CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
TULSA COUNTY • CJ-2026-1029

Ohio Security Insurance Company v. Leisure Hospitality Management, Inc.

Filed: Mar 5, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut right to the chase: an insurance company is suing a hotel management firm for $18,270 — not for fraud, not for arson, not even for a suspiciously flooded ballroom — but for unpaid premiums. That’s right. This isn’t a case about a fire, a flood, or a scandalous affair caught on security footage. This is about a bill that went unpaid. And now, in the grand tradition of American civil justice, we are spending court time, attorney hours, and at least one podcast-worthy narrative on the high drama of… an invoice overdue.

Ohio Security Insurance Company, a corporate entity with the thrilling name of a minor league baseball team, is the plaintiff. They sell insurance — probably fire, liability, maybe bedbug coverage, who knows — and they’re based out of somewhere that’s not Oklahoma, but they’re allowed to do business there, which is legally important but narratively boring. On the other side is Leisure Hospitality Management, Inc., a Tulsa-based company that, as the name suggests, manages hotels. Not owns them — manages them. Which means they’re the ones making sure the towels are folded just so, the front desk staff don’t fall asleep during check-in, and, presumably, that the insurance bills get paid. Irony alert: they’re being sued by an insurance company… for not paying their insurance bill. It’s like a fire department sending a late notice to a firefighter.

These two entities had a relationship — the kind that starts with a handshake and ends with a lawsuit. On November 19, 2021, Leisure Hospitality signed up for a policy with Ohio Security. Policy number XWS59313442 — a number so forgettable it might as well be a Wi-Fi password at a roadside motel. The policy was meant to provide coverage — again, we don’t know for what, because the petition is about as descriptive as a parking ticket — but the key detail is this: someone was supposed to pay money every month. That’s how insurance works. You pay, they cover you. It’s not a charity. It’s not a favor. It’s a contract. And contracts, despite what your ex might have told you, are legally binding.

But somewhere along the way, the payments stopped. Like a gym membership you forgot to cancel, but with higher stakes and actual consequences. Leisure Hospitality allegedly failed to keep up with the premiums. Not a little bit late. Not “I’ll pay it next week, promise.” No — they straight-up didn’t pay. And now Ohio Security wants its $18,270 back. That’s the number. Eighteen thousand, two hundred and seventy bucks. Plus interest. Plus court costs. Plus attorney fees. And, of course, “any other relief this court deems just and proper,” which is legalese for “and maybe a fruit basket if you’re feeling generous.”

Now, let’s talk about why this is even in court. Ohio Security isn’t accusing Leisure Hospitality of insurance fraud. They’re not saying someone faked a fire or staged a robbery to collect. Nope. Their entire case hinges on one very simple legal concept: breach of contract. That’s it. You signed a contract. You agreed to pay money. You didn’t pay. Therefore, you broke the contract. It’s the civil court equivalent of “you said you would, but you didn’t.” It’s the “you promised you’d return my lawnmower” of corporate disputes. But instead of a lawnmower, it’s $18,270. And instead of your neighbor Steve, it’s a hotel management company that probably oversees multiple properties and employs dozens of people. You’d think they could manage a single invoice.

And yet, here we are.

Now, is $18,270 a lot of money? In the grand scheme of things, not really. For a business, especially one in the hospitality industry, that’s less than the cost of a single luxury suite in Vegas for a month. It’s roughly the price of a mid-range sedan. It’s not chump change, sure — you can’t just blow that on avocado toast and sourdough croissants — but for a company that manages hotels, this should not be a make-or-break sum. It’s not like they’re being sued for millions over a guest slipping in the shower. This is a debt that, by all appearances, should have been settled with a single wire transfer and a mildly apologetic email.

