CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
OKLAHOMA COUNTY • CJ-2026-1330

FRONTIER DRILLING, LLC v. FLEETPRIDE, INC.

Filed: Feb 22, 2024
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s be real: how hard is it to sell a working engine? Like, it’s not rocket science. It’s supposed to turn on, run, and not lock up three miles down the road. But somehow, a company called Fleetpride managed to sell Frontier Drilling an engine so cursed it turned a perfectly functional 2013 Kenworth winch truck into a $150,000 paperweight — and now Frontier wants both the seller and the installer to pay up. This isn’t just a bad repair job. This is a mechanical betrayal.

So who are we talking about here? On one side: Frontier Drilling, LLC, an Oklahoma-based company that, surprise, does drilling — probably not the kind with diamonds, more like the kind that makes oil fields cry. They rely on heavy-duty trucks to do their work, and one of those workhorses is Truck 7552, a 2013 Kenworth TW. It’s not flashy, but it’s functional — or at least, it was. On the other side of this legal rodeo: Fleetpride, Inc., a big-name truck parts chain based in Alabama but doing business all over, including Oklahoma. They’re like the Walmart of diesel components — you go there when your rig’s on its last leg and you need something now. And then there’s Korbin’s Truck Services, LLC, the local Oklahoma shop that actually installed the engine. Think of them as the hands-on guys — the grease-monkeys with the tools and the confidence to say, “Yeah, we can fix that.”

The drama kicks off in early 2024, when Frontier realizes Truck 7552 needs a new heart. So they do what any sensible business would: buy a replacement engine. On February 15, 2024, they purchase what Fleetpride calls a “plug and play” engine — a phrase that sounds like corporate snake oil but in theory means “you drop it in, it works, no wizardry required.” Three days later, Korbin’s Truck Services installs it. Simple, right?

Wrong.

By February 22 — just three days after installation — the check engine light is on. And not in a “meh, ignore it” way. This is the kind of warning light that says, “I regret everything.” The truck had barely gone three miles. That’s not even enough distance to develop road rash. Then, on February 28, the light comes back. And back. And back. Oil leaks start showing up — which, again, should not happen on a brand-new engine unless someone’s using it as a science experiment. But Frontier keeps trying. They limp through the year, dealing with ongoing mechanical gremlins, until January 17, 2025 — nearly a year after the engine swap — when the truck finally gives up the ghost and gets towed back to base. A few days later, a third-party diesel expert named Blanton Diesel takes a look and delivers the verdict: the engine locked up when warm. Translation: it seized. It’s dead. And less than a year after buying and installing a “plug and play” engine, Frontier is right back where they started — except now they’ve got a truck that’s been sitting idle for almost a year, losing them money every single day.

So why are we in court? Because Frontier says both Fleetpride and Korbin’s screwed up — and in multiple ways. First, they’re suing both defendants for breach of contract. Basically: “We paid you to deliver a working engine and a proper installation. You didn’t. Where’s my truck?” Frontier paid in full, did their part, and got a lemon. That’s breach 101.

Then, they go after Korbin’s for negligence — meaning, “You had a duty to install this thing right, and you didn’t.” If you’re a mechanic and you agree to install an engine, the law expects you to do it competently. Frontier claims the problems started immediately, which suggests something went wrong during installation — maybe a bad connection, maybe improper torque, maybe they forgot to put oil in (kidding… probably). But the timing screams “installer error.”

Next, they turn to Fleetpride, hitting them with two negligence claims and a products liability charge. The argument? Fleetpride, as a professional seller of truck parts, had a responsibility to make sure the engine wasn’t defective before selling it. They didn’t inspect it. They didn’t test it. They just slapped a price tag on it and sent it out the door. Frontier says the engine was fundamentally flawed — a “defective product” — and that Fleetpride should’ve known better. That’s the products liability claim: if you sell something that’s broken out of the box, you’re on the hook. And the implied warranty claim? That’s the legal version of “it should work.” When you sell a product, the law assumes it’s fit for its intended use — in this case, being an engine. If it’s not, you’ve breached that implied promise. Frontier says the engine couldn’t even idle without failing, so no, it was not “fit.”

Now, here’s the money shot: Frontier is asking for $75,000 from Fleetpride and another $75,000 from Korbin’s — totaling $150,000. Is that a lot? For a single engine job? On paper, maybe. But Frontier isn’t just asking for the cost of the engine or the labor. They’re claiming lost profits from not being able to use the truck for nearly a year, towing fees, repair costs, and the loss of use of a specialized vehicle in a time-sensitive industry. If this truck was hauling gear to drill sites, every day it sat idle was a day Frontier couldn’t bill a client. In that context, $150,000 starts to look less like an overreach and more like basic math.

