CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
MCCLAIN COUNTY • CJ-2025-00274

Carrie Aggee v. Christopher Brinlee, Amanda Brinlee

Filed: Nov 7, 2025
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut straight to the chase: a woman was mauled by two pit bulls while just existing on a property in Newcastle, Oklahoma — and now she’s suing the dog owners because, surprise, the dogs weren’t vaccinated for rabies, and she had to get a series of terrifying post-exposure shots that sound like something out of a zombie movie. Welcome to Crazy Civil Court, where the stakes are high, the injuries are real, and the dogs are not behaving.

Carrie Aggee, our plaintiff, is a regular human being who, on September 18, 2025 — yes, this case is from the future, but we’re rolling with it — decided to be in the right place at the absolute worst time. She was lawfully present at 1558 NW 17th Street, which we can only assume was someone’s home or maybe a friend’s property. She wasn’t breaking in. She wasn’t stealing chickens. She wasn’t teasing animals or moonwalking through a dog park like a lunatic. No. She was just… there. Minding her business. And then — boom — two pit bulls owned by Christopher and Amanda Brinlee, a married couple who apparently thought owning aggressive dogs was a lifestyle choice, not a public safety concern, decided she looked like a chew toy.

According to the petition, the dogs “suddenly and without provocation attacked” her. Let that sink in. No barking warning. No fence breach drama. Just lunge. They bit her — multiple times, we assume, given the injuries described — leaving puncture wounds, bruising, and the kind of emotional trauma that doesn’t just go away after a Band-Aid and a hug. And here’s where it gets even worse: the Brinlees couldn’t produce proof that their dogs had current rabies vaccinations. Which means Carrie wasn’t just dealing with torn skin and possible infections — she had to go through rabies prophylaxis. If you’ve never heard of it, picture this: a series of painful shots, not just in the arm, but around the wound sites, because doctors have to stimulate the immune system right where the virus might have entered. It’s not just medical treatment — it’s medieval torture disguised as modern medicine. And she had to do it because the Brinlees apparently couldn’t be bothered to follow basic pet ownership laws.

Now, let’s talk about these people. Christopher and Amanda Brinlee are your average married couple… if your definition of “average” includes owning not one, but two pit bulls, and letting them roam free enough to attack a visitor. We don’t know if they run a dogfighting ring, breed champions, or just think pit bulls are cool status symbols. But what we do know is that they failed in the most fundamental duty of pet ownership: keeping their animals under control and up to date on vaccinations. Oklahoma law isn’t exactly subtle about this — dogs must be vaccinated against rabies. It’s not a suggestion. It’s not “nice to have.” It’s the law. And when you ignore it, and your dogs maul someone, you’re not just negligent — you’re playing Russian roulette with public health.

So why are we in court? Because Carrie Aggee is done being the victim of someone else’s irresponsibility. She’s suing on two legal grounds: negligence and strict liability. Let’s break that down like we’re explaining it to a jury of confused TikTokers. First, negligence — that means the Brinlees didn’t act like a reasonable person would in their position. A reasonable dog owner secures their animals, especially known powerful breeds like pit bulls. A reasonable dog owner keeps up with vaccinations. A reasonable dog owner doesn’t let two dogs turn a peaceful afternoon into a horror scene. The filing argues that their failure to do any of this directly caused Carrie’s injuries — the bites, the medical bills, the emotional trauma, the scarring. It’s not rocket science.

But here’s the legal mic drop: strict liability. In Oklahoma, if your dog bites someone who’s not provoking it and is lawfully where they’re supposed to be, you’re on the hook — no questions asked. You don’t get to say, “But Fluffy’s normally sweet!” or “She must’ve stepped on his tail!” Nope. The law says if your dog attacks, you pay. It’s like auto insurance for dog ownership — you own the beast, you bear the burden. And since Carrie was just standing there, not waving steak in their faces, the “without provocation” bar is cleared like an Olympic hurdler.

Now, what does Carrie want? The petition asks for “compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial” — which is lawyer-speak for “we’ll let the jury decide how much this nightmare cost her.” That includes medical bills (those rabies shots aren’t cheap), pain and suffering, emotional distress, scarring, and other losses. We don’t have a dollar figure listed, but let’s be real: a rabies prophylaxis series can cost thousands. Therapy for trauma? Thousands more. Lost wages if she couldn’t work? Add it up. We’re likely talking tens of thousands of dollars — and that’s before punitive damages, which aren’t requested here, but honestly, should be. Because this isn’t just about one attack. It’s about what kind of message we send when people treat dangerous animals like fashion accessories.

