CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
TULSA COUNTY • CS-2025-859

AGENCY OF CREDIT CONTROL INC v. SHANNON TRESA SKILLENS

Filed: Feb 3, 2025
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s be real: nobody wakes up dreaming of suing someone for $2,875 over a medical bill. But here we are, deep in the heart of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, where a debt collection agency has dragged a woman named Shannon Tresa Skillens into court over what amounts to less than the average American’s annual Netflix subscription binge. That’s right—this lawsuit hinges on a bill so small it could’ve been paid off with a single weekend shift at a Tulsa Waffle House, and yet, it’s now a full-blown legal drama. Welcome to the circus of civil court, where your credit score is the ringmaster and your anesthesiologist is somehow involved.

So who are these people? On one side, we’ve got Agency of Credit Control Inc., which sounds like a villainous corporate syndicate from a 1980s action movie but is, in reality, a debt collection agency that buys up unpaid medical bills and then sues to collect them. They’re represented by a law firm with more initials than a medical chart—Robinson, Hoover & Fudge, PLLC—where Hugh H. Fudge (yes, that’s his real name, and no, we are not making this up) is leading the charge. On the other side is Shannon Tresa Skillens, an individual whose only known crime, according to the filing, is failing to pay a medical bill. We don’t know if she’s a teacher, a nurse, or just someone who really hates being woken up by collection calls—we only know she’s now the defendant in a case that could’ve been settled with a Venmo request and a mildly passive-aggressive text.

The story, as it’s told in the two-paragraph petition, is about as dramatic as a lukewarm cup of coffee. Sometime before December 28, 2023, Shannon Tresa Skillens received medical services—specifically, anesthesia. We don’t know if she was having her wisdom teeth yanked, a knee scoped, or just getting sedated for a colonoscopy she’d been avoiding since 2019—but someone at Associated Anesthesiologists Inc. put her under, kept her breathing, and did the whole “count backwards from ten” routine. And somewhere along the way, a bill was generated. For $2,875. That’s not chump change, sure—especially in Oklahoma, where the median household income hovers around $60,000. But it’s also not “sell-your-kidney” territory. Yet, for reasons entirely unexplained in the filing, Shannon didn’t pay it. Maybe she forgot. Maybe she disputed it. Maybe she moved, changed her number, and thought, “Out of sight, out of mind.” Or maybe she just didn’t have the money. The petition doesn’t say. It doesn’t accuse her of fraud, bad faith, or even ignoring multiple notices. It just says: she didn’t pay. So Associated Anesthesiologists Inc., like many medical providers when bills go unpaid, sold the debt to a third party—Agency of Credit Control Inc.—who then hired lawyers to sue her. Because in America, when you don’t pay your medical bills, the next step isn’t a sternly worded letter from your doctor. It’s a lawsuit in district court.

Now, why are they in court? Legally speaking, this is a classic breach of contract claim—the kind of case that makes up about 80% of small civil dockets across the country. The idea is simple: you got a service, you agreed (implicitly, by showing up and not running out the door) to pay for it, and now you haven’t. That’s a breach. The plaintiff—Agency of Credit Control Inc.—isn’t claiming Shannon punched someone in the recovery room or faked her own death to avoid payment. They’re just saying she owes money, they’re the ones legally allowed to collect it (because they bought the debt), and now they want a judge to make her pay up. It’s not flashy. There’s no mystery. No betrayal. No dramatic courtroom reveal. Just a spreadsheet, a signature, and a chain of financial transactions that ended with a law firm in Oklahoma City typing up a petition on a Monday morning.

