ACH DIH PROPERTIES, LLC v. HOME DEPOT USA, INC.
What's This Case About?
Let’s be honest: when you hear “Home Depot,” you think of garden hoses, overpriced power tools, and that one guy in aisle 12 who’s been staring at ceiling fans for 45 minutes. You do not think, “Ah yes, the multinational orange retail giant that’s slapping a $130,000 lien on a luxury townhome development in Oklahoma because a rogue subcontractor ghosted their Pro Xtra account.” But here we are. Welcome to CrazyCivilCourt, where the stakes are high, the paperwork is higher, and someone forgot to pay their Home Depot bill—again.
Our story begins, as so many modern tragedies do, with real estate. ACH DIH Properties, LLC—let’s call them ADP, because even their own lawyers seem to have given up on the full name—bought a big ol’ plot of land in Edmond, Oklahoma, in April 2024. The vision? Build “The Oaks at Covell,” a swanky 102-unit townhome complex that promises granite countertops, smart-home features, and, presumably, HOA meetings that last longer than most therapy sessions. ADP brought in their construction partner, ACRE Construction, LLC—basically the project’s general contractor—to make this dream a reality. Think of ACRE as the conductor of this chaotic orchestra of subcontractors, plumbers, electricians, and guys who install things with nail guns.
One of those subcontractors was Xtreme Exteriors Roofing & Siding, LLC—yes, “Xtreme” with an X, because subtlety is for people who don’t wear neon safety vests. Xtreme, according to their own website (we checked, it’s very dramatic), is a “premier home exterior contractor” with “decades of experience.” In November 2024, ACRE signed a contract with Xtreme for $289,445.56 to handle, presumably, the roofing, siding, and other things that keep rain out and property values up. All good so far. Classic construction deal. Handshake, paperwork, dreams of curb appeal.
But here’s where Xtreme’s “Xtreme” work ethic takes a nosedive. Instead of paying for the materials they pulled from Home Depot—using a Pro account designed for contractors who, you know, pay their bills—they just… didn’t. Home Depot, being the world’s largest home improvement store and not a charity, eventually noticed that Xtreme was racking up charges like a college student with their first credit card. And when no payment came, Home Depot did what any self-respecting corporation does: they filed a lien. On January 27, 2026, they slapped a $130,351.56 lien on the property—the very land ADP owns—claiming they were owed for materials used on the project.
Now, normally, a lien is a big deal but not a shocker. Subcontractors and suppliers do it all the time when they’re not paid. But here’s the Xtreme problem: Home Depot filed the lien 207 days after they allegedly last delivered materials. Oklahoma law gives you 90 days to file a lien. Not 207. Not “whenever you get around to it.” Ninety. It’s not exactly a gray area. It’s like showing up to a wedding three months late and still demanding cake.
ADP and ACRE were not amused. They sent a certified letter on February 3, 2026—because nothing says “legal drama” like certified mail with return receipt—demanding Home Depot release the lien, which they called “fraudulent” and a “cloud on title.” Translation: this lien is screwing up their ability to access construction financing. If the property has a lien on it, banks get nervous. And when banks get nervous, they charge more interest or just say no. ACRE is now at risk of missing deadlines, blowing budgets, and possibly having to explain to investors why their luxury townhomes are being held hostage by a Home Depot receipt.
So ADP, the actual property owner, sues Home Depot to quiet title—a legal term that sounds like a meditation app but really means “get this bogus claim off my land.” They want the court to declare, once and for all, that Home Depot has zero rights to their property and that the lien is as valid as a Monopoly deed.
But it’s not just Home Depot in the crosshairs. ACRE is also suing Xtreme, the subcontractor who started this whole mess by failing to pay their Home Depot bill. ACRE claims Xtreme breached their contract—shocker—by not only doing incomplete work but also by leaving ACRE on the hook for a lien they never should’ve faced. So now ACRE wants damages—over $75,000, to start—and is also demanding indemnity, which is legalese for “if I get sued or have to pay because of your mess, you reimburse me.” They’re throwing in “implied indemnity” too, which is basically the legal version of “this is your fault, and I shouldn’t have to clean it up.”
And ADP? They’re suing Xtreme for negligence—yes, negligence for not paying a Home Depot account. The argument is simple: Xtreme had a duty to pay their suppliers, they didn’t, and now ADP is stuck in legal limbo. It’s like if your roommate doesn’t pay the electric bill, the power company shuts off the lights, and then you get sued because the landlord says the apartment’s uninhabitable. Only here, the roommate is a roofing company, and the electric bill is $130K in siding materials.
Now, let’s talk money. $130,000 sounds like a lot—and it is, especially if you’re a homeowner. But in the world of commercial construction? That’s a rounding error. We’re talking about a 102-unit development. Even a modest $300K per unit puts the total project value north of $30 million. So $130K is less than half a percent of the total. But here’s the thing: in construction, timing is everything. A lien—even a wrongful one—can delay financing, trigger penalty clauses, and scare off buyers. So while the dollar amount might not break the bank, the disruption could cost way more.
