CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
TULSA COUNTY • CJ-2026-919

Audri Main v. Julie Smith

Filed: Feb 26, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut right to the chase: a woman riding her bright yellow scooter home from a shift at Raising Cane’s got hit by a luxury office worker’s car, was launched into the air, bounced off the hood like a cartoon character, and then—instead of calling 911—the driver just… picked her up, scooter and all, and dropped her off at her apartment like she was returning a misdelivered Amazon package. No ambulance. No police. No insurance info. Just a “here you go, good luck with those bruises” and poof, she vanished. Oh, and now the scooter rider is suing for nearly $300,000. Welcome to Crazy Civil Court, where the stakes are high, the judgment is low, and the facts are stranger than fiction.

So who are these people? On one side, we’ve got Audri Main—20 years old, working a shift at the holy grail of greasy-spoon glory, Raising Cane’s Chicken Fingers. She’s not rolling in cash, but she’s got her wheels: a bright yellow Phantom Commuter R1 Seated Scooter, which sounds like something Batman would use to get coffee, but in this case, it’s just how Audri rolls home after frying chicken tenders all day. On this particular February evening, the weather was nice, the ride was peaceful, and she was doing what she always does—cruising eastbound on the sidewalk along 51st Street in Tulsa, minding her business, probably still smelling like fry oil. On the other side of this collision? Julie Smith. Senior Wealth Consultant at Mariner, working out of the Richmond Plaza building. That title alone paints a picture: probably wears blazers with invisible lapel pins, has a Keurig in her office, and refers to her car as “the BMW” even when no one asked. She’s leaving work, heading through the parking lot, and—somehow—ends up in a direct path with a scooter-riding former Cane’s employee. The stage is set. The sidewalk is the scene. And the crash? Oh, it’s spectacular.

Here’s how it went down: Audri sees Julie’s car approaching the parking lot exit. She slows down—good Samaritan move—because she’s not trying to get creamed. Julie stops her car just before the sidewalk. Everything seems fine. Audri starts to cross. Then—bam. Julie suddenly lurches forward and plows right into her. The impact? So violent that Audri is launched off her scooter, flies through the air, bounces off the hood of the car, and crashes onto the pavement. Let that sink in: this is not a fender bender. This is a full-body projectile event. And if that weren’t wild enough, Julie doesn’t call 911. Doesn’t check for a pulse. Doesn’t even say, “Hey, are you okay?” Nope. Instead, she gets out, helps Audri and the mangled scooter into her car, and drives her home like it’s a favor. She drops her off at her apartment building and peaces out—no insurance info, no contact details, nothing. It’s like she committed a crime and then tried to erase it by playing Uber driver to the victim. And to add insult to injury—literally—Audri’s scooter was so wedged under the car that Julie had to back up over it to free it. That’s not just negligence. That’s post-impact disrespect.

Now, why are they in court? Because Julie Smith allegedly violated Oklahoma law—specifically 47 O.S. §10-103 and §10-104—which says if you’re in a collision, you have to stop, exchange insurance info, and render aid if needed. Julie did none of that. She didn’t stop (except briefly before hitting Audri), she didn’t give insurance info at the scene, and she didn’t report the crash. In fact, she ghosted Audri so hard that Audri had to hire a lawyer—Chris Knight of the Knight Law Firm, who we can only assume rides a motorcycle and has a leather jacket with “Objection” stitched on the back—just to track down Julie’s insurance. Messages were left. Emails sent. Office calls made. Crickets. Only after a hand-delivered letter threatening a lawsuit did Julie finally cough up the insurance details. That delay matters—because under Oklahoma law, failing to provide insurance info like this can mean you’re on the hook for treble damages. That’s triple the actual damages. So if Audri’s medical bills are around $28,700, treble that? We’re looking at over $86,000—just for that one screw-up. And that’s before we even get to the rest of the lawsuit.

