CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
GARFIELD COUNTY • CJ-2026-113

Midland Credit Management, Inc. v. Trevor J Loving

Filed: Apr 10, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s get one thing straight: nobody expects to wake up one day and find themselves sued for eleven grand over a credit card they probably forgot they even had. But that’s exactly what happened to Trevor J. Loving of Oklahoma, who is now the reluctant star of a civil drama so mundane, it almost feels like performance art. Eleven thousand, one hundred and twelve dollars and thirty cents — not a round number, not a dramatic sum, but somehow exactly the amount that will keep you up at night if you’re the one being sued.

Trevor isn’t accused of murder, fraud, or even stealing someone’s Wi-Fi. No, his crime — if we can call it that — was defaulting on a Capital One Platinum Mastercard, originally opened back in 2010. That’s right: this debt has been marinating for over a decade. The card was active, apparently, until early 2025, when the last payment was made on February 8 — a final, feeble attempt at financial responsibility before the inevitable collapse. Three days later, on February 11, Capital One officially charged off the account, which is banker-speak for “we’ve given up on getting paid, so we’re selling your debt to someone who hasn’t yet lost hope.” Enter Midland Credit Management, Inc., the plaintiff in this case and a professional debt collector with the soul of a spreadsheet and the patience of a vulture.

Midland didn’t just stumble into this. They bought Trevor’s debt — or rather, the right to sue him over it — in March 2025. Since then, they’ve been quietly compiling records, training specialists to testify about them, and waiting for the perfect moment to strike. That moment came on January 12, 2026, when Midland, armed with a notarized affidavit and a team of six attorneys (yes, six), filed a petition in Garfield County District Court demanding exactly $11,112.30. Not $11,000. Not $12,000. But $11,112.30. Down to the penny. It’s the kind of precision that suggests either meticulous record-keeping or a deep commitment to making sure no fraction of a cent goes unclaimed.

So who are these people? On one side, you’ve got Midland Credit Management, a California-based debt buyer that specializes in purchasing defaulted accounts and then suing people to get their money back. They’re not a bank. They didn’t lend Trevor anything. But in the strange alchemy of modern finance, they now legally own the debt — like a collector buying a rare painting at auction, except the painting is your shame and the frame is a W-2. Represented by the law firm Love, Beal & Nixon, P.C. — which, let’s be honest, sounds like a country band or a law firm from a 1980s legal drama — Midland is playing the long game. They didn’t come for revenge. They came for interest, court costs, and a judgment that could follow Trevor like a ghost for years.

On the other side is Trevor J. Loving, a man whose entire legal identity now hinges on a single credit card he opened 15 years ago. We don’t know what happened in the intervening years. Did he lose a job? Get divorced? Fall into medical debt? Did he just… forget? The filing doesn’t say. There’s no drama, no betrayal, no secret affair paid for with plastic. Just a steady accumulation of unpaid balances, late fees, and compounding interest — the financial equivalent of watching paint dry, except the paint is your credit score and it’s peeling off in chunks.

The legal claim here is as straightforward as a punch to the gut: debt collection. Midland is asking the court to formally declare that Trevor owes them $11,112.30, plus interest from the date of judgment, plus court costs. That’s it. No punitive damages. No request for Trevor to wash their cars or apologize in writing. Just cold, hard cash. And while $11,000 might not sound like a fortune in the grand scheme of American debt — the average credit card balance is around $6,000, and some people owe way more — it’s still a lot for a single, unsecured debt to go to court over. It’s not chump change. It’s a used car. It’s a wedding ring. It’s a year of rent in some parts of Oklahoma. And it’s definitely the kind of number that makes you wonder: how did we get here?

What’s wild — and by wild, we mean deeply American — is how impersonal the whole thing is. Trevor isn’t being sued by someone he knows. He’s not being taken to court by a neighbor he borrowed money from. He’s being sued by a company that bought a digital file containing his financial failures from another company that gave up on him. The affidavit comes from Michelle Willhite, a Legal Specialist in St. Cloud, Minnesota, who has never met Trevor, doesn’t know his story, but can recite his account history like scripture. She swears under penalty of perjury that she’s “familiar with the manner and method” of how Midland keeps records. She didn’t create the debt. She didn’t charge the interest. But she’s the one standing in court — metaphorically — pointing at Trevor and saying, “He owes this.”

And yet, for all its clinical precision, this case feels absurd. Not because the debt isn’t real — it almost certainly is — but because of how normal it’s all treated. Six attorneys on the letterhead. A notarized affidavit from a woman in Minnesota about a man in Oklahoma over a card issued by a bank in Virginia. The machine hums on, indifferent to human error, bad luck, or the fact that $11,112.30 might as well be a million bucks to someone working retail or driving for Uber. This isn’t justice. It’s bureaucracy with teeth.

