CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
HARPER COUNTY • CJ-2026-00004

Pinney Trucking, LLC v. Chance Brown and General, Inc.

Filed: Mar 5, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s be real: someone got trucked in this story—just not the way you think. A trucking company is suing a man and his corporation for $13,225 because, apparently, hauling equipment across Oklahoma is not a charitable service. And yet, here we are, in Harper County District Court, where the drama of unpaid invoices unfolds like a daytime soap opera with diesel fumes.

Pinney Trucking, LLC—the plaintiff in this tale of fiscal betrayal—is a small trucking outfit based in Skiatook, Oklahoma. They move stuff. Big stuff. Probably heavy. Definitely important enough that people hire them to do it. On the other side of this legal rodeo are the defendants: Chance Brown, a man who lives in Laverne (population: “you’ve never heard of it”), and his business, General, Inc.—a company so generically named it sounds like it was created in a high school economics class during a power outage. Chance, we’re told, owns the corporation, which operates out of a highway-adjacent building that probably has a flickering neon sign and at least one broken window. It’s the kind of place where you wouldn’t be surprised to see a forklift parked next to a pickup with muddy tires and a bumper sticker that says “I Brake for Nobody (Literally).”

So what happened? Well, between June and August of 2025—summer in Oklahoma, when the roads shimmer like mirages and your AC either works or you pray—Chance Brown and General, Inc. called up Pinney Trucking and said, “Hey, we need some equipment moved. You good for that?” Pinney Trucking said yes, because that’s their job, and also because rent exists. Over the course of five separate hauls, Pinney Trucking did what truckers do: they loaded up, drove across state lines (or at least county lines—again, we don’t know how far, but let’s assume it involved at least one Waffle House stop), and delivered whatever needed delivering. Could’ve been oilfield gear. Could’ve been industrial mixers. Could’ve been 13,225 dollars’ worth of garden gnomes. The filing doesn’t say. But whatever it was, it got hauled.

And then came the part where someone was supposed to pay.

Spoiler: they didn’t.

Instead, Chance Brown and General, Inc. apparently looked at the invoice, shrugged, and said, “Eh, we’ll get to it,” which in legal terms translates to “we are now defendants in a civil lawsuit.” Pinney Trucking sent the bill. It went unpaid. They followed up. Still nothing. No explanation. No apology. Just silence—the kind that echoes louder than a semi backfiring at dawn. After months of radio silence, Pinney Trucking did what any self-respecting Oklahoma business does when wronged: they lawyered up.

Enter Loyed E. “Trey” Gill III—a man whose name sounds like a country music stage persona but who is, in fact, a real-life attorney with a real-life law firm called Bond | Gill | Rule (yes, really). Trey filed the petition on January 1, 2026, because nothing says “fresh start” like suing someone right after New Year’s. The legal claims? Two of them, and both sound like Latin phrases your high school Latin teacher used to intimidate you with.

First up: Quantum Meruit, which literally means “as much as he deserved.” In plain English? “We did the work, you got the benefit, now pay us what we’re owed.” It’s not about a written contract—it’s about fairness. Even if there was no formal agreement with signatures and notarized seals and all that jazz, the idea is that when you ask someone to do a job and they do it, you can’t just ghost them like a bad Tinder date. You owe them money. That’s how society works. Or at least, that’s how it’s supposed to work.

Second claim: Unjust Enrichment—which sounds like a rejected boy band name but is actually the legal way of saying, “You got something good, you knew it was good, you kept it, and you didn’t pay for it. That’s not cool.” Pinney Trucking argues that by accepting the services—five separate times, mind you—Chance Brown and General, Inc. benefited from the work, appreciated the benefit (we assume, since they didn’t call and say “Hey, we don’t need this delivered after all”), and then straight-up refused to compensate the people who made it happen. That, the law says, is unjust. And also kind of rude.

Now, let’s talk about what Pinney Trucking actually wants. $13,225. Is that a lot? Well, in the world of trucking, that’s not a king’s ransom, but it’s not pocket change either. That’s two months’ rent for a decent warehouse. That’s a new set of tires for a semi (okay, maybe just one fancy tire—those things cost more than your phone). That’s also about 265 hours of minimum wage labor. Point is: it’s real money. And on top of that, they’re asking for attorney’s fees, court costs, and interest—because when you force someone to sue you, you don’t just owe the original bill. You owe the emotional toll, the paperwork, the gas to drive to court, and the existential dread of being named in a lawsuit titled Pinney Trucking, LLC v. Chance Brown and General, Inc. That last one might not be legally recoverable, but it should be.

Here’s the kicker: there’s no jury trial demanded. This isn’t going to be a courtroom showdown with dramatic cross-examinations and surprise witnesses. It’ll likely be a judge, some paperwork, and maybe a bored court clerk sipping coffee in the background. But that doesn’t make it less entertaining. Because the real story here isn’t about money—it’s about principle. Or pride. Or possibly just exhaustion. Pinney Trucking didn’t sue because they’re greedy. They sued because they got stiffed. And in the world of small businesses, especially in industries like trucking where margins are thin and trust is currency, letting something like this slide can set a dangerous precedent. Next time, it might be $20,000. Or $50,000. Or suddenly, everyone starts thinking they can just… not pay.

