CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
WASHINGTON COUNTY • CS-2026-00178

LVNV Funding LLC v. Stefanie L Morley

Filed: Mar 9, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut right to the chase: Stefanie L. Morley owes $1,539.87 — and now, a faceless debt-buying corporation named LVNV Funding LLC is dragging her into court over it. No dramatic betrayal. No stolen heirlooms. No secret love child. Just a credit card bill that slipped through the cracks, got sold like a used textbook, and now, nearly five years later, shows up in small claims court with a law firm, a notarized affidavit, and a very serious tone. Welcome to America, where your forgotten $1,500 balance can become a legal drama with its own cast, crew, and paperwork.

So who are these people? On one side, we’ve got Stefanie L. Morley — presumably a regular human being trying to survive the Oklahoma cost of living, pay her electric bill, and maybe remember to renew her car insurance. We don’t know much about her, and that’s the point. She’s not a villain. She’s not a scammer. She’s just someone who once opened a credit card with the Bank of Missouri back in August 2021, probably to cover a surprise expense, a vacation that got out of hand, or maybe just a series of Amazon binges during a particularly rough week. Fast forward, life happens, payments get missed, and the account goes south. Classic.

On the other side? LVNV Funding LLC. Sounds like a tech startup. Feels like a tax ID number. Is, in fact, a debt collection company that makes its living buying up delinquent accounts for pennies on the dollar and then suing people to collect the full amount. They didn’t issue the card. They didn’t lend Stefanie the money. They weren’t there when she swiped that card at the gas station or ordered takeout during a power outage. But now, they own the debt — or at least claim to — and they’re ready to go full courtroom mode over it.

Here’s how we got here: In 2021, Stefanie opened a credit account with the Bank of Missouri. Things were probably fine at first. Minimum payments made. Credit score holding steady. But at some point, the wheels came off. Maybe she lost a job. Maybe medical bills piled up. Maybe she just forgot to set up autopay. Whatever the reason, she defaulted — meaning she stopped paying. The Bank of Missouri, like most creditors, didn’t want to deal with a deadbeat account, so they sold it off. First stop: Concord Credit Inc., another middleman in the great American debt carousel. Then, in March 2024, Concord bundled Stefanie’s debt — along with hundreds or thousands of others — into something called “Portfolio 43300,” which sounds like a spy mission but is actually just a spreadsheet of people who didn’t pay their bills. That portfolio was then sold to LVNV Funding LLC, who now legally claims the right to collect every last penny.

Fast-forward to January 28, 2026 — yes, we’re living in the future now — and LVNV, armed with an affidavit signed by someone named Janet Cortez (who claims to be an “Authorized Representative” but whose entire job seems to be swearing under oath that yes, this debt is real), files a petition in Washington County District Court. The document is short, cold, and to the point: Stefanie owes $1,539.87. We have the records. We demand judgment. And by the way, we’d like court costs, interest, and attorney’s fees too, because why stop at just the debt?

Now, let’s break down what’s actually happening in legal terms — because this isn’t exactly a “you stole my lawn gnome” kind of case. LVNV isn’t accusing Stefanie of fraud or theft. They’re not saying she forged checks or ran a scam. This is a “petition for indebtedness,” which is legalese for “you owe money, and we have the paperwork to prove it.” The claim hinges entirely on documentation: the original credit agreement, the chain of ownership, and proof that Stefanie hasn’t paid. There’s no trial by combat, no dramatic courtroom showdown — just a stack of records and a judge who will likely glance at the affidavit, see that everything looks in order, and say, “Yep, that’s a debt.”

And what does LVNV want? $1,539.87. Not a million. Not even ten thousand. But let’s be real — for most people, $1,500 isn’t nothing. That’s a car repair. A month’s rent in some parts of Oklahoma. Two months of groceries. A plane ticket to anywhere fun. It’s the kind of sum that can wreck a budget but isn’t big enough to hire a lawyer over. And that’s the whole business model here: LVNV knows that most people won’t show up to court, won’t fight back, and will either pay up or get a judgment against them that can lead to wage garnishment or bank levies. It’s not about justice. It’s about efficiency. It’s about volume. File 500 of these a month, win 80%, and suddenly you’re making bank — literally.

