CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
ADAIR COUNTY • CS-2026-68

KINO FINANCIAL CO., LLC v. FRED EDGMON

Filed: Mar 3, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s get one thing straight: Fred Edgmon didn’t rob a bank, he didn’t steal a car, and he definitely didn’t set anything on fire (as far as we know). No, his crime — and we use that word loosely — was failing to pay his credit card bill. And now? He’s staring down the barrel of a lawsuit for $4,512.03. Yes, that’s two cents past four-and-a-half grand. Someone at Kino Financial Co., LLC really wanted to make sure they weren’t leaving money on the table. This isn’t Law & Order: SVU, folks. This is Law & Overdue: Civil Dispute Edition, and the stakes are as low as the drama is high.

So who are we talking about here? On one side, we’ve got Kino Financial Co., LLC — a name that sounds like a boutique accounting firm from a Wes Anderson movie, but in reality is just another debt buyer. These are the folks who swoop in after banks give up on collecting old debts, buy them for pennies on the dollar, and then try to collect the full amount like they were there for the original shopping spree. Think of them as the vultures of the financial world, but with better business cards and a whole team of lawyers on speed dial. Representing them? A legal dream team that reads like a law firm’s holiday party guest list: Stephen L. Bruce, Everette C. Altdoerffer, Leah K. Clark, Clay P. Booth, Roger M. Coil, Adam W. Sullivan, and Katelyn M. Conner. Seven attorneys. Seven. For a $4,512.03 credit card debt. That’s not just overkill — that’s bringing a flamethrower to a candlelight dinner.

On the other side of this legal showdown is Fred Edgmon, a regular guy from Adair County, Oklahoma — a rural part of the state where the deer outnumber the traffic lights. We don’t know much about Fred, but we can make some educated guesses. He probably owns at least one pair of boots, may have attended a high school with a mascot involving a Native American symbol (this is Oklahoma, after all), and likely never imagined he’d be named in a court filing that lists seven attorneys on the opposing side. At some point, Fred got a credit card — likely through First Bank & Trust - Mercury Financial LLC — and used it to buy stuff. Maybe it was groceries. Maybe it was a new tractor part. Maybe it was that one impulse buy from a late-night infomercial. We’ll never know. What we do know is that he stopped making payments. And in the world of debt collection, that’s basically a declaration of war.

Here’s how it went down: Fred had a credit card. He agreed to pay it back. He didn’t. The bank probably called, sent letters, maybe even threatened to ruin his credit score (spoiler: they already did). Then, at some point, the bank said “screw it” and sold the debt to Kino Financial for a fraction of the value. Now Kino owns the debt, and they’re coming after Fred like he skipped out on a million-dollar yacht lease. According to the petition, Fred “defaulted under the terms of the agreement,” which is legalese for “he didn’t pay.” The account was assigned to Kino “for value,” which is lawyer-speak for “they bought it, probably for $500.” And now, Kino wants the full $4,512.03 — plus interest, plus fees, plus the cost of this lawsuit, and — plot twist — they want the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission to hand over Fred’s employment info so they can potentially garnish his wages. That last bit is straight out of a dystopian financial thriller, but in this case, it’s just Tuesday in Adair County.

Now, let’s talk about why they’re in court. The official claim? Breach of contract. That’s it. Fred signed a contract saying he’d pay back what he borrowed, plus interest. He didn’t. That’s a breach. It’s not exactly Romeo and Juliet, but in the legal world, broken promises — even financial ones — are grounds for action. Kino isn’t claiming fraud, identity theft, or that Fred used the card to fund a secret llama farm in the Ozarks. Nope. This is pure, unseasoned contract law: you agreed to pay, you didn’t, now we’re suing. It’s the legal equivalent of “you said you’d bring chips to the potluck, and you showed up with nothing but a sad salad.”