But no. Instead, we’ve got attorneys involved. Scott F. Lehman, Hailey N. Huber, and Brenner C. Orendorff — all from the firm Latham, Keele, Lehman, Ratcliff, Carter & Clarke, P.C. — which sounds like a law firm from a 1980s legal drama. These are real people, with real bar numbers, billing real hours to chase an $18,270 debt. And while we don’t know if Leisure Hospitality has responded yet — this is just the petition, after all — the fact that it’s even gotten this far is… well, it’s something. Maybe someone in accounting dropped the ball. Maybe there was a dispute over coverage. Maybe the invoice got lost in a spam folder. Maybe the CFO was too busy dealing with a bedbug infestation to notice the unpaid bill. We don’t know. The filing doesn’t say. But the lack of explanation is part of what makes this so deliciously petty.

Because here’s the thing: this case is routine. It’s the legal equivalent of a pop quiz in middle school math — nothing fancy, just basic principles being applied. But the fact that it’s in the District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, with attorneys filing motions and citing statutory interest rates, all over a sum that’s less than many people’s student loan payments… that’s the absurdity. It’s not that the claim is invalid — Ohio Security is almost certainly in the right. But the machinery of justice is being deployed over a debt that, in a functional business world, should have been resolved with a phone call.

And yet, we’re here. And honestly? We’re kind of rooting for the insurance company. Not because they’re the heroes — they’re a faceless corporation with a name that sounds like a government agency — but because they’re enforcing the rules. You sign a contract, you pay your bills. It’s capitalism 101. If Leisure Hospitality is too disorganized to manage its own insurance payments, maybe they shouldn’t be managing hotels. Imagine checking into a hotel and later finding out the pool isn’t insured because the management forgot to pay the premium. That’s not hospitality. That’s negligence.

Still, the most absurd part isn’t the amount. It’s the policy number. XWS59313442. That’s the kind of number you scribble on a sticky note and lose under a stack of room service invoices. It’s not memorable. It’s not user-friendly. And yet, this entire legal battle hinges on it. One number. One missed payment. One lawsuit. One story for us to tell.

So will the court rule in favor of Ohio Security? Probably. Will Leisure Hospitality pay up and quietly update their accounting software? Likely. Will anyone learn a lesson about timely bill payments? Maybe. But one thing’s for sure: in the world of civil court drama, sometimes the most explosive conflicts aren’t about betrayal or theft — they’re about invoices. And for that, we say: case closed. Or, at least, until the next late payment.

Case Overview

Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$18,270 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Breach of Contract

Petition Text

276 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA Ohio Security Insurance Company, Plaintiff, vs. Leisure Hospitality Management, Inc., Defendant. Case No. PETITION William D. LaFortune COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Ohio Security Insurance Company, and for its cause of action against the Defendant, Leisure Hospitality Management, Inc., would allege and state as follows: 1. Plaintiff, Ohio Security Insurance Company, is a foreign corporation authorized to do business in the State of Oklahoma. 2. Defendant, Leisure Hospitality Management, Inc., is a domestic corporation with its principal place of business located in Tulsa, Oklahoma. 3. Venue is proper in Tulsa County, as Defendant maintains its principal place of business therein. COUNT I BREACH OF CONTRACT 4. Paragraphs 1-3 are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. 5. On or about November 19, 2021, Defendant executed an Insurance Policy with Ohio Security Insurance Company (Policy Number XWS59313442) to provide insurance coverage. 6. Defendant has failed to pay the premiums on Policy Number XWS59313442 and Ohio Security Insurance Company is filing this action to recover the balance of $18,270.00, with interest thereon at the applicable post judgment statutory rate per annum from the date of judgment, plus costs and attorney's fees. WHEREFORE premises considered, Ohio Security Insurance Company, demands judgment against Leisure Hospitality Management, Inc., for the remaining balance of $18,270.00, with interest thereon at the applicable post judgment statutory rate per annum from the date of judgment, plus costs and attorney's fees and any other relief this court deems just and proper. Respectfully submitted, Scott F. Lehman, OBA #15908 Hailey N. Huber, OBA #35416 Brenner C. Orendorff, OBA #35700 Latham, Keele, Lehman, Ratcliff, Carter & Clarke, P.C. 1515 E 71st Street, Suite 200 Tulsa, OK 74136 (918) 970-2099 Attorney for Plaintiff
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.