CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
MAYES COUNTY • CJ-2020-00047

Oklahoma State University Medical Center Trust v. Mark Pirtlle

Filed: Feb 20, 2020
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut right to the chase: Oklahoma State University Medical Center Trust is suing a man named Mark Pirtlle for $42,524.69—over medical bills—and they’re so serious about collecting that they’ve already drafted a legal order demanding the state’s unemployment agency hand over his work history like he’s a fugitive dodging child support. This isn’t a murder mystery. There’s no missing body, no secret affair, no twisty courtroom reveal. Just one very large hospital bill, one very quiet defendant, and a legal machine revving up to collect every last penny. And honestly? It’s glorious in its bureaucratic audacity.

So who are we talking about here? On one side, you’ve got the Oklahoma State University Medical Center Trust—yes, that’s a real name, and no, it doesn’t roll off the tongue like “Grey Sloan Memorial,” but give it time. This is a full-blown medical institution, likely with fluorescent lighting, overpriced cafeteria coffee, and at least one nurse who’s seen it all. They’re represented by Works & Lentz, Inc., a law firm that, judging by the sheer number of debt collection petitions they file, probably has a standing order at the courthouse coffee machine. On the other side? Mark Pirtlle. That’s it. That’s the whole dossier. No job title, no criminal record listed, no dramatic backstory—just a guy whose name appears on a single medical account from February 23, 2017, with a balance that could buy a brand-new Toyota Camry… or, you know, a lot of ibuprofen.

Now, what actually happened? Well, that’s the thing—we don’t really know. The court filing is about as detailed as a parking ticket. There’s no explanation of what treatment Mark received, no mention of whether he was unconscious in an ambulance or just walked in for a routine check-up that spiraled into a $42K invoice. Did he break his back skydiving? Did he survive a rare tropical disease contracted during a poorly planned vacation? Or did he just have the kind of allergic reaction that requires three days in the ICU and a team of specialists who bill by the minute? The petition doesn’t say. All we know is that on February 23, 2017—three years before the lawsuit was filed—Mark Pirtlle received “goods and services” from OSU Medical Center. And somehow, that tab ballooned to nearly $43,000. That’s not just a hospital visit. That’s a career-ending injury kind of bill. And for reasons unexplained, Mark never paid it. Maybe he disputed the charges. Maybe he thought his insurance would cover it. Maybe he’s been living off canned beans and avoiding landlines since 2017. We may never know. But the hospital waited three years, then decided: enough. Time to bring out the legal artillery.

And so, here we are. The lawsuit? It’s not about malpractice, assault, or fraud. It’s not even about whether Mark actually got the treatment—he’s not denying that. No, this is a straight-up “indebtedness” claim. In plain English: “You got care. You didn’t pay. Now we want our money.” It’s the legal equivalent of a diner walking out without paying the check—except instead of $12.95 for pancakes, it’s $42,524.69 for… something involving MRIs, specialists, and possibly a helicopter ride. The hospital isn’t asking for punitive damages. They’re not demanding an apology. They’re not even asking for a jury trial. They just want the cash, plus interest, plus $1,000 in attorney’s fees (which, let’s be real, is probably less than what they actually spent on this paperwork). Oh, and they want the state to hand over Mark’s employment records—because once you win a judgment, you gotta find a way to collect. And if Mark’s working a side gig at Home Depot, they intend to know about it.

Now, let’s talk about that number: $42,524.69. Is that a lot? Oh, honey, yes. For context, the median household income in Mayes County, Oklahoma, is around $50,000 a year. So this bill is over 85% of an average person’s annual income. It’s more than most people spend on rent in a year. It’s the kind of number that makes you reconsider your entire life choices—like, “Should I have become a professional mermaid instead?” And yet, in the world of American healthcare, it’s not even shocking. It’s just… normal. A routine hospital stay can easily top $30K. A single CT scan? $3,000. An ambulance ride? $2,500 before you even say “I’m having chest pains.” So while $42K sounds insane, in the grand scheme of U.S. medical billing, it’s not even the most outrageous number we’ve seen this week. It’s just another day in the circus of profit-driven healthcare, where a simple blood test can cost more than a down payment on a used car.

