CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
WAGONER COUNTY • CJ-2026-00105

Jeff Brown v. Gunter Construction, LLC

Filed: Mar 9, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s be real: how many times have you slipped on a wet pool deck and thought, “Man, I could sue”? Jeff Brown did. And not just for the fall — oh no — he’s suing because his pool looks like it was plastered by a raccoon on espresso, the tiles are the wrong color, the concrete is chipping like cheap nail polish, and somehow, the plaster covered the tile grout, which sounds less like construction and more like abstract art. Welcome to Brown v. Gunter Construction, LLC et al., a $17,075 saga of betrayal, bad concrete, and the kind of home improvement disaster that makes you question whether “handyman special” should come with a warning label.

So who are these people? On one side, we’ve got Jeff Brown, a homeowner in Coweta, Oklahoma — a man who, like many before him, dared to dream of backyard bliss. He wanted a sleek, functional in-ground pool, the kind where you can do a graceful dive and not immediately slice your knee open on a jagged wall. On the other side: Gunter Construction, LLC, a company that, according to the state of Oklahoma, is inactive — as in, legally comatose — yet somehow still building pools. The company’s principals? Jeffrey Gunther and Darlin Gunther, a married couple (we assume, given the shared address and surname) operating out of Broken Arrow, who signed the contract in their individual names despite listing the defunct LLC as the contractor. That’s like ordering a pizza from a restaurant that closed in 2019, only to have the former manager show up at your door in a stained apron, saying, “I still got the sauce recipe.” Legally… messy. Also, possibly illegal. But hey, let’s talk about the pool.

Ah yes, the pool. Per the contract signed on April 4, 2025 — which, side note, is the same day this lawsuit was filed, making this the fastest turnaround in construction litigation history — Jeff Brown was promised a 12x24-foot Gunite sports pool with a smooth plaster finish, 6x6 tiles of his choosing, and 11 feet of brushed-finish decking on most sides, with 3 feet on the far end. Sounds standard. Sounds nice. Sounds like something you could Instagram with a cocktail in hand. What he actually got? A concrete nightmare. The plaster finish isn’t smooth — it’s rough, uneven, and “particularly rough along the top edge,” which is not the phrase you want associated with a pool you’re expected to touch. The tiles? Wrong color, or discolored, and partially covered in dried plaster, like someone sneezed mid-pour. The decking? Slick as an oil spill, already chipping, and discolored — a triple threat of structural embarrassment. And here’s the kicker: the Gunthers tried to fix the plaster after the fact, but all they managed was making it look worse — with visible aggregate and discoloration, like a bad DIY drywall job.

Jeff Brown, to his credit, didn’t just rage-post on Nextdoor. He made a written demand for the Gunthers to honor their one-year “workmanship builder’s warranty,” as promised in the contract. And what happened? Crickets. Silence. Radio dead air. These folks ghosted him harder than an Oklahoma summer fling. So now, instead of floaties and lemonade, we’ve got a petition filed in Wagoner County District Court, where Jeff is throwing the legal kitchen sink at them: breach of contract, breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty, and negligence — because yes, someone actually slipped on this slick disaster.

Let’s break down the legal drama in plain English. First, breach of contract: the Gunthers promised a smooth pool with proper tiles and safe decking. They delivered a sandpaper-lined, grout-globbed, hazard-zone splash pad. That’s not fulfilling the deal. Second, breach of express warranty: they specifically promised a one-year warranty on workmanship. Jeff asked for repairs within that window. They said no. That’s like selling a toaster that burns toast and then refusing to honor the “30-day satisfaction guarantee” because you don’t feel like it. Third, breach of implied warranty: even if there were no written promises, the law assumes that a pool won’t be a death trap or look like it was built during a blackout. Pools should be safe. Decks shouldn’t be slicker than a politician’s smile. And fourth, negligence: Jeff claims he actually slipped on the decking and got minor injuries — abrasions, skin irritation, and yes, pain and suffering, because apparently the pool’s rough walls are so bad they’ve become a dermatological hazard. That’s not just poor work — that’s a liability waiting for a viral TikTok of someone face-planting into the shallow end.

Now, what does Jeff want? He’s asking for $17,075 — a very specific number, like he added up every receipt and threw in $75 for emotional distress. Is that a lot for a botched pool job? Honestly? Probably not. Pool resurfacing alone can run $5,000 to $10,000. New tiles? Another few grand. Fixing unsafe decking? Labor, materials, permits — yeah, $17K sounds like a conservative estimate. And he’s also asking for attorney fees, costs, and “all other relief the Court deems just and equitable,” which is legalese for “and maybe a gift card to Home Depot for my troubles.” He’s not asking for a jury trial, which suggests he’d rather just get paid and move on with his life — a man who just wants to swim without fear of exfoliating his entire leg.