So what’s the most absurd part? Honestly? That we’re even talking about this. $13,225. Five hauls. One unpaid invoice. One lawsuit. One attorney named “Trey Gill III” filing papers on New Year’s Day like he’s ringing in the year with legal vengeance. And a company called General, Inc.—so vague it might as well be named “Business Stuff LLC” or “We Do Things Corp.”

But also? We’re rooting for the truckers. Not because they’re saints. Not because we know the full story. But because someone worked for their money. They showed up. They hauled the thing. And someone else benefited. And in a world where too many people try to slide through life on charm and evasion, sometimes the most radical act is just… paying your bills.

So here’s to Pinney Trucking, LLC—out here keeping Oklahoma moving, one invoice at a time. May your roads be clear, your brakes be strong, and your checks never bounce. And to Chance Brown and General, Inc.? Maybe next time, just pay the guy.

Case Overview

$13,225 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court in Harper County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$13,225 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Quantum Meruit Plaintiff seeks payment for trucking services rendered to Defendants
2 Unjust Enrichment Plaintiff seeks payment for trucking services rendered to Defendants

Petition Text

558 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR HARPER COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA PINNEY TRUCKING, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CHANCE BROWN, and GENERAL, INC., Defendants. Case No. CJ-2026-4 ATTORNEY’S LIEN CLAIMED PETITION COMES NOW the Plaintiff, PINNEY TRUCKING LLC, by and through its Attorney, Loyed “Trey” Gill, III of the firm BOND|GILL|RULE, and for its Petition against the Defendants, CHANCE BROWN and GENERAL, INC., alleges and states as follows: THE PARTIES 1. PINNEY TRUCKING LLC is a domestic limited liability company based in Skiatook, Osage County, Oklahoma. 2. CHANCE BROWN is an individual, resident of Laverne, Harper County, Oklahoma, and owner of GENERAL, INC. 3. GENERAL, INC. is a domestic corporation operating in Laverne, Harper County, Oklahoma at 2005 U.S. Highway 283 that is the subject of all acts in this claim. JURISDICTION 4. All acts, transactions and omissions complained of herein occurred in Harper County, State of Oklahoma, and this Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and venue is proper. FACTS 5. CHANCE BROWN and GENERAL, INC. hired Plaintiff, PINNEY TRUCKING LLC to haul equipment on its behalf on five separate dates between June and August of 2025. 6. CHANCE BROWN and GENERAL, INC. owe PINNEY TRUCKING LLC for the trucking services rendered. 7. CHANCE BROWN and GENERAL, INC. have refused to pay Plaintiff, PINNEY TRUCKING LLC for the services performed and owe $13,225.00 before interest, costs and attorney fees. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION – QUANTUM MERUIT 8. Plaintiff incorporates paragraphs 1-7 as if restated herein. 9. CHANCE BROWN and GENERAL, INC. offered to pay PINNEY TRUCKING LLC for trucking services to haul equipment throughout the state of Oklahoma. 10. PINNEY TRUCKING, LLC performed the trucking services to haul equipment for CHANCE BROWN and GENERAL, INC. 11. CHANCE BROWN and GENERAL, INC. have refused to pay the money owed to PINNEY TRUCKING, LLC. 12. PINNEY TRUCKING LLC has a claim for quantum meruit against Defendants grounded on a promise that the Defendants would pay to the Plaintiff for its services as much as Plaintiff should deserve. 13. Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 936, the Court is authorized to enter attorney’s fees against the Defendants CHANCE BROWN and GENERAL, INC. 14. WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Plaintiff requests judgment against the Defendants for the sum of $13,225.00, together with attorney’s fees, costs of this action, pre and post judgment interest, and for such other and further relief the Court deems just and proper in the premises. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION – UNJUST ENRICHMENT 15. Plaintiff incorporates paragraphs 1-14 as if restated herein. 16. Plaintiff is entitled to recover its money on a claim for unjust enrichment against Defendants. 17. PINNEY TRUCKING, LLC conferred a benefit to CHANCE BROWN and GENERAL, INC. by providing trucking services in the amount of $13,225.00. 18. Defendants appreciated the benefit in trucking services being rendered on their behalf. 19. Defendants accepted the benefit of the trucking services, and refuse to pay for the benefit. 20. CHANCE BROWN and GENERAL, INC. have been unjustly enriched to Plaintiff’s detriment as trucking sevices were rendered and Defendants have failed to pay for those services. 21. WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Plaintiff requests judgment against the Defendants for the sum of $13,225.00, together with attorney’s fees, costs of this action, pre and post judgment interest, and for such other and further relief the Court deems just and proper in the premises. FOR THE FIRM: LOYED E. “TREY” GILL III, OBA #20215 BOND | GILL | RULE 401 S. Boston Ave., Suite 2500 Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103 (918) 200-9626 [email protected]
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.