don’t know what does.

So who are these people? On one side, we’ve got Kristopher Stouten, a regular human being presumably living his life in Oklahoma, minding his own business, possibly forgetting about a credit card he once had with Synchrony Bank—maybe one of those store cards you sign up for at a mattress warehouse because “no interest for 24 months!” sounds too good to pass up. Fast forward, the payments stop, the balance balloons, and boom—default. Meanwhile, on the other side of this legal showdown, we have PCA Acquisitions V, LLC, which—despite the dramatic “V” in its name—appears to be one of those shadowy debt-buying companies that specialize in purchasing defaulted accounts for a fraction of their face value and then suing people to collect the full amount. Think of them as the used car salesmen of the financial world: they didn’t sell you the car, they didn’t finance it, but now they’re holding the keys and demanding you pay in full.

The relationship between these two parties? Nonexistent. Zero. Nada. Kristopher never signed a contract with PCA Acquisitions. He didn’t agree to anything with them. He probably didn’t even know they existed until he got served with this lawsuit in 2026. The only connection is that Synchrony Bank—after deciding it couldn’t collect the debt—sold it off to PCA, who then decided to sue. It’s like if you owed your buddy $50 for concert tickets, didn’t pay him back, so he sold your IOU to a stranger at a pawn shop, and now that stranger is showing up at your door with a lawyer and a spreadsheet.

Now, let’s walk through the drama. According to the filing, Kristopher had a credit account—account number ending in 7688, because of course it does—with Synchrony. He stopped making payments. The account went into default. At some point, Synchrony decided it wasn’t worth the hassle of chasing him down and sold the debt to PCA Acquisitions V, LLC. Now, PCA—armed with an affidavit, a sense of purpose, and a whole lot of legal templates—has filed a petition in Wagoner County District Court demanding $3,672.94. That’s the number. That’s the magic figure. They’re not asking for $3,673. They want $3,672.94, down to the penny, like they’ve been tracking this like a hawk since the dawn of time. And just to cover their bases, they’re also asking for interest (at the statutory rate, whatever that is in Oklahoma), court costs, and a “reasonable attorney’s fee,” because why sue for a few thousand bucks if you can’t squeeze a little extra out of the system?

The legal claim here is called a “Petition for Indebtedness,” which is legalese for “you owe us money and we want a judge to make you pay.” It’s not fancy. It’s not complicated. It’s the civil court equivalent of “Hey, we have paperwork saying you owe this, so cough it up.” No fraud allegations. No breach of contract drama. No accusations of identity theft or shady lending practices. Just a straightforward “you didn’t pay, we bought the debt, now pay us.” The evidence? An affidavit from someone named James Norris, who claims to be an “Authorized Rep” of PCA Acquisitions (which, by the way, is incorporated in Delaware—home of corporate ghosts and tax loopholes), swearing that yes, the records show Kristopher owes this amount, and yes, they bought the debt after it defaulted, and yes, their computer systems are very reliable. It’s all very… corporate. Very boilerplate. Very “we’ve done this 4,327 times this month.”

So what does PCA want? $3,672.94. Is that a lot? Well, it’s not nothing. That’s a car repair. That’s a vacation to somewhere with a beach. That’s a year of Netflix, Hulu, Disney+, and three streaming services you’ve never heard of. But in the world of debt collection lawsuits? That’s chump change. This isn’t a million-dollar fraud case. This isn’t a breach of contract between two Fortune 500 companies. This is a single individual being sued for an amount that, while not trivial, is small enough that hiring a lawyer might cost more than just settling. And yet—here we are. A full-blown court case. A notarized affidavit. A team of six attorneys listed on the petition (yes, six—William L. Nixon, Jr., Harley L. Homjak, Alexander M. Hall, Jenifer A Gani, Mariah S. Ellicott, and Benjamin F. Brackett—all from the same firm, Love, Beal & Nixon, P.C., which must have a very efficient assembly line for these filings). For $3,672.94.

Now, here’s our take: the most absurd part of this case isn’t that someone is being sued for a credit card debt. That happens every day. It’s not even that the debt was sold to a third party—also common. No, the absurdity lies in the theater of it all. The Roman numeral in the company name. The army of attorneys. The notarized affidavit from a Delaware rep who’s never met Kristopher Stouten but swears under penalty of perjury that the computer records are accurate. The fact that this is happening in 2026, over a debt that likely went bad years earlier. It’s like watching a full-scale military operation launched to retrieve a lost library book. The machinery of the legal system—designed for serious disputes, for protecting rights, for resolving complex conflicts—is being used to collect a mid-sized credit card balance through a company that didn’t even extend the original credit.

