CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
TULSA COUNTY • CJ-2025-770

Kenneth Allen v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, a Municipal Corporation

Filed: Feb 25, 2025
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s get one thing straight: you don’t sue an entire city unless something truly boneheaded happened. And in this case? A City of Tulsa employee allegedly backed a city-owned vehicle into Kenneth Allen’s car in a QuickTrip parking lot — yes, that QuickTrip, the gas station empire that fuels more bad decisions than a college freshman with a debit card — and now Tulsa is being dragged into court like it’s personally responsible for every pothole, reckless meter maid, and rogue sanitation truck in northeast Oklahoma. Spoiler: it might be.

So who are we talking about here? On one side, you’ve got Kenneth Allen — just your average Tulsa resident trying to live his life, probably buying a Slurpee or maybe a questionable breakfast sandwich, when his day took a hard left into vehicular chaos. He’s represented by the legal dream team of Tony W. Edwards, Matthew B. Patterson, and Allison A. Furlong from Edwards & Patterson Law, a firm that clearly believes in the power of personal injury claims and also triple billing. On the other side? The City of Tulsa, Oklahoma — not a person, not even a corporation in the traditional sense, but a municipal corporation, which sounds like a dystopian government from a sci-fi movie but is actually just how we legally refer to cities when they do dumb stuff and someone sues them. The real villain (allegedly), though, is Kyle Williams — a city employee who, on August 7, 2024, was operating a city vehicle like he’d never seen a rearview mirror before.

Now, let’s set the scene. Picture it: a typical Oklahoma afternoon. The sun is blazing, the humidity is clinging to your skin like a bad relationship, and Kenneth Allen is minding his own business in a QuickTrip parking lot — possibly debating whether to get the spicy chicken sandwich or just accept his fate and go for the beef jerky. His car is parked, presumably legally, not blocking anything, not asking for trouble. Then, in comes Kyle Williams, driving a vehicle owned and operated by the City of Tulsa. What was he doing there? We don’t know — maybe picking up supplies, maybe on a lunch break, maybe conducting official city business like inspecting potholes or avoiding potholes. What we do know is that Mr. Williams decided to back up — and did so “in a negligent and careless manner,” according to the petition. That’s legalese for: he wasn’t paying attention, didn’t check his surroundings, and wham — plowed right into Allen’s car.

The result? A full-on motor vehicle collision. Not a fender bender. Not a “let me write down my insurance info” moment. This was serious enough that Allen claims he suffered bodily injury — not just a sore neck from jerking the wheel, but actual, documented harm. He’s alleging pain and suffering, medical expenses (past, present, and future — meaning this might not be healing anytime soon), lost wages, diminished earning capacity (which sounds dramatic but basically means he might not be able to work as much or as hard as before), and, of course, property damage to his poor, innocent car that just wanted to sit in peace and be fueled by ethanol-laced gasoline.

And here’s the legal twist: Allen isn’t suing Kyle Williams directly. Nope. He’s suing the City of Tulsa. Why? Because Williams was on the clock. He was acting “within the scope of his employment,” which in legal terms means the city is on the hook for his mistakes. It’s called vicarious liability — a fancy way of saying “you hired this person, so you get to pay when they mess up.” It’s like if your teenager borrows your car and crashes it into a mailbox — except the teenager is a city employee, the car is a municipal vehicle, and the mailbox is Kenneth Allen’s entire sense of automotive security.

Allen filed a formal tort claim with the city — which is basically the “hey, you broke my stuff, pay up” form you have to submit before you can actually sue a government entity. The city denied it on October 21, 2024. So now we’re here: full-blown lawsuit, jury trial demanded, attorneys ready to battle over who was looking where and who owes what. And Allen isn’t asking for chump change. He’s seeking over $75,000 in damages. Is that a lot? For a parking lot fender bender? Maybe. For a collision that caused lasting injuries, medical bills, and long-term financial impact? Absolutely. That number isn’t random — it’s carefully calculated to exceed the jurisdictional threshold for filing in district court and to signal that this isn’t just about a scratched bumper. This is about life disruption. This is about “I can’t lift heavy things anymore” and “my back hurts when it rains” and “I had to miss work and now my boss thinks I’m lazy.” Seventy-five thousand dollars might sound like a lot to settle a scrape in a gas station lot, but when you add up years of physical therapy, missed shifts, and chronic pain, it starts to make sense. Especially when the other side is a city with deep pockets and insurance.

