CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
CREEK COUNTY • CS-2026-00255

Midland Credit Management, Inc. v. Trinity Sallas

Filed: Mar 12, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut right to the chase: a woman in Oklahoma owes $3,541.76 — and now a debt collection company is suing her over it. Not $35,000. Not even $10,000. We’re talking about the price of a used car down payment, a really nice vacation, or, let’s be real, a single emergency vet visit for a dramatic goldendoodle — and it’s now the subject of a full-blown court case. Welcome to the wild, woolly world of debt collection litigation, where the stakes are low, the paperwork is high, and someone in Minnesota is swearing under penalty of perjury about a Citibank credit card you probably forgot you had.

Meet Trinity Sallas, resident of Creek County, Oklahoma — a woman whose name now lives forever in the annals of civil court drama, not because she committed a crime, not because she defrauded anyone, but because she stopped paying her Citibank store card. And meet Midland Credit Management, Inc., a debt buyer based in St. Cloud, Minnesota (yes, really), whose entire business model is buying up old, defaulted credit card debt for pennies on the dollar and then suing people to collect the full amount. Think of them as the vultures of the financial ecosystem — not the ones who gave you the credit, not the ones who approved your impulse buy of a $400 blender from a department store, but the ones who showed up months later with a lawsuit and a spreadsheet.

The story, such as it is, begins in January 2024, when Trinity opened a Citibank/TSCR Store credit card account — likely one of those “12 months no interest!” cards you sign up for at the register while being guilted by a sales associate who really needs to hit their quota. For a few months, things were fine. She made a payment on May 17, 2024 — possibly after realizing that “no interest” doesn’t mean “no payments.” But then… silence. No more payments. The account went dark. By December 23, 2024, Citibank had had enough and officially “charged off” the debt — accounting-speak for “we don’t think we’re getting this money back, so we’re writing it off.” But that’s not the end. Oh no. That’s when the real fun begins.

Because in February 2025, Midland Credit Management swooped in and bought the debt — likely for a fraction of what Trinity owes. Maybe they paid $700 for it. Maybe $500. Who knows. The point is: they now legally own the right to collect every penny. And so, on December 23, 2025 — exactly one year to the day after the account was charged off — Midland, via their Oklahoma law firm Love, Beal & Nixon, P.C. (yes, that’s a real name, and no, we’re not making this up), filed a lawsuit in Creek County District Court. Their argument? Simple: Trinity defaulted. The debt is valid. The amount owed is $3,541.76. Pay up.

Now, let’s talk about what’s actually happening here, legally speaking. Midland isn’t accusing Trinity of fraud. They’re not saying she stole anything. This is a straight-up “indebtedness” claim — meaning they just want the court to officially say, “Yep, you owe this money.” To back it up, they’ve attached an affidavit from Lucas Hoffman, a “Legal Specialist” in Minnesota, who swears under penalty of perjury that he has reviewed the electronic records and, based on “personal knowledge” of Midland’s business practices, the debt is real and the amount is correct. He’s never met Trinity. He’s never seen her signature. He’s never handled the original contract. But he’s looked at a database, and that’s enough for court.

And what does Midland want? Judgment for $3,541.76 — plus interest at the statutory rate (which in Oklahoma is 6% unless otherwise agreed), plus court costs. That’s it. No punitive damages. No demand for a jury trial. Just a quiet, bureaucratic push to turn a delinquent account into a court-ordered debt. And make no mistake: if Trinity doesn’t respond, the court will almost certainly grant the judgment. It happens every day. People don’t show up. They don’t file an answer. They don’t even know they’re being sued until a garnishment hits their paycheck. And suddenly, they’re on the hook — not just for the debt, but for interest, fees, and the legal authority for Midland to start seizing wages or bank accounts.

Now, is $3,541.76 a lot of money? Well, yes and no. It’s not a life-changing sum, but it’s also not nothing. For context, the average American has over $6,000 in credit card debt. So this is half of that — the kind of balance that could’ve started with a few online shopping sprees, a medical emergency, or just life piling up while the minimum payments kept getting pushed to next month. And yet, here we are, not in a negotiation, not in a mediation, but in a courtroom, with a notary public in Stearns County, Minnesota, certifying that a woman in Oklahoma owes money to a company that wasn’t even the original lender.

