CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
OKLAHOMA COUNTY • CJ-2025-1308

Locke Supply Co. v. Jordan Page

Filed: Feb 25, 2025
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut straight to the drama: three employees didn’t just quit their jobs — they allegedly spent months plotting a corporate heist from the inside, forming a competing business while still on the clock, stealing customer lists, poaching coworkers, and then lying to their boss’s face so they could cash out their employee stock benefits like some kind of plumbing supply Bonnie and Clyde. This isn’t just betrayal — it’s betrayal with a side of paperwork.

Meet Locke Supply Co., Oklahoma’s very own employee-owned distributor of plumbing, electrical, and HVAC supplies — basically the place your contractor calls when they need 500 feet of copper pipe and a guy named Chad who knows where it is. They pride themselves on being a tight-knit, family-style operation where employees have a stake in the company through an ESOP — an Employee Stock Ownership Plan, which is like a 401(k), but instead of stocks in Apple, you get a slice of the actual business you work for. It’s a nice perk. A valuable perk. And apparently, a very tempting perk if you’re planning to burn the whole place down on your way out.

Enter the alleged trio of turncoats: Jordan Page, James Keifer, and Michael Ballard — all former managers at Locke Supply, all people who were trusted with access to the company’s inner workings, customer relationships, and confidential data. These weren’t just grunts on the warehouse floor. They were in positions of authority. They signed policies promising not to misuse company secrets or start competing businesses. And yet, according to the filing, they allegedly did all of it — while still collecting paychecks.

The plot, as laid out in the petition, reads like a made-for-TV movie titled Plumbing the Depths of Betrayal. On or around November 19, 2024 — yes, this case is so fresh it still has that new-lawsuit smell — Jordan Page, allegedly in cahoots with Keifer, Ballard, and a Texas-based competitor called Winston Water Cooler, formed a new entity: Winston Water Cooler of Oklahoma City, L.P. Now, here’s the kicker — Winston is a Texas limited partnership. It had no real presence in Oklahoma. No office. No warehouse. No water coolers. But Page, still employed at Locke Supply, registered it to do business in Oklahoma, listed himself as the registered agent, used his personal email (jbutter — yes, really), and gave his home address as the official Oklahoma location. A water cooler company with no coolers, no office, and a home-based operation run by a guy who still worked for the company it was about to crush. Subtle? No. Suspicious? Extremely.

But they didn’t stop at paperwork. Oh no. While still technically loyal employees, the suit claims these three began actively recruiting Locke Supply staff to jump ship — luring away a reported 15 employees. That’s not just a few people — that’s a full department. Imagine showing up to work and half your team is suddenly gone, whispering about some new gig with “better opportunities.” And it wasn’t just coworkers they targeted. They allegedly started sweet-talking Locke’s customers too, trying to redirect business to their shadow operation before it even had a logo.

Now, here’s where it gets chef’s kiss dramatic: Michael Ballard got fired on December 13, 2024. Fair enough. But Page and Keifer? They stayed. And according to Locke Supply, they did so under false pretenses. They looked their bosses in the eye and said, “Oh no, we’re not going anywhere,” all while allegedly running a competing business in secret. Why the charade? Two words: ESOP payout. Because if they’d quit or been fired before December 31, they wouldn’t have qualified for their 2024 employee stock contribution — a benefit they’d earned by, you know, not destroying the company from within. The filing claims they stayed on specifically to collect that payout, all while continuing to access confidential info, steal customers, and poach staff. It’s like staying at a hotel past checkout so you can keep using the free Wi-Fi to run a competing Airbnb next door.

Locke Supply says this wasn’t just disloyal — it was illegal. They’re suing for breach of fiduciary duty (basically, “you were supposed to have my back, but you stabbed me instead”), unfair competition, conspiracy, and tortious interference (a fancy way of saying “you messed up our business relationships on purpose”). They’re not asking for an injunction to shut down the competitor — no, they want cold, hard cash: $150,000 in damages. Is that a lot for a plumbing supply drama? Well, not for a business, but it’s not nothing. That’s enough to cover a year’s salary for a couple of employees, or a nice chunk of legal fees. But more than the money, Locke seems to want accountability — and possibly the satisfaction of watching someone try to explain “[email protected]” under oath.

They also want the court to make Page, Keifer, and Ballard give back the money they were paid during the time they were allegedly working against the company. That includes their ESOP payouts, commissions, and any other compensation earned through what the suit calls “deceit and wrongful acts.” In other words: “You want your bonus? Here’s a subpoena.”

Now, let’s be clear — none of this has been proven. These are allegations. Page, Keifer, and Ballard haven’t responded in court yet (at least not in the documents we’ve seen), so we don’t know their side. Maybe they were planning an exit but did nothing illegal. Maybe “Winston Water Cooler” was a misunderstanding. Maybe “jbutter” is just a guy who really likes spreads. But the timeline? The home address? The 15 employees leaving? The Texas competitor connection? The ESOP timing? Come on. That’s not a coincidence. That’s a pattern.

Our take? The most absurd part isn’t even the betrayal — it’s the audacity. These were managers. Trusted employees. People who signed policies and presumably attended HR trainings about ethics and conflicts of interest. And instead of just quitting like normal people, they allegedly turned their final weeks into a corporate espionage arc straight out of Succession — but with water coolers. We’re not rooting for blood, but we are rooting for receipts. We want to see the text messages. The emails. The moment someone asked, “So, Jordan, why is your house now the headquarters of a competing business?” and he had to improvise.

