CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
CARTER COUNTY • CJ-2026-00044

Midland Credit Management, Inc. v. Bradly Daniell

Filed: Feb 13, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut straight to the chase: a man in Oklahoma owes $24,000—cold, hard cash—for failing to pay back a personal loan, and now a debt collection company is dragging him through the court system like a reality TV villain who skipped out on rent. No dramatic car chases, no secret affairs, no hidden treasure—just a stack of electronic records, a notary in Minnesota, and one very quiet defendant who hasn’t said a word (yet). This isn’t Law & Order: SVU. This is Law & Order: We Bought Your Debt and Now We Want It Back.

Meet Bradly Daniell. That’s all we know. No profession, no backstory, no social media deep dive (at least not in the filing). He’s just a name on a docket in Carter County, Oklahoma—somewhere between the Red River and the Arbuckle Mountains, where the deer and the antelope play, and apparently, where people also sign up for high-interest personal loans they don’t end up repaying. On the other side? Midland Credit Management, Inc.—a debt buyer with the charm of a spreadsheet and the persistence of a pop-up ad. These folks don’t issue loans; they buy up defaulted ones from original lenders, like vultures circling a very specific kind of financial roadkill. In this case, the original lender was LOAN ASSET ISSUER II LLC SERIES 2022, which sounds less like a financial institution and more like a limited-edition cryptocurrency NFT drop. But sure, let’s roll with it.

Here’s how the money trail goes: On February 17, 2023, Bradly Daniell opened a personal loan account—account number ending in 0168. Terms? Unknown. Interest rate? Not disclosed. Purpose of the loan? Could’ve been a new roof, could’ve been a timeshare in Branson, could’ve been a down payment on a jet ski he never learned to ride. We’ll never know. What we do know is that he made payments—at least one as recently as October 8, 2024—and then… silence. No more payments. The account went dark. By January 15, 2025, the lender had officially “charged off” the debt, which is corporate-speak for “we’ve given up on getting paid and are now selling your IOU to someone who hasn’t given up yet.” Enter Midland Credit Management, who swooped in on February 24, 2025, and purchased the rights to collect the debt. Now, they’re not just chasing Bradly—they’re legally entitled to chase him. And chase him they did, all the way to the District Court of Carter County, where they filed a lawsuit on December 16, 2025, demanding exactly $24,014.59. Not $24,000. Not “about 24 grand.” No—$24,014.59. That extra $14.59 is either a late fee, a processing charge, or Midland’s way of saying, “We’re serious. Every penny counts.”

So what’s the legal beef here? In court terms, it’s called “indebtedness”—a glorified way of saying, “You borrowed money. You didn’t pay it back. Now we want it.” Midland isn’t accusing Bradly of fraud, theft, or identity theft. They’re not claiming he burned down a warehouse or fled the country. They’re simply asserting that he took out a loan, stopped paying it, and now owes the balance. To prove it, they’ve attached an affidavit from one Richard Hogan—a “Legal Specialist” at Midland, based in St. Cloud, Minnesota, of all places. Richard didn’t meet Bradly. He’s never seen the original loan documents in person. But he has access to Midland’s electronic records, which, according to him, are kept “in the regular course of business” and are therefore admissible in court. That’s the legal loophole that keeps debt collection lawsuits humming: if the records are kept consistently, even if they’re secondhand, they can be used to win a judgment. Richard swears under penalty of perjury that as of November 24, 2025, the balance owed was $24,014.59. That’s the number. That’s the ask. That’s the entire case.

Now, let’s talk about the money. Is $24,014.59 a lot? In the world of civil court, absolutely. Most small claims courts cap out at $10,000. This case is more than double that, which means it’s too big for the “I’m suing my neighbor for stealing my lawn gnome” circuit. This is serious debt. For context, $24,000 could buy a used car, cover a year of rent in many parts of Oklahoma, or fund a pretty decent wedding (if you skip the open bar). It’s not a trivial sum—it’s the kind of number that can wreck a credit score, trigger wage garnishment, or haunt someone for years. And yet, in the grand scheme of debt collection, this is routine. Midland likely bought this debt for pennies on the dollar—maybe $5,000, maybe less. If they win, they stand to nearly quintuple their investment. That’s the business model: buy cheap, sue fast, collect big. And they do it a lot. A quick peek at public records shows Midland has filed thousands of similar lawsuits across the country. They’re not mad at Bradly Daniell. They’re not even thinking about him. To them, he’s just another account number, another line item on a spreadsheet, another affidavit waiting to be notarized.

And what do they want? Judgment for $24,014.59, plus interest at the statutory rate (which in Oklahoma is 5% per year unless the contract says otherwise), plus court costs. No punitive damages. No demand for an apology. No request that Bradly write a 500-word essay on financial responsibility. Just the money. Cold, hard, and precise.

