Union Station South Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Warren S. Clarke
What's This Case About?
Let’s be real: you don’t expect your homeowners association to go full Scarface on a $2,364.56 bill. But that’s exactly what’s happening in Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, where the Union Station South Homeowners Association, Inc. has pulled out the legal big guns—not just to collect a few months of dues, but to foreclose on a house over what amounts to less than the cost of a decent used car. That’s right—this isn’t a lawsuit for damages, or a demand for yard cleanup. This is a full-blown attempt to take someone’s home because they didn’t pay their HOA fees. And if you think that’s dramatic, just wait—because the defendant, Warren S. Clarke, might not even be alive. Or married. Or reachable. But that’s not stopping the HOA one bit.
So who are these people? On one side, we’ve got the Union Station South Homeowners Association, Inc.—a not-for-profit corporation that, like every HOA since the dawn of suburbia, exists to enforce rules about trash cans, lawn lengths, and, apparently, aggressively pursue debt collection. Their job is to maintain the neighborhood’s curb appeal and common areas, funded by monthly or quarterly assessments from residents. On the other side is Warren S. Clarke, the alleged owner of 512 S. Redwood Avenue, a modest home in a quiet Broken Arrow subdivision. That’s about all we know. The filing is so cautious about Clarke’s status that it lists him as “if living, or the unknown heirs, beneficiaries, successors, executors, administrators, devisees, and assigns, if deceased.” Which, let’s be honest, sounds less like a legal document and more like a Choose Your Own Adventure book written by a paralegal. His spouse? “If any.” The occupants of the house? Just “Occupants.” It’s like the HOA is suing a ghost—or a whole haunted house full of legal phantoms.
Now, here’s how we got here. At some point, Warren S. Clarke (or whoever was responsible for the property) stopped paying the HOA dues. According to the claim, as of February 18, 2026, the total past-due balance was $2,364.56. That number includes $804 in unpaid assessments, $30.36 in interest, $85 in “other charges,” and—wait for it—$800 in attorney fees and collection costs. Yes, you read that right: the legal bill to collect under $920 in actual assessments and interest is nearly double the original debt. And while late fees are listed at $0.00 (bless their hearts), the HOA tacks on future assessments, more interest, and even more attorney fees that will keep piling up “during the pendency of this action.” So, the longer this drags on, the more Clarke allegedly owes—even if he’s already moved out, passed away, or never knew about the lawsuit in the first place.
The legal move here is a petition for foreclosure of an owner’s association lien. In plain English? The HOA is saying, “You didn’t pay your dues, so we put a lien on your house. Now, since you still haven’t paid, we want the court to force a sale of the property to cover what you owe.” It’s not uncommon—HOAs in many states have the legal right to place liens and even foreclose over unpaid fees. But here’s the kicker: in Oklahoma, HOA liens are generally junior to mortgage liens. That means if the house is sold, the mortgage lender (in this case, Associated Mortgage Corporation, represented by MERS—the mysterious Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.) gets paid first. Only whatever’s left goes to the HOA. Given that houses in this part of Broken Arrow are worth well over $150,000, it’s unlikely the HOA will get stiffed entirely—but they’re not just after the money. They want the court to wipe out all competing claims to the property, including from the mortgage holder, the spouse (if there is one), and literally anyone else living there. They’re not just chasing a debt—they’re trying to legally erase everyone’s rights to this house, just in case someone shows up later saying, “Uh, that’s my house?”
And what do they want? $2,364.56—plus more. They’re asking for a personal judgment against Clarke (or his estate), meaning he could be on the hook for the debt even if the house sells for nothing. They also want the property sold at auction, the proceeds applied to the judgment, and any leftover cash held by the court (because, of course, they can’t just hand it back to the homeowner—no, it must abide). They want attorney fees, court costs, interest, and a formal declaration that their lien is valid and superior. All of this over a sum that, in the grand scheme of real estate, is basically pocket lint. For context: the average HOA fee in the U.S. is around $300 a month. This debt represents about eight months of dues. Eight months. Not eight years. Not a decade of defiance. Eight months of non-payment, and we’re at foreclosure.
Now, here’s our take: the most absurd part of this case isn’t even the amount. It’s the theater of it all. The HOA filed a lawsuit listing five defendants, including “the spouse of Warren S. Clarke, if any,” and “the occupants of the premises,” who could be tenants, relatives, or a family of raccoons for all we know. They’re dragging Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.—a notorious, often criticized nominee entity used in mortgage servicing—into a fight over lawn maintenance fees. They sent a debt collection notice citing the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act… in a lawsuit. It’s like they’re trying to scare everyone away with legal fireworks, hoping someone will just pay up to make it stop.
And let’s talk about that $800 attorney fee. For a standard foreclosure petition? That’s… aggressive. It suggests the HOA isn’t just trying to recover costs—it’s using legal pressure as a tool. Maybe they’re hoping Clarke (or his heirs) will see this nuclear option and say, “Fine, here’s $2,400, just leave us alone.” And honestly? That’s probably what will happen. Because going to trial over this would cost everyone more than the debt itself.
Do we think the HOA is wrong to collect what’s owed? Not necessarily. Dues keep the lights on, the grass mowed, the playground safe. But when the cure is worse than the disease—when you’re threatening to take a home over a debt smaller than a security deposit—we have to ask: who’s really being served here? The community? Or just the lawyers?
We’re rooting for common sense. For a phone call instead of a foreclosure. For an HOA that remembers it’s supposed to be a homeowners association, not a debt collection cartel. But hey—this is civil court. And in the world of petty disputes, sometimes the smallest debts come with the biggest drama.
Case Overview
-
Union Station South Homeowners Association, Inc.
business
Rep: Timothy D. Geary
- Warren S. Clarke individual
- Spouse of Warren S. Clarke individual
- Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. business
- Associated Mortgage Corporation business
- Occupants of the Premises at 512 S Redwood Ave. individual
| # | Cause of Action | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | petition for foreclosure of owner's association lien | plaintiff seeks to foreclose on defendant's property due to unpaid assessments and fees |