CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
TULSA COUNTY • CJ-2025-781

Xpert Plumbing, L.L.C. v. Seayco-THF Eastside Market Shops, LLC

Filed: Feb 25, 2025
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut straight to the drama: a plumbing company is trying to collect $52,764 from a BBQ joint that apparently feasted on ribs but forgot to pay the plumber. Yes, you read that right—this isn’t a joke sketch from a late-night comedy bit. This is a real, live lawsuit filed in Tulsa County, where the fate of a restaurant and a plumbing bill are about to get grilled in court. And while no one’s accusing anyone of stealing brisket, someone definitely skipped out on the check—and now the pipes are about to burst, legally speaking.

So who are these players in this culinary-construction showdown? On one side, we’ve got Xpert Plumbing, L.L.C., a Tulsa-based plumbing outfit that apparently doesn’t mess around when it comes to unpaid invoices. They’re the kind of company that shows up, fixes your leaky kitchen line, installs the grease trap, and expects a prompt “thank you” in the form of a check. On the other side, we have CCBQ Restaurant, LLC, doing business as Clark Crew BBQ, which—based on their name—sounds like a group of pitmasters who bonded over smoked meat and backyard football. They operate out of a leased space at 10825 E. 71st Street in Tulsa, a spot owned by Seayco-THF Eastside Market Shops, LLC, the landlord in this tangled tale. And because real estate drama isn’t complete without a government cameo, the Tulsa County Treasurer is also named—apparently just to cover all the bases in case there are unpaid taxes on the property. Think of them as the silent observer in the back row, sipping sweet tea and waiting to see who ends up owning what.

Now, let’s talk about what went down. According to the filing, back in December 2024—yes, this December, meaning this lawsuit dropped faster than a brisket off the smoker—Xpert Plumbing showed up to do work for Clark Crew BBQ. The exact nature of the plumbing project isn’t spelled out in glorious detail (we’re left to imagine if it was a clogged grease line, a faulty water heater, or a full kitchen re-plumb), but the key point is this: they did the job. They provided labor, materials, equipment—the whole nine yards. And they did it under what they’re calling an oral contract, which is legalese for “we shook hands and said ‘you fix it, I’ll pay you.’” No fancy paperwork, no signed agreement. Just trust. And maybe a sample of burnt ends.

But here’s where the smoke clears and the stench of betrayal sets in: after the work was done, Xpert sent over the invoice. And then… nothing. Radio silence. Crickets. No payment. No “we’re short this month,” no “let’s set up a payment plan,” not even a passive-aggressive Yelp review. Just $52,764.00 in unpaid bills. That’s not chump change—it’s enough to buy a decent food truck, renovate a small kitchen, or, let’s be honest, a lot of pulled pork sandwiches. So Xpert, probably tired of chasing a check while their own bills piled up, did what any self-respecting contractor does: they slapped a mechanic’s lien on the property. That’s not a fancy barbecue sauce—it’s a legal claim that says, “Hey, I did work on this building, and if I don’t get paid, I get to come after the property itself.” It’s like putting a parking boot on a building.

Now, why are they in court? Let’s break it down like a poorly assembled sandwich. First, breach of contract—Xpert claims they had a deal with Clark Crew BBQ to do the work, and Clark Crew BBQ agreed to pay. Work was done. Payment wasn’t made. That’s textbook breach. Second, unjust enrichment—this is the legal version of “you can’t enjoy the benefits without paying for them.” Xpert is arguing that both the restaurant and the landlord (Seayco) benefited from the plumbing upgrades. Even if the landlord didn’t sign anything, if the building is now worth more or functions better because of the work, they can’t just sit back and say “not my problem.” And third, foreclosure on the mechanic’s lien—this is the nuclear option. Xpert wants the court to officially recognize their lien and, if necessary, force a sale of the property interest to recover what they’re owed. It’s not that they want to kick the BBQ crew out and turn the place into a plumbing supply store—they just want their money. Or, failing that, a piece of the real estate pie.

