CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
TULSA COUNTY • CJ-2026-632

LVNV Funding LLC v. Alberto Leon Benitez

Filed: Feb 12, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut right to the chase: a man in Tulsa owes $15,529.84 — and no, it’s not for a sports car, a timeshare, or even a really aggressive avocado toast habit. It’s for a credit card. A single, ordinary, probably long-forgotten credit card that has, through the arcane and soul-sucking machinery of American debt collection, ended up in the hands of a company called LVNV Funding LLC — a name that sounds less like a financial entity and more like a villainous tech startup from a cyberpunk novel. And now, in the hallowed halls of the Tulsa County District Court, we gather to bear witness to the legal takedown of Alberto Leon Benitez, allegedly $15,529.84 richer in regret and poorer in cash.

So who are these players in this high-stakes game of “Who Owes What Now”? On one side, we have LVNV Funding LLC — a debt buyer, which is basically the vulture of the financial world. These companies don’t issue credit cards or hand out loans; they buy up other people’s bad debts for pennies on the dollar, then swoop in years later with a lawsuit, demanding the full amount (plus interest, because capitalism). LVNV is no stranger to Oklahoma courts — they’ve filed hundreds of these cases, a well-oiled litigation machine powered by spreadsheets and notarized affidavits. Their legal muscle? Love, Beal & Nixon, P.C. — yes, that’s really the law firm’s name, and no, we don’t know if the “Love” part is ironic or just aggressively optimistic.

On the other side: Alberto Leon Benitez. A private individual. No attorney listed. No dramatic backstory in the filing. Just a man, presumably living his life, maybe paying his rent, maybe walking his dog, maybe finally getting his credit score back on track — until a process server showed up with a lawsuit. According to the documents, Benitez once had a credit card with U.S. Bank, doing business as Elan Financial Services (a name that sounds like a 1980s synth-pop band). The account number? We only know the last four digits: 9535. The rest is redacted, because privacy, but we can all agree that XXXXXXXXXX9535 has a certain ominous ring to it.

Now, let’s talk about what actually happened — or at least, what the plaintiff says happened. Back on November 20, 2019, Benitez was granted credit. That’s four years before the lawsuit. Four years! In that time, he allegedly failed to pay what he owed. The account went into default. U.S. Bank, like many banks, eventually decided, “You know what? We’re tired of chasing this. Let’s sell it to someone whose entire business model is suing people.” So on April 26, 2024, they bundled Benitez’s debt into something called “Portfolio 43458” — which sounds like a classified government project but is, in fact, just a digital folder full of delinquent accounts — and sold it to LVNV or one of its predecessor companies. Then, like a financial game of hot potato, the debt was fully transferred to LVNV, who now claims the legal right to collect every last penny.

And how much is that? $15,529.84. Let that sink in. That’s not a rounding error. That’s $15,529 and 84 cents. Eighty-four cents! Someone somewhere ran the numbers, added the interest, factored in the fees, and decided, “Yes, we must have exactly 84 cents more. Not 80. Not 85. 84.” This isn’t just a demand for money — it’s a statement. A flex. A “we have spreadsheets, and we will use them.”

LVNV’s legal claim? Simple: indebtedness. That’s the official term for “you owe us money and you haven’t paid.” No fraud, no breach of contract, no dramatic embezzlement. Just a straightforward “pay up or we’re taking you to court.” They’re not asking for punitive damages (which would punish Benitez for being, say, extra irresponsible). They’re not asking for an injunction (like, “stop using credit cards forever”). They just want the $15,529.84, plus interest from the date of judgment (which accrues like mold in a damp basement), court costs (because lawsuits aren’t free), and — here’s the kicker — a “reasonable attorney’s fee.” So not only do they want the debt paid, but they want Benitez to help cover the cost of the lawyer who’s suing him. It’s like being charged a late fee for your late fee.

Now, is $15,529.84 a lot? Well, let’s put it in perspective. That’s enough to buy a used car — a decent one, not some rusted-out clown-mobile. It’s about half the average annual rent in Tulsa. It’s 300+ hours of work at minimum wage. It’s a year’s worth of groceries for a family of four. For most people, this isn’t pocket change. It’s life-altering money. And yet, in the world of debt collection lawsuits, this is routine. This is Tuesday. LVNV isn’t trying to break the record for biggest debt ever collected — they’re just grinding through the docket, one affidavit at a time.

The whole case hinges on a single notarized statement from someone named Alphenie Ware — an “Authorized Representative” of LVNV — who swears under penalty of perjury that yes, the records show Benitez owes this amount, and yes, they’ve owned the debt since April 2024, and yes, they’ve waited more than 30 days after demanding payment. That’s it. No witness testimony. No bank statements. No call logs. Just a form, signed, notarized, and filed. And in the eyes of the court, that may be enough.

