K&M TIRE, INC. v. GOLDEN TRIANGLE TRUCKING, LLC
What's This Case About?
Let’s cut right to the chase: a tire company in Oklahoma is suing a trucking firm — and its owner, Bonnie Cabelka — for $7,000 in unpaid bills, and the whole thing hinges on a single piece of paper signed in 2018 that basically says, “If this business tanks, I’ll pay.” That’s it. No stolen trucks. No forged documents. No dramatic midnight repossession. Just seven grand, some overdue invoices, and one very determined tire supplier who’s apparently done playing nice. Welcome to the high-stakes world of commercial credit disputes, where the drama isn’t in the crime — it’s in the paperwork.
So who are these people? On one side, we’ve got K&M Tire, Inc., a tire wholesaler based in Illinois with a P.O. box, a credit department, and a zero-tolerance policy for late payments. They’re not some mom-and-pop corner shop changing your oil for a six-pack and a handshake — they’re in the business of selling tires at scale, and they do it on credit. Which means they extend trust, but only up to a point. And when that trust expires? They’ve got lawyers. Specifically, Reynolds, Ridings, Vogt & Robertson, P.L.L.C., a firm in Oklahoma City with a name that sounds like a law firm from a 1980s cop show. Their guy on this case is James Vogt, OBA #9243, and he’s not here to negotiate — he’s here to collect.
On the other side: Golden Triangle Trucking, LLC, a small trucking operation out of Lawton, Oklahoma — a city best known for Fort Sill and being approximately 90 minutes from anywhere else interesting. The company, apparently run by or connected to Bonnie Cabelka, was buying tires and services from K&M, racking up invoices over several months in early 2024. And Bonnie? She’s not just a name on a letterhead — she’s the person who, back in March 2018, signed a personal guaranty saying, “If my company doesn’t pay, I will.” That’s the legal grenade pin that’s now been pulled.
Here’s how we got here. Between February and April 2024, Golden Triangle Trucking ordered a series of goods and services from K&M Tire. The invoices are laid out in cold, hard numbers: a $937 charge in February, a $1,865 tire job, a $9,076 whopper on the same day — yes, over nine grand for what was presumably a fleet tire replacement. Add in a few service charges, and the total debt balloons to over $12,000. But K&M isn’t suing for the full amount — they’re asking for $7,000. Why? Because courts don’t like being flooded with every last penny of a debt unless it’s actually in dispute. Maybe some of the invoices were paid, maybe some are still pending, but the $7,000 is what K&M has deemed the unpaid, overdue balance they’re willing to fight for. Still, that $9,076 charge just sitting there, unpaid, is the kind of number that makes a credit manager lose sleep.
Now, you might think, “Hey, businesses fall behind on bills all the time. Why sue?” Well, because K&M didn’t just extend credit — they had rules. Their terms? Net 10th prox, which means “pay by the 10th of the next month.” Fail that? You’re hit with 2% monthly interest — that’s 24% APR, which is loan shark territory if you’re not careful. Plus, they reserve the right to charge back fees for bounced checks, to demand financial statements, and — most importantly — to come after the owners personally if the business can’t pay. And that’s exactly what they’re doing.
Because in 2018, Bonnie Cabelka didn’t just sign a credit application — she signed a personal guaranty, a legal promise that she would pay any debt Golden Triangle Trucking incurred with K&M Tire. It’s the financial equivalent of saying, “Put my house on the line.” The document is chilling in its clarity: “absolutely and unconditionally personally guarantee the full and punctual payment of any obligation.” She waived her right to be notified of defaults. She waived her right to sue the company later to get reimbursed. She even waived her right to ask for mercy. This wasn’t a casual “I’ll help if I can” — it was a full-body legal surrender to the possibility of personal liability.
And now, nearly seven years later, that promise is being called in. K&M Tire isn’t just suing the LLC — they’re suing Bonnie Cabelka by name, demanding she pay up, jointly and severally, meaning either party could be forced to cover the whole $7,000. They want interest at 6% from July 4, 2025 (the filing date — which is oddly in the future as of this writing, but hey, maybe they’re time travelers), plus attorney fees and court costs. Is $7,000 a lot? For a tire company, maybe not — it’s less than the cost of a single high-end commercial tire set. But for a small trucking firm operating on thin margins, it could be the difference between staying on the road and getting towed to the scrap yard. And for an individual? $7,000 plus interest and legal fees could mean a second mortgage, a drained savings account, or a very awkward family dinner.
So why are they in court? Because this isn’t about the tires. It’s about the contract. K&M Tire is making two claims: first, that Golden Triangle Trucking owes them money for goods sold and delivered — a straightforward debt claim. Second, that Bonnie Cabelka personally guaranteed that debt, so she’s on the hook too. That second claim is the nuclear option. Most small business owners think, “My LLC protects me!” And usually, it does — until you sign something like this. The personal guaranty is the legal trapdoor that turns limited liability into unlimited liability. And once it’s triggered, courts usually enforce it. No drama. No excuses. Just: You signed it. You pay.
Now, let’s talk about the most absurd thing here. It’s not the $7,000. It’s not even the fact that someone’s getting sued over tires. It’s that this entire legal battle — the lawyers, the court filing, the personal liability — all hinges on a form that Bonnie Cabelka signed seven years ago, likely without reading it, probably during the hopeful early days of her business, when $7,000 felt like a manageable risk. She may have thought, “I’ll never default. My business will grow. I’ll pay on time.” And maybe she did — for years. But one bad quarter, one delayed payment, one missed invoice, and boom — the guaranty activates. The tire company’s lawyers dust off the file, run a credit check (yes, they’re allowed to do that, per the ECOA notice), and drop the lawsuit like a ton of — well, tires.
Our take? We’re rooting for clarity. Not for K&M, not for Bonnie, but for every small business owner who’s ever signed a stack of paperwork without realizing they were putting their house on the line. This case is a perfect example of how mundane, boring, boring legal documents can come back to haunt you years later. It’s not flashy. There’s no betrayal, no fraud, no scandal. Just a debt, a signature, and a reminder that in the world of small business, the fine print isn’t just there to look official — it’s there to collect. And K&M Tire? They’re not being evil. They’re just doing what any creditor does when the music stops: they’re calling the check. Whether Bonnie Cabelka thought she was signing a promissory note or just a formality, the court will likely say: You wrote your name. Now pay up.
Case Overview
-
K&M TIRE, INC.
business
Rep: REYNOLDS, RIDINGS, VOGT & ROBERTSON, P.L.L.C.
- GOLDEN TRIANGLE TRUCKING, LLC business
- BONNIE CABELKA individual
| # | Cause of Action | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | debt for goods sold and delivered | plaintiff seeks judgment against defendants for $7,000.00 with interest |
| 2 | personal guaranty | plaintiff alleges defendant Bonnie Cabelka personally guaranteed payment of any debt incurred by Golden Triangle Trucking, LLC |