BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. v. ALLYSSA LOUISE SMITH
What's This Case About?
Let’s get one thing straight: Bank of America is suing a woman in Tulsa for $2,625.35—less than three grand—over a credit card bill. That’s it. No missing persons, no secret affairs, no backyard wrestling ring used as an unlicensed daycare. Just a credit card. A Visa Signature, to be exact. And yet, somehow, we’re here, treating this like it’s the O.J. Simpson trial of Oklahoma debt collection, because apparently in 2025, a two-and-a-half-thousand-dollar unpaid balance is worthy of a full legal siege, a 15-page statement of interest charges, and a law firm in Colorado filing papers in Tulsa District Court like they’re defending national security.
Meet Allyssa Louise Smith. She lives at 12128 E. 30th Place in Tulsa, Oklahoma—a modest address, not exactly a mansion with a gold-plated toilet. She had a Bank of America credit card. Not a corporate line of credit, not a Merrill Lynch private banking account. Just a regular, run-of-the-mill credit card that probably came with a welcome offer of 0% APR for 12 months and a $25 gift card if she spent $500 in the first 90 days. She used it. She made purchases. She accrued interest. And then, at some point—like most of us when life throws a flat tire, a medical bill, or a surprise pet iguana that eats $200 worth of leafy greens a month—she stopped paying.
The last payment she made? October 6, 2023. That’s four months of silence before the final straw: a statement dated May 9, 2024, showing a balance of $2,625.35. No new purchases. No fees. Just interest—$60.21 in one billing cycle alone—piling up like dirty dishes in a college dorm. The card was maxed out ($2,000 credit line, $2,625 balance—because apparently math is optional in credit card land), and by May 31, 2024, Bank of America officially “charged off” the account. Which sounds dramatic, like they held a funeral for the debt with tiny black credit cards and a eulogy read by a robot voice. But really, a charge-off just means the bank has given up on collecting the money… internally. It doesn’t mean the debt disappears. Oh no. It just means they’re handing it off to the wolves—like Nelson & Kennard, a debt collection law firm based in Colorado, which is now legally demanding Allyssa pay up or face judgment.
So what exactly happened? Well, nothing particularly scandalous. Allyssa opened a credit account. She presumably signed an agreement—probably while clicking “I agree” on a website without reading 47 pages of fine print about Daily Periodic Rates and Average Daily Balances. She used the card. She stopped paying. The interest kept accruing. The bank stopped sending cute “We miss you!” emails and started sending stern “You’re 12 years away from paying this off if you only pay the minimum” warnings. Then silence. Then a lawsuit.
Bank of America’s legal claim? Breach of contract. That’s the fancy way of saying, “You agreed to pay us, and you didn’t.” It’s the same claim used in billion-dollar corporate disputes, and now it’s being wielded against a woman over a credit card balance that, let’s be honest, probably includes a few takeout orders, a car repair, and maybe a last-ditch attempt to cover rent after a paycheck came up short. The contract is real. The debt is real. But so is the APR—28.24% variable on purchases, and a cheerful 29.99% on cash advances. That’s not a credit card. That’s a financial horror movie.
And now, Bank of America wants $2,625.35. Plus court costs. Plus sheriff’s fees. Plus special process server fees—because apparently, someone had to be paid to hand Allyssa a piece of paper saying, “Hey, the bank is suing you.” Is $2,625 a lot? In the grand scheme of lawsuits, no. You could buy a decent used car for that. Or a really nice vacation. Or, if you’re Allyssa, maybe six months of rent in a one-bedroom apartment in Tulsa. But for a debt collection case? It’s not chump change, but it’s not exactly Citibank vs. The Rock either. The real kicker? If she had just paid the $85 minimum payment every month, she’d still be on the hook for over $5,800 by the time it’s paid off. That’s the magic of compound interest—your debt throwing a party and inviting all its friends.
Now, let’s talk about the exhibit. The Exhibit 1 in this case isn’t surveillance footage or a damning text message. It’s a credit card statement. A full, 15-page breakdown of interest calculations, billing rights, reward points (zero, by the way), and a section titled “Important Messages” that basically says, “We haven’t received your payment. Please send it. If you already did, thanks.” It’s like the bank is passive-aggressively guilt-tripping her while simultaneously suing her. And the interest charge calculation? It’s a full-on math thesis. Average Daily Balance Method. Pre-Cycle balances. Daily Periodic Rates. This isn’t a bill—it’s a final exam in financial calculus.
So why are we even talking about this? Because it’s absurd. Not because Allyssa shouldn’t pay her debts—she probably should. But because a national bank, one of the largest financial institutions in the world, is spending legal resources, paying attorneys, and clogging the Tulsa County District Court over $2,625. They’re not after a rogue CEO who embezzled millions. They’re after a woman whose card statement says she earned zero rewards points and probably hasn’t flown Allegiant Air in years. They’re using the full power of the legal system to collect a debt that, let’s be real, might have been better handled with a phone call, a payment plan, or just writing it off as the cost of doing business in a country where 40% of adults can’t cover a $400 emergency.
And yet, here we are. Bank of America, with its P.O. box in Wilmington, Delaware, and its law firm in Colorado, is suing Allyssa Louise Smith in Oklahoma, all because she didn’t pay a credit card bill that ballooned thanks to interest rates that would make a loan shark blush. The most ridiculous part? The statement actually includes a warning that says, “If you make only the minimum payment, you will pay more in interest and it will take you longer to pay off your balance.” And then, when she didn’t pay it off, they sued her. It’s like a gym charging you for a year of membership, then suing you for not going enough.
We’re not rooting for deadbeats. But we’re also not rooting for billion-dollar banks that design credit products to trap people in cycles of debt, then act shocked when someone falls behind. If Allyssa spent the money on yachts and caviar, fine. But we’re betting it was groceries, gas, and life happening. And if that’s the case, then this lawsuit isn’t justice. It’s paperwork with a side of shame.
So here’s our take: If you’re going to charge 28% interest, don’t act surprised when people can’t pay. And if you’re going to sue someone for less than the cost of a used refrigerator, maybe ask yourself if the legal fees are worth it. Because in the end, this isn’t a story about debt. It’s a story about power, paperwork, and the quiet, soul-crushing grind of trying to survive in a system that charges you just for falling behind.
And hey, Allyssa—if you’re out there, and you’re reading this? We’re sorry. And also, maybe stop using that card.
Case Overview
-
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
business
Rep: Nelson & Kennard, Ashton Dewayne Sears, OBA # 35737
- ALLYSSA LOUISE SMITH individual
| # | Cause of Action | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | breach of contract | failure to make required monthly payments |