Here’s the tea, though: Gunter Construction, LLC is inactive. Legally, it shouldn’t be entering contracts. And yet, Jeffrey and Darlin Gunther signed this thing in their individual names, which means they’re not hiding behind a corporate veil — they’re personally on the hook. That’s either bold or deeply unadvised. And the fact that they tried to “fix” the plaster only to make it worse? That’s the kind of move that turns a repairable mistake into a full-blown legal dumpster fire. It’s like trying to fix a typo by scribbling over it with a Sharpie — now everyone knows something went wrong.

Our take? Look, we all want a backyard oasis. We get it. But this case is less “million-dollar listing” and more “million ways to sue your contractor.” The most absurd part isn’t even the plaster-covered tiles — it’s that someone built a dangerously slick deck and thought, “Yep, that’ll do.” This isn’t just shoddy work — it’s a safety hazard dressed up as a luxury upgrade. And Jeff Brown? We’re rooting for him. Not because he slipped — though that’s tragicomic — but because he’s holding someone accountable for selling a dream and delivering a disaster. If you’re going to put your name on a pool contract, you better make sure it doesn’t double as a slip-and-fall exhibit. Otherwise, welcome to the District Court of Petty Civil Justice — where bad plaster meets its match.

Case Overview

Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court in and for Wagoner County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$17,075 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Breach of Contract Defendants failed to construct pool with smooth plaster finish, installed incorrect tiles, and constructed pool surface, tiles, and decking in a workmanlike manner
2 Breach of Express Warranty Defendants failed to warranty their workmanship on the pool
3 Breach of Implied Warranty Defendants failed to construct pool and decking on the Property free from defects
4 Negligence GC and Gunther constructed pool decking in a manner that made it slick and unsafe, left rough and jagged surfaces on the walls and floor of the pool

