CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
OKLAHOMA COUNTY • CJ-2026-1780

AUTO FINANCE USA, LLC v. THOMAS HILLERY MORELAND and KATHRYN MICHELLE MORELAND

Filed: Mar 10, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut right to the chase: an Oklahoma couple owes $13,181.76—not because they stole a car, not because they drove it into a lake, but because they stopped paying for it, and now a company called Auto Finance USA is suing them like it’s the final round of a financial cage match. And get this—the interest rate on that debt? A cool 19.91%. That’s not a loan, folks, that’s a curse disguised as a financing plan.

Meet Thomas Hillery Moreland and Kathryn Michelle Moreland, a married couple from Oklahoma County who, back in the summer of 2023, decided it was time to upgrade their ride. On June 29, 2023—yes, the court knows the exact date, because contracts don’t lie—the Morelands walked into a dealership doing business as “THE KEY DBA THE KEY CARS” and walked out with a 2020 Chevrolet Blazer. Shiny, sporty, SUV energy. The kind of car that says, “I have two kids and a podcast idea.” But unless they paid in cash (they did not), they also walked out with a contract. And that contract? That’s where the trouble began.

Now, we don’t know the nitty-gritty of the Morelands’ finances—maybe the dog got sick, maybe the roof caved in, maybe someone invested heavily in Beanie Babies again. But what we do know is that somewhere along the way, they stopped making payments. The exact number of payments made? Not in the filing. The reason for the default? Not stated. But the result? Crystal clear: they breached the contract. And when you default on a car loan in America, especially one handled by a third-party finance company, the machine kicks in. No drama, no warning shots—just cold, hard repossession.

The Blazer was seized. Then, like a tragic episode of Pimp My Ride: The Aftermath, it was sold—likely at auction, likely for less than what was still owed. That’s how car loans work: you owe more than the car is worth, especially in the early years, thanks to depreciation and interest. So when the sale proceeds were applied to the balance, there was still a chunk of money missing. That missing chunk? $13,810.76 in principal. And because this isn’t a friendly IOU between cousins, but a legally binding contract with a finance company that definitely does not care about your emotional support cactus, interest started piling on—at 19.91% per year. Let that sink in. If you had a credit card charging that rate, you’d be getting passive-aggressive emails about balance transfers. But this? This is worse, because there’s no rewards program, no cash back, just a slow financial suffocation.

Auto Finance USA, the plaintiff in this case, wasn’t even the original seller. They’re the assignee, meaning the dealership sold the contract to them—probably for a cut—so they could offload the risk and get back to selling cars to the next person who thinks leather seats will solve their midlife crisis. Now Auto Finance USA is the one holding the bag, and they’re not about to eat the loss. So they filed this petition in the District Court of Oklahoma County, asking the judge to step in and say, “Yep, the Morelands owe this money,” and then slap a judgment on them so they can start garnishing wages, freezing bank accounts, or just generally making life unpleasant until the debt is paid.

So what exactly are they asking for? First, the $13,810.76 in principal. Then, interest—both before and after judgment, calculated at that eye-watering 19.91% rate. They also want “all costs of this action,” which includes filing fees, process server fees, maybe even the cost of the coffee the lawyer drank while drafting the petition. Oh, and a “reasonable attorney fee,” which in Oklahoma can be awarded in contracts that provide for it—so if the original loan agreement had a clause saying the loser pays legal fees, Auto Finance USA gets to tack that on too. We don’t know how much that is, but let’s just say: it’s not nothing.

Now, is $13,181.76 a lot of money? Well, sure—it’s not a Netflix subscription. But in the grand scheme of civil lawsuits, it’s not exactly Scrooge McDuck diving into a vault levels of cash. It’s about the cost of a used Honda Civic. Or two round-trip flights to Bali. Or, you know, a whole lot of therapy after getting sued. But here’s the thing: this isn’t really about the money. It’s about the principle. Or, more accurately, it’s about the interest. Because if Auto Finance USA wins, that 19.91% keeps ticking. And if the Morelands don’t pay? This could snowball into something much uglier—credit destroyed, wages garnished, bank accounts frozen. All over a car they no longer have.

And yet… what’s the most absurd part of this whole saga? It’s not the interest rate. It’s not the repossession. It’s the name of the dealership: “THE KEY DBA THE KEY CARS.” Let’s unpack that. “DBA” stands for “doing business as,” which means “THE KEY” is the legal entity, and “THE KEY CARS” is the name they use to sell vehicles. But “THE KEY”? That’s like naming your lemonade stand “THE LIQUID” or your bakery “THE FLOUR.” It’s so aggressively generic, it sounds like a placeholder in a legal form. “Please enter business name here: THE KEY.” Did they run out of ideas? Was “Oklahoma Car Place” already taken? And now this company—THE KEY—is tangled up in a debt collection case that’s less Breaking Bad and more Budgeting: The Musical.

Look, we’re not here to judge the Morelands. Life happens. Cars break. Jobs disappear. Medical bills pile up. Maybe they thought they could keep up with the payments and couldn’t. Maybe they thought the car would last longer. Maybe they just really, really liked the Blazer’s panoramic sunroof. But we are here to question a system that allows a finance company to charge nearly 20% interest on a used SUV and then sue for the difference when the math inevitably collapses. That’s not capitalism—that’s financial Jenga, and someone always loses.

And Auto Finance USA? Bless their corporate hearts. They’re not evil—they’re just doing their job. But their job is to extract money from people who are already down on their luck, using the full power of the court system. This isn’t a murder mystery. There’s no twist ending. No secret witness. Just a couple, a car, a contract, and a debt that grew like a mold in a damp basement.

So who are we rooting for? Honestly? The Blazer. That poor 2020 Chevy Blazer, caught in the middle of this whole mess, yanked from its owners, sold at auction, probably now being driven by a rideshare driver who doesn’t even know its dramatic backstory. If cars could talk, this one would have a podcast.

But in the end, this case will likely end with a default judgment—meaning if the Morelands don’t show up to court, Auto Finance USA wins by forfeit. And then the collection process continues. And the interest keeps ticking. And somewhere, a clerk updates a spreadsheet, and life goes on.

Welcome to the American dream, one repossession at a time.

Case Overview

$13,182 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
DISTRICT COURT, OKLAHOMA
Relief Sought
$13,182 Monetary
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 - -

Petition Text

183 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA AUTO FINANCE USA, LLC vs. THOMAS HILLERY MORELAND and KATHRYN MICHELLE MORELAND Plaintiff, Defendants. PETITION COMES NOW the plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys, and states as follows: 1. THE KEY DBA THE KEY CARS, and the defendants executed a contract on June 29, 2023 whereby the defendants purchased a 2020 CHEVROLET BLAZER ("motor vehicle"). 2. The defendants have defaulted in the obligations required under the contract. 3. The motor vehicle was recovered and sold. After the proceeds of the sale were applied to the indebtedness owed by the defendants, there remains a deficiency balance owed under the contract. 4. The defendants are indebted to plaintiff, as assignee, in the principal amount of $13,810.76, with interest at the contractual rate of 19.91 % per annum from January 14, 2025 through February 27, 2026 in the amount of $3,081.19. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against the defendants as follows: 1. The principal amount of $13,810.76; 2. Prejudgment and post judgment interest at the contractual rate (12 O.S. § 727.1); 3. All costs of this action (12 O.S. § 928); 4. A reasonable attorney fee (12 O.S. § 936); and 5. Such other relief to which plaintiff may be justly entitled.
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.