CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
LEFLORE COUNTY • SC-2026-00246

Fast Loans of Arkoma v. Corey Williams

Filed: Mar 12, 2026
Type: SC

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut right to the chase: someone borrowed $1,800 from a business literally called Fast Loans of Arkoma, didn’t pay it back, and now we’re all here — in the hallowed halls of LeFlore County Small Claims Court — because a stack of cash smaller than most people’s security deposits has escalated into a sworn legal battle involving notaries, court orders, and the full weight of the Oklahoma judicial system. Yes, really. This is not a drill. This is Fast Loans vs. Corey Williams, a tale of credit, consequences, and what happens when you treat a payday lender like your cousin who “can wait till next week.”

So who are these people? On one side, we’ve got Fast Loans of Arkoma, a business so committed to speed they skipped the whole “corporate entity” vibe and filed their lawsuit through a single human named Cadesha Walden, who signed the affidavit like she was signing a birthday card — “Plaintiff,” no last name, no explanation, just vibes and a P.O. box in Arkoma, Oklahoma. Is Cadesha the owner? The manager? The one who handed over the cash? We don’t know. But she’s the face of this operation, and she’s ready to go full Law & Order: Small Claims over $1,800. On the other side: Corey Williams, a man living in Fort Smith, Arkansas (just across the border, for those not deep into Oklahoma-Arkansas geography), who apparently took out a loan and then, at some point, decided that repayment was more of a suggestion than a requirement. Their relationship? It started with trust, or at least a handshake and a promissory note, and ended with a notarized grievance and a court date in Poteau.

Now, let’s talk about what actually happened — or at least what Fast Loans says happened, because remember, this is all from one side of the story. According to the affidavit — which is just a fancy word for “sworn statement that counts as evidence in small claims court” — Corey Williams borrowed $1,800 from Fast Loans of Arkoma. That’s not chump change. That’s a month’s rent in some parts of Oklahoma. That’s a down payment on a used car. That’s a lot of fast loans. The nature of the debt? “Money loaned.” No mention of interest rates, repayment terms, or whether Corey put a plasma TV on it or used it to fix his truck. But the key detail is this: Fast Loans says they asked for the money back. Corey said no. Or at least, he didn’t say yes. And now, according to Cadesha Walden, not a single dollar of that $1,800 has been repaid. Not a dime. Not a Venmo. Not even a “let me pay you fifty this week.” Zilch. Nada. And so, with righteous indignation and a $58 filing fee, Fast Loans marched into the District Court of LeFlore County and said: “We want our money. And also, we want you to make him pay for us having to come here.”

Which brings us to why they’re in court. Legally speaking, this is a debt collection case — one of the most common, yet perpetually dramatic, types of small claims disputes. Fast Loans is alleging that Corey owes them money under a loan agreement, and since he hasn’t paid, they’re asking the court to step in and force him to cough it up. In plain English: “He borrowed it. He didn’t give it back. Make him pay.” The claim is straightforward — no fraud, no breach of contract drama, no accusations of stolen collateral. Just a simple “you took money, you didn’t return it.” But here’s the kicker: they’re also asking for “legal fees,” though how much isn’t specified. Given that this is small claims court — where lawyers are rare and most people represent themselves — the “legal fees” might just be the $58 filing cost. Or maybe Fast Loans has a sneaky clause in their loan agreement that lets them tack on attorney fees. Either way, the total demand is $1,858. Not $1,800. Not “about eighteen hundred.” Nope — $1,858. Because when you’re suing someone, you might as well be precise. It’s not greed. It’s accounting.

Now, what do they want? $1,800 plus costs. Is that a lot? Well, in small claims court, it’s actually pretty high. Most cases hover around a few hundred bucks — a damaged security deposit, a broken lawn mower, a pet-sitter who ghosted with the dog. But $1,800? That’s pushing the upper limits of what small claims courts will handle (in Oklahoma, the cap is $10,000, so they’re well under, but still). For context, this is the kind of money that could cover a major car repair, a plane ticket to a destination wedding, or a solid used motorcycle. It’s not life-changing, but it’s not nothing. And for Fast Loans, a business presumably built on short-term, high-risk lending, this is the kind of default that can’t go unchallenged. If they let one borrower skate, what’s to stop the next guy from saying, “Hey, Corey didn’t pay, why should I?” So this isn’t just about the money. It’s about precedent. It’s about sending a message. It’s about making sure the entire ecosystem of fast cash doesn’t collapse because one man in Fort Smith had other plans.

