CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
TULSA COUNTY • CJ-2026-643

Employers Mutual Casualty Company d/b/a EMC Insurance Companies v. Synergy Motorworks, L.L.C.

Filed: Feb 12, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut right to the chase: an insurance company is suing a car repair shop for $10,000 in unpaid premiums—over five separate policies. Five. Not two, not three, but five chances to pay up, and somehow, none of them stuck. It’s like watching someone ignore five different smoke alarms going off in their house and then acting shocked when the fire department shows up with a bill. This isn’t just a case of “oops, forgot to pay the invoice.” This is a full-blown insurance buffet with no intention of settling the check.

Now, meet the players. On one side, we’ve got Employers Mutual Casualty Company, better known as EMC Insurance Companies—a big ol’ corporate entity based in Wichita, Kansas, that’s been insuring businesses since before most of us knew what a deductible was. They’re the kind of company that probably has a jingle, a mascot, and a customer service rep who says “I’m sorry you’re frustrated” six times in a single call. They’re not some fly-by-night operation. They’re the establishment. And they’re mad.

On the other side? Synergy Motorworks, L.L.C., a small auto repair shop tucked somewhere in Tulsa, Oklahoma, presumably elbow-deep in oil-stained rags and the sweet smell of burnt brake pads. They fix cars. They probably have a sign out front with a cartoon wrench and a slogan like “We’ll Synergize Your Ride!” They’re the kind of local business that takes cash, gives you a free air freshener shaped like a pine tree, and maybe lets you wait in a lobby with a single broken chair and a three-year-old issue of Popular Mechanics. They’re the little guy. And right now, they’re the guy who apparently ghosted their insurance provider not once, not twice, but five times.

So what happened? Well, buckle up, because the drama here is quieter than a flat tire but just as inconvenient. On or about October 28, 2024—yes, this all went down in the future, or at least the filing wants us to believe that—Synergy Motorworks signed five separate insurance policies with EMC. Five. That’s not just overkill, that’s like buying five umbrellas because you heard it might rain. Were they insuring a fleet of ghost cars? A secret underground garage of vintage Batmobiles? Or did someone at EMC just really, really need to hit their sales quota?

The policies—bearing the thrilling names 6E68032-1, 6F68032-1, BBB9491-1, BBB9492-1, and BBB9813-1—were supposed to provide coverage. For what, the petition doesn’t say. Maybe liability. Maybe property damage. Maybe protection against meteor strikes—Oklahoma’s a tornado state, but space rocks? That’s a niche risk. Whatever the coverage, the real issue isn’t the policies themselves—it’s that Synergy Motorworks never paid for them. Not a dime. Zilch. Nada. It’s like walking into a steakhouse, ordering the filet mignon, the lobster tail, the truffle fries, the $18 glass of Malbec, and then bolting out the back door when the server brings the check. Except this happened five times, and the restaurant is now suing you in civil court.

And that’s why we’re here. EMC, tired of being the world’s most patient bill collector, filed a lawsuit in Tulsa County District Court claiming breach of contract. In plain English? “You signed a contract. You agreed to pay. You didn’t. Now pay us.” It’s not exactly Romeo and Juliet, but it’s got stakes—financial ones. The claim is straightforward: Synergy Motorworks entered into a binding agreement to pay premiums for these five policies, and they didn’t. That’s it. No hidden clauses, no accusations of fraud, no dramatic betrayal—just a failure to pay money owed. It’s the civil court equivalent of “you broke your word.”

Now, what does EMC want? $10,000. That’s the number. Ten grand. Is that a lot? Well, for a small business in Tulsa, sure—it could cover six months of rent, a new diagnostic machine, or a really good holiday party for the staff (assuming the staff consists of three guys named Chad who eat sandwiches in the break room). But for an insurance company? That’s a rounding error. EMC probably spends more on coffee in a week. Still, it’s not about the money—it’s about the principle. Or, more accurately, it’s about the precedent. If they let one shop skip out on five policies, what’s to stop every muffler repair guy in Oklahoma from doing the same? Soon, EMC would be the charity arm of the auto industry.

The petition asks for the $10,000, plus interest (whatever the “applicable post judgment statutory rate” is—sounds like something a robot says before deducting points from your credit score), plus court costs and attorney’s fees. So yeah, Synergy Motorworks could end up owing more than $10k if this drags on. And get this—EMC didn’t even ask for a jury trial. They’re not trying to make a spectacle of this. They just want their money, quietly, efficiently, like a librarian demanding overdue fines.