What do they want? $2,875.00 in principal, plus $184.30 in prejudgment interest (which, at 6% per year, adds a little extra sting), plus post-judgment interest, court costs, and—because this is America—“a reasonable attorney fee.” That last one is key. Under Oklahoma law, if you win a debt collection case, you can often tack on attorney’s fees, which means Shannon could end up owing even more than the original bill. And while $2,875 might not sound like much compared to, say, a mortgage or a car loan, for many Americans, it’s a real burden. That’s six months of car insurance, a year of dog food for a golden retriever, or three rounds of IVF if you’re really unlucky. It’s also the kind of debt that can tank a credit score, lead to wage garnishment, or haunt someone for years. So while this case may seem petty to us—two paragraphs, no drama, no witnesses—it could have serious consequences for Shannon. And yet, the whole thing feels wildly disproportionate. Did it really take five attorneys (yes, five—Hugh H. Fudge and his four colleagues) to file a two-paragraph petition? Was this debt so critical to Agency of Credit Control Inc.’s bottom line that it warranted legal action? Or is this just how the machine works—sue fast, sue often, and hope most people don’t show up to defend themselves?

Our take? The most absurd part isn’t the amount. It’s the sheer boredom of it all. This case is the legal equivalent of elevator music—unavoidable, mildly irritating, and completely devoid of soul. A woman gets anesthesia—probably during a stressful, vulnerable moment in her life—and years later, she’s being sued by a company with a name straight out of a dystopian bureaucracy. No one here is evil. Shannon probably just forgot to pay a bill. The anesthesiologist did their job. The debt buyer is just doing what debt buyers do—buy debt and sue. But the system? The system is the real villain. It turns human error, financial hardship, and medical necessity into cold, impersonal litigation. And it does it with such routine efficiency that a five-lawyer firm can file a case like this before their morning coffee is even cold.

We’re not rooting for debt collection. We’re not rooting for unpaid medical bills. But if we had to pick a side, we’d root for a world where $2,875 doesn’t end up in court. Where a reminder letter works. Where people aren’t sued over the cost of a mid-tier smartphone. Where Hugh H. Fudge can spend his days doing something more interesting than chasing down anesthesia bills. But until that world exists, we’ll be here—chronicling the petty, the bizarre, and the absurd, one Tulsa County debt collection case at a time. Because in the grand theater of civil court, sometimes the most dramatic thing isn’t murder, fraud, or betrayal. It’s a missed payment, a sold debt, and the quiet, relentless march of interest.

Case Overview

Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Tulsa County, OKLAHOMA
Relief Sought
$2,875 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 breach of contract unpaid debt of $2,875.00

Petition Text

196 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA AGENCY OF CREDIT CONTROL INC vs. SHANNON TRESA SKILLENS ) OS-2025-00859 MELISSA EAST DISTRICT COURT FILED FEB 03 2025 DON NEWBERRY, Court Clerk STATE OF OKLA. TULSA COUNTY PETITION COMES NOW the plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys, and states as follows: 1. ASSOCIATED ANESTHESIOLOGISTS INC provided goods and/or services for the defendant through December 28, 2023. 2. The defendant has failed to pay for the goods and/or services. 3. The defendant is indebted to plaintiff, as assignee, in the principal amount of $2,875.00. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against the defendant as follows: 1. The principal amount of $2,875.00; 2. Prejudgment interest at the legal rate of 6% per annum as damages, which as of January 21, 2025 totals $184.30 (15 O.S. § 266); 3. Post judgment interest at the statutory rate (12 O.S. § 727.1); 4. All costs of this action (12 O.S. § 928); 5. A reasonable attorney fee (12 O.S. § 936); and 6. Such other relief to which plaintiff may be justly entitled. Hugh H. Fudge (OBA# 20487) Danil L. Schinzing (OBA# 32113) Emily R. Remmerl (OBA# 22110) Sean A. Nelson (OBA# 30194) Keith A. Daniels (OBA# 19788) Robinson, Hoover & Fudge, PLLC P.O.Box 1748 Oklahoma City, OK 73101 (405) 232-6464 | (833) 342-0001 Toll Free [email protected] | (405) 232-6363 Fax Attorneys for Plaintiff
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.