And hey — if “jbutter” testifies? We’re bringing popcorn. This case is going to be drip-tastic.

Case Overview

$150,000 Demand Jury Trial Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$150,000 Monetary
$0 Punitive
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 breach of fiduciary duty, unfair competition, conspiracy, tortious interference, and other wrongful acts Defendants allegedly misappropriated confidential information and formed a competing business

Petition Text

845 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA LOCKE SUPPLY CO., ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) (1) JORDAN PAGE, ) (2) JAMES KEIFER, and ) (3) MICHAEL BALLARD, ) Defendants. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PETITION Plaintiff, Locke Supply Co. ("Locke Supply"), hereby alleges and asserts the following causes of action against the above-named Defendants: 1. Locke Supply is an employee-owned distributor of plumbing, electrical and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning supplies with its principal place of business in Oklahoma County. 2. Upon information and belief, Defendants James Keifer ("Keifer") and Michael Ballard ("Ballard") are residents of Cleveland County. Upon information and belief, Defendant Jordan Page ("Page") is a resident of Oklahoma County. (Keifer, Ballard, and Page collectively as Defendants.) The Court has jurisdiction over all parties as they are residents within the State of Oklahoma, and venue is proper in this Court as pursuant to 12 O.S. § 134 as some part of the cause of action arose in Oklahoma County. 3. While employed with Locke Supply, Defendants were all managers or in positions of authority or confidence. As such, they each owed a duty of loyalty to Locke Supply. While employed with Locke Supply, Defendants all signed certain employee policies that restricted their use of confidential information, addressed conflicts of interest as well as outside employment and outside business interests. As set out herein, Defendants violated each of these policies and their obligations to Locke Supply. 4. While employed with Locke Supply, on or about November 19, 2024, Page, in conspiracy and collusion with the other Defendants and a Texas competitor, formed a competing Texas entity in Oklahoma, Winston Water Cooler of Oklahoma City, L.P. ("Winston Water Cooler"). Winston Water Cooler is a Texas limited partnership and is a competitor of Locke Supply. On December 5, 2024, Page submitted, or caused to be submitted, filings with the Oklahoma Secretary of State for Winston Water Cooler to register to do business in the State of Oklahoma. Upon information and belief, Winston Water Cooler did not have a physical presence in Oklahoma prior to this filing. 5. In the filing, Page identified himself as the registered agent and included his personal email address for future contact ("jbutter"). Page listed his own home residence as the Oklahoma address for the competitor. 6. Before and after the creation of the competing entity, and during their employment with Locke Supply, Defendants solicited (and continued to solicit) employees of Locke Supply to join the competing enterprise as well as customers of Locke Supply to move their business to the competing enterprise. 7. Before and after the creation of the competing entity, and during their employment with Locke Supply, Defendants used confidential information of Locke Supply to unlawfully compete against their employer. 8. Ballard was terminated on or about December 13, 2024. On the same day, Page and Keifer lied to, and defrauded, Locke Supply into believing that they intended to remain employed with Locke Supply and had no intention of leaving Locke Supply with Ballard. 9. Upon information and belief, Page and Kiefer lied to the faces of Locke Supply representatives so that they could remain employed until December 31 so that they could receive contribution from Locke Supply’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”). If they had been terminated or had resigned, they would not have been entitled to the ESOP contribution for 2024. 10. Upon information and belief, Page and Kiefer lied to the faces of Locke Supply representatives so that they could continue to have access to Locke Supply’s confidential information so that they could continue to solicit employees and customers of Locke Supply in breach of their obligations to Locke Supply and in an effort to unlawfully compete against Locke Supply. 11. Because of the collusion and unlawful efforts of Defendants, approximately fifteen (15) employees of Locke Supply have left employment to work for a competitor. 12. Because of the collusion and unlawful efforts of Defendants, Locke Supply’s relationship with its customers and the public has been unlawfully damaged. 13. Upon information and belief, Defendants have misappropriated Locke Supply’s confidential and/or trade secret information to start a competing enterprise. Because of their breaches of fiduciary duty (namely their duty of loyalty), unfair competition, conspiracy, tortious interference, and other wrongful acts, Locke Supply seeks all damages caused by their actions, and additionally seeks reimbursement of the compensation it paid the Defendants during their wrongful acts, repayment of the ESOP payments made to them, repayment of any commissions or any monies paid to them based on their deceit and wrongful acts during their employment, as well as all other appropriate relief. PRAYER WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Locke Supply prays for a jury trial and that this Court grant judgment in favor of the Plaintiff against Defendants. Plaintiff further prays that it be awarded all damages, including but not limited to monetary relief in excess of the amount required for diversity jurisdiction pursuant to Section 1332 of Title 28 of the United States Code, plus interest and costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, and all other relief deemed proper by this Court. Respectfully submitted, [signature] Joshua W. Solberg, OBA #22308 HARTZOG CONGER CASON LLP 201 Robert S. Kerr Ave., Suite 1600 Oklahoma City, OK 73102 (405) 235-7000 (Telephone) (405) 996-3403 (Facsimile) [email protected] ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.