And what do they want? $52,764.00. In the grand scheme of civil lawsuits, that’s not a jaw-dropping number—no yachts or private islands at stake here. But for a small business? That’s serious cash. For a restaurant, especially one that might still be finding its footing, that’s the difference between staying open and closing the smoker for good. For a plumbing company, that’s payroll, equipment, and maybe a few tanks of gas for the work van. So while it’s not “Scandal-level” money, it’s absolutely life-altering for the businesses involved. And let’s not forget: Xpert also wants attorney’s fees and court costs. So if they win, Clark Crew BBQ could be on the hook for even more.

Now, here’s our take—because let’s be real, we’re not just court reporters, we’re drama reporters. The most absurd part of this whole mess? The fact that a BBQ restaurant—a place where people go to celebrate, to unwind, to eat meat off the bone with their hands—might get tangled up in a lien foreclosure because someone couldn’t cut a check. Imagine the irony: patrons are chowing down on $22 smoked tri-tip while lawyers are arguing over whether the grease trap was properly paid for. And let’s talk about the oral contract. In 2024. In a commercial project worth over fifty grand. Nobody thought to email a proposal? A single PDF? A “Hey, here’s what we’ll do and what it’ll cost”? That’s like ordering a custom wedding cake with a handshake and hoping for the best.

Are we rooting for the plumber? Honestly—yes. They showed up, did the work, and got stiffed. That’s not on. But also, major side-eye to Clark Crew BBQ. If you’re running a restaurant and you can’t manage vendor payments, maybe the problem isn’t the plumbing—it’s the business plan. And to the landlord, Seayco: if you’re leasing space to a tenant who can’t pay their contractors, maybe it’s time to review your tenant screening process. Because now you’re in the lawsuit too, and your property has a lien on it. That’s not great for resale value—or for your relationship with other contractors.

At the end of the day, this isn’t just about pipes and payments. It’s about accountability. It’s about the quiet heroes of the small business world—the plumbers, the electricians, the HVAC guys—who keep the lights on and the toilets flushing, only to get ghosted when the bill comes. So while this case may not have blood, it’s got heat. And if Clark Crew BBQ doesn’t settle up soon, they might find themselves the main course in a legal feast they never signed up for.

Case Overview

$52,764 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$52,764 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Breach of Contract Xpert Plumbing, L.L.C. claims that CCBQ RESTAURANT, LLC d/b/a CLARK CREW BBQ breached a contract by failing to pay for plumbing services.
2 Unjust Enrichment Xpert Plumbing, L.L.C. claims that CCBQ RESTAURANT, LLC d/b/a CLARK CREW BBQ and Seayco-THF Eastside Market Shops, LLC were unjustly enriched by receiving benefits from Xpert's work without paying for it.
3 Foreclosure on the Mechanic's Lien Xpert Plumbing, L.L.C. seeks to foreclose on a mechanic's lien it placed on CCBQ RESTAURANT, LLC d/b/a CLARK CREW BBQ's property due to unpaid plumbing services.

