CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
OKLAHOMA COUNTY • CS-2026-2878

Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Charles Pace and Elizabeth Leonard

Filed: Mar 9, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut straight to the drama: Charles Pace and Elizabeth Leonard, a perfectly ordinary Oklahoma couple trying to live their lives, are now officially on the state’s Most Wanted list—not for armed robbery or moonshining, but for failing to pay their income taxes. And thanks to interest, penalties, and the state’s relentless math department, what started as about $1,370 in unpaid taxes has ballooned into a $3,239.46 debt—because apparently, the Oklahoma Tax Commission believes in compound interest like it’s a sacred text.

Now, you’re probably imagining some high-rolling tax evaders living in a gated community with a gold-plated hot tub, but no. Charles and Elizabeth? They’re just two people with Social Security numbers and a shared tax return. We don’t know if they’re married, roommates, or just got tangled up in each other’s financial lives like two garden hoses in a shed—but they’re now jointly on the hook for two separate tax years: 2020 and 2023. That’s right—this isn’t even about some long-running tax feud. It’s two isolated years, like two bad haircuts spaced three years apart, but with far more paperwork.

The story starts innocently enough. Back in 2020—remember that year? The one where we all learned what “supply chain” meant and spent months in sweatpants?—Charles and Elizabeth apparently didn’t file or pay their Oklahoma income taxes. The tax bill for that year was $506.46. Not nothing, but not exactly a down payment on a Tesla, either. But instead of paying it, they… didn’t. And the state, being the patient but unrelenting entity that it is, waited. And waited. And then started adding interest. And penalties. And a tax warrant penalty, which sounds like something out of a dystopian tax-themed video game. By the time the state issued a tax warrant in April 2021, that $506 had grown to $928.21. That’s a 83% increase, folks, and we’re not even at the scary part yet.

Then, plot twist: in 2023—yes, after the first tax ghost came knocking—they did it again. This time, the base tax owed was $864. The state waited until April 2024 to assess it, and by October, with interest and fees, it had climbed to $1,102.47. So now we’ve got two separate tax sins, two separate warrants, and a total unpaid balance creeping toward $2,031. But wait—because the clock never stops in Tax World—the total now stands at $2,236.99 as of March 2026. And with ongoing interest, it’s headed for $3,239.46. That’s right: the state is suing to collect more than triple the original tax amount, all because two people didn’t pay their taxes on time. It’s like returning a library book three years late and getting billed for a new edition, shipping, and emotional distress.

So why are we here, in the hallowed (and slightly fluorescent-lit) halls of the District Court of Oklahoma County? Because the Oklahoma Tax Commission doesn’t mess around. They’ve filed what’s called an “Application for State Tax Enforcement,” which is basically the government’s way of saying, “We’ve sent the polite letters. We’ve called. We’ve even put a lien on your property like a passive-aggressive ghost. Now we’re bringing the legal cavalry.” The tax warrants—Exhibit A and Exhibit B, because nothing says drama like labeled evidence—have already been filed with the county clerk, which means they’re treated like court judgments. That’s a big deal. It means the state can freeze bank accounts, garnish wages, or even put a lien on property. Charles and Elizabeth’s toaster could technically be next if it had resale value.

The legal claim here is called “tax escheatment,” which sounds like a medieval punishment but is really just the state’s way of collecting what it thinks you owe. The Oklahoma Tax Commission isn’t asking for punitive damages, or a public apology, or even a TikTok confession. They just want their money—plus fees, interest, and the full weight of Title 68 of the Oklahoma Statutes, which is basically the state’s tax rulebook thicker than a Stephen King novel. They’re not demanding a jury trial, which tells us they’re confident. This isn’t a “did they or didn’t they” case. It’s a “they didn’t, and now we’re collecting” case.

And what do they want? $3,239.46. Is that a lot? In the grand scheme of lawsuits, no. You could buy a used car for that. Or a really nice vacation. Or, if you’re the Oklahoma Tax Commission, about 3.2 years of coffee from the state office machine. But for an individual? That’s a chunk of change. Especially when you consider that the original tax debt was just over $1,370. The fact that penalties and interest nearly doubled the amount feels… excessive. It’s like going to a concert, being $20 over on your credit card, and getting billed $400 because you didn’t pay it within 30 seconds of the charge posting.

Now, here’s our take: the most absurd part of this whole saga isn’t that someone didn’t pay their taxes. Let’s be real—taxes are confusing, life gets busy, and sometimes you just… forget. Or can’t afford it. The absurd part is how quickly a relatively small oversight snowballs into a financial monster thanks to the state’s penalty machine. A $506 tax bill becomes $928 with interest and fees? A $36 filing fee on a $864 tax? That’s 4% just to file the warrant. At that rate, the state should be charging extra for breathing near a tax form.

We’re not saying Charles and Elizabeth are innocent. The filing suggests they owe the money, and unless there’s some wild backstory we’re missing—like they were abducted by aliens during tax season—we’re inclined to believe the numbers. But come on, Oklahoma. Couldn’t you have sent one more reminder? A sternly worded postcard? A concerned text? Instead, it’s straight to legal enforcement, with attorneys from Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP—the law firm that’s basically the state’s go-to for “we need someone to collect money aggressively.” These guys are the Avengers of tax collection, but with less spandex and more garnishment forms.