So what’s our take? Here’s the absurd part: five policies. Why five? Did someone at Synergy Motorworks think signing more policies would give them better coverage, like stacking coupons at Bed Bath & Beyond? Or was this a clerical error so massive it defies belief? Maybe the owner clicked “submit” once and accidentally triggered a bot that auto-filled and approved four more. Or maybe—just maybe—this was a desperate bid for coverage in a high-risk industry, and they gambled on getting protected before paying up. Like buying life insurance after you’ve already jumped out of the plane.

But here’s what we’re rooting for: transparency. Did Synergy Motorworks intentionally stiff the insurer, or was this a catastrophic administrative failure? Did they think the policies were free? Did they not realize insurance works on a “pay now, get covered later” model? And why didn’t EMC cancel the policies when the payments didn’t come through? Insurance companies usually send reminders, warnings, final notices—sometimes even a strongly worded email with “URGENT” in all caps and three exclamation points. Did any of that happen? Or did EMC just quietly file a lawsuit like a passive-aggressive landlord?

Look, we’re not saying Synergy Motorworks deserves a free pass. Contracts matter. Pay your bills. But $10,000 over five policies averages out to $2,000 each—if that’s the full premium, it’s not pocket change for a small shop. And if they were getting coverage during this time (and the filing doesn’t say they weren’t), EMC can’t exactly say “you didn’t pay, so no coverage”—that’s not how insurance works. You pay after the policy starts, usually in installments. So if EMC provided coverage and now wants to be paid, fair. But if they didn’t provide coverage and still want $10k? That’s like charging someone for a Netflix subscription they never got access to.

In the end, this case is a reminder that the most dramatic courtroom battles aren’t always about murder, betrayal, or stolen inheritances. Sometimes, they’re about invoices. About due dates. About the quiet, soul-crushing weight of forgetting to pay the damn insurance. And while we may never know the full story—was it greed? incompetence? a rogue intern with a pen and a dream?—one thing’s clear: in the world of petty civil disputes, even the smallest financial misstep can end up in front of a judge. And in Tulsa County, apparently, five missed payments is the line between “oops” and “see you in court.”

Case Overview

$10,000 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$10,000 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Breach of Contract Defendant failed to pay premiums on insurance policies

Petition Text

337 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA Employers Mutual Casualty Company d/b/a EMC Insurance Companies, Plaintiff, vs. Synergy Motorworks, L.L.C., Defendant. Case No. CJ-2026-00643 PETITION COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Employers Mutual Casualty Company d/b/a EMC Insurance Companies, and for its cause of action against the Defendant, Synergy Motorworks, L.L.C., would allege and state as follows: 1. Plaintiff, Employers Mutual Casualty Company d/b/a EMC Insurance Companies, is a foreign corporation with its principal place of business located in Wichita, Kansas. 2. Defendant, Synergy Motorworks, L.L.C., is a domestic limited liability company with its principal place of business in Tulsa, Oklahoma. 3. Venue is proper in Tulsa County, as Defendant maintains its principal place of business therein. COUNT I BREACH OF CONTRACT 4. Paragraphs 1-3 are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. 5. On or about October 28, 2024, Defendant executed three (5) Insurance Policies with Employers Mutual Casualty Company d/b/a EMC Insurance Companies (Policy Numbers 6E68032-1, 6F68032-1, BBB9491-1, BBB9492-1, and BBB9813-1) to provide insurance coverage. 6. Defendant has failed to pay the premiums on Policy Numbers 6E68032-1, 6F68032-1, BBB9491-1, BBB9492-1, and BBB9813-1 and Employers Mutual Casualty Company d/b/a EMC Insurance Companies is filing this action to recover the balance of $10,000.00, with interest thereon at the applicable post judgment statutory rate per annum from the date of Judgment plus costs and attorney's fees. WHEREFORE premises considered, Employers Mutual Casualty Company d/b/a EMC Insurance Companies, demands judgment against Synergy Motorworks, L.L.C., for the remaining balance of $10,000.00, with interest thereon at the applicable post judgment statutory rate per annum from the date of judgment, plus costs and attorney's fees and any other relief this court deems just and proper. Respectfully submitted, Scott F. Lehman, OBA #15908 Hailey N. Huber, OBA #35416 Brenner C. Orendorff, OBA #35700 Latham, Keele, Lehman. Ratcliff, Carter & Clarke, P.C. 1515 E 71st Street, Suite 200 Tulsa, OK 74136 (918) 970-2099 Attorney for Plaintiff
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.