CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
OKLAHOMA COUNTY • CJ-2026-839

Debra Brice v. SSM Health Care of Oklahoma, Inc. d/b/a St. Anthony Hospital

Filed: Feb 2, 2024
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut right to the chase: a woman is suing a hospital and her doctor for $75,000 because she says they botched her medical care so badly she’s now permanently injured, in pain, and financially screwed—all while allegedly failing to tell her what the heck they were even doing to her body in the first place. And get this: she’s doing it herself, no lawyer, just Debra Brice, Oklahoma homeowner and accidental legal warrior, going toe-to-toe with a multi-million-dollar hospital system and a licensed doctor. This isn’t just a lawsuit—it’s a one-woman David vs. Goliath medical drama with paperwork, swearing, and at least one very confused notary who apparently thinks we’re living in the year 2074.

Debra Brice, of Shawnee, Oklahoma—home of the Pottawatomie County Fair and, now, this absolutely wild civil case—walks into this story as your average resident with, presumably, an average life. Until February 6, 2024. That’s the day she walked (or was wheeled) into St. Anthony Hospital, an Oklahoma City institution that’s been around since the early 1900s and has seen its fair share of emergencies, surgeries, and, we assume, at least one dramatic Code Blue played out in slow motion for a medical drama filming on location. But on this day, it wasn’t a heart attack or a car crash that brought Debra in—it was something far more mundane, and yet far more legally explosive: routine medical treatment. At least, that’s what she probably thought it was. The petition doesn’t specify what kind of treatment she received—no diagnosis, no procedure name, no dramatic moment where a scalpel slipped or a medication was mislabeled. Just… something happened. And according to Debra, it changed everything.

Enter Dr. Jared Lepley, D.O.—a physician licensed to practice in Oklahoma, and, per the filing, allegedly present during Debra’s treatment. We don’t know his specialty, his bedside manner, or whether he wears those cool doctor clogs everyone seems to love on TikTok. What we do know is that, in Debra’s telling, he and the entire St. Anthony Hospital machine failed her in two major ways: first, by being straight-up negligent in how they diagnosed, treated, and cared for her; and second, by not properly informing her about the risks, benefits, or alternatives of whatever they were doing. That second part? That’s the legal equivalent of a mic drop. Informed consent isn’t just a form you sign while half-asleep before surgery—it’s a bedrock principle of medical ethics. If a doctor doesn’t tell you what could go wrong, or what other options you have, and you end up hurt? That’s not just bad medicine. That’s potentially a lawsuit waiting to happen. And Debra, whether she knew it at the time or not, was already drafting her opening argument in her head.

Now, let’s talk about what “negligence” actually means here, because we’re not talking about a doctor who forgot to wash their hands (though, honestly, still bad). In legal terms, negligence means the doctor or hospital didn’t meet the standard of care that a reasonably competent medical professional would have provided under the same circumstances. Did they misdiagnose her? Did they ignore obvious symptoms? Did they perform a procedure incorrectly? We don’t know—Debra’s petition is, shall we say, economical with the details. But she’s alleging that their actions—or inactions—were the sole and proximate cause of her injuries. That’s legalese for “this wouldn’t have happened if they hadn’t messed up.” And the consequences? She claims she’s now dealing with permanent bodily injury, ongoing physical pain, mental anguish (which, honestly, suing a hospital pro se probably adds to), and lost wages because she couldn’t work. Oh, and a pile of medical bills. The kind that make you question every life choice that led you to need an MRI in America.

So why is she in court? Because she wants someone to pay. Not just for the bills, but for the pain, the suffering, the violation of her right to make informed decisions about her own body. Her legal claim is straightforward: negligence. That’s it. One count. No frills. But within that single claim lies a whole world of potential courtroom fireworks. She’s not just asking for reimbursement—she’s demanding punitive damages, which are the legal system’s way of saying, “You didn’t just mess up—you messed up so badly that we need to punish you to make sure you don’t do it again.” That’s not something courts hand out lightly. You don’t get punitive damages for a typo on a prescription. You get them when the behavior was reckless, intentional, or so grossly careless it might as well have been. And Debra? She’s throwing that grenade into the courtroom with both hands.

And how much does she want? $75,000. Is that a lot? Well, in the world of medical malpractice, it’s actually… kind of modest. Real malpractice cases often seek millions, especially when there’s permanent disability or death involved. But $75,000? That’s the price of a luxury SUV, a small house in some parts of the country, or, in medical billing terms, approximately 1.3 emergency room visits without insurance. It’s enough to make a difference in someone’s life—enough to cover medical debt, lost income, therapy, maybe even a vacation to forget the whole thing—but not so much that it screams “ambulance chaser.” It feels like a number chosen not because it’s extravagant, but because it’s real. It’s what she thinks it would take to make her whole. Or at least, not completely broken.

