CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
CRAIG COUNTY • CS-2026-00040

LVNV Funding LLC v. Christopher Dayton

Filed: Mar 12, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut straight to the drama: a faceless financial entity is suing a man in rural Oklahoma for $1,699.15 — not for murder, not for grand theft, not even for stealing someone’s Wi-Fi — but because, somewhere in the vast, soulless machinery of American debt, a credit card balance changed hands like a hot potato until it landed in the lap of a company that’s never met the guy and probably couldn’t pick him out of a lineup if their lives depended on it. And yet, here we are. In Craig County. At the District Court. With lawyers. Notaries. Affidavits. All of this… for less than the price of a used iPhone.

Meet the players. On one side: LVNV Funding LLC. Sounds like a tech startup, right? Or maybe a boutique investment firm in a glass tower somewhere. Nope. LVNV is a debt buyer — a company that purchases delinquent debts for pennies on the dollar from original creditors, then sues to collect the full amount. They’re not the bank. They didn’t lend anyone money. They just bought the right to chase you down like a 19th-century bounty hunter, but with more paperwork and fewer horses. They’re based in Delaware (of course they are), incorporated in Nevada (naturally), and represented in this case by Love, Beal & Nixon, P.C. — a debt-collection law firm with a name so aggressively wholesome it sounds like a sitcom about small-town lawyers who solve crimes between church picnics and fixing their pickup trucks. Their lead attorney? William L. Nixon, Jr. — a man whose bar number is listed but whose soul, frankly, is not.

On the other side: Christopher Dayton. A real human being, presumably. Lives in Craig County, Oklahoma — a quiet, sparsely populated slice of the northeast corner of the state where the most exciting thing on a Friday night might be a high school basketball game or a trip to the Dollar General. He’s not represented by a lawyer. At least, not yet. And unless he’s got a secret legal team in the wings, he’s about to go one-on-one with an entire law firm armed with not just legal training, but the cold, unblinking efficiency of a corporate debt machine.

Now, the story. Or as close as we can get to one, since there are no dramatic betrayals, no late-night arguments, no missing pets or broken promises. Just paperwork. Glorious, soul-crushing paperwork. According to the filing, back on December 3, 2017 — nearly a decade ago, in internet years — Christopher Dayton opened a credit card account with Credit One Bank, N.A. That’s the kind of bank that specializes in subprime credit, the kind that sends you offers in the mail like, “Congratulations! You’ve been pre-approved for a $300 credit limit at 29.99% APR!” The kind of card you get when your credit score is basically a cry for help. He used it. He didn’t pay it off. He defaulted. Classic.

Then, the financial equivalent of a game of telephone began. Credit One Bank, having given up on collecting, sold the debt — along with thousands of others — to a company called Credit Asset Sales LLC. This is normal. Banks do this all the time. They’d rather get 10 cents on the dollar now than spend years chasing deadbeats. But then, Credit Asset Sales LLC bundled that debt into something called “Portfolio 43495” — which sounds like a rejected sci-fi movie title — and sold it to LVNV Funding LLC on April 17, 2024. So now, LVNV owns the right to collect. They didn’t lend the money. They didn’t see Dayton swipe the card. They weren’t there when he bought whatever doomed purchase sent him into this spiral — maybe tires, maybe a medical bill, maybe a surprise birthday party that went sideways. But they now claim he owes them $1,699.15. And they want it back. With interest. And court costs. And attorney’s fees. Because of course they do.

So why are we in court? Because LVNV sent a demand letter — standard procedure — and more than 30 days passed with no payment. So now, they’re asking the court to step in and say, “Yep, Christopher Dayton, you owe this money. Pay up.” The legal claim? A “Petition for Indebtedness.” Which, in plain English, means: “This person owes us money, we have proof, and we want the court to force them to pay.” No drama. No allegations of fraud. No dispute over whether the debt exists — at least, not yet. Just a cold, hard assertion: the numbers say he owes it. The records (allegedly) back it up. The court should rule in our favor.

And what do they want? $1,699.15. Let’s put that in perspective. That’s not nothing. It’s not a rounding error. It’s enough to cover a car transmission repair. Or a month’s rent in some parts of Oklahoma. Or six months of Netflix, Hulu, Disney+, and Spotify Premium — with money left over for a pizza. But compared to the legal machinery now being deployed? It’s absurd. We’ve got a law firm with seven listed attorneys on the case — seven — billing their time (or their paralegals’ time) to file a lawsuit over an amount that wouldn’t even cover their hourly fees if this went to trial. This is the financial equivalent of using a flamethrower to light a candle. And yet, this is how the debt collection industry works. Scale it. Sue thousands. Win most. Settle some. Scare the rest. Even if you only collect half, you’re still making money — because you bought the debt for, let’s be real, maybe $170.