Now, here’s where we, the impartial narrators of petty civil drama, offer our completely biased take: the most absurd part of this whole thing isn’t that someone got hit in a QuickTrip lot — that happens more often than we’d like to admit. It’s that a city employee, driving a city vehicle, allegedly caused a preventable collision in one of the most low-speed, low-risk environments possible — a parking lot — and now the entire municipality is on the hook. Think about it: taxpayers’ money, potentially funding a lawsuit over a guy who couldn’t reverse without hitting another car. And not even on a highway. Not during a storm. Not in a high-speed chase. In a QuickTrip parking lot. The land of impulse buys and questionable nutrition. The irony is thicker than the grease on a $1 breakfast burrito.

Do we think Kenneth Allen deserved to get hit? Absolutely not. No one wins the lottery of life when their car becomes a piñata for municipal incompetence. Do we think the City of Tulsa should be held accountable for its employees’ actions? Yes — that’s how responsibility works. But come on. This is the kind of incident that should’ve been settled with an apology, a repair check, and maybe a gift card to the QuickTrip for emotional damages (free Slurpee for a year?). Instead, we’re headed to court, with attorneys prepping arguments, witnesses possibly being called, and a jury of six Oklahomans being asked to decide whether this collision warrants three-quarters of a hundred grand.

And let’s be real — if Kyle Williams had just checked his blind spot, if he’d taken five extra seconds to look behind him instead of assuming the space was clear, none of this would be happening. No lawsuit. No legal fees. No city budget line item for “QuickTrip Collision Incident of 2024.” Just two cars, a minor ding, and a shrug. But no. Someone got hurt. Someone filed a claim. Someone said “no.” And now, the City of Tulsa is learning what every driver should know: always. look. behind. you.

We’re rooting for Kenneth Allen — not because we love lawsuits, but because nobody should pay for a public employee’s moment of inattention with their health and livelihood. But also? We’re silently praying that Kyle Williams gets mandatory defensive driving training. And maybe a refresher on how mirrors work.

Case Overview

$75,000 Demand Jury Trial Petition
Jurisdiction
The District Court in and for Tulsa County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$75,000 Monetary
Plaintiffs
  • Kenneth Allen individual
    Rep: Tony W. Edwards, Matthew B. Patterson, and Allison A. Furlong
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 - Negligence resulting in motor vehicle collision

Petition Text

455 words
THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA KENNETH ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF TULSA, Oklahoma, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant. PETITION COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, Kenneth Allen, by and through his attorneys of record, Tony W. Edwards, Matthew B. Patterson, and Allison A. Furlong, and for his cause of action against the Defendant, allege and state as follows: 1. That the Plaintiff, Kenneth Allen, is a resident of Tulsa, Tulsa County, Oklahoma. 2. That the Defendant, City of Tulsa, is a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Oklahoma, subject to the provisions of the Oklahoma Governmental Tort Claims Act, 51 O.S. § 151-172. 3. That Plaintiff filed a tort claim with Defendant. which was denied on October 21, 2024. That this action is brought within the timeframe allowed by law. 4. That the motor vehicle collision which gives rise to this action occurred in Tulsa, Tulsa County, Oklahoma. 5. That this Court has jurisdiction and venue in this matter. 6. That the Plaintiff, Kenneth Allen, is without fault and that the damages from the collision were directly and proximately caused by and due to the negligence of the Defendant set forth below. 7. That on or about August 7, 2024, Plaintiff, Kenneth Allen, was driving his vehicle in a safe and lawful manner, in a QuickTrip parking lot. Kyle Williams, a City of Tulsa employee, operating his vehicle in a negligent and careless manner. Mr. Williams backed his vehicle improperly and collided with Plaintiff's vehicle. As a result of Mr. Williams' negligent inattention. Mr. Williams struck Plaintiff's vehicle causing the collision. 8. At the time of the collision, Mr. Williams was acting within the scope of his employment with the City of Tulsa. 9. That Defendant City of Tulsa is vicariously liable for the above-described actions and/or inactions of its driver, Kyle Williams, on or about August 7, 2024. 10. That as a result of the negligence of the Defendant and the resulting collision of the vehicles heretofore mentioned, Plaintiff suffered bodily injury and damage to his personal property. 11. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of the Defendant, City of Tulsa, the following damages were caused, for which damages are claimed by the Plaintiff in an amount in excess of $75,000.00; past, present and future physical pain and suffering; past, present and future medical expenses; lost earnings; impairment to earning capacity; and permanent injuries and property damage. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for a judgment against the Defendant in an amount in excess of $75,000.00, his costs, and such other and further relief to which he may be entitled. Respectfully submitted, EDWARDS & PATTERSON LAW JURY TRIAL DEMAND RESERVED ATTORNEY LIEN CLAIMED Tony W. Edwards, OBA #2649 Matthew B. Patterson OBA #22266 Allison A. Furlong, OBA #35115 321 S. 3rd Street, Suite 1 McAlester, Oklahoma 74501 P: (918) 302-3700 | F: (918) 302-3701 Attorneys for Plaintiff
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.