Now, here’s the kicker: Debra is representing herself. Pro se, as the legal term goes. That means no law degree (probably), no paralegal army, no slick courtroom suits. Just her, her printer, and a deep, simmering belief that she was wronged. And while we’re not supposed to root, well… come on. You’re telling us a regular person, armed only with Google, a notary public, and righteous indignation, is taking on a corporate hospital system and a doctor with malpractice insurance thicker than the Bible? That’s not just a lawsuit. That’s a folk hero origin story. Will she win? Who knows. Medical negligence cases are notoriously hard to prove, especially without an expert witness to testify that, yes, the doctor did fall below the standard of care. And going it alone? That’s like trying to perform open-heart surgery with a YouTube tutorial. But the sheer audacity? The chutzpah? The fact that she’s even trying? That’s the stuff of legend.

The most absurd part of all this? The notary. Look at the verification. “Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 day of Feb, 2074.” 2074. That’s not a typo. That’s a time traveler. Either that, or someone really needs to check their computer clock. And yet, in a case about medical records, informed consent, and the fragility of human error, it feels weirdly fitting. Because at the heart of this whole mess is a simple question: who’s accountable when the system fails you? Is it the doctor? The hospital? The paperwork? The calendar? Debra Brice thinks the answer is “yes, and also pay me $75,000.” And you know what? We’re here for it. Whether she wins or loses, one thing’s for sure: St. Anthony Hospital didn’t see this coming.

Case Overview

$75,000 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma
Filing Attorney
Debra Brice
Relief Sought
$75,000 Monetary
$1 Punitive
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 negligence Plaintiff alleges Defendants were negligent in medical diagnosis, care, and treatment, resulting in injuries and medical expenses.

Petition Text

403 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA DEBRA BRICE ) 2116 TIMBERS BLVD ) SHAWNEE, OK 74804 ) Plaintiff, vs. SSM HEALTH CARE OF OKLAHOMA, INC. d/b/a ST. ANTHONY HOSPITAL; and JARED LPLEY, D.O. Defendants. PETITION COMES NOW, Plaintiff, Debra Brice, (hereinafter "Plaintiff") pro se, and for her cause of action against Defendants, SSM Health Care of Oklahoma, Inc. d/b/a St. Anthony Hospital and Jared Lepley, D.O. (hereinafter "Defendant" or "Defendants"), alleges and states as follows: 1. Plaintiff is a resident of Pottawatomi County, Oklahoma. 2. To the best of Plaintiff's knowledge, Defendant Lepley is a resident of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma. 3. To the best of Plaintiff's knowledge, Defendant SSM Health Care of Oklahoma, Inc. is a for profit hospital operating in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma doing business as St. Anthony Hospital. 4. Venue is proper in Oklahoma County, State of Oklahoma, and the Court has jurisdictions over the parties. 5. On February 6, 2024, Defendant Lepley and Defendant St. Anthony Hospital by and through their agents, ostensible agents, servants, and employees administered medical treatment, care, and diagnosis to the Plaintiff. 6. Defendant Lepley and Defendant St. Anthony Hospital’s agents, ostensible agents, servants, and employees were negligent in the medical diagnosis, care, and treatment administered to Plaintiff, which was the sole and proximate cause of injuries suffered by the Plaintiff. 7. Defendant Lepley, and Defendant St. Anthony Hospital’s agents, ostensible agents, servants, and employees failed to properly inform Plaintiff of all material risks, benefits, and alternatives to the care they administered to Plaintiff and therefore did not obtain Plaintiff’s valid informed consent. 8. As a result of the conduct of Defendants the Plaintiff has incurred medical expenses and has suffered permanent bodily injury, physical pain, mental anguish, and lost earnings. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendants for actual and punitive damages in excess of $75,000, interest, costs, and any other relief the Court deems just and proper. Respectfully submitted, Debra Brice, pro se IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA Case No. ______________ VERIFICATION I, Debra Brice of lawful age, being first duly sworn, upon oath, state that I am the Plaintiff above named: that I have read the above and forgoing petition, that I am familiar with the contents thereof, and that the things and matters therein contained are true and correct. Debra Brice Signature Debra Brice Print Name Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 day of Feb, 2074 My commission expires on: ________________ Notary Public
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.