Now, here’s our take. The most absurd part isn’t the amount. It’s the distance. The sheer, Kafkaesque remove between the original act — Dayton swiping a credit card in 2017 — and this cold, notarized affidavit from a woman named Rebekah Odaniel, who claims to be an “Authorized Representative” of a company that bought a portfolio that included a debt that originated with a bank that probably doesn’t even remember the account. No one here — not the plaintiff, not the attorneys, not the notary — has ever met Christopher Dayton. They don’t know his story. They don’t care if he lost his job, got sick, or just made a dumb choice at 2 a.m. with a cart full of online impulse buys. It’s all just data now. A number. A case file. CS-26-40.

And yet… we’re weirdly rooting for Dayton. Not because he’s innocent. Not because debt should be ignored. But because there’s something deeply unbalanced about a system where a man can be hauled into court by a corporation that didn’t lend him a dime, represented by a law firm with six-figure salaries, all over a debt that’s been bought, sold, and securitized like a commodity on the stock exchange. If he shows up — if he fights — even just by asking for proof, by demanding they show the chain of ownership, by making them actually work for that $1,699.15 — then he’s already won a small victory. Because the whole system depends on people not showing up. On silence. On fear.

So go ahead, Christopher Dayton. File an answer. Ask for documentation. Request a trial by jury. Make them bring in someone from Credit One Bank. Make them explain Portfolio 43495. Make them earn it. Because if you don’t, the next time you get a letter, it won’t be for $1,699.15. It’ll be for $2,500 — with “attorney’s fees” tacked on like a convenience charge at a gas station.

And remember: we’re entertainers, not lawyers. But if this were a movie, we’d be rooting for the guy in Craig County. Even if he did once buy a $1,700 inflatable dinosaur pool float and now regrets it.

Case Overview

$1,699 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$1,699 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Petition for Indebtedness Debt collection for $1,699.15

Petition Text

558 words
25-60563-0 ZH1 010 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAIG COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA LVNV Funding LLC, Plaintiff, vs. Christopher Dayton, Defendant. No. CS-26-40 PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for its cause of action against the defendants alleges and states as follows: 1. Credit One Bank, N.A., provided credit to the defendant on account number XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX8566. The Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $1,699.15. An Affidavit of Account and/or contract is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $1,699.15, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment, all court costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. William L. Nixon, Jr., #092804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Gracelyn Porras Dillingham, #35852 Jenifer A. Gani, #021876 Daniela Westfahl, #36242 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405-720-0565 E-Mail: [email protected] IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT IN AND FOR CRAIG COUNTY, OK. LVNV Funding LLC Plaintiff vs. Christopher Dayton Defendant(s) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT I am an Authorized Representative for LVNV Funding LLC (hereafter the "Plaintiff"), and hereby certify as follows: 1. I have personal knowledge regarding Plaintiff's creation and maintenance of its normal business records, including computer records of its accounts receivable. This information is regularly and contemporaneously maintained during the course of Plaintiff's business. I am authorized to execute this affidavit on behalf of Plaintiff and the information below is true and correct based on the Plaintiff's business records. 2. In the regular course of business, Plaintiff regularly acquires revolving credit accounts, installment accounts, service accounts, and/or other credit lines or obligations. The records provided to Plaintiff at the time of acquisition are represented to include information provided by the original creditor and/or its successors-in-interest. Such information includes the debtor's name and social security number, the account balance, the identity of the original creditor and the account number. 3. Based on the business records maintained on account XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX8566 (hereafter, the "Account"), which are a compilation of the information provided to Plaintiff upon acquisition and information obtained since acquisition, the Account is the result of the extension of credit to Christopher Dayton by Credit One Bank, N.A. on or about 12/03/2017. Said business records further indicate that the Account was then owned by Credit Asset Sales LLC. Credit Asset Sales LLC later sold and/or assigned Portfolio 43495, which included the Defendant's Account, to Plaintiff or Plaintiff's predecessor(s)-in-interest on 04/17/2024. Thereafter, all ownership rights were assigned to, transferred to and became vested in Plaintiff, including the right to collect the balance owing of $1,699.15 plus any legally permissible interest. 4. Based on the business records maintained in regard to the Account, the above stated amount is justly and duly owed by the Defendant to the Plaintiff and all just and lawful offsets, payments and credits to the Account have been allowed. Demand for payment was made more than thirty days ago. Rebekah Odaniel January 28, 2026 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by the above-signed on Wednesday, January 28, 2026. (Notary Public) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.