Icon Roofing and Construction LLC v. Don L. Boyne and Mary Louise Boyne
What's This Case About?
Let’s cut right to the chase: a roofing company is suing a married couple in Oklahoma for $26,760—because, allegedly, they got a whole new roof, brand-new gutters, a lifetime labor warranty, and a $20,000 “Peace of Mind Roof Guarantee,” then ghosted the bill like it was a bad first date. No drama-filled courtroom confessions, no accusations of arson or insurance fraud—just a very expensive roof, a canceled check, and one very annoyed contractor who’s now asking a judge to step in and play marriage counselor to a homeowner-roofer relationship gone horribly, financially wrong.
So who are these people? On one side, we’ve got Icon Roofing and Construction LLC—a slick, full-service Oklahoma roofing outfit that markets itself with phrases like “Lifetime Warranty on Labor” and “Peace of Mind Roof Guarantee,” which sounds less like a construction firm and more like a self-help seminar for shingles. They’re represented by a law firm with a name straight out of a legal drama: Ball | Morse | Lowe PLLC. You can practically hear the dramatic theme music. On the other side: Don and Mary Louise Boyne, a married couple living in Sapulpa, Oklahoma, in a house on South Moccasin Place that now, thanks to this lawsuit, has one of the most legally contested roofs in Creek County. They’re not represented by counsel—at least not yet—and their bank, AVB Bank, is also named in the suit, not because it did anything wrong, but because it might have some claim to the property if things go sideways. It’s like when your landlord shows up at your breakup to make sure the couch stays.
Now, let’s talk about what actually went down—because this isn’t just a “you didn’t pay” situation. This is a full-blown insurance-era saga. Back on September 6, 2024, Mary Louise Boyne signed a Residential Roofing Contract with Icon Roofing. The job? A full roof replacement, new gutters, all funded by insurance money—because, as the contract clearly states, “The only cost to the property owner is their deductible.” That’s the golden line. The homeowner isn’t supposed to pay the full tab—just their chunk, and the insurance company covers the rest. Icon would get paid when the check cleared. Simple. Clean. Everyone wins. The roof wins. The gutters win. Even the shingles win.
The contract listed the total price at $26,903, with payments scheduled in installments tied to insurance payouts: $15,003 upon completion, $9,900 “when received RGT” (whatever that means—roof grant? receipt given today? we may never know), and any supplements going straight to the contractor. Icon did the work. They tore off the old roof, replaced rotten wood (well, except the parts not covered), installed new underlayment, flashing, ice/water shield, ridge caps, drip edges—you name it. They even threw in a chimney cricket, which sounds like a backyard pest but is actually a little metal roof slope that keeps water from pooling around your chimney. Fancy. They finished on October 22, 2024. The invoice—number 439566—was sent the same day, for $26,760. (Yes, $143 less than the original quote. Maybe they found a coupon.) And here’s where it gets juicy: Mrs. Boyne did allegedly make a payment. But—and this is a big but—that payment was later canceled. Like a Netflix subscription you forget you signed up for. Icon says they’ve made “multiple demands” for payment. The Boynes say… well, we don’t know what they say, because this is just the plaintiff’s version. But the silence speaks volumes. No payment. No explanation. Just a roof that’s been done for months and a bill that’s collecting dust like debris in a gutter.
So why are we in court? Three reasons, according to the filing. First: Breach of Contract. Icon says they held up their end—delivered the goods, did the work, even included a “Limited Lifetime Warranty” and a “Peace of Mind Roof Guarantee” that sounds like it should come with a free aromatherapy candle. The Boynes, by allegedly not paying, broke the deal. Second: Open Account. This is legalese for “you owe us money and haven’t paid, even though we invoiced you.” It’s the legal equivalent of “Yo, we sent you the bill.” Third: Unjust Enrichment—a fancy way of saying, “You got a sweet new roof and didn’t pay for it, so it’s only fair you cough up the cash, or else you’re basically stealing.” All three claims hinge on the same core issue: Icon did the work, the Boynes benefited, and no money changed hands (except the phantom payment that vanished like a magician’s assistant).
And what does Icon want? $26,760 in damages—plus interest, attorney fees, and “any other relief the Court deems just and equitable.” Is $26,760 a lot? For a roof and gutters? In 2025, in Oklahoma? Honestly? Not crazy outrageous. A full roof replacement can easily run $20K–$30K depending on materials and labor. These were Martha Vista Storm Grey shingles—premium stuff. Plus gutters. Plus labor. Plus a chimney cricket. Plus a lifetime labor warranty. That’s not a Home Depot weekend warrior job. That’s a “we’re serious about not leaking during tornado season” job. So the amount itself isn’t the absurd part. The absurd part is the story. A contract that says the homeowner only pays their deductible… then gets sued for the full balance. Did the insurance company not pay? Did the check bounce? Did someone misread the contract? Was there a supplement that wasn’t covered? We don’t know—because this is just the plaintiff’s side. But the fact that a payment was made and then canceled? That’s the plot twist. It suggests there was an attempt to pay—then something went wrong. Maybe the insurance check came with strings. Maybe the Boynes realized they were on the hook for more than expected. Maybe they just changed their minds. But canceling a payment after work is complete? That’s like eating the entire buffet, paying with a gift card, then calling the restaurant to say “never mind, I want my card back.”
Our take? The most absurd part isn’t the money. It’s the audacity of the “Peace of Mind Roof Guarantee” while simultaneously suing your customer for $26,760. “Peace of mind”? For whom? The homeowner is now being sued. The roofer is hiring Ball | Morse | Lowe. The chimney cricket is probably stressed. This is the opposite of peace of mind. It’s roof-related litigation limbo. And honestly? We’re rooting for the gutters. They did nothing wrong. They were just trying to do their job—carry rainwater away from the foundation—while everyone else argued over who pays for them. If there’s any justice in Creek County, those gutters get their money. And maybe a theme song.
Case Overview
-
Icon Roofing and Construction LLC
business
Rep: BALL | MORSE | LOWE PLLC
- Don L. Boyne and Mary Louise Boyne individual
- AVB Bank business
| # | Cause of Action | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Breach of Contract | Icon Roofing and Construction LLC alleges that Don L. Boyne and Mary Louise Boyne failed to pay for goods and services provided |
| 2 | Open Account | Icon Roofing and Construction LLC alleges that Don L. Boyne and Mary Louise Boyne failed to pay for goods and services provided on an open account |
| 3 | Unjust Enrichment | Icon Roofing and Construction LLC alleges that Don L. Boyne and Mary Louise Boyne received benefits from goods and services provided without paying |