Our take? We’re rooting for the weird specificity of it all. The $11,112.30. The six lawyers. The fact that the last payment was made on February 8, 2025 — a random Tuesday. The affidavit signed in Stearns County, Minnesota, by a notary named Christy Lynn Bliss, whose commission expires on April 31, 2026 — a date that doesn’t exist, because April only has 30 days. (Yes, really. Even the notary’s seal is living in its own alternate reality.) This case is a perfect little diorama of how debt works in 21st-century America: impersonal, relentless, and just bureaucratic enough to make you laugh so you don’t cry.

We’re entertainers, not lawyers. But if we were, we’d suggest Trevor show up to court with a spreadsheet, a sense of humor, and maybe a copy of The Debtors’ Prison Handbook. Because in a system where $11,112.30 is worth six attorneys and a notarized affidavit from Minnesota, the only sane response is to laugh — right before you file for bankruptcy.

Case Overview

$11,112 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Garfield County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$11,112 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 debt collection collection of outstanding debt

Petition Text

668 words
25-60035-0 YE1 008 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF GARFIELD COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA Midland Credit Management, Inc., ) Plaintiff, vs. ) Trevor J Loving, ) Defendant. PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for cause of action against the Defendant alleges and states: 1. Defendant Defaulted on CAPITAL ONE, N.A. obligation with account number XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX1295. Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $11,112.30. An Affidavit of Account and/or contract is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $11,112.30, with interest at the statutory rate, all court costs, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. Gracelyn Dillingham William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Daniela Westfahl, #36242 Gracelyn Porras Dillingham, #35852 Jenifer A Gani, #021876 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405/720-0565 Fax: 405/720-9570 E-Mail: [email protected] STATE OF OKLAHOMA Midland Credit Management, Inc, Plaintiff -vs- Loving, Trevor J, Defendant(s). AFFIDAVIT OF MICHELLE WILLHITE Michelle Willhite, whose business address is 600 W. Saint Germain St Suite 200, St. Cloud, MN 56301-3616, certifies and says: 1. I am employed as a Legal Specialist and have access to pertinent account records for Midland Credit Management, Inc. ("Plaintiff" or "MCM"). I am a competent person over eighteen years of age, and make the statements herein based upon personal knowledge of those account records maintained by Plaintiff. Plaintiff is the current owner of, and was assigned all the rights, title and interest to Defendant's CAPITAL ONE, N.A./PLATINUM MASTERCARD account XXXXXXXXXXXX1295 (MCM Number 332478909) (hereinafter "the Account"). 2. I have access to and have reviewed the electronic records pertaining to the Account maintained by MCM and am authorized to make this affidavit on MCM's behalf. The electronic records reviewed consist of (i) data and records acquired from the seller or assignor when MCM purchased or was assigned the Account, which were incorporated into MCM's business records upon purchase or assignment, and (ii) data and records generated by MCM in connection with servicing the Account since the date the Account was purchased by or was assigned to MCM. 3. I am familiar with and trained on the manner and method by which MCM creates and maintains its business records pertaining to the Account, which consist of (i) data and documents acquired from the seller or assignor, and (ii) subsequent collection and/or servicing activities by MCM. The records are acquired or created, and are kept in the regular course of MCM's business. It was in the regular course of MCM's business for a person with knowledge of the subsequent collection and/or servicing activities recorded, and a business duty to report, to make the record or data compilation, or to transmit information thereof to be included in such record, or for such information to be posted in MCM's records by a computer or similar digital means. In the regular course of MCM's business, the record or compilation of the subsequent collection activities is made at or near the time of the act or event by MCM as a regular practice. 4. MCM's records show that Defendant(s) owed a balance of $11,112.30 as of 2025-12-22. 5. On or about 2025-03-25, Midland Credit Management, Inc became the successor in interest to this Account. 6. MCM's records show that: 1) the Account was opened on 2010-06-25; 2) the last payment posted to the Account on 2025-02-08; and 3) the Account was charged off on 2025-02-11. 7. If called to testify as a witness thereon, I could and would competently testify as to all the facts stated herein. Left Blank Intentionally I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements are true and correct. JAN 12 2026 Date STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF STEARNS Signed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on by Michelle Willhite. (Seal) Christy Lynn Bliss Notary Public - Minnesota My Commission Expires 04/31/2026 OK038
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.