But here’s the real tea: the most absurd part isn’t the amount. It’s the certainty with which the hospital is pursuing this. They didn’t send a polite reminder. They didn’t offer a payment plan. They didn’t even wait six months. They waited three years, then dropped a full legal petition with a notarized affidavit from someone named Heather Dunaway, who solemnly swears—under penalty of perjury—that yes, Mark Pirtlle owes exactly $42,524.69, “over and above all credits or set-offs.” It’s like the hospital’s legal team is treating this like a high-stakes corporate merger, not a guy who probably just forgot to update his insurance info after switching jobs. And let’s not gloss over the fact that they’re already planning post-judgment enforcement—asking the court to force the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission to hand over Mark’s work history. That’s not just collecting a debt. That’s hunting a debt. It’s like sending a bloodhound after a man who owes you for a pizza he never picked up.

Look, we’re not here to defend unpaid medical bills. If Mark got treatment and ghosted the bill, sure, the hospital has a right to pursue what they’re owed. But the whole thing reeks of a system that treats patients like ATMs with pulse rates. Where’s the compassion? Where’s the financial counseling? Where’s the “Hey, we noticed you haven’t paid—want to set up a plan so you don’t get sued?” Instead, it’s straight to the legal guns, with attorneys drafting orders to track down employment records like Mark’s a white-collar fugitive. And for what? To recover a debt that might’ve been avoided with a single phone call?

We’re rooting for transparency. We’re rooting for the day when a hospital bill doesn’t read like a ransom note. We’re rooting for Mark Pirtlle—wherever he is—to at least get a chance to explain himself. Did he know about this? Was he bankrupt? Did he think it was covered? We may never get those answers. But one thing’s for sure: in the grand theater of petty civil court drama, this case is a five-star tragedy wrapped in a spreadsheet. And the saddest part? This isn’t even the most expensive episode of “I Went to the Doctor and My Life Was Never the Same.”

Case Overview

$42,525 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$42,525 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 indebtedness goods and services

Petition Text

350 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR MAYES COUNTY, STATE OF OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER TRUST, Plaintiff, vs. MARK PIRTLLE, Defendant(s). PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW, the Plaintiff and for its cause of action against the Defendant(s), alleges and states as follows, to-wit: 1. Defendant(s) owes the Plaintiff the sum of $42,524.69 for goods and services on account rendered to the Defendant(s) and/or family, according to the account evidenced by the exhibit attached hereto. 2. Plaintiff further requests that, upon entry of judgment in favor of Plaintiff herein, that an Order be entered directing that the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission shall produce employment information for the preceding four quarters from the records in their possession of the Judgment Debtor(s) upon service of a certified copy of the Order at any time or times subsequent to the filing date of the Journal Entry of Judgment and Order. Further, that the requested information shall be produced within 30 days from the date of service of the Order upon the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission, pursuant to 40 O.S. 4-508(D). WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against the Defendant(s) for the sum of $42,524.69, together with statutory interest and costs both accrued and accruing, including including a reasonable attorney's fee not less than $1,000.00. WORKS & LENTZ, INC. By ________ Susan E. Lentz, OBA# 18760 Jared C. Lentz, OBA# 30624 Annette P. Howlett, OBA# 21223 1437 South Boulder, Suite 900 Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119 (918) 592-2420 Attorneys for Plaintiff AFFIDAVIT OF ACCOUNT STATE OF OKLAHOMA ) COUNTY OF TULSA ) ss. I, Heather Dunaway, Agency Supervisor, of OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER TRUST, do state that I am familiar with, and of my personal knowledge and experience know the amounts of the following account(s) of MARK PIRTLLE have a balance due and owing of $42,524.69 that said account(s) are just and correct and are due and owing over and above all credits or set-offs. ACCOUNT NUMBER BALANCE PATIENT D.O.S. CLIENT NAME V00073811580 $42,524.69 PIRTLE, MARK 2/23/17 OSU MEDICAL CENTER TRUST Heather Dunaway Subscribed and sworn to before me this 24th day of January, 2020. Susan E. Reed Notary Public My commision expires: 3-21-23 #2777099
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.