Look, we’re not rooting for tax evasion. We pay our taxes. Mostly. But we are rooting for a system that doesn’t turn a minor financial misstep into a five-figure anchor. If the goal is compliance, then piling on penalties until people are buried in debt feels more like punishment than persuasion. And honestly, if the Oklahoma Tax Commission spent half as much energy making taxes easy to pay as they do chasing people down, maybe we wouldn’t need a whole court case over $3,239.46.

So here’s to Charles and Elizabeth—two names on a tax warrant, now forever immortalized in the annals of petty civil drama. May your day in court be short, your penalties be waived, and your next tax return be filed on time. And to the rest of us? File your taxes, people. The state is watching. And they do not forget.

Case Overview

$3,239 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$3,239 Monetary
Plaintiffs
  • Oklahoma Tax Commission government
    Rep: Scott McGlasson, OBA#20591, Elizabeth Paul, OBA#32714, Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 tax escheatment Plaintiff seeks to collect unpaid taxes from Defendants.

Petition Text

746 words
In the District Court of Oklahoma County State of Oklahoma STATE OF OKLAHOMA, EX. REL. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION Plaintiff, v. CHARLES PACE ELIZABETH LEONARD SSN XXX-XX-5463 , XXX-XX-8521 Defendant(s) FILED DISTRICT COURT OKLAHOMA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA March 9, 2026 10:46 AM RICK WARREN, COURT CLERK Case No Case Number CS-2026-2878 (To be entered by Court Clerk) Application for State Tax Enforcement COMES NOW the Plaintiff herein and alleges and states as follows: 1. That the Tax Warrant attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and by this reference incorporated herein as if set out in full was filed in the County Clerk’s Office, as reflected, by the Plaintiff against the real and personal property of the above-named defendant(s). 2. That the total indebtedness as of the date of said tax warrant(s) was $2,030.68, such indebtedness arising as a result of the Defendant’s failure to pay taxes for the following tax types and periods: Tax Warrant 192956416 , 92817408 Tax Type Periods INCOME 2020 INCOME 2023 3. That a total indebtedness in the amount of $2,236.99 as of 03-06-26 remains unpaid. 4. That the above-referenced tax warrant(s) have been filed as provided by law and the Oklahoma Tax Commission therefore has all of the remedies and may take all of the proceedings thereon for collection thereof which may be had or taken upon a judgment of the District Court per Title 68 O.S. §231 - §255. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that Defendant(s) be ordered to appear at a hearing on assets; that such garnishment action or actions be maintained, or any other actions as are needed against said Defendant(s) in order to collect the full amount of indebtedness, together with interest, penalty, and fees as provided by Title 68 O.S. §217 or other laws, and for the costs of this action. DATED this date: 03-06-26 BY: OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION, Plaintiff Scott McGlasson, OBA#20591 Elizabeth Paul, OBA#32714 Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP P.O. Box 950391 Oklahoma City, OK 73195-0391 877-304-6848 / 877-304-6847 (fax) [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff Oklahoma Tax Commission PO Box 26930 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73129 Oklahoma County FEIN/SSN: ****-**-5463, ****-**-8521 Taxpayer: CHARLES D PACE AND ELIZABETH D LEONARD Tax Warrant: 192956416 Date Assessed: April 10, 2021 THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA TO: The County Clerk of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma Whereas, the above named taxpayer(s) is indebted to the State of Oklahoma for Income with penalties and interest thereon computed to date, for the period(s) and in the amount(s) as follows: IIT-12264257-02 01/01/2020 - 12/31/2020 Total Tax: $506.46 Interest to date of issuance: $237.44 Penalties to date of issuance: $67.20 Tax warrant penalty: $81.11 Filing Fee: $36.00 Total Amount Due: $928.21 Interest continues to accrue on the total tax until paid, and additional penalties may accrue as authorized by Oklahoma Law. Now therefore, you are directed to record and index this warrant in the same manner as a judgement, using the name(s) of the delinquent taxpayer(s) shown above, name of the tax, the amount of the tax, interest and penalties for which the warrant is issued, and the date and time when filed. In witness whereof, the Oklahoma Tax Commission has caused this writ to be subscribed and duly attested, with the seal of said commission affixed this June 17, 2024 EXHIBIT A Oklahoma Tax Commission: [Signature] Assistant Secretary County Clerk Retains Oklahoma Tax Commission PO Box 26930 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73129 Oklahoma County FEIN/SSN: ****-**-5463, ***-**-8521 Taxpayer: CHARLES D PACE AND ELIZABETH D LEONARD Tax Warrant: 92817108 Date Assessed: April 18, 2024 THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA TO: The County Clerk of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma Whereas, the above named taxpayer(s) is indebted to the State of Oklahoma for income with penalties and interest thereon computed to date, for the period(s) and in the amount(s) as follows: IIT-12264257-02 01/01/2023 - 12/31/2023 Total Tax: $864.00 Interest to date of issuance: $62.32 Penalties to date of issuance: $43.20 Tax warrant penalty: $96.95 Filing Fee: $36.00 Total Amount Due: $1,102.47 Interest continues to accrue on the total tax until paid, and additional penalties may accrue as authorized by Oklahoma Law. Now therefore, you are directed to record and index this warrant in the same manner as a judgement, using the name(s) of the delinquent taxpayer(s) shown above, name of the tax, the amount of the tax, interest and penalties for which the warrant is issued, and the date and time when filed. In witness whereof, the Oklahoma Tax Commission has caused this writ to be subscribed and duly attested, with the seal of said commission affixed this October 15, 2024 EXHIBIT B Oklahoma Tax Commission: Jenni King Assistant Secretary County Clerk Retains
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.