So what do these plaintiffs actually want? ADP wants the lien wiped off the property like a bad Yelp review. They want the court to declare Home Depot has no claim, no interest, no business being on their land. They also want to be reimbursed for legal fees and, under Oklahoma’s anti-slander-of-title law, triple damages—which could mean up to nearly $400K if they win. ACRE wants Xtreme to pay for the breach, cover any liability from the lien, and reimburse them for every legal dollar spent playing defense in a fight they didn’t start.
Now, our take? The most absurd part isn’t even that Home Depot filed a lien 117 days late. It’s that no one seems to have communicated. Xtreme vanishes into the ether, Home Depot assumes someone else will pay, ACRE assumes Xtreme paid, and ADP assumes the property is lien-free. It’s a classic game of “not my problem” that only ends when the lawyers show up. And let’s be real—Home Depot? The company that employs 475,000 people? They have a whole department for contractor accounts. Did no one notice Xtreme was months behind? Did no one send a single reminder? Or was it just easier to file a lien and hope someone else figures it out?
We’re rooting for ADP and ACRE—not because they’re innocent angels, but because they’re the ones trying to build something. Xtreme acted like a contractor on a reality TV show where the goal is to cause maximum chaos. And Home Depot? For a company that prides itself on “dedicated support for Pro-level customers,” they sure handled this like a DIY disaster. If you’re going to flex your corporate muscle with a lien, at least do it legally. Otherwise, you’re not a creditor—you’re just a very orange nuisance.
So next time you’re in Home Depot, browsing the mulch section or arguing with an associate about whether duct tape counts as a structural adhesive, remember: somewhere in Oklahoma, a luxury townhome project is being held up because someone didn’t pay for a few pallets of siding. And that, folks, is the American dream—litigated one lien at a time.
Case Overview
-
ACH DIH PROPERTIES, LLC
business
Rep: Brian L. Mitchell, OBA No. 19529 and Daniel R. Wilson, OBA #32284
-
ACRE CONSTRUCTION, II, LLC
business
Rep: Brian L. Mitchell, OBA No. 19529 and Daniel R. Wilson, OBA #32284
- HOME DEPOT USA, INC. business
- XTREME EXTERIORS ROOFING & SIDING, LLC business
| # | Cause of Action | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Quiet Title | ADP seeks to quiet title in its favor against Home Depot's wrongful lien |
| 2 | Breach of Contract | ACRE sues Xtreme for breach of contract for failing to provide services as agreed upon |
| 3 | Indemnity | ACRE seeks indemnification from Xtreme for any liability incurred due to Xtreme's actions |
| 4 | Implied Indemnity | ACRE seeks implied indemnity from Xtreme for any liability incurred due to Xtreme's actions |
| 5 | Negligence | ADP sues Xtreme for negligence for failing to pay Home Depot on Xtreme's open account |
Docket Events
26 entries-
02/19/2026SSFCHSCPCSHERIFF'S SERVICE FEE FOR COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER10.00
-
02/19/2026OCJCOKLAHOMA COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND1.55
-
02/19/2026DCADMIN10DISTRICT COURT ADMIN FEE FOR $10 COLLECTION1.50
-
02/19/2026CONTRACTBREACH OF AGREEMENT - CONTRACT
-
02/19/2026PFE1PETITION163.00
-
02/19/2026
-
02/19/2026DCADMINCSFDISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER1.50
-
02/19/2026TEXTCIVIL RELIEF MORE THAN $10,000 INITIAL FILING.
-
02/19/2026DCADMIN155DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTIONS0.23
-
02/19/2026OCASAOKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES10.00
-
02/19/2026SJFISSTATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND - INTERPRETER AND TRANSLATOR SERVICES0.45
-
02/19/2026TEXTOCIS HAS AUTOMATICALLY ASSIGNED JUDGE DISHMAN, C. BRENT TO THIS CASE.
-
02/19/2026CCADMIN10COURT CLERK ADMIN FEE FOR $10 COLLECTION1.00
-
02/19/2026
-
02/19/2026ADJUSTADJUSTING ENTRY: MONIES DUE TO AC09-CARD ALLOCATION6.71
-
02/19/2026CCADMIN0155COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTION0.16
-
02/19/2026DMFEDISPUTE MEDIATION FEE7.00
-
02/19/2026
-
02/19/2026SMIMASUMMONS ISSUED - MAILED BY ATTORNEY
-
02/19/2026CCRMPFCOURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE10.00
-
02/19/2026CCADMINCSFCOURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER1.00
-
02/19/2026LTFLENGTHY TRIAL FUND10.00
-
02/19/2026OCISROKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM REVOLVING FUND25.00
-
02/19/2026ACCOUNT
-
02/19/2026PFE7LAW LIBRARY FEE6.00
-
02/24/2026