The most absurd part of this whole saga? The sheer distance — not just geographically, but emotionally — between the human at the center of this and the corporate machinery now pursuing her. Trinity Sallas likely used a credit card at a store, made a few payments, fell behind, and moved on. Meanwhile, in a windowless office in St. Cloud, Minnesota, a Legal Specialist named Lucas Hoffman is signing sworn statements about her financial history, citing electronic records generated by algorithms and data transfers, all so a debt buyer can monetize a defaulted account through the power of the Oklahoma judicial system. It’s like a Kafka novel, but with more spreadsheets and less existential dread — though honestly, if you’re being sued over a debt you may not even remember, the dread is probably there.

We’re not rooting for debt collectors. We’re not rooting for reckless spending. But we are rooting for transparency, for fairness, and for a system that doesn’t turn minor financial stumbles into legal landmines. Because if you think this couldn’t happen to you — that you’re too responsible, too organized, too good with money — just wait. One missed payment, one sold debt, one affidavit from a stranger in Minnesota, and boom: you’re the defendant in Case No. 25-58046-0 YE1 008.

So here’s the takeaway: check your mail. Open your envelopes. And if you see something from Love, Beal & Nixon, P.C., don’t toss it. Because in America, even $3,541.76 is worth a lawsuit — and someone in Minnesota is already typing your name into a legal affidavit.

Case Overview

$3,542 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$3,542 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Indebtedness

Petition Text

664 words
25-58046-0 YE1 008 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF CREEK COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA Midland Credit Management, Inc., Plaintiff, vs. Trinity Sallas, Defendant. PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for cause of action against the Defendant alleges and states: 1. Defendant Defaulted on CITIBANK, N.A. obligation with account number XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX4865. Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $3,541.76. An Affidavit of Account and/or contract is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $3,541.76, with interest at the statutory rate, all court costs, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Daniela Westfahl, #36242 Gracelyn Porras Dillingham, #35852 Jenifer A Gani, #021876 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405/720-0565 Fax: 405/720-9570 E-Mail: [email protected] STATE OF OKLAHOMA Midland Credit Management, Inc, Plaintiff -vs- Sallas, Trinity, Defendant(s). AFFIDAVIT OF LUCAS HOFFMAN Lucas Hoffman, whose business address is 600 W. Saint Germain St Suite 200, St. Cloud, MN 56301-3616, certifies and says: 1. I am employed as a Legal Specialist and have access to pertinent account records for Midland Credit Management, Inc. ("Plaintiff" or "MCM"). I am a competent person over eighteen years of age, and make the statements herein based upon personal knowledge of those account records maintained by Plaintiff. Plaintiff is the current owner of, and was assigned all the rights, title and interest to Defendant's CITIBANK, N.A./TSCR STORE account XXXXXXXXXXXXX4865 (MCM Number 331867439) (hereinafter "the Account"). 2. I have access to and have reviewed the electronic records pertaining to the Account maintained by MCM and am authorized to make this affidavit on MCM's behalf. The electronic records reviewed consist of (i) data and records acquired from the seller or assignor when MCM purchased or was assigned the Account, which were incorporated into MCM's business records upon purchase or assignment, and (ii) data and records generated by MCM in connection with servicing the Account since the date the Account was purchased by or was assigned to MCM. 3. I am familiar with and trained on the manner and method by which MCM creates and maintains its business records pertaining to the Account, which consist of (i) data and documents acquired from the seller or assignor, and (ii) subsequent collection and/or servicing activities by MCM. The records are acquired or created, and are kept in the regular course of MCM's business. It was in the regular course of MCM's business for a person with knowledge of the subsequent collection and/or servicing activities recorded, and a business duty to report, to make the record or data compilation, or to transmit information thereof to be included in such record, or for such information to be posted in MCM's records by a computer or similar digital means. In the regular course of MCM's business, the record or compilation of the subsequent collection activities is made at or near the time of the act or event by MCM as a regular practice. 4. MCM's records show that Defendant(s) owed a balance of $3,541.76 as of 2025-12-05. 5. On or about 2025-02-25, Midland Credit Management, Inc became the successor in interest to this Account. 6. MCM's records show that: 1) the Account was opened on 2024-01-18; 2) the last payment posted to the Account on 2024-05-17; and 3) the Account was charged off on 2024-12-23. 7. If called to testify as a witness thereon, I could and would competently testify as to all the facts stated herein. Left Blank Intentionally I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements are true and correct. DEC 23 2025 Date STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF STEARNS Signed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on DEC 23 2025 by Lucas Hoffman. Karla Ann Sutter Notary Public - Minnesota My Commission Expires 01/31/2029 Notary Public OK038
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.