CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
OKLAHOMA COUNTY • CJ-2025-8277

SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION v. QUAIL SPRINGS HOSPITALITY, LLC d/b/a SPRINGHILL SUITES-QUAIL SPRINGS

Filed: Nov 7, 2025
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s get one thing straight: this is not a case about murder, fraud, or even a dramatic love triangle. No, this is a case about an elevator. Or more accurately, about the $22,808.55 that one very serious elevator company claims a hotel still owes them for elevator-related services. That’s right—over twenty-two grand, eight hundred bucks, and fifty-five cents. For an elevator. Not a rocket, not a time machine, not even a gold-plated dumbwaiter serving caviar to guests on the 12th floor. Just a regular, run-of-the-mill, up-and-down people-moving box. And now, because someone didn’t pay their bill, we’re in court. Welcome to Crazy Civil Court, where the stakes are low, the drama is petty, and the legal paperwork is very serious.

So who are these people? Well, first we’ve got Schindler Elevator Corporation—the kind of company that sounds like it should be run by German engineers in perfectly pressed lab coats, muttering about precision and hydraulics. They install, maintain, and probably dream about elevators. They’re the folks you call when your hotel’s lift starts making that creaky noise or, worse, gets stuck between floors with a honeymoon couple inside. On the other side of this legal spat is Quail Springs Hospitality, LLC, which operates under the far more cheerful name of SpringHill Suites – Quail Springs. If you’ve ever stayed at a Marriott-affiliated hotel that smells faintly of citrus air freshener and offers free breakfast waffles, you’ve been here. This isn’t some back-alley motel—it’s a respectable, mid-tier chain hotel in Oklahoma City, the kind of place where business travelers charge their stay to the company card and watch Netflix in bed before passing out at 9:47 PM. These two—elevator titans and hotel operators—were once in a beautiful, functional relationship. Schindler fixed the elevators. Quail Springs paid the bill. It was harmony. Until it wasn’t.

What happened? Well, according to the court filing—short, sweet, and aggressively to the point—Schindler says they did their job. They provided services. They held up their end of whatever contract they had with the hotel. And now, they’re owed $22,808.55. That’s it. That’s the whole story. There’s no mention of shoddy work, no accusations of sabotage, no dramatic tale of an elevator plummeting five floors because someone skipped maintenance. Just a clean, cold, hard number: $22,808.55. The kind of figure that makes you wonder: What on earth costs that much for an elevator? Was it a full replacement? A software upgrade? Did they install a voice-activated AI butler that says “Going up, sir?” in a British accent? The filing doesn’t say. It’s like reading the last page of a mystery novel where the butler did it, but you never get to see the murder. All we know is: Schindler sent an invoice. The hotel didn’t pay. And now, we’re here.

Why are they in court? Because this is a breach of contract case. In plain English: one side says they did what they promised, the other side didn’t pay up, and now the unpaid side wants the court to step in and say, “Hey, you owe money. Pay it.” That’s pretty much the elevator pitch (pun absolutely intended) for 90% of civil lawsuits between businesses. No one’s accusing anyone of stealing trade secrets or starting a fire in the motor room. This isn’t Succession with more elevators. It’s just a debt collection case dressed up in legal robes. Schindler isn’t asking for punitive damages, isn’t demanding an apology, isn’t seeking to rename the hotel “Schindler’s Lift.” They just want their money. Plus interest—18% per year, which is… aggressive. That’s credit card interest levels, folks. If you had a balance this high on a card with an 18% APR, you’d be getting passive-aggressive emails from your bank every Tuesday. But here? It’s baked into the lawsuit. They’re not just mad—they’re compounding mad.