And let’s not forget — they’re demanding a jury trial. That means Frontier isn’t messing around. They want twelve Oklahomans to look Fleetpride and Korbin’s in the eye and say, “You sold/installed a junk engine. Pay up.”

Our take? The most absurd part isn’t even the engine failing — machines break. It’s the timeline. Three miles. Three days. Check engine light. A year of suffering. A truck sidelined. And the fact that both the seller and the installer are being sued suggests this wasn’t just a fluke — it was a systemic failure. Either Fleetpride sold a known lemon (which would be wild for a national company), or Korbin’s botched the install (embarrassing for a local shop), or — and hear us out — both dropped the ball. Maybe the engine was bad, and it was installed wrong. But someone had to know something was off when the light came on after three miles. Did anyone even test-drive it?

We’re rooting for Frontier, not because they’re innocent angels — they’re a drilling company, not a charity — but because this is a classic case of corporate shrug culture. Big parts suppliers move inventory fast. Local shops turn jobs quick. But when the customer gets stuck with a truck that’s literally undrivable, someone has to be accountable. You can’t sell a “plug and play” engine that locks up before lunch and just say, “Oops.” This isn’t a fender bender. This is a business-crippling disaster wrapped in a diesel nightmare.

And if the jury agrees? Well, let’s just say Fleetpride and Korbin’s might want to start budgeting for a very expensive lesson in basic mechanics — and basic responsibility.

Case Overview

$75,000 Demand Jury Trial Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$75,000 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Breach of Contract Frontier claims Fleet and Korbin breached contract by providing non-operational engine and poor installation
2 Negligence Frontier claims Korbin was negligent in installing engine
3 Negligence Frontier claims Fleet was negligent in selling defective engine
4 Products Liability Frontier claims Fleet liable for selling defective engine
5 Breach of Implied Warranty Frontier claims Fleet breached implied warranty of merchantability