Petition Text

1,247 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR WAGONER COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA JEFF BROWN, Plaintiff, v. GUNTHER CONSTRUCTION, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company; JEFFREY GUNTHER, an individual; and DARLIN GUNTHER, an individual, Defendants. PETITION COMES NOW, Plaintiff, Jeff Brown ("Brown"), by and through his attorney of record, Tadd J.P. Bogan of the law firm of JONES, GOTCHER & BOGAN, P.C., and for his causes of action against Defendants, Gunter Construction, LLC ("GC"), Jeffrey Gunther ("Gunther"), and Darlin Gunther ("Darlin") (hereinafter collectively "Defendant"), states as follows: 1. Brown is an individual who resides in and owns real property located at 14460 S. 246th East Ave., Coweta, Wagoner County, Oklahoma (the "Property"). 2. GC is an Oklahoma limited liability company, which is listed as inactive by the Oklahoma Secretary of State, doing business at 7609 S. 5th Street, Broken Arrow, Tulsa County, Oklahoma. 3. Gunther is an individual who resides at 7609 S. 5th Street, Broken Arrow, Tulsa County, Oklahoma. 4. Darlin is an individual who resides at 7609 S. 5th Street, Broken Arrow, Tulsa County, Oklahoma 5. The causes of action asserted herein arise out of a contract entered into and partially performed in Wagoner County, State of Oklahoma, and relate to improvements constructed in Wagoner County, State of Oklahoma. 6. This Court has jurisdiction over the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof, and is a proper venue for this action. FACTS 7. On or about April 4, 2025, Brown and Defendants entered into an In-Ground Sports Design Swimming Pool Contract dated May 2, 2025 (the “Contract”). 8. Pursuant to the Contract, Brown and GC are listed as the parties thereto; however, GC is listed as inactive with the Oklahoma Secretary of State, and the Contract is executed by Gunther and Darlin in their individual names and capacities. 9. Pursuant to the Contract, Defendants agreed to build an in-ground at the Property which included the following specifications: 12x24 in-ground Gunite sports design swimming pool with a depth of 3' to 5'; with a “Smooth Plaster Finish with a choice of 6x6 Tiles”; and 11’ of decking between patio and pool, 11’ of decking on both ends of the pool, and 3’ of decking on the far end of the pool, with a brushed finish. 10. Defendants constructed a pool on Brown’s Property; however, the plaster finish of the pool is not smooth, rather, it is rough and uneven. 11. Defendants attempted to smooth the plaster finish of Brown’s pool after construction thereof was complete; however, the plaster finish remains rough, particularly along the top edge, and there is discoloration and visible aggregate where Defendants attempted to smooth the finish/surface of the pool. 12. Further, the tiles installed on the pool are not the color selected by Brown, or have become discolored, and have plaster covering parts of the mortar. 13. Furthermore, the pool decking installed by Defendants is discolored, is dangerously slick, and is already chipping. 14. Brown has made written demand on Defendants to honor the warranty provided in the Contract; however, Defendants have failed and refused to warranty their work. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION BREACH OF CONTRACT (All Defendants) 15. Brown hereby incorporates and realleges the allegations contained in paragraph numbers one (1) through fourteen (14) above. 16. Defendants breached the Contract by failing to construct the pool on the Property with a smooth plaster finish, and by installing incorrect or defective tiles. 17. Defendants breached the Contract by failing to construct the pool surface, tiles, and decking in a workmanlike manner. 18. As a result to Defendants' breach of the Contract, Brown has been damaged in the sum of $17,075.00, plus the cost to repair the chipped concrete decking, attorney fees, costs, and all other relief this Court deems just in equitable. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION BREACH OF EXPRESS WARRANTY (All Defendants) 19. Brown hereby incorporates and realleges the allegations contained in paragraph numbers one (1) through eighteen (18) above. 20. Pursuant to the Contract, Defendants agreed to provide a 1-year "workmanship builder's warranty" on the pool. 21. Brown made a warranty claim with Defendants within one (1) year of Defendants’ construction of the pool, but Defendants have failed and refused to warrant their workmanship on the pool. 22. As a result of Defendants’ breach of their express warranty, Brown has been damaged in the sum of $17,075.00, plus the cost to repair the chipped concrete decking, attorney fees, costs, and all other relief this Court deems just in equitable. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION BREACH OF IMPLIED WARRANTY (All Defendants) 23. Brown hereby incorporates and realleges the allegations contained in paragraph numbers one (1) through twenty-two (22) above. 24. The Contract and Defendants’ construction of Brown’s pool and decking surrounding the pool include implied warranties that the work performed by Defendants will be free from defects, and that the concrete decking surrounding the pool will be fit for the ordinary and particular purpose for which it was constructed. 25. Defendants breached their implied warranties to Brown by failing to construct the pool and decking on the Property free from defects, and by failing to construct the pool decking in a manner that is fit for the ordinary and/or particular purpose for which it was constructed. 26. As a result of Defendants’ breach of their implied warranties, Brown has been damaged in the sum of $17,075.00, plus the cost to repair the chipped concrete decking, attorney fees, costs, and all other relief this Court deems just in equitable. FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION NEGLIGENCE (GC & Gunther) 27. Brown hereby incorporates and realleges the allegations contained in paragraph numbers one (1) through twenty-six (26) above. 28. Gunther individually oversaw GC's, or GC's subcontractor's, construction of the pool and pool decking on the Property. 29. GC and Gunther had an extracontractual duty to avoid foreseeable harm to Brown and/or his Property. 30. GC and Gunther breached that duty by, inter alia, constructing the pool decking in a manner which made it slick and unsafe, left rough and jagged surfaces on the walls and floor of the pool, and left the plaster covering parts of the tile mortar. 31. As a direct and proximate result of CG's and Gunther's installation of the pool decking in a manner which caused it to be extremely slick, Brown has slipped and fallen on the concrete decking of the pool, causing him physical harm, and pain and suffering. 32. Further, Brown has received minor abrasions and skin irritation from the rough surface of the pool's plaster. 33. Furthermore, as a result of GC's and Gunther's negligence, the pool decking and pool tiles are significantly discolored, and the tiles have been damaged by plaster covering the tile mortar. 34. As a result of GC's and Gunther's negligence, Brown has been damaged in an amount to be determined at trial, which is in excess of $17,075.00, but less than $75,000.00, plus attorney fees, costs, and all other relief this Court deems just and equitable. WHEREFORE, premises considered, Plaintiff Jeff Brown prays the Court enter judgment in his favor and against Defendants for Breach of Contract, Breach of Express Warranty, and Breach of Implied Warranty, and award him damages in the sum of $17,075.00, plus the cost to repair the chipped concrete, attorney fees, costs, and all other relief this Court deems just and equitable; and award judgment in his favor and against GC and Gunther for Negligence, and award him damages in a sum to be determined at trial which does not exceed the sum of $75,000, exclusive of attorney fees and costs, plus attorney fees, costs, and all other relief this Court deems just and equitable. Respectfully submitted, Tadd J.P. Bogan, OBA# 20962 JONES, GOTCHER & BOGAN, P.C. 15 East Fifth Street, Suite 3800 Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103 Telephone: (918)581-8200 Facsimile: (918)583-1189 E-Mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff, Jeff Brown
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.