Now, here’s where we, the narrators of petty civil chaos, take a moment to editorialize. What’s the most absurd part of this whole thing? Is it that a company that never lent Stefanie a single dollar can sue her for the full amount? Is it that the original creditor, the Bank of Missouri, already got paid — likely by insurance or by selling the debt for profit — yet someone else gets to come after her anyway? Is it that Janet Cortez, whose entire existence in this case is one notarized paragraph, holds the fate of Stefanie’s credit score in her hands?

Frankly, it’s all absurd. But the real kicker is how normal this is. This isn’t some outlier. This is how millions of Americans get dragged into the legal system — not for crimes, not for scandals, but for small debts that snowballed, got sold, and ended up in the hands of profit-driven entities with entire law firms on speed dial. Stefanie isn’t a bad person. She’s not even necessarily irresponsible. She’s just one missed payment, one life hiccup, away from being a defendant in a court filing that treats her like a line item.

Do we root for her? Absolutely. Not because she’s innocent — maybe she should’ve paid the bill — but because the system is rigged to punish the small fish while the big players profit twice: once when they sell the debt, and again when they sue for it. We’re not saying don’t pay your bills. We’re saying it’s wild that a company named LVNV Funding LLC — which sounds like a rejected Marvel villain — can buy your debt, rebrand itself as the wronged party, and then demand a court enforce payment like they’ve been personally slighted.

So here’s to Stefanie L. Morley, allegedly in arrears for $1,539.87. May she show up to court. May she ask for the original contract. May she force them to prove Janet Cortez actually works there. Or, hey — maybe she just pays the bill and moves on. Either way, this case is a perfect little microcosm of modern American life: you’re one forgotten credit card away from becoming a defendant in a lawsuit filed by a company that didn’t even know you existed until last year.

And the moral of the story? Set up autopay. And maybe don’t trust any company whose name sounds like a Wi-Fi network.

Case Overview

$1,540 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Washington County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$1,540 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 petition for indebtedness collection of debt

Petition Text

550 words
25-61019-0 ZH1 010 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA LVNV Funding LLC, Plaintiff, vs. Stefanie L Morley, Defendant. PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for its cause of action against the defendants alleges and states as follows: 1. Bank of Missouri, provided credit to the defendant on account number XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX5025. The Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $1,539.87. An Affidavit of Account and/or contract is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $1,539.87, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment, all court costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. William L. Nixon, Jr., #012904 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Gracelyn Porras Dillingham, #35852 Jenifer A. Gani, #021876 Daniela Westfahl, #36242 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405-720-0565 E-Mail: [email protected] IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT IN AND FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, OK LVNV Funding LLC Plaintiff vs. Stefanie L Morley Defendant(s) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT I am an Authorized Representative for LVNV Funding LLC (hereafter the "Plaintiff"), and hereby certify as follows: 1. I have personal knowledge regarding Plaintiff's creation and maintenance of its normal business records, including computer records of its accounts receivable. This information is regularly and contemporaneously maintained during the course of Plaintiff's business. I am authorized to execute this affidavit on behalf of Plaintiff and the information below is true and correct based on the Plaintiff's business records. 2. In the regular course of business, Plaintiff regularly acquires revolving credit accounts, installment accounts, service accounts, and/or other credit lines or obligations. The records provided to Plaintiff at the time of acquisition are represented to include information provided by the original creditor and/or its successors-in-interest. Such information includes the debtor's name and social security number, the account balance, the identity of the original creditor and the account number. 3. Based on the business records maintained on account XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX5025 (hereafter, the "Account"), which are a compilation of the information provided to Plaintiff upon acquisition and information obtained since acquisition, the Account is the result of the extension of credit to Stefanie L Morley by Bank of Missouri on or about 08/30/2021. Said business records further indicate that the Account was then owned by Concord Credit Inc.. Concord Credit Inc. later sold and/or assigned Portfolio 43300, which included the Defendant's Account, to Plaintiff or Plaintiff's predecessor(s)-in-interest on 03/28/2024. Thereafter, all ownership rights were assigned to, transferred to and became vested in Plaintiff, including the right to collect the balance owing of $1,539.87 plus any legally permissible interest. 4. Based on the business records maintained in regard to the Account, the above stated amount is justly and duly owed by the Defendant to the Plaintiff and all just and lawful offsets, payments and credits to the Account have been allowed. Demand for payment was made more than thirty days ago. Janet Cortez January 28, 2026 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by the above-signed on Wednesday, January 28, 2026. PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.