Petition Text

907 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA XPERT PLUMBING, L.L.C., an Oklahoma limited liability company, Plaintiff, vs. SEAYCO-THF EASTSIDE MARKET SHOPS, LLC, a foreign limited liability company registered to do business in Oklahoma; and CCBBQ RESTAURANT, LLC d/b/a CLARK CREW BBQ, a foreign limited liability company registered to do business in Oklahoma; TULSA COUNTY TREASURER, Defendants. PETITION Plaintiff, Xpert Plumbing, L.L.C. ("Xpert") hereby submits its Petition and for their causes of action against Seayco-THF Eastside Market Shops, LLC ("Seayco"), CCBQ Restauand I.L.C d/b/a Clark Crew BBQ ("CCBQ") and the Tulsa County Treasurer ("TCT")(collectively the "Defendants") and further states as follows: JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. Xpert is an Oklahoma limited liability company with its principal place of business in Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma. 2. Defendant Seayco is a foreign limited liability company registered to do business in Oklahoma with a principal place of business in Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma. 3. Defendant CCBQ is a foreign limited liability company registered to do business in Oklahoma with a principal place of business in Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma. 4. Defendant Tulsa County Treasurer may have some claim to the Property referenced herein by virtue of unpaid real estate taxes on the Property. 5. This case arises out of a breach of contract for work performed by Xpert on Seayco’s property located in Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma and for its Tenant, CCBQ. 6. Venue and jurisdiction are therefore proper in this Court. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 7. Xpert is a Tulsa based plumbing company which plumbing services to contractors in Tulsa, Oklahoma. 8. Seayco is the owner of property located at 10825 E. 71st Street, Tulsa, OK 74133, and more particularly described in Exhibit A hereto ("Property"). 9. CCBQ is a restaurant located at 10825 E. 71st Street, Tulsa, OK 74133, which leases premises from Seayco and which specializes in serving BBQ to the public. 10. On or about December 2, 2024, Xpert provided labor, material and equipment to CCBQ on the Property (the "Project") owned by Seayco on an open account in exchange for monetary payment ("Contract"). 11. After completing the Project, Xpert invoiced CCBQ for the labor, material, equipment and services it provided pursuant to the Contract. 12. To date, CCBQ has paid none of the invoices Xpert issued to it and as of the date of the filing of this lawsuit, CCBQ remains in arrears to Xpert in the amount of $52,764.00 ("Outstanding Balance"). 13. Xpert has placed a mechanic's lien on the Property ("Mechanic's Lien") as a result of CCBQ's failure to pay the Outstanding Balance. 14. As a result of CCBQ’s breach of Contract and failure to pay the Outstanding Balance, Xpert has been damaged in the amount of $52,764.00. COUNT I - BREACH OF CONTRACT 15. Xpert realleges and restates each and every allegation and statement set forth in paragraphs 1 through 14 above. 16. Xpert and CCBQ entered into an oral contract wherein Xpert agreed to perform certain services for CCBQ, including labor, material and supplies, and CCBQ agreed to pay Xpert for its services. 17. CCBQ breached the Contract by failing to pay the Outstanding Balance to Xpert. 18. As a result of CCBQ’s breach of contract, Xpert has suffered damages in an amount of $52,764.00. WHEREFORE, premises considered Xpert prays that this Court (1) enter judgment in favor of it and against CCBQ for all actual damages on Xpert’s cause of action Breach of Contract, and (2) that Xpert be awarded its reasonable attorney fees and costs for prosecuting this action, and for all such other and further legal or equitable relief as this Court deems proper. COUNT II - UNJUST ENRICHMENT 19. Xpert realleges and restates each and every allegation and statement set forth in paragraphs 1 through 18 above. 20. CCBQ and Seayco benefitted from the work of Xpert. 21. As a result of receiving these benefits from the work of Xpert, CCBQ and Seayco were unjustly enriched. 22. As a result of CCBQ’s and Seayco’s unjust enrichment, Xpert has suffered damages in the amount of $52,764.00. WHEREFORE, premises considered, Xpert prays that this Court (1) enter judgment in favor of it and against CCBQ and Seayco for all actual damages on Xpert’s cause of action Unjust Enrichment, and (2) that Xpert be awarded its reasonable attorney fees and costs for prosecuting this action, and for all such other and further legal or equitable relief as this Court deems proper. COUNT III - FORECLOSURE ON THE MECHANIC’S LIEN 23. Xpert realleges and restates each and every allegation and statement set forth in paragraphs 1 through 22 above. 24. CCBG is in default under the Contract and, therefore, Xpert is entitled to foreclose on the Mechanic’s Lien. 25. Because the Property underlying CCBQ’s lease is owned by Seayco, Seayco and TCT may claim some right, title or interest in the Property. 26. To the extent Seayco and TCT claim some right, title or interest in the Property, their interests, if any, are inferior and subordinate to the rights of Xpert. WHEREFORE, premises considered, Xpert prays that this Court (1) enter judgment in its favor and against CCBQ, Seayco and TCT for all actual damages on Xpert’s cause of action, (2) enter an order foreclosing on Xpert’s Mechanic’s Lien, and (3) that Xpert be awarded its reasonable attorney fees and costs for prosecuting this action, and for all such other and further legal or equitable relief as this Court deems proper. Respectfully submitted, [signature] Brian L. Mitchell, OBA # 19529 Jean Walpole Coulter, OBA # 9324 Mitchell Legal, PLLC 203 E. Hobson Ave. Sapulpa, OK 74066 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.