And what do they want? $22,808.55. Is that a lot? Well, let’s put it in perspective. That’s enough to buy a brand-new Honda Civic. It’s more than the average American makes in two months. It could cover a year of rent in a decent Oklahoma City apartment. Or, if you were feeling fancy, you could throw a very nice wedding—catering, band, open bar, the whole thing—on that kind of budget. But for an elevator company? That might be one major repair job. A full modernization of a lift system. New control panels, door operators, safety sensors, maybe even a fancy new cab interior with LED lighting and hand sanitizer dispensers. Or—just as likely—it could be months of maintenance fees that just… never got paid. Maybe someone at the hotel lost the invoice in a stack of paperwork. Maybe the accounting department switched software and the payment got lost in a digital black hole. Maybe the guy who signs checks went on vacation and never came back. We don’t know. But whatever the reason, Schindler is done playing nice. They want their cash, and they want it with interest, attorney’s fees, and the full weight of the Oklahoma District Court behind them.

Now, here’s our take: the most absurd thing about this case isn’t the amount. It’s the tone. This petition is shorter than a TikTok caption. It’s two paragraphs of facts, one of which is just “they owe us money,” and a prayer for relief that sounds like it was copied from a legal Mad Lib. There’s no drama, no backstory, no colorful details about a rogue elevator technician or a hotel manager who refused to pay because the lift “smelled funny.” Just cold, hard numbers and a demand for justice. And yet… that’s what makes it kind of beautiful. This is the legal equivalent of a passive-aggressive Post-it note left on a coworker’s desk: “You still owe me $22k. Signed, Elevator Guy.” It’s so dry, so bureaucratic, so Oklahoma, that you can’t help but imagine the attorneys involved having a very serious conversation about interest accrual while sipping lukewarm coffee in a beige conference room.

Are we rooting for the elevator company? Sure. They did the work. They deserve to get paid. But also… come on, SpringHill Suites. You’re part of a multinational hospitality empire. You’ve got free coffee in the lobby and fluffy towels in every room. You really can’t cut a check for less than $23,000? Is the budget that tight? Did the waffle machine eat into the maintenance fund? Look, we get it—businesses have cash flow issues. Invoices get missed. People drop the ball. But when a company shows up in court with a bill that specific, down to the penny, and with an 18% interest clause ready to go, you know they’ve sent multiple reminders. This isn’t the first call. This is the final warning with a law degree.

In the grand scheme of civil court dramas, this isn’t Erin Brockovich or The Lincoln Lawyer. There are no whistleblowers, no corporate cover-ups, no emotional courtroom breakdowns. But that’s what makes it perfect. This is the quiet, unglamorous underbelly of capitalism: the bills that don’t get paid, the contracts that get ignored, the elevators that keep running while the paperwork piles up. And when it finally explodes? It’s not with fireworks. It’s with a two-page petition and a demand for $22,808.55.

We’re entertainers, not lawyers. But if we were judges? We’d rule in favor of Schindler, tack on the interest, add a reasonable attorney’s fee, and then quietly suggest that both parties go ride the elevator together and talk it out. Maybe over a complimentary waffle.

Case Overview

$22,809 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$22,809 Monetary
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 breach of contract balance due on contract

Petition Text

169 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION, v. QUAIL SPRINGS HOSPITALITY, LLC d/b/a SPRINGHILL SUITES-QUAIL SPRINGS, (Plaintiff) Defendant. PETITION COMES NOW the Plaintiff, and for its cause of action against the Defendant alleges and states as follows: 1. Plaintiff is authorized by law to bring this action in this County. The Defendant can be properly served with process. 2. The Defendant is indebted to the Plaintiff in the sum of $22,808.55 for balance due on contract. 3. Plaintiff is entitled to receive a reasonable attorney’s fee. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against the Defendant for the principal sum of $22,808.55, plus an interest rate of 18% per annum from October 22, 2024 until the date of Judgment and thereafter a the post-Judgment rate, until paid, a reasonable attorney’s fee, costs and such other relief as this Court deems just and proper. Respectfully submitted, Greg A. Metzer, OBA #11432 METZER & AUSTIN, P.L.L.C. 1 South Broadway, Suite 100 Edmond, OK 73034 (405) 330-2226 (405) 330-2234 (FAX) [email protected] ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.