And what do they want? $4,512.03. Let’s put that in perspective. That’s not chump change — it’s enough to buy a decent used car, cover a year of car insurance, or pay for a solid chunk of a wedding. But in the context of legal fees and seven attorneys? It’s nothing. The amount of time spent drafting this petition, filing it, and coordinating between six other lawyers probably cost more than the debt itself. And yet, here we are. Kino isn’t asking for punitive damages, they’re not seeking an injunction, no one’s demanding a jury trial. It’s just cold, hard cash — and maybe the satisfaction of knowing they made an example out of Fred Edgmon, credit card rebel.

Now, here’s our take: the most absurd part of this whole saga isn’t that someone got sued for not paying a credit card. That happens every day. It’s not even the seven lawyers. No, the real kicker is the precision of the demand: $4,512.03. Not $4,500. Not “approximately four and a half thousand.” No, it’s two cents over four grand. That’s the kind of detail that suggests someone in an office somewhere ran a spreadsheet, triple-checked the interest calculations, and said, “We will have those two cents.” Meanwhile, Fred is probably out there wondering why his mailbox suddenly feels like a subpoena drop box.

Are we rooting for Fred? Honestly, kind of. Not because he’s some debt-defying folk hero, but because this case is a perfect microcosm of how lopsided the debt collection system can be. A man gets sued by a faceless company backed by an army of attorneys for a debt they bought for pennies, and now they’re coming after him with the full force of the legal system. It’s not dramatic. It’s not violent. But it’s quietly, mundanely brutal in a way that feels uniquely American.

At the end of the day, this isn’t about justice. It’s about balance sheets. And somewhere, in a quiet office in Edmond, Oklahoma, a paralegal is printing out another copy of this petition, probably thinking, “Man, I hope Fred at least got something nice with that credit card.” We can only hope it was worth it, Fred. Even if the court doesn’t.

Case Overview

$4,512 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$4,512 Monetary
Plaintiffs
  • KINO FINANCIAL CO., LLC business
    Rep: Stephen L. Bruce, OBA #1241; Everette C. Altdoerffer, OBA #30006; Leah K. Clark, OBA # 31819; Clay P. Booth, OBA #11767; Roger M. Coil, OBA #17002; Adam W. Sullivan, OBA #35748; Katelyn M. Conner, OBA #36601
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 breach of contract defaulted on credit card agreement

Petition Text

281 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF ADAIR COUNTY, STATE OF OKLAHOMA KINO FINANCIAL CO., LLC Plaintiff, vs. FRED EDGMON Defendant. FILED DISTRICT COURT ADAIR COUNTY, OKLAHOMA March 3, 2026 5:34 PM NICHOLE COOPER, COURT CLERK Case Number CS-2026-68 Case No. PETITION COMES NOW the Plaintiff, KINO FINANCIAL CO., LLC and for its cause of action against the Defendant FRED EDGMON (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”) alleges and states as follows: 1. That Defendant entered into a credit card agreement with First Bank & Trust - Mercury Financial LLC whereby First Bank & Trust - Mercury Financial LLC agreed to extend a revolving line of credit to the Defendant for cash advances or the purchase of goods and services. 2. Defendant agreed to pay the account balance plus finance charges and other charges and fees in monthly installments according to the terms of the above referenced agreement. 3. Defendant defaulted under the terms of the agreement referred to in paragraph 1 above. 4. All rights to the account were assigned to the Plaintiff for value. 5. Defendant is currently indebted to Plaintiff for charges made under the above referenced agreement in the sum of $4512.03. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff prays for judgment against the Defendant in the amount of $4512.03 with post-judgment interest thereon at the statutory rate until paid, and costs of this action including a reasonable attorney's fee. Plaintiff further requests an order directing the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission to produce employment information of the judgment debtor pursuant to 40 O.S. § 4-508(D). Stephen L. Bruce, OBA #1241 Everette C. Altdoerffer, OBA #30006 Leah K. Clark, OBA # 31819 Clay P. Booth, OBA #11767 Roger M. Coil, OBA #17002 Adam W. Sullivan, OBA #35748 Katelyn M. Conner, OBA #36601 Attorneys for Plaintiff P.O. Box 808 Edmond, OK 73080-0808 (405) 330-4110 | [email protected]
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.