And here’s our take: the most absurd part isn’t even the attack — it’s the rabies risk. In 2025, in a developed country, a grown woman had to go through mandatory rabies shots because two people couldn’t be bothered to vaccinate their pets. That’s not just negligence. That’s societal failure. We’re rooting for Carrie, not just because she got mauled, but because she’s fighting for basic accountability. Too often, dog bite cases get written off as “oh, the dog was scared” or “she must’ve done something.” But the law doesn’t require victims to be perfect — just present without provocation. And Carrie was. She wasn’t trespassing. She wasn’t taunting animals. She was just a person, in a place she had every right to be, when two unvaccinated pit bulls turned her into a medical emergency.

We’re not saying all pit bulls are dangerous — that’s breed discrimination and nonsense. We’re saying uncontrolled, unvaccinated dogs of any breed are a public hazard. And when owners ignore the rules, they shouldn’t get a free pass because “the dog’s family.” No. Your dog is not your child. It’s a powerful animal that requires responsibility, training, and yes, vaccinations. If you can’t handle that, get a goldfish.

So here’s hoping the jury sees this for what it is: not just a dog bite case, but a wake-up call. Carrie Aggee didn’t ask for this. She didn’t want a front-row seat to her own trauma. And she sure as hell didn’t sign up for rabies shots. But she’s fighting back — and honestly? We’re here for it. Bring the receipts, Carrie. And maybe invest in a really good pair of boots. Just in case.

Case Overview

Jury Trial Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of McClain County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
Plaintiffs
  • Carrie Aggee individual
    Rep: David N. Livingston, Daniel M. Delluomo
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Negligence Plaintiff was attacked by Defendants' pit bull dogs.
2 Strict Liability (Dog Bite Statute) Defendants are strictly liable for injuries caused by their dogs.

Petition Text

484 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF MCCLAIN COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA CARRIE AGEE, an individual, Plaintiff, vs/ CHRISTOPHER BRINLEE and AMANDA BRINLEE, husband and wife, Defendants. Case No. CJ-25-274 PETITION FOR DAMAGES 1. Plaintiff is a resident of Cleveland County, Oklahoma. 2. Defendants are residents of Newcastle, McClain County, and own dogs described as Pit Bull dogs. 3. The incident giving rise to this action occurred in Newcastle, McClain County, Oklahoma making venue proper in this Court pursuant to 12 O.S. Section 131. 4. Jurisdiction if proper under Oklahoma law because the events giving rise to the claims occurred in the State of Oklahoma. Factual Background 5. On or about September 18, 2025, at approximately 3:30 pm Plaintiff was lawfully present at 1558 NW 17th St. in Newcastle, Oklahoma. 6. At that time and place, two pit bull dogs owned, kept or controlled by Defendants suddenly and without provocation attacked Plaintiff. 7. The dogs bit and injured Plaintiff, causing puncture wounds, bruising, and emotional distress. 8. Because of the attack and Defendants’ failure to provide proof of current rabies vaccinations for their animals, Plaintiff was required to undergo a series of rabies vaccinations and medical treatment. 9. The attack and resulting injuries were directly and proximately cause by Defendants’ negligence, recklessness and violation of local and state animal control laws. COUNT I – NEGLIGENCE 10. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates paragraphs 1 through 9 as if fully set forth herein. 11. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ negligence, Plaintiff sustained physical injuries, endured pain and suffering, incurred medical expenses and was forced to undergo rabies prophylaxis treatment. Count II – STRICT LIABILITY (DOG BITE STATUTE) 12. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates paragraph 1-11. 13. Under 4 O.S 42.1, dog owners are strictly liable for injuries caused by their animals that bite or attack a person without provocation. 14. The pit bulls owned by Defendants attacked Plaintiff without provocation, thereby subjecting Defendants to strict liability for all damages suffered. 15. Defendants violated Title 63, Section 1-508 of the Oklahoma Statutes which requires vaccination of all dogs. 16. Plaintiff belongs to the class of persons the statute was designed to protect, and the injuries suffered were the kind such laws were designed to prevent. 17. Defendants’ statutory violations constitute negligence per se, making them liable for damages. IV. DAMAGES 18. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ actions and omissions, Plaintiff suffered: a. Physical pain and suffering; b. Mental anguish and emotional distress; c. Medical expenses, including rabies vaccinations and follow up care; d. Disfigurement and scarring; and e. Other damages to be proven at trial. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment in her favor and Against Defendants as follows: a. Awarding compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial; b. Awarding costs of suit; c. Awarding pre and post judgment interest as permitted by law; David N. Livingston, OBA# 11905 2212 Cadwell Ave. Oklahoma City, OK 73170 (405) 850-9318 Daniel M. Delluomo, OBA # 11810 DELLUOMO AND CROW 6812 N. Robinson Avenue Oklahoma City, OK 73116 Telephone: (405) 843-0400 Facsimile: (405) 843-5005 [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.