And what does Audri want? A cool $293,511.14. That’s not a typo. Let’s break it down: she’s got $28,706.07 in medical bills—from ER visits at Saint Francis Hospital to physical therapy, imaging, lab work, even a $6.65 Walgreens run (probably for ibuprofen and a stress gummy). She lost $512 at work—maybe she couldn’t flip chicken tenders with a bruised body and a broken spirit. She’s claiming pain and suffering, mental anguish, and an inability to work out at the gym (RIP, leg day). Oh, and she says she’s got permanent injuries—her left knee now clicks, pops, and grinds like a haunted door hinge. That’s called crepitus, and it didn’t happen before the crash. So she’s not just asking for reimbursement. She’s asking for compensation for a life that’s now… creakier. And with punitive damages in the mix? That means the court could slap Julie with extra money just to say, “Hey, don’t be a ghost-dumping hit-and-run hero ever again.”

Now, is $293,511 a lot for getting launched off a scooter and dropped at your apartment like expired takeout? In the grand scheme of personal injury cases, it’s not insane. Car crashes with permanent injuries routinely settle for way more. But here’s what’s wild: the audacity. Julie didn’t just cause an accident. She treated it like a minor inconvenience. No emergency services. No concern. Just a quick cleanup and a “you’ll be fine” energy. And the fact that it took a hand-delivered legal threat to get basic insurance info? That’s not just negligence. That’s entitlement on turbo mode. Meanwhile, Audri’s got X-rays—though weirdly, the exhibit attached is of a duckbill platypus jaw? Either someone messed up the filing, or this case is about to take a bizarre evolutionary turn. (We’re assuming it’s a clerical error. But honestly, at this point, we wouldn’t be surprised.)

Our take? We’re rooting for the scooter. Not just Audri—though we’re definitely on Team Yellow Scooter—but for the idea of it. This is a 20-year-old worker bee, trying to enjoy a nice ride home after flipping chicken, and she gets turned into a human pinball by a woman who thinks a joyride to the apartment complex counts as “handling it.” The most absurd part isn’t even the bounce-off-the-hood drama—it’s the aftermath. Julie Smith didn’t just fail to do the right thing. She failed to do anything. No call. No care. No accountability until a lawyer showed up like a civil court bounty hunter. And now, thanks to Oklahoma’s treble damages law, her “I’ll deal with it later” attitude could cost her triple. Poetic? A little. Petty? Absolutely. But that’s why we’re here. Because in the world of civil court, sometimes justice isn’t about murder weapons or drug cartels—it’s about a woman who thought she could hit someone, play chauffeur, and just drive away. Spoiler: she can’t. And if you’re gonna bounce someone off your hood, at least leave your insurance card. This isn’t Fast & Furious. It’s Tulsa. Act like it.

Case Overview

$293,511 Demand Jury Trial Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$293,511 Monetary
$1 Punitive
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 negligence Defendant's vehicle struck Plaintiff's scooter, causing injuries and damages