And honestly? We’re rooting for the underdog. We’re rooting for Kristopher Stouten. Not because he definitely didn’t owe the money—maybe he did. Maybe he maxed out a credit card and ghosted it. But because this whole setup feels like a glitch in the Matrix. A man vs. a faceless entity with a Roman numeral in its name, represented by six lawyers, all billing by the hour, chasing $3,672.94 like it’s the Holy Grail. If Kristopher shows up in court with a printout from his bank showing he already paid it, or a letter from Synchrony saying the debt was forgiven, or even just a solid “I don’t remember this, show me the original contract,” we’ll be fist-pumping from our couch. Because sometimes, the most heroic thing you can do in a civil court is make a debt collector actually prove their case.

But let’s be real: this probably ends with a default judgment. Kristopher doesn’t show up, the judge signs the order, PCA gets their judgment, and maybe—maybe—they collect. Or maybe the debt gets sold again. Maybe next year, PCA Acquisitions VI, LLC sues him for the same amount. At this rate, they could go all the way to XVII. And somewhere, in a cubicle in Delaware, a man named James Norris will sign another affidavit, and the machine will keep grinding.

We’re entertainers, not lawyers. But if this were a TV show, we’d call it “The Debt That Ate Wagoner County.” And we’d binge it in one sitting.

Case Overview

$3,673 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Wagoner County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$3,673 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Petition for Indebtedness PCA Acquisitions V, LLC is seeking $3,672.94 from Kristopher Stouten for unpaid credit

Petition Text

541 words
Wagoner County, Oklahoma Filed in District Court FEB 24 2026 James E. Hight Court Clerk 25-56524-0 ZH1 013 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF WAGONER COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA PCA Acquisitions V, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. Kristopher Stouten, Defendant. No. CS-2L-248 PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for its cause of action against the defendants alleges and states as follows: 1. Synchrony, provided credit to the defendant on account number XXXXXXXXXXXXXX7688. The Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $3,672.94. An Affidavit of Account and/or contract is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $3,672.94, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment, all court costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Alexander M. Hall, #33900 Jenifer A Gani, #021876 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405/720-0565 Fax: 405/720-9570 E-Mail: [email protected] AFFIDAVIT OF MERIT CURRENT ACCOUNT HOLDER: PCA ACQUISITIONS V, LLC ORIGINAL ACCOUNT NUMBER: XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-7688 Name: KRISTOPHER STOUTEN Defendant The undersigned, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am a Authorized Rep of PCA Acquisitions V, LLC (hereafter the "Plaintiff") and have personal knowledge of the facts herein from my review of the information in the possession of plaintiff pertaining to the account referred to below. 2. Plaintiff purchased the receivable after it was in default from, Synchrohny Bank, and succeeded to all rights that Plaintiff's assignor had against Defendant. 3. This action is based upon a credit agreement entered into between Defendant and the credit grantor. Pursuant to the agreement, Defendant agreed to pay monthly installments to the credit grantor. Upon information and belief, Defendant failed to make payments due pursuant to the agreement. 4. In the performance of my duties, I am familiar with the manner and method by which Plaintiff creates and maintains its normal business books and records, including computer records of its collection accounts. Plaintiff maintains computer records of activity on the accounts that occurred since it purchased the accounts, including payments received, amounts owing on such accounts, credits and debits, and also has computer records of the information that Plaintiff acquired from its assignor. Entries are made in such computer records only by individuals who have examined the account information at or near the time the events reflected in them occurred or who have relied on account information from Plaintiff's assignor. Plaintiff's records were made in the regular course of business and it was the regular course of such business to make the records. 5. The balance, after all prior payments and credits have been allowed, due and owing to Plaintiff from Defendant is $3,672.94. PCA Acquisitions V, LLC STATE OF Delaware ) COUNTY OF New Castle ) ss Given under my hand on: Dated: 12-9-25 Affiant Name (Printed) James Norris Affiant Name (Signature) Title of Affiant Authorized Rep Subscribed and sworn to before me on this 9 day of December, 2023. Notary Public My Commission Expires: 04/26 Dylan B Roberts NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF DELAWARE My Commission Expires 08/10/2026
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.