Petition Text

1,292 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR OKLAHOMA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA FRONTIER DRILLING, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company, Plaintiff, vs. FLEETPRIDE, INC., an Alabama for profit corporation, and KORBIN’S TRUCK SERVICES, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company, Defendants. PETITION COMES NOW, Plaintiff, FRONTIER DRILLING, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company ("Frontier"), and for its causes of action against Defendant FLEETPRIDE, INC., an Alabama for profit corporation duly registered in the State of Oklahoma as a foreign entity ("Fleet") and KORBIN’S TRUCK SERVICES, an Oklahoma limited liability company ("Korbin’s") alleges and states as follows, to wit: JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. Plaintiff FRONTIER DRILLING, LLC, is a limited liability company with its principal place of business in the City of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma County, State of Oklahoma. 2. Defendant, FLEETPRIDE, INC, based upon best available information and belief, is an Alabama for profit corporation duly registered with the Oklahoma Secretary of State to operate as a foreign entity in the State of Oklahoma with its registered agent in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. 3. Defendant, KORBIN’S TRUCK SERVICES, LLC, based upon best available information and belief, is an Oklahoma limited liability company with its principal place of business and registered agent in Perkins, Oklahoma. 4. The contracts entered into between the parties and the location of the truck at issue in this matter are located in the City of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma County, State of Oklahoma; therefore, venue and jurisdiction are properly before this Court. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 5. Frontier is the owner of that certain 2013 Kenworth TW with a VIN of 1XKDP4EX9DJ347552 ("Truck 7552"). 6. Truck 7552 is a winch truck that Frontier utilizes in its operations. 7. In early 2024, Truck 7552 required a new engine, which Frontier purchased from Fleet on or around February 15, 2024 (the "Engine"). 8. The Engine was a "plug and play" engine. 9. On or around February 19, 2024, Korbin installed the Engine in Truck 7552. 10. Frontier first discovered an issue with the Engine only three (3) days later, on February 22, 2024, when the check engine light came on. 11. Truck 7552 had only traveled three (3) miles when the check engine light came on following installation. 12. The check engine light came back on February 28, 2024. 13. Additional mechanical issues continued throughout the year 2024. These issues included at least one oil leak, which should not have occurred on a newly installed engine. 14. On or about January 17, 2025, Truck 7552 was towed from East Highway 180 to Frontier's yard. 15. On or about January 24, 2025, it was determined following an inspection by non-party Blanton Diesel that Truck 7552 needed a new engine, as it “locked up” when the Engine was warm. 16. This is less than a year after the Engine was purchased and installed. 17. Truck 7552 has been sitting for nearly a year now. 18. Frontier has been unable to put Truck 7552 into service, which has directly cost Frontier revenue generated from Truck 7552. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION Breach of Contract – Against both Defendants 19. Frontier restates and incorporates paragraphs 1 – 18 as if fully set forth herein. 20. Frontier and Fleet entered into that certain oral contract on or about February 15, 2024 when Frontier purchased the Engine from Fleet. 21. Fleet has breached this contract by failing to provide Frontier with an operational engine for Truck 7552. 22. Frontier has paid the purchase price in full to Fleet. 23. Frontier has met all obligations required of it pursuant to the contract between the parties by paying the full purchase price. 24. Frontier and Korbin entered into a certain oral contract on or about February 19, 2024 whereby Korbin agreed to install the Engine in Fleet 7552. 25. Korbin failed to live up to its obligations under the agreement between it and Frontier by failing to properly install the Engine, resulting in Frontier losing the opportunity to use Truck 7552 in its operations. 26. Frontier paid all amounts due and owing to Korbin. 27. Frontier discovered both breaches on February 22, 2024, when the check engine light came on only three (3) days after installation. 28. Frontier has sustained the following damages as of the drafting of this Petition related to Defendants’ respective breaches, which said damages are continuing: a. Loss of use of Truck 7552 b. Additional towing expenses c. Additional repair expenses d. Lost profits 29. Frontier has been damaged by Defendants’ breaches, and each of them, in an amount exceeding $75,000.00 as of the date of filing the Petition. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION Negligence – Against Korbin 30. Frontiers restate and incorporates Paragraphs 1 – 29 as if fully set forth herein. 31. Korbin owed a duty to install the Engine in Truck 7552 within the reasonable standard of care. 32. Korbin undertook such a duty when it agreed to install the Engine. 33. Korbin breached this duty, as evidenced by the fact that Truck 7552 first began experiencing mechanical issues within three (3) days of installation. 34. Truck 7552 is not in use due to Korbin’s negligence. 35. Frontier has sustained damage due to Korbin’s negligence in an amount in excess of $75,000.00. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION Negligence – Against Fleet 36. Frontier restates and incorporates Paragraphs 1 – 35 as if fully set forth herein. 37. Fleet owed a duty to treat the Engine with reasonable care and inspect the same for any mechanical issues prior to placing it in the stream of commerce. 38. Fleet undertook such a duty when it agreed to sell Frontier the Engine. 39. Fleet breached this duty, as evidenced by the fact that Truck 7552 first began experiencing mechanical issues within three (3) days of installation. 40. Truck 7552 is not in use due to Fleet’s negligence. 41. Frontier has sustained damage due to Fleet’s negligence in an amount in excess of $75,000.00. FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION Products Liability – Against Fleet 42. Frontier restates and incorporates Paragraphs 1 – 41 as if fully set forth herein. 43. Fleet, as a commercial seller of truck parts, was aware of potential mechanical issues with the products it markets and sells. 44. The Engine Fleet sold to Frontier and installed by Korbin had no alterations, modifications, or repairs of any kind prior to its installation by Korbin. 45. Fleet placed the Engine in the stream of commerce and failed to adequately warn Frontier of any issues with the same. 46. Fleet’s failure resulted in Frontier being unable to use Truck 7552. 47. Frontier has sustained damage due to Fleet’s failure in an amount in excess of $75,000.00. Petition Page 5 of 7 FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION Breach of Implied Warranty – Against Fleet 48. Frontier restates and incorporates Paragraphs 1 – 47 as if fully set forth herein. 49. Fleet, as a commercial seller of truck parts, was aware of potential mechanical issues with the products it markets and sells. 50. Fleet breached the implied warranty of merchantability by placing the Engine in the steam of commerce when it was not fit for its ordinary purpose as a truck engine. 51. This is evidenced by the fact that the check engine light first came on only three (3) days after installation. 52. Fleet further breached the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose as well in that the Engine sold to Frontier cannot be used for its sole purpose. 53. Fleet’s failure resulted in Frontier being unable to use Truck 7552. 54. Frontier has sustained damage due to Fleet’s breach of the implied warranty in an amount in excess of $75,000.00. WHEREFORE, premises considered, Plaintiff prays for an order and judgment from this Court as follows: (1) For judgment against FLEET PRIDE, INC. in favor of Plaintiff for its causes of action alleged above in the aggregate sum in excess of $75,000; (2) For judgment against KORBIN’S in favor of Plaintiff for its causes of action alleged above in the aggregate sum in excess of $75,000.00; (3) for its costs and attorney’s fees incurred prosecuting this matter as allowed by law; (4) for such other legal and equitable relief as the court means just and proper. Respectfully Submitted, [Signature] J. Scott Henderson, OBA #20722 Justin T. Hiersche, OBA #20724 MCAFEE & TAFT, a Professional Corporation 8th Floor Two Leadership Square 211 N. Robinson Oklahoma City, OK 73102-7103 Telephone: 405.235.9621 Facsimile: 405.235.0439 Email: [email protected] [email protected] ATTORNEYS FOR FRONTIER DRILLING, LLC ATTORNEY’S LIEN CLAIMED
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.