But here’s our take: the most absurd part of this whole saga isn’t the amount, or the fact that someone’s being sued over less than two grand. It’s the drama of it all. We’ve got a business with a name that sounds like a 1980s action movie (Fast Loans: The Reckoning), filing a sworn affidavit like they’re testifying before a grand jury, all over a loan that probably came with an interest rate higher than a SpaceX launch. And Corey Williams? We don’t know his side — maybe he got hit with insane fees, maybe the loan terms were predatory, maybe he paid part of it and they lost the receipt. But we do know this: he’s now been formally summoned by the State of Oklahoma to appear in Poteau on April 17, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., with “all books, papers, and witnesses” ready to defend himself. That’s federal-court-level intensity for a dispute that likely started with a handshake and a wad of cash behind a bulletproof window.

We’re rooting for transparency. We’re rooting for someone — anyone — to pull out a ledger, a text thread, a receipt, and say, “Here’s exactly what happened.” Because right now, this whole case is built on one side’s word. And while debt is real and people should pay what they owe, small claims court shouldn’t be a one-sided ambush. If Fast Loans wants to play the long game with legal fees and court dates, they should be ready to prove their case, not just assert it with a notary stamp and a sense of moral superiority.

At the end of the day, this isn’t just about $1,800. It’s about the weird, wild world of small claims court — where every unpaid debt, no matter how small, gets its moment in the sun. Where a loan from a business called Fast Loans of Arkoma becomes a matter of public record. Where one person’s “I forgot” is another person’s “I’m suing you.” And where, on a spring morning in Poteau, Oklahoma, a judge will decide whether Corey Williams owes every last penny — or whether Fast Loans might have to settle for just being fast at everything except getting paid.

We’re not lawyers. We’re not judges. But we are here for it. Bring your books, your papers, and your A-game, Corey. Poteau is waiting.

Case Overview

$1,858 Demand Affidavit
Jurisdiction
Small Claims Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$1,800 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
- - Debt collection for $1800.00 + LEGAL FEES

Petition Text

311 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF LEFLORE, STATE OF OKLAHOMA FAST LOANS OF ARKOMA Plaintiff vs. COREY WILLIAMS Defendant State of Oklahoma County of LeFlore Small Claims No. SC-26-246 SMALL CLAIMS AFFIDAVIT Fast Loans of Arkoma, being duly sworn, deposes and says: That the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $1800.00 + LEGAL FEES for MONEY LOANED; plus cost of the sum of $58.00, that the plaintiff has demanded payment of said sum, that the defendant refused to pay the same and no part of the amount sued has been paid, that the defendant resides at 217 LAKEVIEW COURT FORT SMITH, AR 72903 in the above named county, and the mailing address of the plaintiff is P.O. BOX 319 ARKOMA, OK 74901. Cadesha Walden Plaintiff. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 12TH day of MARCH, 2026. (SEAL) Notary Public-Deputy Court Clerk My Commission expires _______________________ ORDER The people of the State of Oklahoma, to the state of Oklahoma, to the within name Defendant: You are hereby directed to appear and answer to the foregoing claim at the Small Claims Court, Courthouse. City of Poteau, County of Leflore, State of Oklahoma on the 17TH day of APRIL, 2026. at the hour of 9:00 o'clock A.M. Of said day or seven (7) days after service hereof, whichever is later, and to have with you, then and there all books, papers and witnesses needed by you to establish your defense to said claim. You are further notified that in case you do not so appear judgment will be given against you for the amount of said claim as it is stated in said affidavit and, in addition, costs of the action (including attorney fees where provided by law), including costs of service of the Order. Dated this 12TH day of MARCH, 2026. (SEAL) MINDY WHITE, Court Clerk By Deputy (SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR RULES OF THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT)
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.