Petition Text

893 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA AUDRI MAIN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) -v- ) JULIE SMITH, ) ) Defendant. PETITION COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Audri Main, and for her claim against the Defendant states that: 1. On February 27, 2024, twenty-year-old Audri Main had just finished her workday at Raising Cane’s Chicken Fingers. She decided to enjoy that warm day in February by taking a ride on her bright yellow Phantom Commuter R1 Seated Scooter. Once Audri finished her ride for the day, Audri headed home to her apartment. Audri was lawfully driving her scooter eastbound on the sidewalk that is located on the north side of 51st Street between Harvard and Yale in Tulsa, Oklahoma. 2. The Defendant, Julie Smith, had left her office at Mariner in the Richmond Plaza building where she works as a Senior Wealth Consultant. The Defendant was driving through the parking lot for the Richmond Plaza office building, which is located on the north side of 51st Street between Harvard and Yale in Tulsa, Oklahoma. 3. The Defendant drove her vehicle in a southerly direction going toward the parking lot exit that is on the north side of 51st Street. 4. As Audri Main was approaching the Richmond Plaza parking lot exit that allows vehicles to enter onto 51st Street, she saw the Defendant’s vehicle approaching the exit. Audri slowed down just in case the Defendant did not stop before exiting the parking lot. 5. The Defendant did bring her vehicle to a stop in the parking lot a few feet before reaching the sidewalk. When the Defendant’s vehicle stopped, Audri Main was on the sidewalk about ten feet away from the west edge of the exit, so Audri prepared to drive across the exit on the sidewalk. 6. When Audri Main was about to pass in front of the Defendant’s vehicle, Julie Smith suddenly drove forward causing her vehicle to strike Audri’s scooter. 7. The impact caused Audri to be launched from her scooter and she flew into the air. When Audri began to come down, her body bounced off the hood of the Defendant’s vehicle and then she landed on the ground. 8. The Defendant ran over Audri’s scooter to the extent that she had to back-up in order to free the scooter from underneath her vehicle. 9. Instead of seeking medical attention for Audri or calling the police, Julie Smith instead loaded Audri and her scooter into her vehicle and left Audri at her apartment building. 10. The Defendant failed to comply with 47 O.S. §10-103 and 47 O.S. §10-104 by not providing her automobile insurance information to Audri before the Defendant left the scene of the collision and is liable for treble damages pursuant to those statutes. 11. The Defendant not only failed to provide her automobile insurance information at the scene of the collision, when Audri asked the Defendant for her insurance information the Defendant would not provide it. After the Defendant did not provide her insurance information to Audri despite Audri asking for it, Audri hired an attorney. The Defendant also did not provide her automobile insurance information to Audri’s attorney despite messages being left on her cell phone, on her office phone, and an email being sent to her work email address. The Defendant’s automobile insurance information was only provided after a letter was hand-delivered to the Defendant’s office advising her that she would be sued if her automobile insurance information was not provided by the end of the next business day. 12. As a result of the negligent manner in which the Defendant operated her vehicle, Audri was injured including, but not limited to the visible bruises shown in the attached Exhibit “A”, she suffered pain of body and mind, she was impaired, she was unable to enjoy activities of normal daily living such as working out at the gym, she suffered $512.00 in lost earnings, and she owes the following medical bills: <table> <tr> <th>Provider</th> <th>Amount</th> </tr> <tr> <td>Saint Francis Hospital</td> <td>$18,100.30</td> </tr> <tr> <td>EMP of Tulsa County</td> <td>$1,650.37</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Radiology Consultants of Tulsa</td> <td>$1,142.75</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Lab Medicine of Greater Tulsa</td> <td>$55.00</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Heritage Medical Clinic</td> <td>$589.00</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Oklahoma Physical Therapy</td> <td>$4,943.00</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Tulsa Diagnostic Imaging</td> <td>$1,900.00</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Oklahoma Medical Service & Supply</td> <td>$319.00</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Walgreens</td> <td>$6.65</td> </tr> <tr> <th>Total</th> <th>$28,706.07</th> </tr> </table> 13. As a result of the Defendant’s negligence, Audri Main has suffered permanent injuries. Audri’s left knee continues to exhibit crepitus, which is clicking, popping, or grinding during movement, that it did not exhibit prior to her being injured. Audri continues to have mental pain and suffering due to the collision. WHEREFORE, Audri Main, demands judgment against the Defendant in an amount in excess of the amount required for diversity jurisdiction and in excess of $10,000.00, treble damages pursuant to the aforesaid statutes, the costs of this action, interest at the statutory rate, and any and all other relief to which she may be entitled. Respectfully Submitted, [signature] Chris Knight OBA #11390 5314 South Yale Avenue, Suite 150 Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135 (918) 496-1200 Fax: (918) 496-3800 [email protected] Attorney's lien claimed EXHIBIT A Fig. 5. X-ray image of a duckbill platypus, showing the separation between the two jaws.
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.