Here’s where we, the peanut gallery, start side-eyeing the whole operation. The most absurd part? Not the amount. Not the name LVNV Funding LLC (though seriously, who greenlit that?). It’s the sheer distance between the original debt and the current plaintiff. Benitez didn’t borrow money from LVNV. He never signed a contract with them. He probably never even heard of them until this lawsuit landed in his lap. And yet, they’re the ones suing him, armed with records they didn’t create, based on a transaction they weren’t part of, demanding full payment as if they’d personally lent him the cash over a handshake and a beer.

We’re not saying Benitez doesn’t owe the money — the filing suggests he did use the credit card and didn’t pay it back. But the system that turned that personal financial misstep into a legal showdown with a shadowy debt buyer? That’s the real villain here. It’s a system where your debt can be bought, sold, and weaponized by companies whose only relationship to you is a spreadsheet and a subpoena. And while we’re not rooting for anyone to dodge responsibility, we are rooting for a little more transparency, a little more humanity, and maybe — just maybe — a law firm called Love, Beal & Nixon to show a little actual love.

So what happens next? If Benitez doesn’t respond, LVNV will likely win by default. The court will issue a judgment, and then the fun really begins — wage garnishments, bank levies, credit score devastation. If he does fight it, he could challenge the debt’s validity, question the chain of ownership, or argue that the amount is incorrect. But that means hiring a lawyer, going to court, and spending more money on a debt he may not even have the cash to pay.

At the end of the day, this isn’t just about $15,529.84. It’s about how ordinary financial struggles get funneled into the legal system, stripped of context, and turned into cold, impersonal judgments. It’s about a man named Alberto Leon Benitez, and a company with an acronym for a name, and a single credit card account that outlived its usefulness — but not its ability to cause drama.

We’re entertainers, not lawyers. But if this were a movie, we’d pitch it as The Debt Collector: Portfolio 43458. Starring a spreadsheet. And a notary public. And 84 very, very important cents.

Case Overview

$15,530 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$15,530 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 indebtedness defendant owes plaintiff $15,529.84

Petition Text

541 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA LVNV FUNDING LLC, Plaintiff, vs. ALBERTO LEON BENITEZ, Defendant. PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for its cause of action against the defendants alleges and states as follows: 1. US Bank NA d/b/a Elan Financial Services, provided credit to the defendant on account number XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX9535. Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $15,529.84. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $15,529.84, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment, all court costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Alexander M. Hall, #33900 Jenifer A Gani, #021876 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405/720-0565 Fax: 405/720-9570 E-Mail: [email protected] IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT IN AND FOR TULSA COUNTY, OK LVNV Funding LLC Plaintiff vs. Alberto Leon Benitez Defendant(s) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT I am an Authorized Representative for LVNV Funding LLC (hereafter the "Plaintiff"), and hereby certify as follows: 1. I have personal knowledge regarding Plaintiff's creation and maintenance of its normal business records, including computer records of its accounts receivable. This information is regularly and contemporaneously maintained during the course of Plaintiff's business. I am authorized to execute this affidavit on behalf of Plaintiff and the information below is true and correct based on the Plaintiff's business records. 2. In the regular course of business, Plaintiff regularly acquires revolving credit accounts, installment accounts, service accounts, and/or other credit lines or obligations. The records provided to Plaintiff at the time of acquisition are represented to include information provided by the original creditor and/or its successors-in-interest. Such information includes the debtor's name and social security number, the account balance, the identity of the original creditor and the account number. 3. Based on the business records maintained on account XXXXXXXXXXXXXX9535 (hereafter, the "Account"), which are a compilation of the information provided to Plaintiff upon acquisition and information obtained since acquisition, the Account is the result of the extension of credit to Alberto Leon Benitez by US Bank NA d/b/a Elan Financial Services on or about 11/20/2019. Said business records further indicate that the Account was then owned by U.S. Bank, N.A.. U.S. Bank, N.A. later sold and/or assigned Portfolio 43458, which included the Defendant's Account, to Plaintiff or Plaintiff's predecessor(s)-in-interest on 04/26/2024. Thereafter, all ownership rights were assigned to, transferred to and became vested in Plaintiff, including the right to collect the balance owing of $15,529.84 plus any legally permissible interest. 4. Based on the business records maintained in regard to the Account, the above stated amount is justly and duly owed by the Defendant to the Plaintiff and all just and lawful offsets, payments and credits to the Account have been allowed. Demand for payment was made more than thirty days ago. Alphenie Ware November 17, 2025 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by the above-signed on Monday, November 17, 2025. (Notary Public)
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.