CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
TULSA COUNTY • CJ-2026-626

CarMax Business Services, LLC, d/b/a CarMax Auto Finance v. Jaden L Coleman

Filed: Feb 12, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut straight to the chase: CarMax is suing a Tulsa man for $11,880.25 because he didn’t pay for a car. That’s it. That’s the whole case. No secret affair uncovered in the glove compartment. No dramatic high-speed chase after a failed test drive. Just a financing agreement gone sideways, a defaulted loan, and now a corporate debt collection machine rolling into court like it’s starring in its own made-for-TV legal drama. Welcome to CrazyCivilCourt, where the stakes are low, the paperwork is high, and someone always forgets to read the fine print.

Meet Jaden L. Coleman, a regular guy from Tulsa, Oklahoma — or at least, as regular as you can be when you’re named in a debt collection lawsuit. We don’t know much about him, except that at some point, he walked into a CarMax (or maybe clicked “buy now” on their website while eating cold pizza at 2 a.m.), and decided he was ready to upgrade his ride. The vehicle in question? Unknown. The color? Unclear. The model year? Lost to history. All we know is that Jaden signed on the dotted line with CarMax Auto Finance — that’s the financial arm of the no-haggle, pop-up-ad-of-every-used-car-commercial empire — and walked away (or drove away, more accurately) with wheels and a monthly payment plan.

CarMax Business Services, LLC, the plaintiff in this riveting courtroom saga, isn’t some mom-and-pop dealership trying to recoup a few grand. This is a national auto retail giant with a finance division that likely has more algorithms than customer service reps. They don’t call it “the CarMax experience” for nothing — it’s slick, it’s seamless, and when you miss a payment? They don’t send a passive-aggressive text. They send a law firm. In this case, that firm is Love, Beal & Nixon, P.C., a debt collection outfit based in Oklahoma City that probably files more lawsuits before lunch than most people check their email. And yes — their name really is Love, Beal & Nixon. It sounds like a law firm from a 1980s cop show, and honestly, we’re here for it.

So what happened? Well, according to the petition — which, let’s be honest, is about as dramatic as a spreadsheet with feelings — Jaden took out a loan to buy a car. Standard stuff. CarMax financed it, he signed a contract, they got a security interest (which means, legally, “we own this car until you pay us”), and all was well in the world of amortized auto debt. But then — plot twist! — Jaden stopped making payments. The exact timeline isn’t in the filing, but somewhere between “first payment” and “final payment,” the money trail went cold. Maybe he lost his job. Maybe the transmission blew. Maybe he moved to a commune in New Mexico and decided cars were a construct of capitalist oppression. We’ll never know. What we do know is that CarMax did the corporate equivalent of knocking on the door, then leaving a note, then calling a tow truck — and when none of that worked, they did what big companies do: they sued.

Now, here’s where the legal gears start grinding. CarMax isn’t asking for the car back. They’re not demanding Jaden perform a TikTok apology dance. They’re not even asking for punitive damages, which would be the legal version of “teach him a lesson.” No, they’re going straight for the jugular — or at least, the wallet. Their claim? “Petition for Indebtedness.” In plain English: “He owes us money, Your Honor, and we want it.” This isn’t a breach of contract case with layers of deceit and betrayal. It’s not a dispute over lemon law or odometer fraud. It’s not even about whether the car was pink instead of blue. It’s a straightforward “you borrowed money, you didn’t pay it back, now pay up or the court will make you” situation.

And how much does Jaden allegedly owe? $11,880.25. Let that number sink in. Not $12,000. Not “about eleven grand.” $11,880.25. That extra quarter is the legal equivalent of “and don’t forget the tax.” For context, that’s enough to buy a decent used pickup, put a down payment on a tiny house, or fund a very ambitious Chipotle habit for five years. But in the world of auto loans? It’s not chump change, but it’s not a Lamborghini-level debt either. It’s the kind of sum that could come from a few missed payments on a $25,000 car, especially once late fees, interest, and repossession costs pile up. And yes, CarMax is also asking for “interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment,” court costs, and a “reasonable attorney’s fee” — which, given that Love, Beal & Nixon probably charges by the lawsuit, could mean Jaden ends up owing even more if he doesn’t settle.

But here’s the real kicker: this whole case hinges on paperwork. Did Jaden actually sign the contract? Did CarMax properly apply any payments he did make? Was the repossession (if the car was taken) done legally? Did they follow Oklahoma’s debt collection laws to the letter? Because if not — if there’s one missing disclosure, one late notice, one typo in the account number — Jaden might have a shot at fighting back. But based on the filing, it doesn’t look like he’s putting up a defense. No countersuit. No claim of fraud. No “I returned the car and they sold it for more than I owed.” Just silence — and a bill.

Now, for our take: what’s the most absurd part of this? Is it that a billion-dollar company is suing an individual over twelve grand? Nah. That’s just capitalism. Is it the fact that the amount is so precise — $11,880.25 — like they’re billing for 25 cents of emotional distress? A little. But the real absurdity is how normal this is. This isn’t an outlier. This is Tuesday at the Tulsa County District Court. CarMax, and companies like it, file hundreds of these suits every month across the country. People fall behind on payments, cars get repossessed, balances go unpaid, and then — bam — a lawsuit. It’s so routine that the petition is basically a Mad Lib: [Plaintiff] sues [Defendant] for $[exact amount] because [loan default]. Fill in the blanks and file.

And yet — we kind of root for Jaden. Not because he’s definitely in the right. Not because CarMax doesn’t have a point. But because we’ve all been there — that moment when the bank account is low, the bills are piling up, and you think, “I’ll figure it out next month.” And then next month comes, and it’s worse. And then the notices start. And then the lawyers. And suddenly, you’re in court over a car payment. It’s not glamorous. It’s not dramatic. But it’s real. And in the grand pantheon of civil court dumpster fires, this one burns with the quiet, unremarkable fury of adulting gone wrong.

So here’s hoping Jaden either settles, or wins the lottery, or finds a rich uncle with a soft spot for defaulted auto loans. And here’s hoping CarMax gets their money — but maybe, just maybe, considers a payment plan before pulling out the legal artillery next time. After all, even love, beal, and nixon can’t fix a broken budget.

Case Overview

$11,880 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma
Filing Attorney
LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C.
Relief Sought
$11,880 Monetary
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Petition for Indebtedness Debt collection

Petition Text

221 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA CarMax Business Services, LLC, d/b/a CarMax Auto Finance Plaintiff, vs. Jaden L Coleman, Defendant. PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for its cause of action against the defendant alleges and states as follows: 1. Defendant executed a contract with Plaintiff relating to the purchase of collateral with the account number XXXX3360. The contract granted to plaintiff a security interest in the collateral. Defendant defaulted on the obligations required under the contract. After all due credits were applied to the indebtedness owed by the defendant, there remained a balance due. 2. Defendant remains indebted to Plaintiff in the amount of $11,880.25, inclusive of credits, adjustments, interest, and fees, if applicable. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against Defendant in the sum of $11,880.25, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment, all court costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, and for such other and further relief as this Court may deem equitable, just and proper. William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Peggy S. Horinek, #010344 Jenifer A. Gani, #021876 Alexander M. Hall, #33900 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Mingmei "Elaine" Pok, #36236 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405-720-0565 E-Mail: [email protected]
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.