So where’s the drama? Where’s the twist? Honestly? There isn’t one. That’s the most absurd part. This case is so ordinary, it’s extraordinary. A man borrows money. He stops paying. A company buys the debt. They sue. It happens every day, in every county, across America. But the sheer banality of it is what makes it fascinating. No one here is a hero. No one’s a villain (unless you count the entire predatory debt collection industry, but we’ll save that rant for another day). Bradly may have made a financial mistake. Or maybe he lost his job. Maybe he was hit with a medical bill. Maybe the loan terms were predatory. We don’t know. And the filing doesn’t care. To the court, this isn’t about hardship. It’s about paperwork. It’s about whether Midland can prove they own the debt and how much is owed. Everything else—the human story behind the default—is irrelevant.

We’re rooting for transparency, if nothing else. We want to see the original loan agreement. We want to know the interest rate. We want to hear from Bradly Daniell—does he dispute the debt? Does he plan to fight back? Or will he just vanish, letting Midland win by default? Because if he doesn’t show up, that’s exactly what’ll happen. And then—poof—wage garnishment, bank levy, credit score in the gutter. All over a loan he may not even remember taking out.

This isn’t a murder mystery. It’s not a scandal. It’s not even particularly juicy. But it is real. It’s the quiet, grinding machinery of American debt—where a man in Oklahoma owes money to a company in Minnesota, represented by lawyers in Oklahoma City, all based on records compiled by someone who’s never met him. And for that, we’re calling this case: The Ghost of Debt Past vs. The Machine That Never Sleeps.

Case Overview

$24,015 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$24,015 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 indebtedness

Petition Text

666 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF CARTER COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA Midland Credit Management, Inc., ) Plaintiff, ) vs. Bradly Daniell, ) Defendant. ) PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for cause of action against the Defendant alleges and states: 1. Defendant Defaulted on LOAN ASSET ISSUER II LLC SERIE S 2022 obligation with account number XXXXX0168. Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $24,014.59. An Affidavit of Account and/or contract is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $24,014.59, with interest at the statutory rate, all court costs, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Peggy S. Horinek, #010344 Jenifer A. Gani, #021876 Alexander M. Hall, #33900 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405-720-0565 E-Mail: [email protected] STATE OF OKLAHOMA Midland Credit Management, Inc, Plaintiff -vs- AFFIDAVIT OF RICHARD HOGAN Daniell, Bradly, Defendant(s). Richard Hogan, whose business address is 600 W. Saint Germain St Suite 200, St. Cloud, MN 56301-3616, certifies and says: 1. I am employed as a Legal Specialist and have access to pertinent account records for Midland Credit Management, Inc. ("Plaintiff" or "MCM"). I am a competent person over eighteen years of age, and make the statements herein based upon personal knowledge of those account records maintained by Plaintiff. Plaintiff is the current owner of, and was assigned all the rights, title and interest to Defendant's LOAN ASSET ISSUER II LLC SERIES 2022 1/UPGRADE account XXXXX0168 (MCM Number 331791556) (hereinafter "the Account"). 2. I have access to and have reviewed the electronic records pertaining to the Account maintained by MCM and am authorized to make this affidavit on MCM's behalf. The electronic records reviewed consist of (i) data and records acquired from the seller or assignor when MCM purchased or was assigned the Account, which were incorporated into MCM's business records upon purchase or assignment, and (ii) data and records generated by MCM in connection with servicing the Account since the date the Account was purchased by or was assigned to MCM. 3. I am familiar with and trained on the manner and method by which MCM creates and maintains its business records pertaining to the Account, which consist of (i) data and documents acquired from the seller or assignor, and (ii) subsequent collection and/or servicing activities by MCM. The records are acquired or created, and are kept in the regular course of MCM's business. It was in the regular course of MCM's business for a person with knowledge of the subsequent collection and/or servicing activities recorded, and a business duty to report, to make the record or data compilation, or to transmit information thereof to be included in such record, or for such information to be posted in MCM's records by a computer or similar digital means. In the regular course of MCM's business, the record or compilation of the subsequent collection activities is made at or near the time of the act or event by MCM as a regular practice. 4. MCM's records show that Defendant(s) owed a balance of $24,014.59 as of 2025-11-24. 5. On or about 2025-02-24, Midland Credit Management, Inc became the successor in interest to this Account. 6. MCM's records show that: 1) the Account was opened on 2023-02-17; 2) the last payment posted to the Account on 2024-10-08; and 3) the Account was charged off on 2025-01-15. 7. If called to testify as a witness thereon, I could and would competently testify as to all the facts stated herein. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements are true and correct. DEC 16 2025 Date STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF STEARNS Richard Hogan Signed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on DEC 16 2025 by Richard Hogan. Christy Lynn Biss Notary Public - Minnesota My Commission Expires 04/31/2020 Notary Public OK038
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.