Audri Main v. Julie Smith
What's This Case About?
Let’s cut right to the chase: a woman riding her bright yellow scooter home from a shift at Raising Cane’s got hit by a luxury office worker’s car, was launched into the air, bounced off the hood like a cartoon character, and then—instead of calling 911—the driver just… picked her up, scooter and all, and dropped her off at her apartment like she was returning a misdelivered Amazon package. No ambulance. No police. No insurance info. Just a “here you go, good luck with those bruises” and poof, she vanished. Oh, and now the scooter rider is suing for nearly $300,000. Welcome to Crazy Civil Court, where the stakes are high, the judgment is low, and the facts are stranger than fiction.
So who are these people? On one side, we’ve got Audri Main—20 years old, working a shift at the holy grail of greasy-spoon glory, Raising Cane’s Chicken Fingers. She’s not rolling in cash, but she’s got her wheels: a bright yellow Phantom Commuter R1 Seated Scooter, which sounds like something Batman would use to get coffee, but in this case, it’s just how Audri rolls home after frying chicken tenders all day. On this particular February evening, the weather was nice, the ride was peaceful, and she was doing what she always does—cruising eastbound on the sidewalk along 51st Street in Tulsa, minding her business, probably still smelling like fry oil. On the other side of this collision? Julie Smith. Senior Wealth Consultant at Mariner, working out of the Richmond Plaza building. That title alone paints a picture: probably wears blazers with invisible lapel pins, has a Keurig in her office, and refers to her car as “the BMW” even when no one asked. She’s leaving work, heading through the parking lot, and—somehow—ends up in a direct path with a scooter-riding former Cane’s employee. The stage is set. The sidewalk is the scene. And the crash? Oh, it’s spectacular.
Here’s how it went down: Audri sees Julie’s car approaching the parking lot exit. She slows down—good Samaritan move—because she’s not trying to get creamed. Julie stops her car just before the sidewalk. Everything seems fine. Audri starts to cross. Then—bam. Julie suddenly lurches forward and plows right into her. The impact? So violent that Audri is launched off her scooter, flies through the air, bounces off the hood of the car, and crashes onto the pavement. Let that sink in: this is not a fender bender. This is a full-body projectile event. And if that weren’t wild enough, Julie doesn’t call 911. Doesn’t check for a pulse. Doesn’t even say, “Hey, are you okay?” Nope. Instead, she gets out, helps Audri and the mangled scooter into her car, and drives her home like it’s a favor. She drops her off at her apartment building and peaces out—no insurance info, no contact details, nothing. It’s like she committed a crime and then tried to erase it by playing Uber driver to the victim. And to add insult to injury—literally—Audri’s scooter was so wedged under the car that Julie had to back up over it to free it. That’s not just negligence. That’s post-impact disrespect.
Now, why are they in court? Because Julie Smith allegedly violated Oklahoma law—specifically 47 O.S. §10-103 and §10-104—which says if you’re in a collision, you have to stop, exchange insurance info, and render aid if needed. Julie did none of that. She didn’t stop (except briefly before hitting Audri), she didn’t give insurance info at the scene, and she didn’t report the crash. In fact, she ghosted Audri so hard that Audri had to hire a lawyer—Chris Knight of the Knight Law Firm, who we can only assume rides a motorcycle and has a leather jacket with “Objection” stitched on the back—just to track down Julie’s insurance. Messages were left. Emails sent. Office calls made. Crickets. Only after a hand-delivered letter threatening a lawsuit did Julie finally cough up the insurance details. That delay matters—because under Oklahoma law, failing to provide insurance info like this can mean you’re on the hook for treble damages. That’s triple the actual damages. So if Audri’s medical bills are around $28,700, treble that? We’re looking at over $86,000—just for that one screw-up. And that’s before we even get to the rest of the lawsuit.
And what does Audri want? A cool $293,511.14. That’s not a typo. Let’s break it down: she’s got $28,706.07 in medical bills—from ER visits at Saint Francis Hospital to physical therapy, imaging, lab work, even a $6.65 Walgreens run (probably for ibuprofen and a stress gummy). She lost $512 at work—maybe she couldn’t flip chicken tenders with a bruised body and a broken spirit. She’s claiming pain and suffering, mental anguish, and an inability to work out at the gym (RIP, leg day). Oh, and she says she’s got permanent injuries—her left knee now clicks, pops, and grinds like a haunted door hinge. That’s called crepitus, and it didn’t happen before the crash. So she’s not just asking for reimbursement. She’s asking for compensation for a life that’s now… creakier. And with punitive damages in the mix? That means the court could slap Julie with extra money just to say, “Hey, don’t be a ghost-dumping hit-and-run hero ever again.”
Now, is $293,511 a lot for getting launched off a scooter and dropped at your apartment like expired takeout? In the grand scheme of personal injury cases, it’s not insane. Car crashes with permanent injuries routinely settle for way more. But here’s what’s wild: the audacity. Julie didn’t just cause an accident. She treated it like a minor inconvenience. No emergency services. No concern. Just a quick cleanup and a “you’ll be fine” energy. And the fact that it took a hand-delivered legal threat to get basic insurance info? That’s not just negligence. That’s entitlement on turbo mode. Meanwhile, Audri’s got X-rays—though weirdly, the exhibit attached is of a duckbill platypus jaw? Either someone messed up the filing, or this case is about to take a bizarre evolutionary turn. (We’re assuming it’s a clerical error. But honestly, at this point, we wouldn’t be surprised.)
Our take? We’re rooting for the scooter. Not just Audri—though we’re definitely on Team Yellow Scooter—but for the idea of it. This is a 20-year-old worker bee, trying to enjoy a nice ride home after flipping chicken, and she gets turned into a human pinball by a woman who thinks a joyride to the apartment complex counts as “handling it.” The most absurd part isn’t even the bounce-off-the-hood drama—it’s the aftermath. Julie Smith didn’t just fail to do the right thing. She failed to do anything. No call. No care. No accountability until a lawyer showed up like a civil court bounty hunter. And now, thanks to Oklahoma’s treble damages law, her “I’ll deal with it later” attitude could cost her triple. Poetic? A little. Petty? Absolutely. But that’s why we’re here. Because in the world of civil court, sometimes justice isn’t about murder weapons or drug cartels—it’s about a woman who thought she could hit someone, play chauffeur, and just drive away. Spoiler: she can’t. And if you’re gonna bounce someone off your hood, at least leave your insurance card. This isn’t Fast & Furious. It’s Tulsa. Act like it.
Case Overview
-
Audri Main
individual
Rep: Chris Knight
- Julie Smith individual
| # | Cause of Action | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | negligence | Defendant's vehicle struck Plaintiff's scooter, causing injuries and damages |